128 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2019
  2. Nov 2018
    1. I wish I had died

      so so so so soo much more wishing for death is mentioned than is mentioned in texts by white authors. Almost as though white authors had a harder time with such a concept

    2. but she has a mother’s instincts, and is capable of feeling a mother’s agonies.

      more motherhood. much more than in the previous text for sure. clearly an important theme overall. It seems as though bearing children is the one natural thing a slave woman can never be deprived of, her only blessing in the world, and yet even that in time can be torn away from her, as property cannot have property

    3. . I was frequently threatened with punishment if I stopped there; and my grandmother, to avoid detaining me, often stood at the gate with something for my breakfast or dinner

      i love love loveee that literally nothing about grandmothers has changed. Grandmas: making sure we eat since the dawn of humanity

    4. Moreover, they thought he had spoiled his children, by teaching them to feel that they were human beings.

      *** brings to question what authority parent (as slaves) have over their children... how much parental guidance they have right to give.... and now we move from motherhood to parent hood..

    5. They lived together in a comfortable home; and, though we were all slaves

      surprised to find that slaves were able to live such a life.... Incredible how vastly different the many lives of slaves could be.. from living in group shacks with no amenities or life comfort, hardly any food or water, beaten severely, to a life like this or like Eliza..

    6. but I never knew it till six years of happy childhood had passed away

      imagine discovering at six that you are a slave.... meanwhile white childrens "innocence lost" moment is discovering Santa is not real

    1. But when was the last time Stranger Things started a civil war?

      a lot of television shows and actors cause civil uproar. Roxanne, Duck Dynasty, Paula Deen, The Kardashians to name a few... but today we have the internet which, I suppose (given a bit of imaginative license) one could argue is a vehicle to express our civil outrage that is healthier and more therapeutic than say, taking arms against your own nation. Perhaps our media gives us a voice and an outlet? We have more self representation these days.... but more self reliance? perhaps not....

    2. righteous indignation from the northern abolitionists, while at the same time, says Reynolds, “it stiffened the South’s resolve to defend slavery and demonize the North.”

      feels really similar to a lot of the divides that we see today

    3. as a whole.

      why must it be America as a whole? is it not beneficial to read texts that had a profound impact on local groups to give us a sense of the diverse identities our country has do offer? Should we then not include texts that have a strong impact on native reservations (which are legally not America if what ive been taught is correct) Should we not include texts that had/have a strong impact on primarily black communities or Hispanic? A strong impact on the West coast but not the East? It seems as though this thesis is working to actually narrow down the cannon into only texts that had a strong magnitude of impact on "America as a whole" and on "Society as a whole" ... curious to know then, what should we exclude? The aforementioned texts? others too? or is it just saying that Uncle Toms Cabin should ALSO be included because of its impact... "shouldn't be considered worthy of canonization" is what makes me think we are now excluding these other texts all together, and probably any like them.

    4. A work shouldn’t be considered worthy of canonization in American Literature because of its ambiguity or complexity, but for the magnitude of impact that it made on America as a whole.

      why can't the cannon be like a diversified portfolio though? Can we not indulge in a little bit of both? is it not worth our time to toil over a little ambiguity and complexity as well as impact and cultural/societal influence?

    5. impact on a society.

      and the big question is how we can measure the impact a single text has on society as a whole, and in what ways can some of these cannonized works actually have a NEGATIVE impact..... how do we then determine if the impact was overall negative or positive, and at what period in history was the force of its impact most powerful and how has the impact shifted over time and does the impact change with different lenses or critical analysis??? so many questions here.... are we all just assuming that if a text has an impact on us as individuals that it must then have the same impact on every reader, and all of society......? interpolation, subjectivity and authority come to mind here. how do different texts impact different individuals, and how do we factor those outlier impacts on the greater "societal" impact...

    1. Tom, that’s to be your young Mas’r; take good care on him,’ says she. And now I jist ask you, Mas’r, have I ever broke word to you, or gone contrary to you, ‘specially since I was a Christian?”

      feeling a little bit character confused at this point... who is who here?

