Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Pedigo et al, apply statistical modeling to a complete brain nanoscale network - a synaptic connectome of an insect brain: the Drosophila larva. They use a series of approaches to explore the symmetry of the right and left hemispheres. First, they compare network densities and find significant differences between the two hemispheres, with the right hemisphere having a higher density. They further grouped neurons by cell type to determine whether the differences were distributed across the entire brain or to specific connections and find the differences involving neurons in the learning and memory center, the mushroom body. Finally, they explored different definitions of an edge by using different thresholds either based on synaptic counts or proportions of synaptic inputs to a downstream neuron and found that when using the proportion of synaptic inputs, removing fewer edges (compared to when using synaptic count) was necessary to achieve left and right symmetry. The presentation of the methodology and writing is very clear and effective and is accessible to scientists from various backgrounds: both biologists and theoreticians. The methodology and approach used in this paper on the assessment of the degree of bilateral symmetry will serve as a basis for comparing networks and connectomes in general by providing a clear framework for statistical network modeling. This work is particularly timely as an increasing number of synaptic connectomes is being generated giving opportunities for various connectome comparisons. It will be of interest to neuroscientists in order to address various biological questions: to evaluate the degree of inter-individual variability/stereotypy of connectivity in the brain and how it relates to behavioral variability/stereotypy, to characterize changes in network connectivity due to different diseases, etc.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Tornini et al. investigate the function of long non-coding RNAs in vivo. In the manuscript, the authors show that two of these molecules linc-mipep and linc-wrb encode for a micropeptide that regulates zebrafish behavior. In the absence of this peptide, zebrafish larvae show dysregulation of NMDA receptor and glucocorticoid receptor-mediated signaling and immediate early gene induction. Given the homology of linc-mipep and linc-wrb encoded peptides with homology to chromosome binding and chromatin unwinding domain of HMGN1 the authors explore the altered chromatin accessibility in the mutant animals. This analysis revealed a broad dysregulation of 3D chromatin structure with some enrichment at loci regulating the expression of immediate early response genes. Finally, single cell analysis revealed that oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and cerebellar granule cells are more affected in the mutants.

This work represents a technical tour-de-force with extensive genomics data to characterize the molecular phenotype of linc-mipep and linc-wrb loss of function. This data show interesting findings in part consistent with the behavioral phenotype observed.

The manuscript provides compelling evidence that micropeptides encoded by what were previously identified as long non-coding RNAs have a precise biological function.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study presents a useful study, proposing the modelling of Buruli ulcer occurrence in humans based on detection of M. ulcerans in Australia. The data were collected and analyzed using solid and validated methodology and can be used as a starting point for the elucidation of M. ulcerans transmission in Australia.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Francou et al. examine the dynamics of cell ingression at the primitive streak during mouse gastrulation and correlate this with the localization of elements of the apical Crumbs complex and the actomyosin cytoskeleton. Using time-lapse live imaging, they show that cells at the primitive streak ingress in a stochastic manner, by constricting their apical surface through a ratcheting shrinkage of individual junctions. Meticulous evaluation of immunofluorescent staining for many elements of the actomyosin contractile process as well as junctional and apical domain elements reveals anisotropic localization of Crumbs2, ZO1, and ppMLC. In addition, the localization of two groups of proteins showed a close correlation - actomyosin regulators and apical and junctional components - but there was a lack of correlation of localization of these two groups of proteins to each other. The localization of actomyosin and its activity, was altered and more homogeneous in Crumbs2-/- embryos, and there was a significant decrease in aPKC and Rock1. The authors conclude from these observations that Crumbs2 regulates anisotropic actomyosin contractility to promote apical constriction and cell ingression.

The strengths of this manuscript are the very detailed observations on the process of apical constriction and the meticulous evaluation of the localization of the many proteins likely to be involved in the process. While many of the general observations are not new, Francou et al. provide a much richer understanding of this process, as well as a paradigm with which to evaluate the effects of mutations on the gastrulation process. The figures are beautiful, clear, and informative, and support the conclusions made by the authors. The data provide a very compelling picture of both the dynamics of cell behavior and the anisotropies in protein localization associated with it.

However, much of the Crumbs2 mutant phenotype is not sufficiently explained by the authors' data or conclusions. First, the loss of Crumbs2 does not prevent ingression, as there are mesoderm cells evident between the epiblast and endoderm (Ramkumar et al., 2016, Xiao et al., 2011). There are certainly fewer, and the biggest effect appears to be during the elongation of the axis from E7.75 onward and not during the earlier migratory period (E6.5-E7.75) according to data from both previously published work (Xiao et al., 2011; Ramkumar et al., 2015, 2016) and the data presented here. Nor does the loss of Crumbs2 prevent apical constriction. Ramkumar et al. in their 2016 paper show by live imaging that the major effect of the Crumbs2 mutation is to prevent the cells from detaching from the epithelium, but that the apical domain does undergo constriction, leading to many elongated flask-shaped cells still attached at the apical end. These observations do not fit well with the model proposed by the authors of Crumbs2 regulating anisotropic actomyosin contractility to promote apical constriction and suggest a more complicated story. However, the complications of the Crumbs2 mutant do not detract from the value of the basic observations presented in this manuscript, which are solid and well-documented, and will be a valuable resource for the field.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Sapiro et al sought to develop technology for a transcriptomic analysis of B. burgdorferi directly from infected ticks. The methodology has exciting implications to better understand pathogen RNA profiles during specific infection timepoints, even beyond the Lyme spirochete. The authors demonstrate successful sequencing of the B. burgdorferi transcriptome from ticks and perform mass spectrometry to identify possible tick proteins that interact with B. burgdorferi. This technology and first dataset will be useful for the field. The study is limited in that no transcripts/proteins are followed-up by additional experiments and no biological interactions/infectious-processes are investigated.

Critiques and Questions:

This study largely develops a method and is a resource article. This should be more directly stated in the abstract/introduction.

Details of the infection experiment are currently unclear and more information in the results section is warranted. State the species of tick and life-stage (larval vs nymphal ticks) used for experiments. For RNA-seq, are mice are infected and ticks are naïve or are ticks infected and transmitting Borrelia to uninfected mice?

What is the limit of detection for this protocol? Experimental data should be provided about the number of B. burgdorferi required to perform this approach.

More information regarding RNA-seq coverage is required. Line 147-148 "read coverage was sufficient"; what defines sufficient? Browser images of RNA-seq data across different genes would be useful to visualize the read coverage per gene. What is the distribution of reads among tRNAs, mRNAs, UTRs, and sRNAs?

My lab group was excited about the data generated from this paper. Therefore, we downloaded the raw RNA-seq data from GEO and ran it through our RNA-seq computational pipeline. Our QC analysis revealed that day 4 samples have a different GC% pattern and that a high percentage of E. coli sequences were detected. This should be further investigated and addressed in the paper: Are other bacteria being enriched by this method? Why would this be unique to day 4 samples? Does this affect data interpretation?

Comprehensive data comparisons of this study and others are warranted. While the authors note examples of known differentially expressed genes (like lines 235-241), how does this global study compare to other global approaches? Are new expression patterns emerging with this RNA-seq approach compared to other methods? What differences emerged from day 1 to day 4 ticks compared to differences observed in unfed to fed ticks or fed ticks to DMC experiments? Directly compare to the following studies (PMID: 11830671; PMID: 25425211; PMID: 36649080).

