His repetition signifies the essential point he makes at the beginning of the speech that people always have to learn more and more to have a better and broader view about the world outside them.

The author uses contradiction to demonstrates two opposite things in order to help the audience have a better idea of the points he wants to make. In this contradiction, he wants to emphasize the fact that the freedom that go along with consciousness and ability to take control over the process of decision making will help people to grow strongly and understand what is really meaningful to their life.

The author manifests his take away that it is very important for people to know how to choose what is right for them and have control over their mindset because it will help them to be able to grow outside the circle and less worry about things that do not matter in their life. Life is a full of mysteries that not all of it is about us.

The author presents the audience with many different scenarios about life that seems to be frustrated and upset to get their attention toward the big idea behinds the wall. He connects back to point he makes previously in his speech that people often hold the belief of self-centering that they do not pay attention to other thing surrounding them. That way of thinking demonstrates that people have no control of what they have been thinking and it leads to whole lots of problems. His example conveys the fact that learning to control our thoughts can reduce the problem in our life and reduce the stress people experience.

This can be considered as a delayed sentence because he focuses on the cause and effect of the problem and then present the consequence after. His point makes a way back to the main idea of his speech that people should be conscious when it comes to make decision for their own life because it is one of the important factors that can affect people' own living life. He uses logos to persuade the audience as he creates causal and proposal argument in a small parts of his speech.

The author uses ethos as a way to persuade the audience about his claim as he indicates that he has graduated for twenty years to come to this concluding thought. He wants people to learn to control of what in their mind instead of letting these thoughts flow by themselves. Having consciousness to control over our own mind is very important as it helps people to level up themselves in a way that support them as they grow up.

The author presents the big question to help the audience think about what he is saying and deeply looking toward the answer for the problem. He also indicates his experience to help people understand and feel that they are not alone. The word "dangerous" might affect the audience emotionally since it portrays an image of something people do not want to see. By sharing his personal thought, he also foreshadows the answer to his problem that people should focus on the current instead of trying to overthink too much that gradually lost in their own thoughts.

This statement conveys the author's personal experience that creates meaning for the point he makes later on. His word choices demonstrate an ironic tone because he believes that it is a wrong thing to be self-centered and thinks that all the actions he has taken is always right.

His story can be seen as a foreshadowing for his key idea in the speech. It sways the audience attention to a new different point without interrupting the flow of the speech.

He portrays his claim by stating that education is more than just thinking about everything in life and not knowing what the thoughts will lead people to which directions. Knowing what the audience want to gather insider of their mind is much more significant because it conveys that they have specific plans and ideas for all the thoughts in their mind. Education is the practicing of how people want to control their mindset.

This can be considered as a paradox because the author presents ideas that seems contradictory to convey the truth idea behinds. His words indicate that students mostly believe that they know everything and their thoughts are always true. In fact, their decisions might go on the wrong direction and they need people to help them realizing their problem. He also indicates the effect of ethos because he shows people that he has experience about the issue that he presents.

The author uses analogy to emphasize his idea that people are less likely to see things in front of their eyes, instead, they try to seek and explore for the less meaning values of life. The fish story can be compared to the students who are sitting there because they are young and their point of view about life is limited under their scopes. because of that, the auhor starts with a little story to connect his ideas together.

This is an appeal to self-evident because he makes personal statement on Hillary and thinks it is true just because he believes it.

This is an appeal to emotion as Hillary wants people to consider about themselves and their families, which will affect people emotionally.

This can be considered as a personal attack fallacy because Trump doesn't have evidence for what he is saying and he believes that Hillary cannot make America great again, in which doesn't address the issue in the debate.

Hillary demonstrates Trump's lack attention towards the nuclear weapons of other country, in which appealing to emotion because the audience might be upset since the nuclear weapons are very dangerous to human life.

Hillary's statement is lack of evidence support and she expects all her ideas are true, but it seems more like an assumption.

This is an appeal to authority because all these comments are based on personal statement and it doesn't mean that their words are true.

Her tone is strong and assertive as she demonstrates how Trump persists the false statement for years to accuse President Obama as if he is not born in America. She uses an appeal to emotion to affect the audience emotionally since she demonstrates how Trump doesn't believe in Obama.

This is an appeal to ignorance because Trump doesn't logically explain his answer, instead, he is turning around the problem that make the audiences think he tries to help President Obama.

This statement has lack of evidence support to be valid. Hillary doesn't indicate how it affect the race problem in America.

This is an appeal to ignorance since Trump has lack of evidence support for his claim to be true. The fact that his system is doing something good doesn't mean that other people are bad.

He doesn't clearly address the reason for releasing his tax return and immediately change the subject into his income to sway away people' attention.

This is a personal attack fallacy because Trump uses his personal statement to blame on Hillary, in which is not in the context of the debate

This is ad hominem fallacy because Trump is attacking Hillary as a person and not what address during the debate itself.

This can be seen as an appeal to emotion. Trump's statement back in the time period makes people upset since it is a hard time for everyone.

Hillary uses juxtaposition to show how good her father is comparing to all the actions Trump has done as a businessman.

This is an appeal to emotion because Hillary only indicates the half story told from the workers who had work for Trump to impacts the audience emotionally,, in which Trump is treating these people poorly even though they have finished their job. She doesn't know the story from Trump side.

This is an ad hominem fallacy because Hillary attacks Trumps by a personal statement and, she doesn't address the issue regarding to the problem with the tax return.

She says it will help boosting the economy by giving benefits to the middle class, but she doesn't indicate how it will help change the economy. This can be considered as slippery slope fallacy because there is no evidence to support the statement

Hillary uses anaphora to persuade the audience that her plan is better by emphasizing how it will help raising the economy.

This is appealing to authority because there is no evidence whatsoever that support the statement, instead, there are personal opinion that conclude the whole idea of this statement.

Hillary uses logos to convey the idea that she is capable to create new jobs for people through exporting to foreign country by demonstrating the fact that the percentage of exporting goods to the world was increasing when she was secretary of state.

She restates the recession that happened 8 years ago to strengthen her points and reminds the audience that Trump's plan can ruin the economy of the country just like that time period.

Hillary uses the appeal to authority to persuade that her claim is true. She states that an expert say that her plan will help the United States, however, there is no evidence to support the claim. The experts might predict the future, but it doesn't mean that the statement is true since it is just a hypothesis.

Hillary generates her opinion from a perspective of a middle class. She is clearly showing her bias toward the middle class by stating this personal experiment because this conveys a one-side opinion and leaves out the other side of the country.

This is an ad hominem fallacy because Hillary is attacking Trump's personally by inferring that his asset is building from his dad money, and states that he only helps the wealthy wealthier.

This is unfair for wealthy people because they also work to earn the money and because the unequal distribution of the classes in the society, they have to share their work and effort to others.

Hillary demonstrates the bias toward the working class in the country and she wants everyone to have an equal opportunity, but not everyone work hard equally. Her idea just benefits a group of people but not for all.

Hillary Clinton uses logos to persuade the audience by giving them hope toward the future. Her words of choice also place an impact to people since the word "invest" means that she wants to give them opportunity to be better as the future generation of the country.