    2. has not those temptations to hardheartedness which always overcome frail human nature when the prospect of sudden and rapid gain is weighed in the balance, with no heavier counterpoise than the interests of the helpless and unprotected.

      the corruption of power......

    3. “S’pose not; you Kentucky folks spile your niggers. You mean well by ‘em, but ‘tan’t no real kindness, arter all. Now, a nigger, you see, what’s got to be hacked and tumbled round the world, and sold to Tom, and Dick, and the Lord knows who, ‘tan’t no kindness to be givin’ on him notions and expectations, and bringin’ on him up too well, for the rough and tumble comes all the harder on him arter. Now, I venture to say, your niggers would be quite chop-fallen in a place where some of your plantation niggers would be singing and whooping like all possessed. Every man, you know, Mr. Shelby, naturally thinks well of his own ways; and I think I treat niggers just about as well as it’s ever worth while to treat ‘em.”

      ALLLL of this mess!

    4. he was a good-hearted fellow,

      okay, this is bad then... so this kind mr shelby with all his humanity who treats slaves real nice will still go so far as to refer to Tom as a "good-hearted fellow" after going on and on about how gruesomely he beats his slaves

    5. a little humanity, thrown in along, goes a heap further than all your jawin’ and crackin’;

      humanity again, also it is painting the portrait of shelby as a really well meaning man.. like super great guy who cares so much about his own conceptof humanity (what is or is not humane?) EXCEPT he owns slaves which brings up the question of if this is doing something bad by making it appear that some white men owned slaves but treated them nice and didnt mean any harm... that they werent exactly guilty, it was just the world they lived in... are we sympathizing with him or are we seeing an even darker facet of slavery as an industry

    6. Perhaps you laugh too, dear reader;

      interesting how the reader is addressed here directly by the author..... and in regard to humanity again. obviously an important theme...

    7. It’s always best to do the humane thing, sir; that’s been my experience.”

      they are really shown to think slavery is humane? but certain aspects of it are not...... naive or numb is my question? desensitized or an example of the human capacity to justify our own actions and conceptualize what is humane and innhumane...

    8. These critters ain’t like white folks, you know; they gets over things,

      (because I had a cat have and be rid of her kittens recently this makes me think about we say the same thing about cats "not missing their babies" and "not knowing the difference" more or less to make ourselves feel better in what we are doing

    9. “Come here, Jim Crow,” said he. The child came up, and the master patted the curly head, and chucked him under the chin. “Now, Jim, show this gentleman how you can dance and sing.”

      really twisted, he is being treated like a cute little pet....

  3. Oct 2018
    1. he had got his neck out of the yoke of matrimony, and could go in and out whenever he pleased, without dreading the tyranny of Dame Van Winkle.

      he seriously hated his wife

    2. The red coat was changed for one of blue and buff, a sword was held in the hand instead of a sceptre, the head was decorated with a cocked hat, and underneath was painted in large characters, GENERAL WASHINGTON

      its america now

    3. His fences were continually falling to pieces; his cow would either go astray, or get among the cabbages; weeds were sure to grow quicker in his fields than anywhere else; the rain always made a point of setting in just as he had some out-door work to do; so that though his patrimonial estate had dwindled away under his management, acre by acre, until there was little more left than a mere patch of Indian corn and potatoes, yet it was the worst conditioned farm in the neighborhood.

      the struggle is real

    4. Whenever he went dodging about the village, he was surrounded by a troop of them, hanging on his skirts, clambering on his back, and playing a thousand tricks on him with impunity; and not a dog would bark at him throughout the neighborhood.

      true family man

    5. A termagant wife may, therefore, in some respects, be considered a tolerable blessing; and if so, Rip Van Winkle was thrice blessed.

      yet all men become weathered and annoyed with their termagant wives

  4. Sep 2018
    1. All the story does is reiterate the societal bounds that women and minority groups have been trying to break.

