An uninterruptible stream. And yet we study the work itself as if its molten fire had hanlened into rock..
is a good writer only someone that can handle the stream?
An uninterruptible stream. And yet we study the work itself as if its molten fire had hanlened into rock..
is a good writer only someone that can handle the stream?
Do you remember feeling, when you were writing a paper for school, That your vocabulary was steadily shrinking?
all the time
Were you asked to write in order to be heard, to be listened to? Asked to write a piece that mattered to you? Was there ever a satisfactory answer to the question, "Why am I telling you this?" Besides "It's due on Monday"?
not really, no
"And then one day." You know exactly how those four words feel. You know exactly what they do.
it's very true. felt short but there is more
The obsession with transition negates a basic truth about writing, A magical truth. You can get anywhere from anywhere, Always and almost instantly. The gap between sentences is sometimes a pause for breath And sometimes an echoing void. And if you can get anywhere from anywhere, You can start anywhere And end anywhere. There is no single necessary order.
why does it feel like many writers are obsessed with transitions for a dramatic affect
A reader is likelier to get lost cutting his way through The jungle of transitions than crossing the gap of a well-made ellipsis
interesting.
It gives the reader pause.
which is always important
The meaning of the sentence is never a substitute for the sentence itself, Not to a six-year-old
wish we could go back to when we were six
ou do very well on the reading comprehension portion of the test. But no one said a word about following a trail of common sense
i couldn't agree more!!!
You were taught that reading is extraction
true, to find the hidden meaning of every other sentence. we were groomed
You're also two people, writer and reader. This is a tremendous asset.
i've never really thought of being two people like that
Every form of writing turns the world into language,
i like this sentence a lot
The answer is simple. Your job as a writer ii making 1entence1. Most of your time will be spent making 1entenc:e1 In your head. In . your head. id no one ever teU you this? That i th wrttc:r', 1Jfe. Never Imagine you've left the level of the sentence b hind
short sentence of "In your head" gives emphasis!!
Can a short sentence sound like a harbinger? Anadumbration
i think it can, short sentences have strong signals
Many people assume there's a correlationbetween sentence length and the sophisticationor complexity of an idea or thought--even intel-ligence generally.
reiterated this idea above! short sentences matter too lol
What you've been taught.2.What you assume is true because you've heard itrepeated by others.3. What you feel, no matter how subtle.4. What you don't know.5. What you learn from your own experience.These are the ways we know nearly everything about the world around us.
these can't be the only ways to know the world around us
You've been taught to believe that h childish, s ort sentences areMerely a first step toward writina longer , • • -"t> sentences.
this is true sadly, most people think short sentences aren't complex
The difficulty is forcing yourself to keep them short.
agreed!!
It doesn't wave to its friends in the audience
personification is always fun
he hardest is knowing what each sentenceactually says
interpretations are always the hardest
Humanity, as a result, is far too slender an abstraction to carry the burden of culpability.
This is the sentence that confuses me, so here's three different paraphrases.
Humanity is too skinny of complex art to hold the weight of blame.
People's consciousness is too thin to hold the weight of the blame of climate change.
Humanity, based on when she or he is born, lacks the complexity to support the pain of guilt.
It's clear to me this sentence simply means that people don't want to carry the burden of subconsciously knowing that climate change is really their fault and the complex issues that fall back on it is too much for them to bare.
It would be be more accurate to describe the crisis as a clash between the expanding demands of humankind and a finite world.”
I do think politics plays a part in the crisis of climate change, but I think it's the demands of humankind that play a much bigger part because I think a majority of climate change is attached to the 1%'ers ego trip.
the story of human nature can come in many forms, both in the Anthropocene genre and in other parts of climate change discourse.
well, I think human nature comes to more forms than just those two when it comes to climate change, such as greed, ignorance, and arrogance.
when humanity ignited its first dead tree, it could only lead, one million years later, to burning a barrel of oil.
This really makes you think. What sparked the first dead tree to ignite?
when our ancestors learned how to set things ablaze, they lit the fuse of business-as-usual.
I love the cause and effect the author states, "set things ablaze, life the fuse of business-as-usual"
the inescapable fate for a planet subjected to humanity’s “business-as-usual.”
"business - as - usual", almost like what's happening to the planet is a 'casual' and 'day - to - day' occurrence.