Details about the categorization of gene functions should be further described. The authors use functional analysis from Drechtrah et al., 2015, but that study also lacks details of how that annotation file was generated. Here, the authors have seemed to supplement the Drechtrah et al., 2015 list with bacteriophage and lipoprotein predictions - which are the same categories they focus their findings. Have they introduced a bias to these functional groups? While it can be noted that many lipoproteins are upregulated (or comment on specific genes classes), there are even more "unknown" proteins upregulated. I argue that not much can be inferred from functional analysis given the current annotation of the B. burgdorferi genome.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, the authors used an unbiased method to identify proteins from porcine oocyte extracts associated with permeabilised boar spermatozoa in vitro. The identification of the proteins is done by mass spectrometry. A previous publication of this lab validated the cell-free extract purification methods as recapitulating early events after sperm entry in the oocyte. This novel method with mammalian gametes has the advantage that it can be done with many spermatozoa at the time and allows the identification of proteins associated with many permeabilised boar spermatozoa at the time. This allowed the authors to establish a list of proteins either enriched or depleted after incubation with the oocytes extract or even only associated with spermatozoa after incubation for 4h or 24h. The total number of proteins identified in their test is around 2 hundred and with very few present in the sample only when spermatozoa were incubated with the extracts.

The list of proteins identified using this approach and these criteria provide a list of proteins likely associated with spermatozoa remnants after their entry and either removed or recruited for the transformation of spermatozoa-derived structures.

Using WB and histochemistry labelling of spermatozoa and early embryos using specific antibodies the authors confirmed the association/dissociation of 6 proteins suspected to be involved in autophagy.

While this unique approach provides a list of potential proteins involved in sperm mitochondria clearance it's (only) a starting point for many future studies and does not provide the demonstration that any of these proteins has indeed a role in the processes leading to sperm mitochondria clearance since the protein identified may also be involved in other processes going-on in the oocyte at this time of early development.

Concerning the localisation of the 6 proteins further analysed, the authors must add how much the presented picture represents the observed patterns. They must include the details on the fraction of spermatozoa and embryos displaying the presented pattern.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Mice and humans have two Cylicin genes (X-linked Cylicin 1 and the autosomal Cylicin 2) that encode cytoskeletal proteins. Cylicins are localized in the acrosomal region of round spermatids, yet they resemble a calyx component within the perinuclear theca of mature sperm nuclei. The function of Cylicins during this developmental stage of spermiogenesis (tail formation and head elongation/shaping) was not known. In this study, using CRISPR/Cas genome editing, the authors generated Cylc1-and Cylc2-knockout mouse lines to study the loss-of-function of each Cylicin or all together.

The major strengths of the study are the rigorous and comparative phenotypic analyses of all the combinatorial genotypes from the cross between the two mouse lines (Cylc1-/y, Cylc2-/-, Cylc1-/y Cylc2+/- and Cylc1-/y Cylc2-/-) at the levels of male fertility, cellular, and subcellular levels to support the conclusion of the study. While spermatogenesis appeared undisturbed, with germ cells of all types detected in the testis, low sperm counts in epididymis were observed. Mice were subfertile or infertile in a dose-dependent manner where fewer functional alleles had more severe phenotypes; the loss of Cylc2 was less tolerated than the loss of Cylc1. Thus, loss of Cylc1, and to an even greater extent, loss of Cylc2, leads to sperm structure anomalies and decrease sperm motility. Particularly, the sperm head and sperm head-neck region are affected, with calyx not forming in the absence of Cylicins, the acrosomal region being attached more loosely, and the sperm head itself appearing structurally rounder and shorter. Furthermore, manchette, which disassembles during spermiogenesis, persists in mature sperm of mice missing Cylc2. It is interesting that the study identifies a human male that has mutations in both CYLC1 and CYLC2 genes, and suffers from infertility, with similar motility and sperm structure defects compared to the mouse models. CYLC1 in the sperm from the infertile patient sperm is absent, providing evidence that in both rodents and primates, Cylicins are essential for male fertility.

The major weakness of the study is the less robust or absent of statistical analyses determining the statistical significance of some of the morphological phenotypes observed (e.g., the roundness/shortening of sperm head). Evolutionary analysis of two genes-while interesting- is less congruent with the other parts of the study and disrupts the overall flow of the functional studies. The authors show that the reason for the loss of Cylc2 being more severe is due to the higher conservation of Cylc2 compared to Cylc1 in rodents and primates, however, the conservation of these genes in other species is not discussed.

Overall, the work highlights the relevance and importance of Cylicins in male infertility and advances our understanding of perinuclear theca formation during spermiogenesis.

We have done wonders in becoming more direct, abbreviated and to the point but at the same time, have perhaps lost the essence of language, literature and words.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Gordon-Fennell et al., here present a relatively low-cost, open-source platform for head-fixed operant and consummatory behaviour, called OHRBETS (prounounced Orbitz). This setup provides a great advantage over other systems in that it enables the animal to perform a truly operant response (i.e.one that fulfills the criterion of bidirectionality) whilst head-fixed. The authors provide thorough evidence of the utility of this setup, showing that a number of behavioural paradigms can be performed whilst the animal is head-fixed, as well as consummatory behaviours, optogenetic manipulations, and photometry recordings. These findings will be of broad interest to neuroscientists across multiple fields.

Strengths:<br /> 1. The work presented here is extremely thorough and explores multiple different types of paradigms. There is a huge amount of data that will be immensely useful to individuals who hope to use this setup and build on these findings. The setup is generally well-explained.<br /> 2. The statistics reported are generally quite strong and the sample sizes are sufficient (although strictly speaking ANOVA and Tukey should not be used together - Tukey's 'overall' test is a test of the maximal comparison, if the maximal comparison is not significant then no other pairwise comparison will be).<br /> 3. The open-source nature of the system is a great advantage as the fact that it is relatively low cost (as long as a lab has access to a 3D printer). This and similar endeavours will promote equality throughout the field.<br /> 4. The response here is truly operant as it is bidirectional. In other words, the animal shows that its response is governed by the relation between that response and the outcome, not stimulus-outcome associations like so many other so-called 'operant' responses (e.g. licking, food approach behaviours). Here, the stimuli are kept constant but the animal will either turn the wheel to the left or to the right to receive the food, depending on which direction is reinforced. This means that the animal cannot be governed solely by a stimulus-outcome response as in Pavlovian conditioning, because their response would not flexibly reverse the way that it is shown to here, particularly in Figure 1Q.<br /> 5. The accumbens shell recordings are interesting data in their own right (i.e. not simply to demonstrate the viability of the system), particularly the heterogeneity of the responses in the medial and lateral shells. This could be interesting for future studies to follow up on.<br /> 6. The correlational data between the head-fixed and free-moving versions of paradigms is, for the most part, quite convincing.

Weaknesses<br /> 1. I was curious as to how novel this setup is. Although I do not do head-fixed research myself, I thought there were already some open-source, relatively cheap systems available. I'm not sure how the current setup differs from those already available. Personally, even if this system involves only the wheel turning, as this is a truly operant response, that is novel enough for my liking.<br /> 2. It would be useful to have a bit more detail in the manuscript (not just on the GitHub link - in supplemental material perhaps?) on how to build such a system, just to get a sense of how difficult building such a system might be and how many components it has.<br /> 3. I wasn't sure how to feel about the comparisons across experimental set-ups in Figures 2 and 3. Usually, these sorts of comparisons are not considered statistically valid due to the many variables that differ between set-ups. However, I do see that the intent here is a bit different - i.e. is to show that despite all these alterations in variables the behavioural outputs are still highly correlated. However, without commenting on this intent, I did find these comparisons a little jarring to read.<br /> 4. The only dataset I was not wholly convinced by was that in Figure 3 (real-time place preference and aversion). I think the authors have done the best job that they can of replicating such a procedure in a head-fixed mouse, but the head-fixed version is going to necessarily differ from the freely moving version in a fundamental way when the contextual cues and spatial navigation form part of the RTPT task. Giving a discrete cue, such as a tone, just is not a sufficient substitute for contextual cues, and I think the two types of task would engage fundamentally different brain cells and circuits (e.g. only the free-moving version is likely to engage place cells in the hippocampus).<br /> 5. Personally, I found having the statistics in a separate file confusing.<br /> 6. Line 589-594. Suggesting the medial/lateral shell recording results mean that the medial shell 'tracks value, and the range of values during the multi-spout consumption of gradients of NaCl is greater than the range of values during multi-spout consumption of gradients of sucrose" seems to engage in circular logic to me. That is, the authors should use behavioural data to infer what the animal is experiencing and whether it is a change in value, and/or a greater change in value during NaCl vs. sucrose consumption, and only then should they make an inference about what the larger medial shell response means.

