ABCA4
Supplementary table 2 lists this variant as previously reported in 3 individuals from PMID: 19365591
ABCA4
Supplementary table 2 lists this variant as previously reported in 3 individuals from PMID: 19365591
Table S2. ABCA4 variant categorization:
This variant was not evaluated.
Table S2. ABCA4 variant categorization:
This variant is found in table S2A to have an OR of 47.7 with a CI (4.71-2311.43).
Table S2. ABCA4 variant categorization:
This variant was not evaluated.
Table S2. ABCA4 variant categorization:
This variant was not evaluated.
Table S2. ABCA4 variant categorization:
This variant was not evaluated.
20 c.3208_3209insGT p.S1071fs DC c.1519G>T p.D507Y
Case#: Fujinami Patient 20, British
DiseaseAssertion: ABCA4-Related Retinal Disease
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: Dx of ABCA4-associated retinal disease. At least localized low AF signal at the fovea surrounded by a homogeneous background, but no specific information provided
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: ABCA4 microarray, PCR-enrichment–based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of ABCA4. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis.
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.3208_3209insGT (p.S1071fs) ; c.1519G>T (p.D507Y) not confirmed in trans
CAID: CA958508
SupplementalData:
Subjects All subjects provided written informed consent for this research study, which was approved by the University of Iowa Human Subjects Committee. The study included 176 patients with SD, 457 patients with RP, 60 patients with CRD and 272 normal control subjects. Seventeen members of this cohort (13 with SD, 1 with CRD and 3 with RP) had disease-causing mutations identified on one or both alleles in previous studies that employed single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis as the primary screening method (3). All patients and control subjects were ascertained in the outpatient ophthalmology clinic at the University of Iowa. All patients received a complete eye examination including measurement of Snellen visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior segment and fundus, and binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Most patients had fundus photography and Goldmann perimetry performed as well.Molecular characterization of the ABCA4 gene A multi-platform screening approach was used to genotype the ABCA4 gene in all 693 research subjects and 272 controls. Thirty-two of the most common disease-causing ABCA4 variations were selected for the initial screen. The entire research cohort was assayed for these 32 variations using a combination of SNPlex, SSCP analysis, TaqMan and automated DNA sequencing (3). The SNPlex and TaqMan assays were performed as previously described (22,23). Fourteen of the variations were compatible with Applied Biosystems SNPlex allele-specific assay platform. Nine variations were screened by SSCP analysis, three were screened using an Applied Biosystems' TaqMan assay and six were screened by automated DNA sequencing. All CRD and RP patients who had one plausible disease-causing allele identified in the first tier of screening were assayed by automated sequencing of the entire coding region of the ABCA4 gene in an effort to identify their second disease-causing allele. In addition, Stargardt patients who had one of the three most common alleles (Gly863Ala, Gly1961Glu or IVS38-10) were also sequenced through the entire coding region of the ABCA4 gene.Visual acuity The best-corrected visual acuity was recorded in each patient's medical record as a Snellen fraction (normal = 20/20). Before statistical analysis, these values were converted to the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) by calculating the base 10 logarithm of the Snellen fraction [e.g. normal = log(20/20) = 0]. For patients with multiple hospital visits, the acuity measurements taken closest to the patient's 27th birthday were used for the statistical analysis. Values from the left eye and right eye were averaged.Visual field volume scores Goldmann visual fields were scanned with a Sharp scanner and analyzed with ImageJ software (available at http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) as follows: transparent layers were added to each field, and the isopters of the visual fields were manually traced onto these layers. Each isopter was assigned a z-axis value according to relative luminous energy of the stimulus (I2e = 100, I3e = 31.7, I4e = 10, III4e = 0.49, V4e = 0.024, no detection = 0). The volume scores were calculated by multiplying the area of each isopter by its associated z-axis value and then summing the values for all isopters. For patients with multiple hospital visits, the visual field measurements taken closest to the patient's 27th birthday were used for the statistical analysis. Values from the left eye and right eye were averaged.Statistical analyses The frequencies of disease-causing alleles observed among the three groups of retinal disease patients were compared with the frequency in controls using Fisher's exact test. The phenotype of each patient was assumed to result from the additive effect of two alleles and one or more additional factors that were cumulatively represented by a single residual value for each subject. The values for the quantitative contribution of each allele were estimated using a multiple linear regression analysis (24). Specifically, to dissect the effect of each allele, we decomposed the mean phenotype of a person whose genotype consists of allele i and allele j into ai + aj, where ai is the effect of the i-th allele. To do this, we created a vector Yva of length 51 containing the average logMAR visual acuities for each subject, and a 51x16 matrix, X. Each cell of this matrix, Xij, indicated the number of occurrences of the j-th allele for each subject i. This system of 51 equations was solved with multiple linear regression to give estimates of a, using the statistics program R (available at http://www.R-project.org). To verify the allelic data, each row of X summed to 2, and each column summed to the corresponding number of occurrences of each allele for this cohort. These calculations were performed in the same manner for Yvol, the vector of containing each subject's visual field quantitative phenotype. The estimates of a, the coefficients for each allele, for both Yva and Yvol are given in Table 1.
Case#: Patient on line 28, US
DiseaseAssertion: retinitis pigmentosa (RP)
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: Thirty-two of the most common disease-causing ABCA4 variations were selected for the initial screen. The entire research cohort was assayed for these 32 variations using a combination of SNPlex, SSCP analysis, TaqMan and automated DNA sequencing. All CRD and RP patients who had one plausible disease-causing allele identified in the first tier of screening were assayed by automated sequencing of the entire coding region of the ABCA4 gene in an effort to identify their second disease-causing allele. In addition, Stargardt patients who had one of the three most common alleles (Gly863Ala, Gly1961Glu or IVS38-10) were also sequenced through the entire coding region of the ABCA4 gene.
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.6601_6602del (p.Arg2201AlafsTer?) "Glu2200del2 aggGA"; c.5461-10T>C "IVS38-10 T>C"
CAID: CA227421
SupplementalData: genotype in supplemental table 1
In this study, we summarized the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of 129 Chinese patients with ABCA4-RD.
Case#: Patient 8541, male, 10yo at presentation, 9yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: The inclusion criteria for patients were as follows: (1) clinical phenotypes were consistent with retinal dystrophy, and two or more ABCA4 gene mutations were identified by genetic analysis; or (2) clinical phenotypes were consistent with Stargardt disease, and one ABCA4 gene mutation was identified. The diagnosis of STGD was based on visual acuity loss with an atrophic maculopathy with or without yellowish-white flecks. BCVA= 0.92 OU. FAF type 1 ( a localized low FAF signal at fovea surrounded by a homogeneous background with or without perifoveal foci of high or low signal)
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: Yellowish-white flecks
GenotypingMethod: Analysis by targeted panel sequencing of 256 known retinal disease genes or by clinical exome sequencing of 1651 inherited eye disease-related genes
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.2587_2587+6delGG TAAGC; c.3468C>G p.(Tyr1156*)
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA341290648
SupplementalData: supplemental table S2
V1 H1 Exon 36.1–3 G>A chr1:94,484,001 c.5196+1137G>A 4 4 0 0
Case#: Braun Family 5 Proband (from left to right, top to bottom of available pedigrees), male
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: Proband has 1 affected sister with the same genotype and 1 unaffected, heterozygous brother. Genotypes not provided for parents.
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "five or more of the following features of ABCA4-associated retinal disease: decreased visual acuity before age 20, decreased visual acuity as the first visual symptom, symmetrical fundus findings, pisciform flecks, beaten metal macular atrophy, bulls-eye maculopathy, peripapillary sparing, vermillion fundus, masked choroid on fluorescein angiography, nummular pigment overlying extensive macular atrophy, central outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography and central scotomas on Goldmann perimetry."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: one plausible disease-causing mutation detected in ABCA4 after assessing the entire coding sequence and canonical retinal splice junctions with automated bidirectional Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.5196+1137G>A; c.4363T>C (p.C1455R)
ClinVar: 438100
CAID: CA26843511
SupplementalData: pedigree in fig s2
V1 H1 Exon 36.1–3 G>A chr1:94,484,001 c.5196+1137G>A 4 4 0 0
Case#: Braun Family 1 Proband (from left to right, top to bottom of available pedigrees), female
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: Both parents are unaffected heterozygotes. c.4139C>T (p.P1380L) paternally inherited, c.5196+1137G>A maternally inherited. Proband has 2 unaffected, heterozygous children.
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "five or more of the following features of ABCA4-associated retinal disease: decreased visual acuity before age 20, decreased visual acuity as the first visual symptom, symmetrical fundus findings, pisciform flecks, beaten metal macular atrophy, bulls-eye maculopathy, peripapillary sparing, vermillion fundus, masked choroid on fluorescein angiography, nummular pigment overlying extensive macular atrophy, central outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography and central scotomas on Goldmann perimetry."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: one plausible disease-causing mutation detected in ABCA4 after assessing the entire coding sequence and canonical retinal splice junctions with automated bidirectional Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.5196+1137G>A; c.4139C>T (p.P1380L)
ClinVar: 438100
CAID: CA26843511
SupplementalData: pedigree in fig s2
V1 H1 Exon 36.1–3 G>A chr1:94,484,001 c.5196+1137G>A 4 4 0 0
Case#: Braun Family 7 Proband (from left to right, top to bottom of available pedigrees), female
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: Unaffected carrier parents. c.5196+1137G>A maternally inherited; c.4561-10T>C paternally inherited
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "five or more of the following features of ABCA4-associated retinal disease: decreased visual acuity before age 20, decreased visual acuity as the first visual symptom, symmetrical fundus findings, pisciform flecks, beaten metal macular atrophy, bulls-eye maculopathy, peripapillary sparing, vermillion fundus, masked choroid on fluorescein angiography, nummular pigment overlying extensive macular atrophy, central outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography and central scotomas on Goldmann perimetry."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: one plausible disease-causing mutation detected in ABCA4 after assessing the entire coding sequence and canonical retinal splice junctions with automated bidirectional Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.5196+1137G>A; c.4561-10T>C
ClinVar: 438100
CAID: CA26843511
SupplementalData: pedigree in fig s2
V1 H1 Exon 36.1–3 G>A chr1:94,484,001 c.5196+1137G>A 4 4 0 0
Case#: Braun Family 2 Proband (from left to right, top to bottom of available pedigrees), female
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: Both parents are unaffected carriers. c.1622T>C (p.L541P) and c.3113C>T (p.A1038V) complex variants were paternally inherited, c.5196+1137G>A maternally inherited.