      Like when Unca Eliza refuses to marry to the ship captains son, choosing exile on an isolated and uninhabited island? Yeah, she was SOO socially bound in that scenario...... no, she broke the social boundaries in her refusal to marry son and was empowered as she made a life threatening choice in the name of her own self respect and autonomy.

    2. women take a passive and male-focused role

      Except that Unca Eliza literally is the opposite of passive, Unca Eliza's aunt, the princess, was also VERY aggressive and assertive, and Unca choosing exile with her lover after literally being HIS HERO, is not exactly "passive" nor "male focused."

    3. Do they not have princess-based duties

      THIS is actually anti-feminist.... because it goes against the womans autonomy, diminishing her to nothing more than what she is obligated to be, rather than what she desires to be. It is parallel to "Does she not have a sandwich to be making? Shouldn't she be in the kitchen?"

    4. Neither Unca nor Alluca are examples of feminist characters for one simple reason: every action they both take is motivated by the pursuit of a man.

      And yet, isnt the whole core of feminism that it is a womans choice? Her chocie to be domestic, her choice of who she wants to love, her chocie of sexuality, her freedom to be the person she wants to be? A woman who wants to stay at home, please her man and be a wife is just as valid as one who opposes such things, so long as she is doing it of her own will and with respect from both her self and her man. I would like to see evidence that Winkfeild did not respect his wife or genuinely love and appreciate her.

    5. If you had asked her she would have said she did it all for love

      is this not a genuine component of a great love story though? Was their love not true? This sounds very against inter-racial love... Perhaps he did impost his culture on his love, but to question her willingness to conform? The validity of her choice?

    6. I think the best and most female empowering part of the entire courtship between Winkfield and Princess Unca is when she forgoes her entire belief system and religion to conform to Winkfield’s

      sarcasm?

    7. her assimilated

      due to Unca's hybridity, I wonder why she chose the word "assimilated" here. Is her coloinal identity inferior? Is it not part of who she is? Is it not HERS?

    1. Before I knew what affliction meant, I was ready sometimes to wish for it. When I lived in prosperity, having the comforts of the world about me, my relations by me, my heart cheerful, and taking little care for anything, and yet seeing many, whom I preferred before myself, under many trials and afflictions, in sickness, weakness, poverty, losses, crosses, and cares of the world, I should be sometimes jealous least I should have my portion in this life, and that Scripture would come to my mind,

      pain olympics

    2. strangely did the Lord provide for them; that I did not see (all the time I was among them) one man, woman, or child, die with hunger.

      it is strange to her that the lord watches over those who are not christian

    1. Englishman stripped naked, and lying dead upon the ground, but knew not who it was.

      the point in which it is important to imagine role reversal, flipped script.

    1. But a sore time of trial, I concluded, I had to go through, my master being gone, who seemed to me the best friend that I had of an Indian, both in cold and hunger, and quickly so it proved.

      so master is friend?

    2. But the thoughts of my going homeward

      a salve? a hostage? seems to be under impression she is going home yet wont be sold back to husband? "master" and "mistress"... things at work

    1. The occasion of his coming to see me at this time, was this: there was, as I said, about six miles from us, a small plantation of Indians, where it seems he had been during his captivity; and at this time, there were some forces of the Ind. gathered out of our company, and some also from them (among whom was my son’s master) to go to assault and burn Medfield. In this time of the absence of his master, his dame brought him to see me. I took this to be some gracious answer to my earnest and unfeigned desire. The next day, viz. to this, the Indians returned from Medfield, all the company, for those that belonged to the other small company, came through the town that now we were at. But before they came to us, Oh! the outrageous roaring and hooping that there was. They began their din about a mile before they came to us.

      movement

    2. When I had been at my master’s wigwam, I took the first opportunity I could get to go look after my dead child.

      question sanity look after dead child, losing her marbles/sad/shock

    1. God was with me in a wonderful manner, carrying me along, and bearing up my spirit, that it did not quite fail.

      the only thing keeping her alive = faith/God