Overall this is a very solid paper in which the authors achieve their aims of demonstrating an open-source system for head-fixed operant and consummatory behavioural assessment, that is successfully employed across a number of different behavioural assays as well as in conjunction with optogenetic manipulations and fibre photometry recordings.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This paper provides new technological approaches to expand adipocytes and aggregate them into structures that resemble fat. The authors use two cell types: a mouse cell line, as well as primary porcine cells. They demonstrate excellent lipid droplet accumulation in the mouse cell line however, this does not have translational relevance. So they go on to also perform those same experiments with the porcine cell line. The results are also encouraging especially if the cultivation is carried out over a period of 97 days.<br /> The authors also demonstrate similar mechanically mechanical properties of their cultivated fat to the native fat as well as the ability to aggregate it using two different approaches.

Overall, I think this is a thorough manuscript in the area of food bioengineering. The limitations remain the ability to fully remove FBS during this production process.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript represents a substantial and well-executed body of work that contributes new data on 32 hymenopteran genomes, systematically identifies viral endogenization and domestication events, and tests whether this phenomenon is more common in hymenopteran species with specific lifestyles, eg. endoparasitism. The authors developed a pipeline to identify endogenization that improves upon previously described pipelines and is more comprehensive for the identification of endogenization events from a variety of virus types. Significant findings include the identification of previously undocumented cases of viral endogenization in several hymenopteran species and also moderate statistical support for a higher rate of dsDNA virus endogenization and domestication in endoparasitoids.

1. The authors have tested whether the lifestyle of hymenopteran species (endoparasitism, ectoparasitism, or free-living) is related to the incidence of virus endogenization and domestication. Addressing this kind of question has only become possible with the availability of genome sequences from many taxa so that any results can be statistically supported by appropriate sample sizes. It appears that the authors have not included new genomic data from hymenopteran genomes that have been published since 2019, which are of similar or better quality than the data used in this manuscript. A number of taxa with endogenous viruses (and also without) have become available since then. The best solution would be for the authors to use their pipeline to incorporate the new data, which may have an impact on their findings and could even strengthen their conclusions about virus domestication being more common in endoparasitoids. If this is not possible, the authors should at least justify their decision not to include the most recent data and discuss how it could affect their results.

2. Please summarize in the main manuscript (results or discussion) what the limitations of the pipeline to detect EVEs and dEVEs are - what are important factors to consider, including the availability of closely related "free-living" viruses, and of closely related wasp species for dN/dS analyses.

3. In this manuscript, a description of the methods that precede the results would make it much easier to appreciate the results shown. It appears that this is allowed in cases where it makes sense, according to the author's instructions.

4. The sensitivity and specificity of methods analysis are commendable, as is the availability of substantial supplementary data and scripts on GitHub. However, more effort could be made to align numbers reported in the text and in figures so that readers can verify support for the conclusions described.

I remember in UNVI 101 the importance of knowing and understanding the many different perspectives that there are (artist, humanist...) Understanding the works of how different people view things is important.

Often time we are our own biggest bullies. Lemony Snicket once said, “If we wait until we're ready, we'll be waiting for the rest of our lives.”

I really appreciate that Lucas still self reflects on his past rather then forgetting about it completely and starting a new life.

I really like what Brian is saying here, It is really hard to see how easily our identities can change from one accident.

Zig Ziglar once said, "The first step in solving a problem is to recognize that it does exist."

I'm still very new to the UofA but it has been a great experience. Taking some Gen Ed's gave me a lot of really eye opening experiences. I took an Intro to African American Hip Hop and I enjoyed that course a lot. I've learned that Gen Ed's are usually the most fun courses where you will learn a lot.

The Lifelong learning assignment from UNVI 101 was a lot of fun making. I hope we can make something similar in 301.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The article from Salas Lucia et al addresses the distribution and transport of thyroid hormones (TH, including T4 and T3) in the adult brain. This is a complex and important question. Overall, the manuscript is difficult to follow as it jumps from one question (Dio2 polymorphism) to another (Mct8 function in the uptake of TH in neurons, and then the connection between TRH neurons and tanycytes), without deepening any aspect. There are, however, interesting findings in the article, but they should be confirmed by additional experiments.

Part 1: Type 2 deiodinase<br /> T4 entry is easier than T3 entry in the brain. However, type 2 deiodinase (Dio2 expressed mainly in glial cells) converts T4 to T3 and produces around 80% of the brain T3. In the introduction, the authors mention the controversial observation according to which a polymorphism of type 2 deiodinase, Thr92Ala-DIO2, is detrimental to the entry of TH into the brain. One of the associated issues, mentioned by the authors, is that some patients treated with TH have normalized circulating levels of hormones but still complain of fatigue, a typical feature of brain hypothyroidism.<br /> Experiment 1: Hippocampal Responsiveness to L-T4 is Impaired in the Ala92-Dio2 Mouse<br /> This first part is a continuation of a previous study published by the same authors. Here, they use transgenic mice with Ala92-Dio2 and Thr92-Dio2 to address possible differences in the TH response of several areas of the brain. The readout is a reporter mRNA, coming from an additional reporter transgene.<br /> Table I is supposed to clarify and summarize the results but brings confusion. The text says that table I supports the claim that "in the cerebellum Luc-mRNA was lower in the Ala92-Dio2 mice" whereas figure 1G does not show any difference. It is unclear whether Table I and figure 1 report the same data, and what the statistical tests are actually addressing (effect of genotype vs effect of treatment, whereas what matters here is only the interaction between genotype and treatment). Overall, it is not acceptable to present quantitative data without giving numbers, standard deviation, p-value, etc. as in Table I. Also, evaluating T3 signaling by only looking at the luc reporter and the Hprt housekeeping gene is not always sufficient (many T3 responsive genes can be found in the literature and more than one housekeeping gene should be used as a reference).<br /> Another important weakness is that the wild-type mice have a proline at position 92. Why not include them? In absence of structural prediction, one wonders whether the mouse models are relevant to the human situation and whether the absence of the proline reduces the enzymatic activity when substituted for an Ala or Thr. This might have been addressed in previous work, but the authors should explain.<br /> Experiment 2: Ala92-Dio2 Astrocytes Have Limited Ability to Activate T4 to T3<br /> Here, the authors use primary cell cultures from different areas of the brain to measure the in vitro conversion of T4 to T3 by Dio2. They find that hippocampus astrocytes are less active, notably if they come from Ala92-Dio2 mice.<br /> This part has the following weaknesses:<br /> - This result correlates with the results from Fig 1F however the difference between Ala92-Dio2 and Thr92-Dio2 is significant in vitro, but not in vivo. What matters is not the activity/astrocytes, but the total activity of the brain area, which depends on the number of astrocytes x individual activity. This is not measured.<br /> - What the authors called 'primary astrocytes' is an undefined mixed population of glial cells, (including radial glial cells, stem cells, ependymal cells, progenitor cells, etc...) that proliferated differentially for more than a week in culture, among which an unknown ratio expresses Dio2. The cellular model is thus poorly characterized, and the interpretation must be prudent.<br /> - Again, wild-type mice are not included.