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "five or more of the following features of ABCA4-associated retinal disease: decreased visual acuity before age 20, decreased visual acuity as the first visual symptom, symmetrical fundus findings, pisciform flecks, beaten metal macular atrophy, bulls-eye maculopathy, peripapillary sparing, vermillion fundus, masked choroid on fluorescein angiography, nummular pigment overlying extensive macular atrophy, central outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography and central scotomas on Goldmann perimetry."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: one plausible disease-causing mutation detected in ABCA4 after assessing the entire coding sequence and canonical retinal splice junctions with automated bidirectional Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.5196+1137G>A; c.1622T>C (p.L541P) and c.3113C>T (p.A1038V) complex variant
ClinVar: 438100
CAID: CA26843511
SupplementalData: pedigree in fig s2
V1 H1 Exon 36.1–3 G>A chr1:94,484,001 c.5196+1137G>A 4 4 0 0
Case#: Braun Family 3 Proband (from left to right, top to bottom of available pedigrees), female
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: Both parents are unaffected, but only mother has genotype information available since father is deceased. c.1622T>C (p.L541P) and c.3113C>T (p.A1038V) complex variants were maternally inherited.
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "five or more of the following features of ABCA4-associated retinal disease: decreased visual acuity before age 20, decreased visual acuity as the first visual symptom, symmetrical fundus findings, pisciform flecks, beaten metal macular atrophy, bulls-eye maculopathy, peripapillary sparing, vermillion fundus, masked choroid on fluorescein angiography, nummular pigment overlying extensive macular atrophy, central outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography and central scotomas on Goldmann perimetry."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: one plausible disease-causing mutation detected in ABCA4 after assessing the entire coding sequence and canonical retinal splice junctions with automated bidirectional Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.5196+1137G>A; c.1622T>C (p.L541P) and c.3113C>T (p.A1038V) complex variant
ClinVar: 438100
CAID: CA26843511
SupplementalData: pedigree in fig s2
V1 H1 Exon 36.1–3 G>A chr1:94,484,001 c.5196+1137G>A 4 4 0 0
Case#: Braun Family 4 Proband (from left to right, top to bottom of available pedigrees), male
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: Both parents are unaffected, but only mother has genotype information available since father is deceased. c.5196+1137G>A maternally inherited. c.1022-1035fs inferred to be inherited from the father since other siblings also have this variant. Proband has 1 affected sister with the same genotype, and 2 siblings that were unaffected heterozygotes
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "five or more of the following features of ABCA4-associated retinal disease: decreased visual acuity before age 20, decreased visual acuity as the first visual symptom, symmetrical fundus findings, pisciform flecks, beaten metal macular atrophy, bulls-eye maculopathy, peripapillary sparing, vermillion fundus, masked choroid on fluorescein angiography, nummular pigment overlying extensive macular atrophy, central outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography and central scotomas on Goldmann perimetry."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: one plausible disease-causing mutation detected in ABCA4 after assessing the entire coding sequence and canonical retinal splice junctions with automated bidirectional Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 sequencer
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.5196+1137G>A; c.1022-1035fs
ClinVar: 438100
CAID: CA26843511
SupplementalData: pedigree in fig s2
MD-0467 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro 43 c.5917delG p.Val1973* 7 NP ABCR400
another case with 541 variant potentially not in cis with 1038
MD-0324ABCA423c.3386G>Tp.Arg1129Leu1c.3G>Ap.Met1Ile ^15YesABCR400 + NGSThis study
Case#: MD-0324 Proband,
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: Family MD-0324
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: STGD diagnosed based on "bilateral central vision loss; fundus presenting with a beaten-bronze appearance and/or the presence of orange-yellow flecks in the retina from the posterior pole to the mid-periphery; fluorescein angiography showing typical dark choroid; and normal to subnormal electroretinogram (ERGs)."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: Haplotype analysis, ABCR400, NGS
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant:c.3386G>T p.Arg1129Leu; c.3G>A p.Met1Ile
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA341289040
SupplementalData: n/a
MD-0247ABCA423c.3386G>Tp.Arg1129Leu47c.6410G>Ap.Cys2137Tyr12YesABCR400 + dHPLC + HRMAguirre-Lamban et al. 2009 (8); Aguirre-Lamban et al. 2010 (16)
Case#: Family MD-0247 Proband, 12yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: AR cone rod dystrophy
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: STGD diagnosed based on "bilateral central vision loss; fundus presenting with a beaten-bronze appearance and/or the presence of orange-yellow flecks in the retina from the posterior pole to the mid-periphery; fluorescein angiography showing typical dark choroid; and normal to subnormal electroretinogram (ERGs)." VA loss, VF loss, BCVA=0.05/0.1, cone-pattern on ERG
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
PreviouslyPublished: Aguirre-Lamban et al. 2009 (8); PMID: 19959634
Variant: c.6410G>A (p.Cys2137Tyr); c.3386G>T (p.Arg1129Leu) found by ABCR400 + dHPLC + HRM
ClinVar: 2202779; 99224
CAID: CA341277358; CA227116
SupplementalData:
MD-0474 ABCA4 12 c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro 28 c.4234C>T p.Gln1412* 9 NP ABCR400
another case with 541 variant potentially not in cis with 1038
Summary genetic testing data is available on the eyeGENE website (eyeGENE.nih.gov/data), including the number of participants for each of the 38 diagnostic categories, variants detected per gene, and variant classification by gene. As of the time of this writing, 3,448 eyeGENE participants have been reported to have at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variant. The 10 most frequently reported genes were ABCA4 (1799, 37%), USH2A (316, 7%), RPGR (283, 6%), CHM (219, 5%), PRPH2 (161, 3%), RS1 (142, 3%), RHO (130, 3%), BEST1 (114, 2%), EYS (67, 1%), and PRPF31 (62, 1%). These 10 genes represent 68% of all pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in eyeGENE. Two thousand one hundred and four participants have genetic results where no pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was found. Variants of uncertain significance were identified in 1,712 individuals.
This paper was listed under this variant in LOVD, but I cannot find it in the main text or supplemental documents.
Supplement 3iovs-63-2-11_s003.pdf (1.1M)GUID: 00045B54-7E12-4EE1-B50D-27CAC38DD633
This individual appears to be the same as in PMID: 23755871. Same author in both papers
AR197197–057CF 3 feet OD; CF 2 feet OSRP[L541P; A1038V][L541P; A1038V]197–069CF 5 feet OD; HM OSRP[L541P; A1038V][L541P; A1038V]
Case#: Family AR197 Proband 05, male, 7yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: arRP
FamilyInfo: parents are het carriers, sibling (06) is affected and has the same genotype
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "diagnosed by clinical criteria (44) consistent with international standards and confirmed by review of ophthalmic records and retinal photographs. The clinical criteria included visual impairment at early age, progressive loss of peripheral visual functions and typical retinal changes of vascular attenuation, disc pallor and bone spicule accumulation." CF 3 feet OD; CF 2 feet OS
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: microarray chip, ABCR-400, PCR
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: [L541P; A1038V] and[L541P; A1038V]
ClinVar: 99067
CAID: CA226911
SupplementalData: n/a
The measurement of ATPase activity has been the only assay available to study the effects of mutations on ABCA4 function. We employed this assay to examine the effects of [L541P; A1038V], R602W and C1490Y mutations on in vitro ATP hydrolysis. Constructs containing wild-type and mutated ABCA4 cDNAs, tagged with the eight amino acid bovine opsin C-terminal epitope (1D4), were expressed in COS7 cells and proteins were purified on a 1D4 affinity column. CHAPS-solubilized ABCA4 was incubated subsequently with ATP, and the hydrolysis rate was estimated with the charcoal method (31).The rate of ATP hydrolysis of the complex allele [L541P; A1038V] was decreased to 68.1% of wild-type ABCA4 (Fig. 3).
ATPase activity in COS7 cells showed decreased activity (68.1% of wild-type), indicating that this variant impacts protein function (PS3_Supporting; PMIDs). However, this is not a cell type that is counted for PS3 evidence by the ABCA4 VCEP.
Supplementary TableS10
This variant is listed for Stargardt DNAID#070949 in trans with c.3682G>A p.(Glu1228Lys). No phenotype information provided.
Supplementary TableS10
This variant is listed for Stargardt DNAID#070982 in trans with c.4253+43G>A. No phenotype information provided. This genotype was also reported in PMID: 32619608 and the first author of that paper is listed under authorship for this paper. Cannot confirm this isn't the same individual
Supplementary TableS10
This variant is listed for Stargardt DNAID#067322 in trans with c.5603A>T p.(Asn1868Ile). No phenotype information provided.
Case 5
Case#: a 46-year-old male
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt Disease
FamilyInfo:visual acuity loss by his brother and father
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007663
CaseHPOFreeText: visual acuity measured 20/400 bilaterally
CaseNotHPOs: NR
CaseNotHPOFreeText:NR
Genotyping Method: ABCA4 microarray (ABCR5000 chip)
PreviouslyPublished: NR
Variant: c.5714+5G>A
ClinVar: 99403
CAID: CA227338
SupplementalData:NR
Case 1A 55-year-old male was examined for long-standing central visual impairment since age 18. Family history was not significant for ocular disease. His best-corrected visual acuity of 20/350 OD and 20/200 OS was consistent with measurements over the last 20 years. Spherical refractive error measured −3.5 OD and −2.0 OS. Anterior segment examination was unremarkable and applanation tonometry measured 17 mmHg OD and 14 mmHg OS. Posterior segment examination and autofluorescence imaging were significant for sharply demarcated central and peripapillary zones of atrophy and the absence of fleck lesions (Figure 1, A–D). Humphrey visual fields demonstrated bilateral central scotomas with eccentric fixation at the inferior border. ERG examination was subnormal and similar to results obtained 22 years ago.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Case 1. STGD with peripapillary atrophy and mutations P1380L and IVS40 + 5G>A. A, Autofluorescence OD. B, Color Photo OD. C, Autofluorescence OS. D, Color Photo OS. All show marked peripapillary and macular atrophy with a sharply demarcated zone of sparing between them. These characteristics caused initial diagnostic confusion with choroidal sclerosis.Genetic testing was employed for further diagnostic information and two heterozygous ABCA4 mutations, P1380L and IVS40 + 5G>A, were identified and classified as disease-causing alleles, thereby confirming the diagnosis of STGD.
Case#: Hwang Case 1, US, male, 55yo at report, 18yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt disease
FamilyInfo: Family history was not significant for ocular disease
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007663, HP:0500087, HP:0000603, HP:0000512
CaseHPOFreeText: BCVA of 20/350 OD and 20/200 OS. Spherical refractive error measured −3.5 OD and −2.0 OS. Posterior segment examination and autofluorescence imaging were significant for sharply demarcated central and peripapillary zones of atrophy and the absence of fleck lesions (Figure 1, A–D). Humphrey visual fields demonstrated bilateral central scotomas with eccentric fixation at the inferior border.
