This article left a deep impression on me because it challenged the common notion that "disability equals defect". Ash mentioned that many people with autism do not consider themselves in need of being "cured", but rather hope that society can be more inclusive of their unique ways of thinking and behaving. Reading this, I particularly resonated with it - this actually reflects the core idea of the social model of disability: the problem does not lie with the individual, but whether the environment provides sufficient understanding and support. This article made me start to think: If we could view neurodiversity in the same way as we do wearing glasses, allowing everyone to have the convenience that suits them, then "disability" might not be regarded as a "mistake", but just a part of human diversity.

I particularly agree with the idea in this passage that "disability is situational". It reminds us that disability is not always a "physical problem" of an individual, but rather depends on the environment, tools and social support. For instance, when we wear thick gloves, hold a baby, or watch a video without sound, we actually temporarily "lose" some abilities. This perspective makes me rethink what "normal" really means - perhaps what is called "normal" is just the kind of ability that society currently chooses to support. If we could provide corresponding conveniences for all kinds of differences as we do for wearing glasses, then the word "disability" might not carry so much stigma.