Part 2: Neuronal response to T3 Involves MCT8 and Retrograde TH transport<br /> The authors next move to primary neuronal cultures, prepared from the fetal cortex which they grow in the microfluidic chamber to study axonal transport. This is a surprising move: the focus is not on Dio2 anymore, but on the MCT8 transporter, which is known in humans to play an important role to transfer TH into the brain. It is expressed mainly in glia, but also in neurons. They study the influence of endosomes and type 3 deiodinase on the trafficking and metabolism of TH.<br /> It would be useful to perform an experiment, in which radioactive T3 is introduced in the "wrong" side of the chamber, in an attempt to detect a possible anterograde transport. This would address the possibility that Mct8 also promotes efflux and control so that the chamber is not leaking.<br /> The authors use sylichristin as an inhibitor of Mct8, to demonstrate that transport is Mct8 dependent. They do not provide indications or references that would clearly indicate that this drug is a fully selective antagonist of Mct8 (but not of Oatp1c1, Mct10, Lat1, Lat2, etc., the other TH transporters). A good alternative would be to use Mct8 KO mice as controls.<br /> The B27 used in primary neuronal culture might contain TH. This is not easy to know, but at least some batches do.<br /> The presence of astrocytes, probably expressing Mct8 and Dio2 is inevitable in primary neuronal cultures, and is not mentioned, but might interfere with TH metabolism.

Part 3: T3 Transport Triggers Localized TH Signaling in the Mouse Brain<br /> The authors return to in vivo experiments, implanting T3 crystals, labeled or not with radioactive iodine. They do so in the hypothalamus, where they address the retrograde transport of TH in TRH neurons, and in the cortex, looking for contralateral transport.<br /> These data are the most difficult to interpret.<br /> - First, T3 is hydrosoluble and would probably migrate without active transport.<br /> - The authors do not demonstrate that these specific neuronal populations contain Mct8, and that these observations are connected to the previous in vitro observation (which used cortical neurons prepared from the fetus). The possibility that astrocytes are involved, as reported in the literature, is not considered.<br /> - Here again, using Mct8KO mice would greatly help to interpret the data. In particular, the experiments with cold T3 involve a 48h delay which is very long in comparison to the 30 minutes required for long-distance transfer of radioactive T3.<br /> Discussion<br /> Considering the diversity of questions that are addressed in the study, it is not surprising that the discussion is not covering all aspects. The authors implicitly consider that their conclusions can be extended to all neurons, while they use in their experiments a variety of different populations coming from either the fetal cortex, hippocampus, adult cortex, or hypothalamus. The claim that they discovered a mechanism applying to all neurons is not supported by the data. Some highly relevant literature is not cited. In particular:<br /> - Mct8 KO mice do not have a marked brain hypothyroidism (PMID: 24691440) which at least suggests that the pathway discovered by the authors can be efficiently compensated by alternative pathways.<br /> - Dio3 KO only increases T3 signaling in a few areas of the brain and only in the long term (PMID: 20719855).<br /> - Anterograde transport of T3 has been reported for some brainstem neurons (PMID: 10473259)

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This article is somewhat far afield from my typical line of research, but, to not bury the lede, I thought that this article makes an important point and is rigorously argued but could use some space to breathe in order to increase its impact.

More precisely, the authors perform a set of detailed calculations and simulations to show that the purported benefits of having non-linear morphogen decays are small near the source and decidedly reversed near the far end. I didn't have any specific concerns with these calculations, but one question I did have was if the typical context of morphogen gradients needs to be taken into account a little more (the paper doesn't really discuss how downstream morphogen gradients' noise might be affected by the structure of noise discussed here).

That said, I think that this is a rigorous submission.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study 1458 Enterobacterales isolates, derived from animals, waste-water and human bloodstream infections, were genetically characterized. This also yielded 3697 plasmids and many AMR genes.

All isolates were derived in a restricted geographical region and within a few years time. They defined "groups of near-identical plasmids" with plasmids derived from different genera, species, and clonal background; 8% of these groups contained plasmids from the different ecological niches and 35% of these cross-niche groups plasmids carried AMR genes. This fits with the concept of recent transfer of AMR plasmids between these ecological niches. Through detailed analyses they provide evidence that for E. coli, AMR dissemination between human and livestock-associated niches is most likely not the result of clonal spread but rather that plasmids transit between ecological niches.

Strengths

This is - to the best of my knowledge - one of the largest and most detailed studies elucidating the epidemiology of plasmids and AMR genes in different ecological niches.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors conducted an extensive characterization of canine H3N2 influenza viruses. By analyzing gene sequences of canine H3N2 influenza viruses isolated in their laboratory and those that are available in public databases, they identified various genetic clades (also somehow correlate with antigenic groups identified in serological assays) and human-like amino acid substitutions in these viruses, which indicated the evolution of these viruses towards potentially more adaptive to humans. By experiments with several selected canine H3N2 influenza isolates, they found that more recent canine H3N2 influenza viruses have acquired receptor specificity for both avian- and human-like receptors, enhanced low-pH stability and in vitro growth as well as improved replication and transmission in the dog and ferret models. They further identified amino acid substitutions underlying the improved transmissibility of these canine H3N2 influenza viruses. The study was well-designed and the conclusions in the manuscript are in general well supported by the experimental data. Findings from the study will certainly help understand the evolution of canine influenza viruses and assessing the risk posed by these viruses to public health.

Although the authors have identified some properties/molecular markers of canine H3N2 influenza viruses that highlight the potential for infecting humans, it needs to be cautious to emphasize the threat of these viruses to public health. One fact is that despite the increasing prevalence of these viruses in dogs and the close proximity between dogs and humans, there is so far no report of human infection with canine H3N2 influenza viruses. The authors are wished to discuss this in their manuscript so that the readers can have a more comprehensive understanding of their findings and the public health importance of canine influenza viruses.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, the authors have elegantly demonstrated the significance of asking fundamental questions in patient-derived models of patient-derived organoids (PDOs). This is especially relevant for studying complex cancers such as High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma (HSCOG). In addition to developing patient-derived organoids, this study has comprehensively examined transcriptomic, genomic, and single-cell data. In addition, based on this data, the authors have performed a complex drug sensitivity assay that further stratifies the PDOs into drug-sensitive and resistant categories. This approach would be central to identifying therapeutic regimens for difficult-to-treat cancers in the future.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The basis of this method is to clone guides into a Crispr-based editing plasmid, transfect pools into Leishmania, maintain them as episomes, then look at phenotypes. The guides are designed to cause editing that converts codons to stop codons, and the authors have designed a computational tool that enables the design of guides that work for the first half of each gene. Selection for the episome is necessary and editing efficiencies were variable (99% to 0%) depending on the species, being worst for L. major. The use of premature termination codons also clearly raises issues for false positives and negatives, especially as there is no evidence for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in Leishmania.

There are already two genome-wide screening options for Leishmania, so the advantages and disadvantages of the method proposed here need to be discussed in a much more detailed and balanced way.<br /> In the "LeishGEM" project (http://www.leishgem.org) all Leishmania mexicana genes will be knocked out and each KO will be bar-coded. At the end, 170 pooled populations of 48 bar-coded mutants will be publicly available. The only real reason the authors of the current paper give for not using this approach is that it is labour-intensive. However, LeishGEM is funded and underway, with several centres involved, so that argument is weak.<br /> There is also a preprint describing RNAi for functional analysis in Leishmania braziliensis.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This umbrella review aims to synthesize the results of systematic reviews of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various dimensions of cancer care from prevention to treatment. This is a challenging endeavour given the diversity of outcomes that can be assessed in cancer care.