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: Genotyping was performed by the ABCR400 microarray followed by direct sequencing to confirm identified variants.
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: P1380L and IVS40 + 5G>A
ClinVar: 7904
CAID: CA129033
SupplementalData: n/a
A 37-year-old man presented with a 3-year history of decreased vision in the right eye, which had recently become worse.
Case#: single case, 37-year-old male, ethnicity not specified although family originally from the Middle East, examined in the UK
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: No history of consanguinity. No history of inherited retinal disease, poor vision or colour vision disturbance. Father had recent diagnosis of chronic central serous retinopathy, not consistent with STGD
CasePresentingHPOs: n/a
CaseHPOFreeText: Late-onset Stargardt disease with slowly progressive phenotype. The patient present with a 3-year history of decreased vision in the right eye that had recently significantly worsened. Visual acuity was 6.24 in right eye and 6/6 in left eye. Fundus examination reveled scattered atrophy and pisiform fundal flecks in both eye, right worse than left. Fluorescein angiography showed a silent choroid and partial bull's eye maculopathy, right worse than left. OCT showed loss of photoreceptors in both eyes and partial central sparing in the left eye. Photopic and scotopic ERG showed reduced amplitude of responses in the right eye and lower range amplitudes in the left eye, normal implicit times in both eyes. Pattern ERG and multifocal ERD showed central retinal dysfunction with preserved peripheral function. No change in vision or retinal appearance over the next 14 months of follow up.
CaseNotHPOs: n/a
CaseNotHPOFreeText: No night vision symptoms. No history of retinotoxic drug exposure.
Genotyping Method: Next-generation sequence analysis with the Oxford Genetics Testing Laboratory Macular Gene Panel.
PreviouslyPublished: Thr829Met missense mutation had been previously reported in an individual with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa, but not previously associated with STGD phenotype.
Variant: ABCA4 NM_000350 c.5882G>A, p.(Gly1961Glu) c.2486C>T, p.(Thr829Met)
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA958261, CA119132
SupplementalData: n/a
Eighty-four unrelated STGD1 patients were found to carry two or more disease-causing ABCA4 mutations, and cosegregation analyses were performed in 54 (64.3%). (See Supplementary Table S3 for a summary of clinical phenotype of STGD1 patients). The mean disease onset age of the patients was 13.1 years (range, 2–44 years), and half of these patients experienced their symptoms of visual impairment in their first decade. We classified the patients into three groups by their disease onset age. For the patients in the first group, whose disease onset ages were between 1 and 10 years, the fraction (45.3%, 19/42) of patients carrying compound heterozygous or homozygous deleterious mutations (nonsense, frameshift insertion or deletion, or splicing mutations) or complex alleles was much higher than those observed for the patients in the group 2 (24.1%, 7/29) and group 3 (15.4%, 2/13), whose disease onset ages were from 11 to 20 years or older than 20 years, respectively. In contrast, the percentage of patients carrying compound heterozygous or homozygous missense mutations was higher in group 3 than in group 1 or group 2 (Table 2). The most common mutation (p.Y808X) was detected in 12 patients, and all were heterozygous compound with missense (6 patients), splicing (1 patient), and insertion or deletion (5 patients) mutations. The two most frequent missense mutations (p.F2188S and p.N965S) were identified as heterozygous. In 84 patients, 9 patients carried complex mutations, and 4 of those 9 patients carried a common complex allele p.E328V/p.E1036K. All these patients had early onset age and relatively severe visual acuity defects. One patient (010222) also carried three heterozygous mutations (p.E328, p.E1036K, and p.R1843W); however, he did not harbor the common complex allele p.E328V/p.E1036K, as only p.E1036K was detected in his son in the subsequent cosegregation analysis. Compared to the four patients carrying the common complex alleles (p.E328V/p.E1036K), patient 010221 had a late onset age (44 years old). Table 2 View Table Correlations Between Onset Age of STGD Patients and Their Carrying Mutations
Per ClinVar entry, this variant was associated with this paper. however, after reading through the genotypes, this variant was not found. Likely this paper was mentioned to support the statement that "Loss-of-function variants in ABCA4 are known to be pathogenic"
In Mexican patients, p.A1773V and p.G818E were identified in 17% and 15%, respectively, of the total mutant alleles.
This variant was mentioned in reference to a previous publication. PMID: 23419329
We identified 1319 distinct causative variants (Supplementary Table S1) in 132 different genes (Table (Table3).3). The ten most commonly mutated genes were ABCA4 (n = 535 [26.3%]), USH2A (n = 228 [11.2%]), RPGR (n = 102 [5%]), CHM (n = 72 [3.5%]), RHO (n = 72 [3.5%]), MYO7A (n = 69 [3.4%]), CRB1 (n = 55 [2.7%]), RPE65 (n = 40 [2%]), RP1 (n = 37 [1.8%]), and GUCY2D (n = 34 [1.7%]) (Table (Table3,3, Fig. 2a). The other 122 genes had a lower contribution to IRDs. One hundred genes were mutated in 15 patients or less and were collectively responsible for disease pathogenesis in 18% of the solved cohort (Fig. 2a, Table Table3).3). Thirty-two genes were mutated in only one patient (Table (Table3).3). Mutations in the mitochondrial DNA accounted for 2.1% of the cohort and were implicated almost exclusively in the pathogenesis of LHON.
This variant is in supplementary table S1 as being found in an Italian IRD "solved" case with AR inheritance, but no further details are provided.
14F/34320/200, 20/250OU: Severe RPE and choroidal atrophic changes in macula and throughout posterior pole and midperiphery, flecks throughout posterior poleCompound heterozygous: G818E and C1488RSubnormal rod, subnormal cone
Case#: Patient #14, female, 34yo
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: stage 3, BCVA: OD=20/200 OS=20/250, fundus findings: OU: Severe RPE and choroidal atrophic changes in macula and throughout posterior pole and midperiphery, flecks throughout posterior pole, full field ERG: Subnormal rod, subnormal cone,
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: direct sequencing of the ABCA4 gene
PreviouslyPublished:
Variant: Compound heterozygous: G818E and C1488R
ClinVar:
CAID:
SupplementalData:
MD-0723 STGD1 23 c.3386G>T p.(Arg1129Leu) 47 c.6410G>A p.(Cys2137Tyr) - 13 13 Yes 15y Cone-pattern 0.2/0.2 This study
This variant is found in compound heterozygosity with c.3386G>T p.(Arg1129Leu) in family MD-0723 in this study. Proband is 13yo at onset of VA loss and VF loss with night blindness. 15yo at opthalmological exam. Cone pattern on ERG. BCVA=0.2/0.2. Eligible for PP4.
MD-0084 STGD1 47 c.6410G>A p.(Cys2137Tyr) 47 c.6410G>A p.(Cys2137Tyr) Yes 7 7 - 23y - <0.05/<0.05 Riveiro-Alvarez et al.,2013
This variant is found in homozygosity in family MD-0084 in a previous publication (PMID: 23755871)
STGD1 was determined according to initial symptoms of VA loss; fundus images showing orange-yellow flecks in the retina, a beaten-bronze appearance; and normal or cone-altered ffERG results
This variant was found in homozygosity 3 times in table S1 (Families MD-0991, MD-1164, and MD-1302). All with a STGD1 phenotype.
MD-0991 had onset of VA loss at 25yo, cone-rod pattern on ERG, and BCVA was 1.2/1.2. Segregation was mentioned, but no details provided.
MD-1164 had onset of VA loss at 42yo, no VF loss, and BCVA was 0.2/0.3. Segregation was not mentioned.
MD-1302 had no clinical details available.
GenotypingMethod: Index cases were studied by different next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategies, including targeted gene panels, clinical exome, and/or whole-exome sequencing
Rp125 arRP ABCA4 NM_000350 Heterozygous c.6416G > C p.(Arg2139Pro) Novel Heterozygous c.1519G > T p.(Asp507Tyr) (Fujinami et al. 2013b)
Case#: Zhao Case Rp125, N. Ireland
DiseaseAssertion: arRP
FamilyInfo: familial case. affected sister with the same genotype
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "Retinitis pigmentosa was diagnosed on the basis of the typical fundal features (bone spicule retinal pigmentation, arteriolar attenuation, and optic disc pallor), visual field constriction, and an attenuated or abolished electroretinogram." 7yo at onset. BCVA= CF, HM. ERG findings: extinguished OU
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: Targeted next-generation sequencing using a retinal capture panel to test 55 RP genes and 131 other retinal disease genes. All putative mutations identified by NGS were validated using Sanger sequencing and tested for co-segregation if additional affected family members are available
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: NM_000350 c..6416G>C p.(Arg2139Pro); c.1519G>T p.(Asp507Tyr)
CAID: CA956878
SupplementalData: table s6, figure s1
13. 34/F31.021.06OD−68.3−23.32p.Gly818Glu; p.Cys1488Arg
Case#: Pt 13, 34yo, female
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: stage 3 (resorbed flecks), logMAR acuity: OD=1.02 OS 1.06, FST Rod Blue Stimulus (dB) OD= −68.3, FST Cone Red stimulus (dB) OD=−23.3, FST Group 2 (elevated cone and normal rod FST thresholds)
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod:
PreviouslyPublished:
Variant: p.Gly818Glu; p.Cys1488Arg
ClinVar: 99135
CAID: CA227000
SupplementalData: n/a
Over 200 ABCA4 sequence variants have been reported so far in patients with STGD and other retinopathies1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. We have examined 33 missense mutations, 3 small in-frame deletions and 1 frameshift near the carboxy terminus (Table 1 and Fig. 2), including those mutations most commonly encountered in STGD patients1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 and several that were reported in AMD patients15. As an initial step in assessing protein folding and stability, we analysed each ABCR variant by immunoblotting and azido-ATP labelling (Fig. 3). Mutations that cause small deletions (delVVAIC1681 and delPAL1761) or introduce charged amino acids into predicted transmembrane domains (G851D and G1886E) produce greatly reduced amounts of protein. Among the ABCR variants that are expressed with normal or nearly normal yield, azido-ATP labelling revealed a subset that is defective in ATP binding. A variety of mutations that lie outside of the nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) can impair azido-ATP labelling, including L541P, predicted to reside adjacent to a transmembrane domain, and W1408R, which resides between the homologous halves of ABCR (Fig. 2). These data suggest that ATP binding to the NBDs is allosterically coupled to conformational changes in or near the transmembrane regions. Moreover, some mutations within either of the two NBDs abolish or nearly abolish all azido-ATP labelling, as seen, for example, with variants T971N, L1971R, G1977S and E2096K, implying allosteric coupling between the two NBDs, as described for P-glycoprotein22,23.Table 1 Naturally occurring ABCR variants produced in transfected 293 cellsFull size tableFigure 2: Locations of 37 naturally occurring ABCR sequence variants and 4 synthetic mutations.The predicted transmembrane topography and domain structure of ABCR is based on the hydropathy profile and sequence alignment with other ABC transporters. The cytosolic face of the membrane is downward. NBD, nucleotide binding domain; HH, highly hydrophobic domain shared with other members of the ABC1/ABCR subfamily of ABC transporters. A, B and C indicate the sequence motifs characteristic of nucleotide binding folds. Asterisks denote the four synthetic mutations.Full size imageFigure 3: Protein yield and ATP-binding capacity of 37 naturally occurring ABCR variants produced in transiently transfected 293 cells.Membranes were analysed by immunoblotting with affinity-purified anti-ABCR antibodies (top) and photoaffinity labelling with α-32P azido-ATP (bottom). We loaded 1 μg (immunoblotting) or 2.5 μg (azido-ATP labelling) of total membrane protein, as determined by Bradford assay, per track. The mutations that reside in NBD-1 and NBD-2 are indicated above the corresponding lanes. The relative levels of the different variant proteins and the extent of azido-ATP labelling were observed to be highly reproducible in multiple independent experiments. ABCR (large arrowhead); an endogenous 55-kD protein (small arrowhead) serves as an internal control for azido-ATP labelling. Molecular mass standards are shown on the left in kD.Full size imageThe combination of immunoblotting and azido-ATP labelling revealed defects in more than 75% of the variants tested. Among the variants with reduced yield and/or ATP binding are G863A and delG863, the two protein products of a guanosine2588→cytosine mutation that both generates a glycine-to-alanine substitution at codon 863 and activates a cryptic splice acceptor site in exon 17 that results in the removal of codon 863 from approximately 50% of the transcripts10. This is the most common allele among STGD patients in Northern Europe, representing roughly 20% of disease-associated alleles. It is also present at a frequency of approximately 3% in the general population in Northern Europe and approximately 1% in the United States population7,9,10. Genotype-phenotype correlations suggest that it is a mild allele and that it leads to STGD only when paired with a more severe allele10. Relative to wild type, the G863A variant is subtantially impaired and the delG863 variant is mildly impaired (Fig. 3).
