Besides the tension between play and history, there is also the ten-sion between play and presence. Play is the disruption of presence. Thepresence of an element is always a signifying and substitutive referenceinscribed in a system of differences and the movement of a chain. Playis always play of absence and presence, but if it is to be thought radic-ally, play must be conceived of before the alternative of presence andabsence. Being must be conceived as presence or absence on the basisof the possibility of play and not the other way around.
I like this relationship between play and the world. I'm still unclear on the usage of the word play, but the best I can surmise is that play is about the inherent uncertainty behind any system, as everything has a little bit of "wiggle room". Centering presence around uncertainty is something that has been incredibly pertinent in this global catastrophe, but I think that's been the only option that's been presented to the world. What do you think of the philosophical implications of this globally cataclysmic events? Will we build societies that can work off of uncertainty as all of our systems and institutions are pushed to be their most flexible, inevitably closing and opening at locally determined intervals?