Search and review methods are good and are in line with recommendations for umbrella reviews. Perhaps one weakness of the search strategy was that only one database (Pubmed) was searched. The search strategy appears adequate, though perhaps some more search terms related to reviews and cancer could have been included. It is therefore possible that some reviews may have been missed by the search strategy.

It is challenging to perform a good umbrella review that yields novel insights, as it is difficult to combine results from different reviews which themselves combine results from different studies with different methodologies. However, I think perhaps one of the main weaknesses of this study is that it is not clear to me what is the core objective of the umbrella review, and how analyses relate to that core objective. In other words, I do not understand based on the introduction what new information the authors are hoping to learn from their umbrella review that could not be learned from reading the individual systematic reviews, beyond a vague objective of "synthesizing" the literature. Because of this, it is not very clear to me how the data extracted and the analysis fits into the larger objectives, and what the new knowledge generated by this review is. Based on the reported results, it would appear that one of the main goals is to assess the quality of systematic reviews and of the underlying studies in the reviews, but it is hard to tell. I think there are potentially important insights this review could tell us, but the message and implications of current evidence remain for me a little confused in the current manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The article is a straightforward continuation of their previous 2016 study. The authors demonstrate an organism-level role of intermediate filaments (IFs) in C. elegans with a model highlighting intermediate filament functions in organism development, larval development, oxidative stress-resilience, size, and lifespan.

The study uses endotube morphogenesis in C. elegans as an elegant model to examine the effect of aberrant IF network morphogenesis on endotube morphology and how these effects are reflected in terms of progeny growth and development.

The study identifies the C. elegans IF protein IFB-2 as a core component of IF network morphogenesis where any mutation or dysfunction of IF interacting proteins such as SMA-5, IFO-1, and BBLN1 can be mostly rescued by silencing of IFB-2.

The observed mutations cause a range of systemic and functional defects of which endotube-related defects that include luminal widening and cytoplasmic invaginations are regarded as the key parameters to observe the direct result of IF network perturbation in the study. Based on these parameters authors narrowed down on IFB-2 head domain as a critical interactor in IF network morphogenesis and function.

On the whole, very interesting findings and an elegant study with excellent data that would be of broad interest for cytoskeletal research. The study has clear ramifications also for the understanding of the evolutionary development and roles of IF, both IF aspects that are still very poorly understood.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This carefully done research paper presents a fundamental model of techniques that are useful for the elucidation of kinase substrates. The paper utilizes state-of-the-art approaches to define a kinetic phosphoproteome and how to integrate that data with complementary approaches using a chemical probe (in this case KTPyS, a triphosphate) to find these substrates. Using these approaches TgCDPK1 was demonstrated to affect microneme secretion via a direct interaction with a HOOK complex (defined as a HOOK protein TGG1_289100, an FTS TGGT1_264050 and 2 other proteins TGGT1_316650 and 306920).

This work is carefully controlled and the analysis pathways are logical and provide paradigms for how to approach the question of identifying substrates of kinases using proteomic approaches employing genetic and chemical strategies.

The authors succeeded in the identification of candidate substrates for TgCDPK1. Validation of the results was provided by previous studies in the literature that characterized some of these substrates as well as the experiments in this manuscript on the characterization of the HOOK complex that is phosphorylated by CDPK1.

The HOOK complex (defined as a HOOK protein TGG1_289100, an FTS TGGT1_264050, and 2 other proteins TGGT1_316650 and 306920) was clearly demonstrated to be involved in invasion via its role in microneme trafficking.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study builds an odorant organization map as estimated by a neural network trained on several odor perceptual classification databases. The authors come up with an attractive hypothesis about the link of odor perception to metabolic connectedness, as opposed to a range of other ways of classifying odorant compounds. There are several interesting implications of this, which the authors touch upon, but could perhaps frame as specific predictions.

The authors clearly have generated a powerful methodology, a useful classifying network, and a well-organized database. The study would be much stronger if the methodology were more thoroughly explained, with open code and data availability as expected for a computational study, and as a resource for further research on the topic.

It would also be valuable to place the current findings in the context of considerable earlier work that has sought to map odor perception and place it in the context of structural and chemical features.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work focuses on the characterization of neutralizing antibodies from humans survivors of SNV and ANDV hantavirus infections, including the mapping of epitopes located in the Gn and/or Gc glycoproteins, and their mechanism of viral interference blocking receptor binding or membrane fusion. It also confirms previous data on broadly neutralizing epitopes allowing inhibition of different hantavirus species. The work covers for the first time in vivo evidence of cross-protection against HNTV infection by a broadly neutralizing antibody prepared from SNV infection using a prophylaxis animal model and compares the data with protection from ANDV lethal challenge using ANDV-specific neutralizing antibodies. The work provides valuable information for the development of therapeutic measures that cross-protect against several hantavirus species which seems a promising strategy to rise pharmaceutical interest against a group of viruses causing orphan disease.

The strength of the work is based on the impressive amount of work and versatility of methods to identify residues involved in the binding and/or escape from seven different neutralizing antibody clones that allow for important conclusions on species-specific antigenic regions and confirm data on a region that seems broadly conserved among different hantavirus species. At the same time, the weakness of the work is that data processing does not allow for readers data analysis (Figs. 1b, 2a, 2c, Ext. Data Fig. 4).

The authors clearly achieve their aim of characterizing the antigenic sites of neutralizing antibodies. Yet, the presented data on binding to ANDV mutant constructs and negative-staining EM does not allow for the conclusion that the epitope of the broadly neutralizing antibodies ANDV-44 and SNV-53 involved the Gn capping loop. An alternative explanation of the escape mutations in the Gn capping loop could be produced by an allosteric effect on the Gc fusion loop region, and a role in structuring the Gc fusion loop has been previously demonstrated (References 7 and 9). In addition, it is not clear why SNV-24 has no broad neutralizing activity although escape mutations occurred at the highly conserved residues K833 and D822 in Gc domain I.

Finally, concerning the in vivo protection experiments, it would be important to show viral RNA levels in lungs and kidneys in the lethal ANDV animal model (Fig. 7) to allow for comparison with the prophylaxis from HTNV infection (Fig. 6).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Collins et al use mesoscopic two-photon imaging to simultaneously record activity from basal forebrain cholinergic or noradrenergic axons in several distant regions of the dorsal cortex during spontaneous behavior in head-fixed awake mice. They find that activity in axons from both neuromodulatory systems is closely correlated with measures of behavioral state, such as whisking, locomotion and face movements. While axons were globally correlated with these behavioral state-related metrics across the dorsal cortex, they also find evidence of behavioral state independent heterogenous signals.

The use of simultaneous multiarea optical recordings across a large extent of dorsal cortex with single axon resolution for studying the coherence of neuromodulatory afferents across cortical areas is novel and addresses important questions regarding neuromodulation in the neocortex. The manuscript is clearly written, the data is well presented and, for the most part, carefully analyzed. Parts of the manuscript confirm previous results on the influence of behavioral state on norepinephrine and acetylcholine cortical afferents. However, the observation that these modulations are globally broadcasted to the dorsal cortex while behavioral state independent hetetogenous signals are also present in these axons is novel and important for the field.