This variant was transfected into HEK 293 cells and appears to show reduced expression and ATP-binding capacity, but no quantities were provided
Patient 4, a 30-year-old individual with the deleterious c.213dupG/p.Ile73Asnfs*26 frameshift mutation and the c.1654G>A/p.Val552Ile missense mutation, displayed mild STGD1 with stage 2 FC and 20/30 VA. The p.Ile73Asnfs*26 mutation is classified as a pathogenic mutation, whereas the p.Val552Ile mutation is classified as likely neutral. Biochemical analysis of the p.Val552Val, however, suggests that this is a mild mutation at a functional level consistent with the clinical assessment of patient 4 (see Discussion section for additional information).
Case#: Garces Patient 4, Canada
DiseaseAssertion: mild STGD1
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: 30yo, VA=20/30, FC=Stage 2 (flecks throughout the posterior pole, anterior to the vascular arcades and nasal to the optic disc and relatively normal ERGs but with prolonged dark adaptation)
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: screened for mutations in the ABCA4, CNGB3, and ELOVL4 genes
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.213dupG/p.Ile73Asnfs*26; c.1654G>A/p.Val552Ile
CAID: CA239745
SupplementalData:
The plots of fluorescence anisotropy changes of 11-cis-retinal with wild type and mutant NBD1 protein titrations are shown in Fig. 6, A–C. The binding of mutant G863A was significantly attenuated as indicated by the drastic right shift of the binding isotherm as well as its inability to achieve saturation in the presence of a high concentration of protein (Fig. 6A). Nonlinear regression analysis gave Kd of 8.0 ± 1.3 × 10−8 m, 8.0 ± 2.0 × 10−6 m, and 4.0 ± 1.4 × 10−6 m for the wild type and R943Q and P940R mutations, respectively (Fig. 6 and Table 1). As a consequence of Stargardt disease mutations, 100-fold (R943Q) to 50-fold (P940R) decreases in the binding affinity of the NBD1 domain for 11-cis-retinal were observed. The retinal binding of the G863A mutant was severely attenuated, and the Kd was ≥1.0 × 10−5 m.
The effects of this variant on 11-cis-retinal interaction with the NBD1 was evaluated via fluorescence anisotropy. The binding of mutant G863A was significantly attenuated (Kd was ≥1.0 × 10−5 m) as indicated by the drastic right shift of the binding isotherm as well as its inability to achieve saturation in the presence of a high concentration of protein (Fig. 6A).
All reported ABCA4 variants (Supplementary Table S1) were classified as follows:
Patient 38 has this variant and also c.5882G>A p.(Gly1961Glu) (Supplement 4-supplementary table 1). Phase is unknown and more specific phenotype information is not provided.
clinical diagnosis of STGD1 was supported by the presence of ≥1 (likely) pathogenic ABCA4 variants with a follow-up data of ≥6 months on FAF imaging.
A cohort of 500 unrelated IRD patients was sequenced with the targeted NGS panel Genetic Eye Disease test (GEDi)3 and analyzed with a comprehensive approach, which included a standard NGS analysis pipeline detecting single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels),16 interrogation of sequence reads to detect the known pathogenic MAK-Alu insertion,21 and application of NGS read-depth algorithms (ExomeDepth15 and gCNV16) to detect larger deletions and duplications, or CNVs (Fig. 1). In this study we define CNVs as deletions or duplications that range from an average size of an exon (≈50–200 bp) and that are not detectable by standard NGS pipelines, to megabases of DNA.22
Case#: OGI802_001554
DiseaseAssertion: IRD
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: detection of CNVs on the panel-based NGS Genetic Eye Disease (GEDi) diagnostic test that involves sequencing the exons of all known IRD disease genes
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.1715G>C; c.5196+1137G>A
ClinVar: 99073
CAID: CA226919
SupplementalData: Table S2
two cases from two additional families (case 3, 11 years and case 4, 11 years).
Case#:two cases from two additional families (case 3, 11 years and case 4, 11 years).
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt’s Disease
FamilyInfo: NR
ParentalTesting: NR
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030500, HP:0011507
CasePhenotypeFreeText: LogMAR visual acuity for the right and left eye of cases 1–4 was 0.3 and 0.2, 0.1 and 0.1, 0.5 and 0.4, and 0.3 and 0.4, respectively. Gross disruption of the outer retinal layers at the macula in all cases; in two (cases 2 and 4), the presumed external limiting membrane (ELM) peak was broadened with the inner segment ellipsoid band (ISe) missing. Subtle white-yellowish fine dots at the macula and numerous white-yellowish flecks extending anterior to the arcade are shown in the colour fundus photograph of case 1. Autofluorescence (AF) imaging of case 1 detected well-defined dots with high signal at the central macula surrounded by a ring of increased signal and numerous foci with high or low signal extending to the peripheral retina. Case 2 also had subtle white-yellowish fine dots at the central macula and numerous white-yellowish flecks extending anterior to the arcade, both associated with high signal on AF imaging. In addition, case 3 had white-yellowish fine dots at the macula and numerous white-yellowish flecks extending to the periphery, both of which had high or low signal on AF imaging. Case 4 showed subtle fine macular dots mainly in a para-foveal location, which are well-defined on AF imaging.
CaseNotHPOs: HP:0007401, HP:0000505
CaseNotPhenotypeFreeText: Most cases with STGD have central macular atrophy with numerous more peripheral flecks (Michaelides et al. 2003). Given their relatively good visual acuity, it is likely that the central macular dots observed in our cases may be an early sign of macular dysfunction before the development of macular atrophy. Similar fine macular dots or a ‘mottled macula’ have also been reported in other inherited retinal diseases
CasePreviousTesting: The age of disease onset in cases 1–4, defined as either the age at which visual loss was first noted by the subject or in the asymptomatic subjects when abnormal retinal appearance was first detected, was 5, 7, 8, and 6 years old, respectively.
GenotypingMethod: After informed consent was obtained, blood samples were taken from probands of 2/3 families for ABCA4 screening. A full medical history was obtained, and a full ophthalmologic examination was performed in all cases. Mutation screening of ABCA4 was performed in two probands of the three families, and two likely disease-causing variants were identified in each case; c.768G > T, p.V256V (a previously reported splicing-altering synonymous variant) and c.4363T > C, p.C1455R (a missense variant) in case 1, and c.1906C > T, p.Q636* (a non-sense variant) and c.5461-10 T > C (a disease-associated intronic variant with uncertain effect) in case 3. A blood sample was not available in one proband (case 4).
Variant: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.1906C>T (p.Gln636Ter) and NM_000350.3:c.5461-10T>C
LegacyVariant: c.1906C>T (p.Gln636Ter) and c.5461-10T>C
ClinVar: 265012 and 92870
CAID: CA10588302 and CA220687
gnomeAD: 1:94528164 G / A and 1:94476951 A / G
MultipleGeneVariants:No
PreviouslyPublished: No
AdditionalInfo: Most symptoms/diagnoses are consistent with Stargardt’s Disease 3, however the probands in the study were younger in age, so many of the symptoms hadn’t progressed much. Also, all of the cases had decent visual acuity, which contradicts a symptom of Stargardt’s Disease 3. Similar fine macular dots or a ‘mottled macula’ have also been reported in other inherited retinal diseases, for example, in those caused by mutations in RDH5 or RPE65, both of which encode proteins with known function in the visual cycle. The thickening of the ELM may be an OCT abnormality that precedes atrophy in the early stages of STGD
two siblings were from one consanguineous family (case 1, 11 years and case 2, 9 years)
Case#: two siblings (female) were from one consanguineous family (case 1, 11 years and case 2, 9 years)
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt’s Disease
FamilyInfo: NR
ParentalTesting: NR
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030500, HP:0011507
CasePhenotypeFreeText: LogMAR visual acuity for the right and left eye of cases 1–4 was 0.3 and 0.2, 0.1 and 0.1, 0.5 and 0.4, and 0.3 and 0.4, respectively. Gross disruption of the outer retinal layers at the macula in all cases; in two (cases 2 and 4), the presumed external limiting membrane (ELM) peak was broadened with the inner segment ellipsoid band (ISe) missing. Subtle white-yellowish fine dots at the macula and numerous white-yellowish flecks extending anterior to the arcade are shown in the colour fundus photograph of case 1. Autofluorescence (AF) imaging of case 1 detected well-defined dots with high signal at the central macula surrounded by a ring of increased signal and numerous foci with high or low signal extending to the peripheral retina. Case 2 also had subtle white-yellowish fine dots at the central macula and numerous white-yellowish flecks extending anterior to the arcade, both associated with high signal on AF imaging. In addition, case 3 had white-yellowish fine dots at the macula and numerous white-yellowish flecks extending to the periphery, both of which had high or low signal on AF imaging. Case 4 showed subtle fine macular dots mainly in a para-foveal location, which are well-defined on AF imaging.
CaseNotHPOs: HP:0007401, HP:0000505
CaseNotPhenotypeFreeText: Most cases with STGD have central macular atrophy with numerous more peripheral flecks (Michaelides et al. 2003). Given their relatively good visual acuity, it is likely that the central macular dots observed in our cases may be an early sign of macular dysfunction before the development of macular atrophy. Similar fine macular dots or a ‘mottled macula’ have also been reported in other inherited retinal diseases
CasePreviousTesting: The age of disease onset in cases 1–4, defined as either the age at which visual loss was first noted by the subject or in the asymptomatic subjects when abnormal retinal appearance was first detected, was 5, 7, 8, and 6 years old, respectively.
GenotypingMethod: After informed consent was obtained, blood samples were taken from probands of 2/3 families for ABCA4 screening. A full medical history was obtained, and a full ophthalmologic examination was performed in all cases. Mutation screening of ABCA4 was performed in two probands of the three families, and two likely disease-causing variants were identified in each case; c.768G > T, p.V256V (a previously reported splicing-altering synonymous variant) and c.4363T > C, p.C1455R (a missense variant) in case 1, and c.1906C > T, p.Q636* (a non-sense variant) and c.5461-10 T > C (a disease-associated intronic variant with uncertain effect) in case 3. A blood sample was not available in one proband (case 4).
Variant: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.768G>T (p.Val256=) and NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.4363T>C (p.Cys1455Arg)
LegacyVariant: c.768G>T (p.Val256=) and c.4363T>C (p.Cys1455Arg)
ClinVar: 99505 and 377404
CAID: CA227458 and CA957621
gnomeAD: 1:94564350 C / A and 1:94495177 A / G
MultipleGeneVariants:No
PreviouslyPublished: No
AdditionalInfo: Some symptoms/diagnoses are consistent with Stargardt’s Disease 3, however the probands in the study were younger in age, so many of the symptoms hadn’t progressed much. Also, all of the cases had decent visual acuity, which contradicts a symptom of Stargardt’s Disease 3.
ABCA4P28592/1STGDc.6285T>Cp.D2095Drs1801555
Case#: Patient P28592/1,
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: Custom 300-kb retinal resequencing chip. PCR amplification, DNA fragmentation, and chip hybridization. Hybridization signals were analyzed using Sequence pilot module seq-C mutation detection software (2009). This resequencing approach was validated by Sanger sequence technology.
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.635G>A p.(R212H); c.6445C>T p.(R2149X); c.6285T>C p.(D2095D)
CAID: CA285825
SupplementalData: n/a
9369a AR 6601–6602delAG Frameshift
This patient was later phenotypically characterized in more depth (PMID: 12037008)
Seventy eyes (38 patients), of which 46 (66%) were female and 24 (34%) male, with RPE atrophy secondary to ABCA4 -related retinopathy (age [years], 45.51 ± 16.70; range 14–78) were included in the study ( Table 1 and see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 2 , http://links.lww.com/IAE/B170 , which shows the individual baseline and progression data of all included eyes).
Case#: Patient #34, female, 61yo at baseline visit, "intermediate" age of onset
DiseaseAssertion: ABCA4-related retinopathy with secondary RPE atrophy
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: Inclusion criteria were defined as 1) presence of at least one mutated allele in ABCA4 (NM_000350.2) in Sanger sequencing with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis or next-generation sequencing 2) a compatible phenotype with flecks at the level of the RPE consistent with ABCA4 -related Stargardt disease 3) presence of RPE atrophy, and 4) serial examinations with an interval of at least 6 months. RPE atrophy to the end-stage (i.e., demarcated lesions with ≥90% darkness of the optic disc under short-wavelength excitation light, DDAF) that previously showed highest interreader agreement.7 The size of DDAF has to be at least 0.05 mm 2 (each single atrophic area in cases of multifocality), and the entire lesion must be completely visualized on the AF image at each visit to be advanced for analysis. Self-reported symptom onset into early-onset (≤10 years), intermediate-onset (11–44 years), and late-onset (≥45 years). ff-ERG based Category: Group 1 contained eyes with normal scotopic and photopic responses; Group 2, eyes with normal scotopic responses, but reduced (over 2 SDs) photopic B-wave and 30-Hz flicker amplitudes; and Group 3, eyes with impairment of both rod- and cone-driven responses. BCVA: OD=n/a, OS=1 [LogMAR] .
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: Insufficient pupil dilation, additional retinal pathology, previous retinal treatment, or other ocular comorbidities substantially affecting image quality led to exclusion from the study
GenotypingMethod: Sanger sequencing with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis or next-generation sequencing
PreviouslyPublished: possible since Birtel is an author on this paper and the probands both have the same second variant as in PMID: 29555955
Variant: allele 1: c.3468C>G p.(Tyr1156*) allele 2: c.5059A>T p.(Ile1687Phe)
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA341290648
SupplementalData: The supplemental table linked here contains genotype and phenotype information.
Seventy eyes (38 patients), of which 46 (66%) were female and 24 (34%) male, with RPE atrophy secondary to ABCA4 -related retinopathy (age [years], 45.51 ± 16.70; range 14–78) were included in the study ( Table 1 and see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 2 , http://links.lww.com/IAE/B170 , which shows the individual baseline and progression data of all included eyes).
Case#: Patient #32, male, 60yo at baseline visit, "late" age of onset
DiseaseAssertion: ABCA4-related retinopathy with secondary RPE atrophy
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: Inclusion criteria were defined as 1) presence of at least one mutated allele in ABCA4 (NM_000350.2) in Sanger sequencing with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis or next-generation sequencing 2) a compatible phenotype with flecks at the level of the RPE consistent with ABCA4 -related Stargardt disease 3) presence of RPE atrophy, and 4) serial examinations with an interval of at least 6 months. RPE atrophy to the end-stage (i.e., demarcated lesions with ≥90% darkness of the optic disc under short-wavelength excitation light, DDAF) that previously showed highest interreader agreement.7 The size of DDAF has to be at least 0.05 mm 2 (each single atrophic area in cases of multifocality), and the entire lesion must be completely visualized on the AF image at each visit to be advanced for analysis. Self-reported symptom onset into early-onset (≤10 years), intermediate-onset (11–44 years), and late-onset (≥45 years). ff-ERG based Category: Group 1 contained eyes with normal scotopic and photopic responses; Group 2, eyes with normal scotopic responses, but reduced (over 2 SDs) photopic B-wave and 30-Hz flicker amplitudes; and Group 3, eyes with impairment of both rod- and cone-driven responses. BCVA: OD=0, OS=0 [LogMAR] .
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: Insufficient pupil dilation, additional retinal pathology, previous retinal treatment, or other ocular comorbidities substantially affecting image quality led to exclusion from the study
GenotypingMethod: Sanger sequencing with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis or next-generation sequencing
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: allele 1: c.52C>T/p.(Arg18Trp) // c.1715G>A/p.(Arg572Gln) // c.2828G>A/p.(Arg943Gln) allele 2: c.1588G>A/p.(Gly863Ala) // c.5603A>T/p.(Asn1868Ile)
ClinVar: 7900
CAID: CA226918
SupplementalData: The supplemental table linked here contains genotype and phenotype information.
Seventy eyes (38 patients), of which 46 (66%) were female and 24 (34%) male, with RPE atrophy secondary to ABCA4 -related retinopathy (age [years], 45.51 ± 16.70; range 14–78) were included in the study ( Table 1 and see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 2 , http://links.lww.com/IAE/B170 , which shows the individual baseline and progression data of all included eyes).
Case#: Patient #33, female, 64yo at baseline visit, "late" age of onset
DiseaseAssertion: ABCA4-related retinopathy with secondary RPE atrophy
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: Inclusion criteria were defined as 1) presence of at least one mutated allele in ABCA4 (NM_000350.2) in Sanger sequencing with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis or next-generation sequencing,9 2) a compatible phenotype with flecks at the level of the RPE consistent with ABCA4 -related Stargardt disease,9 3) presence of RPE atrophy, and 4) serial examinations with an interval of at least 6 months. RPE atrophy to the end-stage (i.e., demarcated lesions with ≥90% darkness of the optic disc under short-wavelength excitation light, DDAF) that previously showed highest interreader agreement.7 The size of DDAF has to be at least 0.05 mm 2 (each single atrophic area in cases of multifocality), and the entire lesion must be completely visualized on the AF image at each visit to be advanced for analysis. Self-reported symptom onset into early-onset (≤10 years), intermediate-onset (11–44 years), and late-onset (≥45 years). ff-ERG based Category: Group 1 contained eyes with normal scotopic and photopic responses; Group 2, eyes with normal scotopic responses, but reduced (over 2 SDs) photopic B-wave and 30-Hz flicker amplitudes; and Group 3, eyes with impairment of both rod- and cone-driven responses. BCVA: OD=0.4, OS=1.1 [LogMAR] .
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: Insufficient pupil dilation, additional retinal pathology, previous retinal treatment, or other ocular comorbidities substantially affecting image quality led to exclusion from the study
GenotypingMethod: Sanger sequencing with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis or next-generation sequencing
PreviouslyPublished: possible since Birtel is an author on this paper and the probands both have the same second variant as in PMID: 29555955
Variant: allele 1: c.3468C>G p.(Tyr1156*) allele 2: c.5059A>T p.(Ile1687Phe); c.4297G>A p.(Val1433Ile)
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA341290648
SupplementalData: The supplemental table linked here contains genotype and phenotype information.