While the evidence for a behavioral state driven global modulation of activity in both neuromodulatory systems is quite clear, I have concerns that the apparent heterogeneity in axonal responses might be driven by movement-induced artifacts. Moreover, even in the case that the heterogeneity in calcium activity across axons is confirmed, it might not be driven by differences in spiking activity across neuromodulatory axons as concluded, but by other mechanisms that are not explicitly discussed or considered.

1) Motion artifacts are always a concern when imaging from small structures in behaving animals. This issue is addressed in the manuscript in Fig 2A-C by comparing axonal responses to "autofluorescent blebs that did not have calcium-dependent activity" (line 1011). Still, as calcium-dependent activity and motion artifacts can both be locked to behavioral variables the "bleb" selection criterion seems biased and flawed with a circular logic. "Blebs" presenting motion-induced changes in fluorescence that may pass as neural activity will be wrongly excluded when from the "bleb" control group using this criterion. This will result in an underestimation of the extent of the contamination of the GCaMP signals by movement-induced artifacts. This potential confound might generate apparent heterogeneity across axons and regions as some axons and some cortical areas might be more prone to movements artifacts than others.

2) In the case that the heterogeneity is indeed due to differences in calcium activity, it might be not due to modularity in spiking activity within the LC or the BF as interpreted and discussed in the manuscript. As calcium signaling in axons not only relates to spiking activity but can also reflect presynaptic modulations, the observed heterogeneity might be due to local action of presynaptic modulators in a context of global identical broadcasted activity. The current dataset does not allow distinguishing which of the two different mechanisms underlies to the observed signal heterogeneity.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, the authors aim to identify the cell state dynamics and molecular mechanisms underlying melanocyte regeneration in zebrafish. By analyzing thousands of single-cell transcriptomes over regeneration in both wild-type and Kit mutant animals, they provide thorough and convincing evidence of (1) two paths to melanocyte regeneration and (2) that Kit signaling, via the RAS/MAPK pathway, is a key regulator of this process. Finally, the authors suggest that another proliferative subpopulation cells, expressing markers of a separate pigment cell type, constitute an additional population of progenitors with the ability to contribute to melanocytes. The data supporting this claim are not as convincing, and the authors failed to show that these cells did indeed differentiate into melanocytes. Despite the challenges of describing this third cell state, this study offers compelling new findings on the mechanisms of melanocyte regeneration and provides paths forward to understanding why some animals lack this capacity.

The majority of the main conclusions are well supported by the data, but one claim, in particular, should be revisited by the authors.

(1) Provided evidence that the aox5(hi)mitfa(lo) population of cells contributes to melanocyte regeneration is inconclusive and somewhat circumstantial. First, the transcriptional profiles of these cells are much more consistent with the xanthophore lineage. Indeed, xanthophores have been shown to express mitfa (in embryos in Parichy, et al. 2003 (PMID: 10862741), and in post-embryonic cells in Saunders, et al. 2019). Second, while the authors address this possibility in Supplemental figure 7 by showing that interstripe xanthophores fail to divide following melanocyte ablation, they fail to account for the stripe-resident xanthophores/xanthoblasts. The presence and dynamics of aox5+ stripe-resident xanthophores/xanthoblasts are detailed in McMenamin, et al., 2014 (PMID: 25170046) and Eom, et al., 2015 (PMID: 26701906). Without direct evidence that the symmetrically-dividing, aox5+ cells measured in this study do indeed differentiate into melanocytes, it is more likely that these cells are a dividing population of xanthophores/xanthoblasts. The authors should revise their claims accordingly.

Minor revisions

(1) At line 140, it is noted that Xanthophores are pteridine-producing, but they also get their yellow color from carotenoids (especially in adults). This should be noted as well, especially since the authors display the xanthophore marker, scarb1, which plays a key role in xanthophore carotenoid coloration.<br /> [Mapping expression levels onto UMAP space for scarb1 and perhaps other markers of xan, irid, or proliferation would be helpful as a supplement to the dot plot in Fig 1 and could help to clarify the transcriptomic signature of mitfa+ aox5-hi cells and plausibility of the model that they are an McSC population. -Parichy]

(2) The authors should provide the list of genes that comprise their cluster signatures (line 252) as part of the supplementary tables.

(3) The authors should more clearly describe how they performed lineage tracing (line 339). Additionally, for the corresponding figure 4E, the authors should list the number of cells traced. The source data only contains calculated percentages rather than counts for each type of differentiation. My understanding is that the number listed in the figure legend is the number of fish (i.e. n = 4), but this should be clarified as well.<br /> [A supplementary figure of labeled cells is important here with enough context to show that cells can be re-identified unambiguously. Additionally note that "lineage tracing" will typically be assumed to mean single-cell labeling and tracking, so if that is not the case for these experiments it would be preferable to use an alternative descriptor. -Parichy]

(4) Line 321, the authors list the mean regeneration percentages for the kita and kitlga(lf) mutants, but these differences are not significantly different according to Figure 4B. By listing the means (which should be noted), the authors seem to be highlighting the differences but then do not comment on them. The description and integration of this result into the main text should be clarified.

(5) In Figure 6E, the RNA-velocity result is not particularly consistent with the authors' claims. Visually, the arrows seem fairly randomly directed. The data in 6B, showing gene expression associated with the S phase and G2/M phase much more clearly convey the directionality of the loop (S phase, followed by G2/M). I suggest that the authors weaken their claim about the RNA-velocity result or remove it altogether and focus on the cell cycle-related gene expression signatures.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study addresses the role of the general transcription factor TBP (TATA-binding protein), a subunit of the TFIID complex, in RNA polymerase II transcription. While TBP has been described as a key component of protein complexes involved in transcription by all three RNA polymerases, several previous studies on TBP loss of function and on the function of its TRF2 and TRF3 paralogues have questioned its essential role in RNA polymerase II transcription. This new study uses auxin induced TBP degradation in mouse ES cells to provide strong evidence that its loss does not affect ongoing polymerase II transcription or heat-shock and retinoic acid-induced transcription activation, but severely inhibits polymerase III transcription. The authors coupled TBP degradation with TRF2 knock out to show that it does not account for the residual TBP-independent transcription. Rather the study provides evidence that TFIID can assemble and is recruited to promoters in the absence of TBP.

All together the study provides compelling evidence for TBP-independent polymerase II transcription, but a better characterization of the residual TFIID complex and recruitment of other general transcription factors to promoters would strengthen the conclusions.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):<br /> <br /> Roberts et al have developed a tool called "XTABLE" for the analysis of publicly available transcriptomic datasets of premalignant lesions (PML) of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Detection of PMLs has clinical implications and can aid in the prevention of deaths by LUSC. Hence efforts such as this will be of benefit to the scientific community in better understanding the biology of PMLs.

The authors have curated four studies that have profiled the transcriptomes of PMLs at different stages. While three of them are microarray-based studies, one study has profiled the transcriptome with RNA-seq. XTABLE fetches these datasets and performs analysis in an R shiny app (a graphical user interface). The tool has multiple functionalities to cover a wide range of transcriptomic analyses, including differential expression, signature identification, and immune cell type deconvolution.

The authors have also included three chromosomal instability (CIN) signatures from literature based on gene expression profiles. They showed one of the CIN signatures as a good predictor of progression. However, this signature performed well only in one study. The authors have further utilised the tool XTABLE to identify the signalling pathways in LUSC important for its developmental stages. They found the activation of squamous differentiation and PI3K/Akt pathways to play a role in the transition from low to high-grade PMLs

The authors have developed user-friendly software to analyse publicly available gene expression data from premalignant lesions of lung cancer. This would help researchers to quickly analyse the data and improve our understanding of such lesions. This would pave the way to improve early detection of PMLs to prevent lung cancer.