Disease-causing mutations were identified in 74% of 251 consecutive MD/CCRD patients
Case#: Patient #9, female, 23yo at onset, 32yo at report, German
DiseaseAssertion: macular dystrophy or cone-rod dystrophy
FamilyInfo: inheritance= sporadic. phase not confirmed, but no other affected family members and no parental consanguinity
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: reduced visual acuity, erg scotopic= reduced, erg-photopic=reduced
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: syndromic retinal disease, age-related macular degeneration, central serous retinopathy, autoimmune retinopathy, retinal vascular disease, achromatopsia, X-linked retinoschisis, North Carolina macular dystrophy
CasePreviousTesting: n/a
GenotypingMethod: Sanger sequencing of ABCA4
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.1654G>A p.Val552Ile; c.4771G>A p.Gly1591Arg; c.1622T>C p.Leu541Pro; c.3113C>T p.Ala1038Val
CAID: CA239745
SupplementalData: Supplementary table 1
Supplementary tables (1.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary table 4 contains this variant, but this table is for single variants found in a recessive gene. Thus, PM3 would not be able to be used and neither would PP4
Disease-causing or likely disease-causing mutations were identified in 185 out of 251 patients (74%) with MD/CCRD (Supplementary Table 1).
Case#: Patient #42, female, 31yo at onset, German
DiseaseAssertion: macular dystrophy or cone-rod dystrophy
FamilyInfo: phase not confirmed, but assumed in case of parental consanguinity or if only siblings were affected
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012508
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: syndromic retinal disease, age-related macular degeneration, central serous retinopathy, autoimmune retinopathy, retinal vascular disease, achromatopsia, X-linked retinoschisis, North Carolina macular dystrophy
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.3468C>G (p.Tyr1156Ter); c.5059A>T (p.Ile1687Phe) Sanger sequencing of ABCA4
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA341290648
SupplementalData: Supplementary table 1
We identified 255 patients (87.9 %) harboring biallelic ABCA4 variants, 27 probands (9.3 %) with two or three variants but lacking familial segregation analysis, and eight patients (2.8 %) with monoallelic ABCA4 variants (Supplemental Table S4). We detected 268 distinct ABCA4 variants, consisting of 114 missense, 35 nonsense, 34 frameshift deletion or insertion, 31 canonical splice variants, 13 noncanonical splice site variants, 9 in-frame deletion or insertion, 9 DIVs, 4 structural variations, and 19 complex variants (Fig. 2).
Case#: Patient#010046, Chinese, female, 28yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: stargardt
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs: STGD1 diagnosis based on the following criteria: "a bilateral central vision defect; fundus displaying a beaten-bronze appearance and/or orange-yellow flecks in the retina from the macula to the midperiphery; fluorescein angiography presenting with a typical dark choroid; and normal to subnormal ERG results." stage 2( numerous yellow-whitish flecks throughout the posterior pole) BCVA=0.05/ 0.05
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
PreviouslyPublished: PMID: 26780318
Variant: p.P2097S; p.A1773V phase unknown
ClinVar: 2202780
CAID: CA341277622
SupplementalData: supplementary table S4 has phenotype information
We identified 255 patients (87.9 %) harboring biallelic ABCA4 variants, 27 probands (9.3 %) with two or three variants but lacking familial segregation analysis, and eight patients (2.8 %) with monoallelic ABCA4 variants (Supplemental Table S4). We detected 268 distinct ABCA4 variants, consisting of 114 missense, 35 nonsense, 34 frameshift deletion or insertion, 31 canonical splice variants, 13 noncanonical splice site variants, 9 in-frame deletion or insertion, 9 DIVs, 4 structural variations, and 19 complex variants (Fig. 2).
Case#: Patient#010633, Chinese, female, 20yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: stargardt
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs: STGD1 diagnosis based on the following criteria: "a bilateral central vision defect; fundus displaying a beaten-bronze appearance and/or orange-yellow flecks in the retina from the macula to the midperiphery; fluorescein angiography presenting with a typical dark choroid; and normal to subnormal ERG results." BCVA=0.05/ 0.05
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: p.P2097S; c.3468C>G p.(Tyr1156*) phase unknown
ClinVar: 2202780;
CAID: CA341277622;
SupplementalData: supplementary table S4 has phenotype information
Peripheral venous blood was obtained from 24 clinically diagnosed Korean STGD patients, followed by extraction of genomic DNAs. Using exome sequencing we investigated gene mutations for the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette, subfamily A, member 4 (ABCA4) elongation of very-long-chain fatty acids 4 (ELOVL4), and prominin 1 (PROM1), and confirmed gene mutations by the direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products.
Paper is said to contain this variant based on LOVD entry, but this paper is not publicly available. Requested from library. Annotation on stable PDF. No individual phenotype provided
Supplementary File pnas.1909378117.sd01.xlsx (5.4MB, xlsx)
This variant was listed in a supplemental table under "autosomal recessive variants" but there are no patient IDs to be able to know if the person who had this variant had another variant. There was also no phenotype information provided
STGD-4F30ABCA4c.4555delAp.T1519Rfs*5HeteroARN/AN/AN/AN/AYABCA4c.6397T>Cp.C2133RHeteroD1D2D322.80Y
Case#: Sporadic Patient #4, female, Chinese, 30yo at report
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: n/a, sporadic case
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: WES with Sanger sequencing confirmation
PreviouslyPublished: no
Variant: c.4555delA p.(T1519Rfs*5); c.6397T>C p.(C2133R)
ClinVar: 2021273; 2733921
CAID: CA341277387; CA645372203
SupplementalData:
10-year-old girl
Case#: Patient female, 10y, ethnicity not reported
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt disease (STGD1), early onset
FamilyInfo: autosomal recessive inheritance; co-segregation of variants in parents (each heterozygous). Pedigree shown in Figure 1A. One unaffected sibling reported.
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007663, HP:0007754, HP:0002587, HP:0030636, HP:0000548
CaseHPOFreeText: early-onset visual decline (age 7), symmetric disease in both eyes, hyperautofluorescent ring surrounding macular atrophy, lipofuscin accumulation, photoreceptor degeneration.
CaseNotHPOs: HP:0007707
CaseNotHPOFreeText: normal anterior segment on slit lamp exam; no external ocular abnormalities reported.
Genotyping Method: Sanger sequencing confirmation; variant identification likely via next-generation sequencing (not explicitly stated).
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: ABCA4 NM_000350.2: c.6817-713A>G; c.3259G>A (p.Glu1087Lys)
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA2837995439, CA227097
SupplementalData: phenotype and validation data in Figures 1–5 and Supplemental Figures S1–S5
Panel-based NGS testing was performed for all recruited patients for the identification of disease-causing variants. All patients recruited in this present cohort had two allele disease-causing ABCA4 variants confirmed according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines (Supplementary Table S2).
Case#: Family F23 Patient P26, 42yo
DiseaseAssertion: MD-C
FamilyInfo: family f23
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.4555del(;)6119G>A genotype b (a patient harboring a severe/null variant and a missense or in-frame insertion/deletion variant)
CAID: CA232815
SupplementalData: table s2
Supplement 4Click here for additional data file.(480K, pdf)Supplement 5Click here for additional data file.(460K, pdf)
This variant was found in 92 of the 670 alleles in this cohort (Supplement 4). Supplement 5 has the individuals listed with their genotypes, but only mentions variants that were classified as VUS/LP/P, so it is unknown which individuals specifically had this variant or which other variants they also had.
19 F 16 c.5714+5G>A c.4469G>A
Case#: Patient 19, female, age 16
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: diagnosis of autosomal recessive STGD based on the pedigree and clinical phenotype of fleck deposits with or without genetic testing
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000608, HP:0000007, HP:0030610, HP:0030500
CaseHPOFreeText: Macular degeneration. autosomal recessive, Photoreceptor outer segment loss on macular OCT, Yellow/white lesions of the macula
CaseNotHPOs: n/a
CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a
Genotyping Method: n/a
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: Allele 1: NM_000350.3:c.5714+5G>A Allele 2: NM_000350.3:c.4469G>A
ClinVar: Allele 1: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.5714+5G>A Allele 2: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.4469G>A (p.Cys1490Tyr)
CAID: Allele 1: CA227338 Allele 2: CA227198
SupplementalData: composite mask analysis shown in figure 3 for patient 19, show large areas of matched degeneration and isolated IS/OS loss
Table S9. List of unique causative variants detected in 858 STGD probands mmc8.xlsx (19.3KB, xlsx) Table S11. STGD1 cases with at least two (likely) causal ABCA4 variants mmc9.xlsx (39.6KB, xlsx)
Case#: DNAID 072962/Pat272, male
DiseaseAssertion: STGD1
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "In classic STGD1, loss of central vision starts around the second decade of life, but both early- and late-onset subtypes have been extensively described." No patient-specific details provided
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: smMIPs sequencing of the complete ABCA4 locus
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.6416G>A (p.Arg2139Gln); c.6445C>T (p.Arg2149Ter)
CAID: CA956878
SupplementalData: tables s9 and s11
Table S9. List of unique causative variants detected in 858 STGD probands mmc8.xlsx (19.3KB, xlsx) Table S11. STGD1 cases with at least two (likely) causal ABCA4 variants mmc9.xlsx (39.6KB, xlsx)
Case#: DNAID 072284/Pat191, female
DiseaseAssertion: STGD1
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: "In classic STGD1, loss of central vision starts around the second decade of life, but both early- and late-onset subtypes have been extensively described." No patient-specific details provided
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: smMIPs sequencing of the complete ABCA4 locus
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.1519G>T (p.Asp507Tyr); c.4139C>T (p.Pro1380Leu) phase not confirmed
CAID: CA958508
SupplementalData: tables s9 and s11
14-year-old patient
Case#: 14-year-old, female, asian (Chinese) patient
DiseaseAssertion: ABCA-4 associated retinal dystrophy
FamilyInfo: The effect of the deep intronic variant on splicing was validated by a minigene assay in our previous study (Tian et al., 2022). Co-segregation analysis result exhibited that the variant c.1222C>T p.(Arg408Ter) came from the female parent, and the deep intronic variant c.2919-884G>T p.[Phe973LeufsTer3,=] from the male parent
ParentalTesting: Co-segregation analysis result exhibited that the variant c.1222C>T p.(Arg408Ter) came from the female parent, and the deep intronic variant c.2919-884G>T p.[Phe973LeufsTer3,=] from the male parent
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000556
CasePhenotypeFreeText: ABCA4-associated retinal dystrophy
CaseNotHPOs: NR
CaseNotPhenotypeFreeText: NR
CasePreviousTesting:NR
GenotypingMethod:
In the present study, we recruited a 14-year-old female patient diagnosed with ABCA4-RD. Biallelic variants were found in this patient, including the nonsense variant c.1222C>T p.(Arg408Ter) detected by Sanger sequencing and the deep intronic variant c.2919-884G>T p.[Phe973LeufsTer3,=] identified by next-generation sequencing.
We isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from the patient’s peripheral venous blood and introduced three episomal plasmids containing transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, LIN28, c-MYC, KLF4, and SV40LT into PBMCs. The reprogramming iPSC line, named BIOi003-A, showed stabilized morphology (Fig. 1A) and a normal karyotype in culture (Fig. 1B). Then, the endogenous expression of two pluripotent biomarkers, POU5F1 and NANOG, was detected (Table 2). The expression levels were compared with human embryonic stem cell line H1(hESC-H1) and mesenchymal stem cell line P3 (MSC-P3) by qRT-PCR (Fig. 1C). Surface markers SSEA4 and TRA-1–81 were analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 1D). the ABCA4 compound heterozygous variants c.(1222C>T;2919-884G>T) p.[Arg408Ter;Phe973LeufsTer3,=] were verified by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1E). Furthermore, the teratoma assay exhibited the differentiation capacity of this iPSC line in vivo (Fig. 1F). Short tandem repeats (STR) analysis exhibited that the PBMCs and the iPSC line came from the same patient. PCR proved negative for mycoplasma contamination
Variant: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.1222C>T (p.Arg408Ter) and NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.2919G>T (p.Leu973Phe)
LegacyVariant: c.1222C>T (p.Arg408Ter) and c.2919G>T (p.Leu973Phe)
ClinVar: 99035 and NR
CAID: CA179692 and CA341275270
gnomeAD: 1:94544895 G / A and NR
MultipleGeneVariants: No
PreviouslyPublished:No
AdditionalInfo: One patient was homozygous at the ABCA-4 gene, so there is information about both variants in one annotation because there is only one patient.
In 20 patients (19 STGD and 1 CRD), 18 different genotypes were identified (Table 1). Except p.Arg187His and p.Tyr954Ser variants, the rest of changes were previously reported as disease-associated allele. 14 The p.Arg187His and p.Tyr954Ser variants were not found in 100 ethnically matched control chromosomes. All the mutations identified in the 20 patients except one were detected by HRM for sensitivity of 95%; however, only 16 variants were identified by dHPLC for sensitivity of 80%. Table 1. View Table Mutations AnalyzedTable 1. Mutations Analyzed Family Exon Genotype Mutation Detected by dHPLC Mutation Detected by HRM Nucleotide Change Amino Acid Change ARDM-167 5 c.560G>A p.Arg187His No Yes ARDM-257 5 c.560G>A p.Arg187His No Yes ARDM-164 6 c.700C>T p.Gln234X Yes Yes ARDM-135 8 c.1029_1030insT p.Asn344fsX Yes No ARDM-240 15 c.2285C>A p.Ala762Glu Yes Yes ARDM-248 19 c.2861A>C p.Tyr954Ser Yes Yes ARDM-90 — IVS21-2A>T — Yes Yes ARDM-40 27 c.3943C>T p.Gln1315X Yes Yes ARDM-158 30 c.4537delC p.Gln1513fsX1525 Yes Yes ARDM-38 33 c.4739delT p.Leu1580fs Yes Yes ARDM-163 36 c.5172G>T p.Trp1724Cys Not Yes ARDM-197 36 c.5172G>T p.Trp1724Cys Yes Yes ARDM-181 — IVS38+5G>A — Yes Yes ARDM-125 40 — p.KNLFA1876dup Yes Yes ARDM-183 43 c.5929G>A(False −) p.Gly1977Ser(False −) Yes Yes ARDM-146 44 c.6140T>A p.lle2047Asn Yes Yes ARDM-174 — IVS44+2T>A — Yes Yes ARDM-247 47 c.6410G>A p.Cys2137Tyr* Yes Yes ARDM-84 47 c.6410G>A p.Cys2137Tyr† No Yes ARDM-225 48 c.6559C>T p.Gln2187X Yes Yes Previously unreported mutations are shown in bold. * Mutation in heterozygous. † Mutation in homozygous. Homozygous sequence alteration (p.Cys2137Tyr) could be identified from wild-type by HRM analyses (Fig. 1). In contrast, dHPLC did not distinguish any homozygous mutation, except when we mixed it, in a 1:1 proportion, with a previously sequenced wild-type sample at the end of each PCR session and before heteroduplex formation.
Case#: Family MD-0247/ARDM-247 Proband, 12yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: AR cone rod dystrophy
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: STGD diagnosed based on "bilateral central vision loss; fundus presenting with a beaten-bronze appearance and/or the presence of orange-yellow flecks in the retina from the posterior pole to the mid-periphery; fluorescein angiography showing typical dark choroid; and normal to subnormal electroretinogram (ERGs)." VA loss, VF loss, BCVA=0.05/0.1, cone-pattern on ERG
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
PreviouslyPublished: PMID: 19028736
Variant: c.6410G>A (p.Cys2137Tyr); c.3386G>T (p.Arg1129Leu) found by ABCR400 + dHPLC + HRM
ClinVar: 2202779
CAID: CA341277358
SupplementalData: n/a
5137 Mo 25 3/10 / FC ND / c.32T>C(1) ND/p.Leu11Pro
Case#: Maia-Lopes Family 17 Proband 5137, Portuguese, 25yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: Family 17
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: moderate central fundus changes, vision: 3/10 / FC
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: ABCR400 microarray, dHPLC
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: ND / c.32T>C(1); ND/p.Leu11Pro
ClinVar: 99217
CAID: CA227106
SupplementalData: n/a
1654G→A V552I 0 0 2 This study
This variant was found in 2 control alleles. No additional details
Case 2
Case#:2, 29-year-old woman
DiseaseAssertion:NR
FamilyInfo:NR
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText:decreased ability to focus, increasing difficulty to adapt in the dark, normal visual acuity in both eyes (logMar BCVA OD/OS: 0.02), PERG responses were diminished in both eyes.
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
Genotyping Method: ”Analysis of the ABCA4 gene”
PreviouslyPublished:No
Variant:NM_000350.3:c.1805G>A, NM_000350.3:c.6079C>T
ClinVar: 99085, 7882
CAID:CA226933, CA119129
SupplementalData:
Supplementary data. bjophthalmol-2018-312064supp004.pdf
This variant is found on pg 2 in proband 11019. Compound heterozygous for c.4532C>A, (p.Pro1511His). JHU institute (US). Said to have Stargardt based on the following criteria: "(1) patients (at least 6 years old) with at least two ABCA4 variants or one ABCA4 variant associated with a typical STGD1 phenotype and (2) presence of a well-defined atrophic lesion with/without flecks at the most recent visit of at least 300 µm in diameter (the total area of all lesions <12 mm2)." No additional details provided
Supplementary data. bjophthalmol-2018-312064supp004.pdf
This variant is found on pg 21 in proband 13047. Compound heterozygous for c.5882G>A p.Gly1961Glu. Said to have Stargardt based on the following criteria: "(1) patients (at least 6 years old) with at least two ABCA4 variants or one ABCA4 variant associated with a typical STGD1 phenotype and (2) presence of a well-defined atrophic lesion with/without flecks at the most recent visit of at least 300 µm in diameter (the total area of all lesions <12 mm2)." No additional details provided
Microarray-based mutation analysis of the ABCA4 gene in Spanish patients with Stargardt disease: evidence of a prevalent mutated allele
PMID: 16917483
Gene: ABCA4
Disease: Stargardt
This paper was referenced by PMID: 23755871 as containing variant c.6410G>A (p.Cys2137Tyr), but this variant foes not appear to be in the text or tables
13/8 35 0.017 163 0 – 3 – 3 4 L541P R1098C
Case#: Patient 13, 35yo
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: Family 8
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: Visual acuity=0.017. OCT ft (μm)=163. MP (dB)=0. Fundus=3(extensive atrophic-appearing RPE changes). ERG=3(abnormal responses involving both rods and cones). mfERG=4(subnormal mfERG in the entire test field (0°–30°) plus pathologic Ganzfeld ERG).
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: PCR of coding regions, intron/exon boundaries, and 5′ and 3′ regions of ABCA4; Standard cycle-sequencing reactions with BigDye Terminator
PreviouslyPublished:
Variant: L541P; R1098C
CAID: CA226911;
SupplementalData: n/a
G818EER51 ± 1363 ± 5111 ± 825 ± 312 ± 32Moderate/Severe
When expressed in transfected HEK293T cells and quantified by Western blotting, this variant was in the range of 40%-52%. This variant has a basal ATPase activity of 63% ± 5% compared to WT (100%) and was categorized as class 2 (partial reduction in expression and basal ATPase activity that was modestly stimulated by N-Ret-PE) with a moderate/severe predicted severity.
3 39 6/6 1 RCD Val552Ile 6/6
Case#: Case 3, 39yo
DiseaseAssertion: BEM, RCD
FamilyInfo: n/a
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: a ring of increased AF surrounding decreased foveal AF, visual acuity= 6/6, 6/6
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: acquired toxic aetiology
GenotypingMethod: The entire coding sequence (50 exons), including exon–intron boundaries, of the ABCA4 gene of each patient was screened using single‐stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and direct sequencing.
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: Val552Ile heterozygous
CAID: CA239745
SupplementalData: n/a
Family 1ABCA4c.[1957C>T];[4604dup]M7.06.0PV, PP0.200.15MA, TPOD, ARAMA, TPOD, ARANormalReduced
Case#: Family 1 proband, male, 6yo at onset, Chinese
DiseaseAssertion: CORD
FamilyInfo: heterozygous unaffected parents
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000613, HP:0000505, HP:0007401, HP:0012511, HP:0008043, HP:0000512
CaseHPOFreeText: ERG responses from cones reduced, BVA=0.20/0.15
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.[1957C>T];[4604dup] phase confirmed
ClinVar: n/a
CAID: CA645372205
SupplementalData:
both the P and PV ABCA4 variants exhibited a dramatically reduced basal ATPase activity (∼30% of WT ABCA4), which did not increase upon the addition of all-trans-retinal. Thus, ABCA4 variants carrying the P mutation were functionally impaired.
ATPase activity in HEK293 cells showed severely reduced basal ATPase activity, ∼30% of WT ABCA4, indicating that this variant impacts protein function (PS3_Supporting; PMIDs).
Amounts of A2E in the eyes of Abca4PV/PV, Abca4−/− and WT mice at the ages of 1, 3, 6, 12 and 15 months were quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Fig. 9B). Mice were raised under a regular 12-h light (∼10 lux)/12-h dark cycle. Age-dependent A2E accumulation was noted in all genotypes, with Abca4PV/PV and Abca4−/− mice accumulating about 5-fold more A2E than WT mice. No statistically significant differences in A2E accumulation were found between Abca4PV/PV and Abca4−/− animals.