Strengths:

1. XTABLE is a nicely packaged application that can be used by researchers with very little computational knowledge.<br /> 2. The tool is easy to download and execute. The documentation is extensive both in the article and on the GitLab page.<br /> 3. The tool is user-friendly, and the tabs are intuitively designed for successive steps of analysis of the transcriptome data.<br /> 4. The authors have properly elaborated on the biological interest in investigating PMLs and their clinical significance.

Weaknesses:

The article is focused on the development and the utility of the tool XTABLE. While the tool is nicely developed, the need for a tool focussing only on the investigation of PMLs is not justified. Several shiny apps and online tools exist to perform transcriptomic analysis of published datasets. To list a few examples - i) http://ge-lab.org/idep/ ; ii) http://www.uusmb.unam.mx/ideamex/ ; iii) RNfuzzyApp (Haering et al., 2021); iv) DEGenR (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4815134); v) TCC-GUI (Su et al., 2019). While some of these are specific to RNA-seq, there are plenty of such shiny apps to perform both RNA-seq and microarray data analysis. Any of these tools could also be used easily for the analysis of the four curated datasets presented in this article. The authors could have elaborated on the availability of other tools for such analysis and provided an explanation of the necessity of XTABLE. Since 3 of the 4 datasets they curated are from microarray technology, another good example of a user-friendly tool is NCBI GEO2R. This is integrated with the NCBI GEO database, and the user doesn't need to download the data or run any tools. iDEP-READS (http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/reads/) provide an online user-friendly tool to download and analyse data from publicly available datasets. Another such example is GEO2Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/g2e/). These tools have been designed for non-bioinformatic researchers that don't involve downloading datasets or installing/running other tools.

Secondly, XTABLE doesn't provide a solution to integrate the four datasets incorporated in the tool. One can only analyse one dataset at a time with XTABLE. The differences in terms of methodology and study design within these four datasets have been elaborated on in the article. However, attempts to integrate them were lacking.

The tool also lacks the flexibility for users to add more datasets. This would be helpful when there are more datasets of PMLs available publicly.

Understanding the biology of PML progression would require a multi-omics approach. XTABLE analyses transcriptome data and lacks integration of other omics data. The authors mention the availability of data from whole exome, methylation, etc from the four studies they have selected. However, apart from the CIN scores, they haven't integrated any of the other layers of omics data available.

Lastly, the authors could have elaborated on the limitations of the tool and their analysis in the discussion.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript builds on data from the same group showing that Lphn2 functions cell-autonomously as a receptor in CA1 pyramidal axons and cell-non-autonomously as a ligand in the neurons of the subiculum. In either case, binding of teneurin-3 to Lphn2 mediates repulsive events, and since different populations of neurons within each region express differing levels of both proteins, this mechanism allows proximal CA1 pyramidal axons to preferentially project to distal subiculum and distal CA1 pyramidal axons to project to proximal subiculum. The authors now ask mechanistic questions about the role of Lphn2 signaling in these wiring processes.

The authors demonstrate that G-protein signaling downstream of Lphn2, which is mediated by the tethered agonist, is necessary for the ability of ectopically expressed Lphn2 to redirect proximal CA1 axons from distal to proximal subiculum. Moreover, the authors show that while autoproteolytic activity of Lphn2 facilitates G-protein signaling, possibly by making the tethered agonist more available for signaling, it is not necessary for axonal mistargeting. Thus, the authors conclude that tethered agonist-dependent G-protein signaling is required for Lphn2-mediated hippocampal neural circuit assembly. Most of the data shown in support of these conclusions are convincing, though I have some concerns about the expression levels and/or effects of the tethered agonist mutants in CA1, which is important since the analyses assume that any defects are in the repulsive interactions described above.

The authors also use heterologous cells to determine that Lphn2 couples to Ga12/13, but not other heteromeric G-proteina-subunits. Within the context of heterologous cells, these experiments are well controlled and exhaustive, as every mutant used in vivo is carefully analyzed. One potential criticism of this work, however, is that perhaps the authors assume too much in simply translating their results in heterologous cells to neurons, especially when one of the most interesting conclusions of this paper (see below) is that Lphn2 signaling is context-dependent. Without further data to confirm the results of these experiments in the neuronal populations studied, these data primarily illustrate possibilities, but don't exclude other possibilities.

Finally, the authors test the role of Lphn2 functioning as a ligand in the subiculum by driving its expression in the normally Lphn2-low dorsal subiculum. As they reported before, this alteration decreases the ability of proximal CA1 axons to project to this area. Interestingly, and in contrast to the role of Lphn2 as a receptor above, neither Lphn2 autoproteolysis nor tethered agonist function are required for this effect.

In summary, this is an interesting paper that addresses timely and pressing issues in the adhesion-GPCR field.

Memindex dimensions mentioned in a 1904 advertisement<br /> cards: 2 3/4 x 4 1/2 inches<br /> case: 2 3/4 x 4 3/4 inches

Dante uses this phrase to describe his fear of the lion. The fact that the lion is "rabid with hunger" further demonstrates how violent it is. John Demaray states that "the growing awareness that the actions of Dante in the narrative are in part a figural re-enactment of Biblical events", these beasts were referenced from the bible and therefore characterizes different types of sin. The lion, she-wolf, and leopard represent barriers that keeps Dante from reaching "Saint Peter's Gate which is the way into heaven.

Demaray, John G. “The Pilgrim Texts and Dante’s Three Beasts: Inferno, I.” Italica, vol. 46, no. 3, 1969, pp. 233–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/477804. Accessed 11 Mar. 2023.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Determination of the biomechanical forces and downstream pathways that direct heart valve morphogenesis is an important area of research. In the current study, potential functions of localized Yap signaling in cardiac valve morphogenesis were examined. Extensive immunostainings were performed for Yap expression, but Yap activation status as indicated by nuclear versus cytoplasmic localization, Yap dephosphorylation, or expression of downstream target genes was not examined. The goal of the work was to determine Yap activation status relative to different mechanical environments, but no biomechanical data on developing heart valves were provided in the study.

There are several major weaknesses that diminish enthusiasm for the study.<br /> 1. The Hippo/Yap pathway activation leads to dephosphorylation of Yap, nuclear localization, and induced expression of downstream target genes. However, there are no data included in the study on Yap nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios, phosphorylation status, or activation of other Hippo pathway mediators. Analysis of Yap expression alone is insufficient to determine activation status since it is widely expressed in multiple cells throughout the valves. The specificity for activated Yap signaling is not apparent from the immunostainings.

2. The specific regionalized biomechanical forces acting on different regions of the valves were not measured directly or clearly compared with Yap activation status. In some cases, it seems that Yap is not present in the nuclei of endothelial cells surrounding the valve leaflets that are subject to different flow forces (Fig 1B) and the main expression is in valve interstitial subpopulations. Thus the data presented do not support differential Yap activation in endothelial cells subject to different fluid forces. There is extensive discussion of different forces acting on the valve leaflets, but the relationship to Yap signaling is not entirely clear.

3. The requirement for Yap signaling in heart valve remodeling as described in the title was not demonstrated through manipulation of Yap activity.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Farahani et al. describe the generation of pYtags, recombinant RTKs, and reporters, that exploit phosphotyrosine/tandem SH2 interaction pairs from immune-specific signaling proteins to allow spatiotemporal monitoring of the activation of different ligand-binding (EGFR and FGFR1) or ligandless (ERBB2) RTKs in living cells stimulated with high and low-affinity ligands (e.g. EGF and EREG or EPGN respectively in the case of EGFR). The study is well-explained and the experiments are clear and clean. Although the authors expanded tool generation to different RTKs and different cells, the potential utility of the approach is limited because the broad concept that different receptor dimers activate different downstream signalling pathways is already well established. Additionally, the results only examine the temporal kinetics of the receptors rather than their spatial organization, e.g. in different vesicular/endosomal compartments. The study also describes the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to generate a pYtag knock-in EGFR-expressing HEK 293T cell line to avoid complications arising from over-expression. There were significant differences in terms of receptor activation dynamics comparing knock-in and over-expressed cell lines.