Autofluorescence and A2E production was measured in transgenic mice and showed loss of function of ABCA4 protein indicating that this variant impacts protein function (PS3; PMIDs).
024 m Caucasian STGD ABCA4 NM_000350.2 c.[6601_6602delAG];[=], c.[4253+43G>A];[=] p.Arg2201fs* p.Ile1377Hisfs*3 Not found 0.004694 AR Pathogenic Pathogenic 2 [36] [19]
Case#: Patient 24, male, Caucasian, onset at 50yo, Germany
DiseaseAssertion: STGD
FamilyInfo: co-segregation of variant in 2 family members (siblings) but they do not appear to be affected based on pedigree
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030528, HP:0000505, HP:0012508, HP:0001105, HP:0025148
CaseHPOFreeText: progressive paracentral scotoma OU, progressive visual impairment OU (blurry vision). BCVA: OD-0.1, OS-0.22. Tension: 13mmHg/14mmHg. FAF: bilateral hyperautofluorescent macular and peripapillary spots, few spots of paracentral retinal atrophy (foveal sparing). Autofluorescence and deposits (severity): deposits medium, atrophy low. OCT: hyperreflective spots, partially invading into the outer retina, partly confluent lesions of cRORA, foveal sparing, degenerative intraretinal fluid. Central macular thickness: 328µm/322µm. Macular volume: 9.31mm³/9.00mm³. mfERG: bilateral amplitudes in normal range, slight relative reduction in the paracentral areas. Fluorescein angiography: bilateral dark choroid, mild paracentral dye pooling in the late phase. Color vision: Inconspicuous. Clinical examination: pattern-like distribution of the lesions.
CaseNotHPOs: n/a
CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a
GenotypingMethod: WES, in-house RD-associated gene panel including 619 candidates and disease-associated genes
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: ABCA4 NM_000350.2 c.[6601_6602delAG] (p.Arg2201fs);[=], c.[4253+43G>A] p.Ile1377Hisfs3;[=]
CAID: CA227421; CA227172
SupplementalData: phenotype and segregation info in supplemental data (table s1, figure s1)
Analysis of the rates of hydrolysis of ATP and CTP in the mutant protein demonstrated that they were significantly reduced (Fig. 3). The results presented in Fig. 3A indicated that the ATPase function of G863A mutant protein was reduced ∼3-fold as compared with NBD1wt, indicating ∼70% of inhibition of the ATPase activity. TheVmax (ATPase) for G863A mutant was 128 pmol/min/mg and that of the wild-type NBD1 was 584 pmol/min/mg (Table II). A time-course analysis of ATP hydrolysis using 2.5 μg of protein (Fig. 3C) suggested the actual rates of ATP hydrolysis were attenuated 3-fold as a consequence of the mutation. We have earlier reported that the NBD1wt has significantly higher CTPase than ATPase activity (1717.Biswas, E.E.Biochemistry. 2001; 40:8181-8187CrossrefScopus (25)PubMedGoogle Scholar). However, in the mutant G863A protein the CTPase activity was reduced (Fig.3B). In this case, the CTP hydrolysis of G863A was reduced to ∼30% of the activity of NDB1wt. The Vmaxfor G863A mutant was 104 pmol/min/mg and that of the wild-type NBD1 was 376 pmol/min/mg (Table II).
ATPase function of G863A mutant protein was reduced ∼3-fold as compared with NBD1wt, indicating ∼70% of inhibition of the ATPase activity (Fig. 3). TheVmax (ATPase) for G863A mutant was 128 pmol/min/mg and that of the wild-type NBD1 was 584 pmol/min/mg (Table II).
Screening of reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 for Stargardt (STGD) The disease prevalence of STGD is estimated as 1 in 10000 individuals4. It has been estimated that about 70% of STGD patients carry variants in ABCA45. Therefore, this represents the scenario of a recessive disease with a relatively homogeneous genetic cause. We screened 945 reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 genes collected in HGMD. Among them, 11 variants are likely benign, as their population AF in is higher than 0.7% (1/20000‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√)<math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="M11"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>20000</mn></mrow></msqrt></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math>, the cutoff based on STGD disease prevalence, therefore were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 934 variants were subjected to our test model. As a result, 26 variants with the AF in the range of 0.46% to 0.03% were identified as likely benign (Binomial test1, Bonferroni correction p-value ≤ 0.05/934 and test2 Bonferroni correction p-value > 0.05/934) (Figure 3A).
This variant is reported in Table S6, but only location, predictions, frequencies, etc are reported for it, not cases.
Screening of reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 for Stargardt (STGD) The disease prevalence of STGD is estimated as 1 in 10000 individuals4. It has been estimated that about 70% of STGD patients carry variants in ABCA45. Therefore, this represents the scenario of a recessive disease with a relatively homogeneous genetic cause. We screened 945 reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 genes collected in HGMD. Among them, 11 variants are likely benign, as their population AF in is higher than 0.7% (1/20000‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√)<math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="M11"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>20000</mn></mrow></msqrt></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math>, the cutoff based on STGD disease prevalence, therefore were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 934 variants were subjected to our test model. As a result, 26 variants with the AF in the range of 0.46% to 0.03% were identified as likely benign (Binomial test1, Bonferroni correction p-value ≤ 0.05/934 and test2 Bonferroni correction p-value > 0.05/934) (Figure 3A).
This variant is reported in Table S6, but only location, predictions, frequencies, etc are reported for it, not cases.
ABCA4
Unable to find this variant in the text or supplementary even though Mastermind says it's in supplemental MOESM1
The STGD patient from Family 12 is a compound heterozygous with p.Val931Met and a novel nonsense mutation at exon 33 (p.Glu1574X; Figure 1B). Disease onset for this patient was at age 43. Ophthalmic examination revealed moderate central retinal changes, decreased mfERG responses exclusively in the central 15 degrees, and decreased visual acuity.
Case#: Family 12 Proband, male, 43yo at onset, Portuguese
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: no affected family members in pedigree (Fig. 1)
CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007663
CaseHPOFreeText: "The criteria for STGD phenotype included bilateral central vision loss and pigmentary macular lesions, normal caliber of retinal vessels, absence of pigmented bone spicules, and compatibility with recessive mode of inheritance." Moderate central retinal changes, decreased mfERG responses exclusively in the central 15 degrees
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: p.Glu1574X; p.Val931Met. Several other polymorphisms also reported. ABCR400 gene chip microarray, DHPLC
ClinVar: 1460063
CAID: CA341283936
SupplementalData: n/a
Mutation scanning and direct DNA sequencing of all 50 exons of ABCR were completed for 150 families segregating recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). ABCR variations were identified in 173 (57%) disease chromosomes, the majority of which represent missense amino acid substitutions. These ABCR variants were not found in 220 unaffected control individuals (440 chromosomes) but do cosegregate with the disease in these families with STGD1, and many occur in conserved functional domains. Missense amino acid substitutions located in the amino terminal one-third of the protein appear to be associated with earlier onset of the disease and may represent misfolding alleles. The two most common mutant alleles, G1961E and A1038V, each identified in 16 of 173 disease chromosomes, composed 18.5% of mutations identified. G1961E has been associated previously, at a statistically significant level in the heterozygous state, with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Clinical evaluation of these 150 families with STGD1 revealed a high frequency of AMD in first- and second-degree relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that compound heterozygous ABCR mutations are responsible for STGD1 and that some heterozygous ABCR mutations may enhance susceptibility to AMD.
Annotating here since the full text is a PDF.
Case#: Family AR321 proband, US, 6yo at onset
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo: proband and two other siblings are affected
CasePresentingHPOs: The essential and defining features of STGD were (1) pedigrees with at least one living affected individual compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance; (2) an ophthalmoscopically characteristic retinal disorder in families with both parents living; (3) bilateral central visual loss with both “beaten metal” elliptical foveal dystrophy and temporal pallor of the optic discs, documented by retinal color photography, with or without yellow-pigment epithelial flecks in the macular and/or retinal “near periphery”; and (4) the characteristic fluorescein angiographic feature of a dark choroid (Blacharski 1988).
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText: (1) evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance; (2) any history of night blindness, loss of peripheral vision, or "retinitis pigmentosa"; (3) cataracta complicata or cells in the vitreous; (4) substantially abnormal electroretinographic or electrooculographic responses; (5) no fluorescein angiography performed or no dark choroid documented; (6) neurological disease (including loss of cognition or seizures); 7) drug exposures (especially to antimalarial and agents known to cause crystalline retinopathies); or (8) any "atypical" maculopathies in which a unique diagnosis of STGD could not be established.
PreviouslyPublished: PMID: 8533764
Variant: c.3113C>T p.A1038V; c.1715G>C p.R572P . Heteroduplex and SSCP analyses were used to screen the 50 exons of ABCA4. Linkage analysis and haplotype analysis were previously performed
ClinVar: 99073
CAID: CA226919
SupplementalData: n/a
JB260 Stargardt ABCA4 c.6119G>A p.Arg2040Gln rs148460146 Zernant et al (2014)50 c.2879del p.Ala960Aspfs*17 N/A
Case#: Bryant Subject JB260, US
DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs: "Stargardt disease is a childhood-onset macular degeneration and is most commonly caused by mutations in ABCA4. Characteristic yellow flecks are typically seen under the macula during a fundus exam."
CaseHPOFreeText:
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: WES; previously screened using arrayed primer extension (APEX) multigene panels for the relevant disease and no disease-causing variants had been identified; PCR and Sanger for verification
PreviouslyPublished: n/a
Variant: c.6119G>A p.Arg2040Gln; c.2879del p.Ala960Aspfs*17
CAID: CA232815
SupplementalData:
See Supplementary Table S2 for a complete genotypic glossary of the cohort.
Case#: Patients were identified from the inherited retinal disease (IRD) database at UC San Diego (UCSD).
DiseaseAssertion: RP with macular edema
FamilyInfo:
CasePresentingHPOs:
CaseHPOFreeText: Dx of RP based on "a history of progressive peripheral vision loss or nyctalopia, and ocular examination findings of RP including bone spicule pigmentation, disc pallor and attenuated vessels and genetic confirmation."
CaseNotHPOs:
CaseNotHPOFreeText:
GenotypingMethod: Next-generation sequencing (NGS), exome sequencing, and/or targeted Sanger sequencing were the primary genetic testing approaches.
PreviouslyPublished: PMID:10206579 is referenced but it seems a reference to the variant and not the proband
Variant: c.6383A>G (p.His2128Arg); c.3G>T (p.Met1?). phase unknown
ClinVar: 99455
CAID: CA227399
SupplementalData: Variant is found in table S2