The study is technologically innovative, yet the analysis of RTK spatial signalling over time in ligand-stimulated cells should be improved.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Mitterer et al continue their comprehensive investigation of the mechanisms underlying the biogenesis of the eukaryotic large, or 60S, ribosomal subunit. Specifically, they elucidate the roles that the DEAD-box helicase Spb4 and its interaction partner, Rrp17, play in the maturation of nucleolar 60S precursor particles. Using cell biology approaches, the authors demonstrate that Spb4 and Rrp17 are associated with late-stage nucleolar 60S precursor particles and that depletion of these factors arrests 60S biogenesis at a step just prior to nucleolar exit. Cryo-EM imaging of particles carrying Spb4 and Rrp17 (purified using affinity-tagged Spb4 or Rrp17) yielded high-quality structures of Spb4- and Rrp17-bound 60S precursor particles. The structures provide novel insights into the roles of Spb4 and Rrp17 in the maturation of nucleolar 60S precursor particles. In addition, the structures provide novel insights into the Spb4 function that may be of interest and importance to the function of other DEAD-box helicases. The authors then establish an in vitro maturation assay that, although unlikely to exactly recapitulate the in vivo maturation process, provides additional insights, particularly when coupled to cryo-EM structures of the in vitro-matured 60S particles.

A major strength of this work is the combination of cell biology, structural biology, and biochemistry. The cell biology-directed preparation of Spb4- and Rrp17-bound 60S precursor particles is particularly powerful and results in high-quality structures of these precursors. Another strength of the work is the remarkable view of a DEAD-box helicase in action and the interesting finding that the RecA domains of the helicase are in the open conformation while the helicase is likely bound to ADP-this will be an interesting and important observation for researchers working in the broader DEAD-box helicase field. An additional strength of the work is the development and use of an in vitro maturation assay that allowed further details of the activities of Spb4 and Rrp17 in nucleolar maturation of 60S precursor particles to be investigated and visualized.

A minor weakness of this work is a question about the confidence with which the authors can conclude, using just the structural data presented here, that Spb4 is bound to ADP rather than to ATP or ATP-Pi.

The considerable strengths of this work far outweigh the minor weakness, and I expect that this work will have a significant impact on the field.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

A quantitative understanding of the mechanisms underlying VDJ recombination is a prerequisite for a better understanding of adaptive immune repertoire generation. Here, Russel et al. study potential sequence-based factors that may drive VDJ trimming, a mechanism involved in VDJ recombination. This work provides a significant advance in the statistical modeling of immune repertoire generation.

Using a previously-published TCR𝛽 repertoire sequencing data set, the authors designed a probabilistic model of nucleotide trimming that allows the exploration of various mechanistically-interpretable sequence-level features. Using this model, they show that local sequence context and the capacity for sequence-breathing, together, can most accurately predict the trimming probabilities of a given V-gene sequence. Their model suggests that double-stranded DNA needs to be able to "breathe" for trimming to occur and provides evidence of a sequence motif that appears to get preferentially trimmed, independent of breathing. Importantly their findings are not dataset-dependent.

So far, there exists no model for VDJ trimming, a major mechanism in the process of VDJ recombination. With this model, we are now in the position to refine modeling tools for VDJ recombination. Importantly, the model developed by Russel et al. enables exploration of what biological sequence-based factors most contribute to VDJ trimming. To support their conclusions, the authors test their approach on multiple model architectures and AIRR datasets.

While I agree that this is important work, the authors might be overstating the mechanistic insight achieved given that solely statistical inference was used in this work. This is something that requires more discussion and support from the authors.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The study employs state-of-art techniques and model-driven fusion of MEG and 7T to characterize the fine spatiotemporal profiles of object recognition in human brains when stimuli are noisy. By using two models, the recognition and the two-state models, to characterize the representational format, the work demonstrates that the ventral visual pathway is more toward two-state representation while the dorsal visual pathway tends to display the recognition-like profile. Overall it is an interesting work addressing an important question. My major concern is on the two selected models and whether they could be fairly compared to address the question. Moreover, some details need more clarification and statistical support.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Gutiérrez-Martínez et al. present a detailed analysis of Siglec-1 nano-distribution on the surface of dendritic cells (DCs) and the role of Siglec-1 in HIV-1 interactions with DCs.

DCs have been proposed as key cellular intermediates in the transmission of HIV and other viruses. Not only can these cells be crucial for the presentation of virus-derived antigens, but, in tissue culture at least, mature DCs (mDC) have been observed to sequester HIV particles into compartments (virus-containing compartment [VCC]) from which the virus can be subsequently transmitted to CD4+ve T cells through cell-cell contacts often termed virological synapses. This so-called trans-infection mechanism is believed to be important in establishing HIV infection and transmission of the virus to immunological tissues. Although there is considerable evidence for this process, the molecular details of how HIV particles are captured by DCs and transferred to VCC are poorly understood. In recent years Siglec-1 (CD169), a plasma membrane-associated sialic acid-binding lectin expressed on monocytic cells has been implicated in the capture of HIV and other viruses. In this paper, the authors have used super-resolution and other imaging methods to perform a detailed quantitative analysis of the cell surface distribution of Siglec-1 on immature and mature DCs, the relationship between this distribution with actin and regulators of actin polymerization, and then how this impacts on the capture of HIV particles and their association with VCCs.

The principal findings, which for the most part are well supported by the data, suggest that small clusters of Siglec-1, which are restricted in their mobility by formin-associated actin, provide platforms with increased avidity for binding virus particles or large unilamellar vesicles through sialic-acid containing gangliosides. In mDCs at least this binding appears to induce the sequestration of bound particles into VCC-like structures. This is a topical and detailed study that addresses important questions of how viral engagement with cell surface receptors leads to events crucial for viral infection and, potentially, pathogenesis. These types of analyses have only recently become feasible with the implementation of super-resolution imaging and few virus-host cell systems have been examined in detail. Thus, this study has relevance not only to HIV but potentially to many other viruses.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this exciting and well-written manuscript, Alvarez-Buylla and colleagues report a fascinating discovery of an alkaloid-binding protein in the plasma of poison frogs, which may help explain how these animals are able to sequester a diversity of alkaloids with different target sites. This work is a major advance in our knowledge of how poison frogs are able to sequester and even resist such a panoply of alkaloids. Their study also adds to our understanding of how toxic animals resist the effects of their own defenses. Although target site insensitivity and other mechanisms acting to prevent the binding of alkaloids to their targets (often ion channels) are well characterized now in poison frogs, less is known regarding how they regulate the movement of toxins throughout the animal and in blood in particular. In the fugu (pufferfish) a protein binds saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin and in some amphibians possibly the protein saxiphilin has been proposed to be a toxin sponge for saxitoxin. However, little is known about poison frogs in particular and if toxin-binding proteins are involved in their sequestration and auto-resistance mechanisms.

The authors use a clever approach wherein a fluorescently labeled probe of a pumiliotoxin analog (an alkaloid toxin sequestered by some poison frogs) is able to be crosslinked to proteins to which it binds. The authors then use sophisticated mass spectroscopy to identify the proteins and find an outlier 'hit' that is a serpin protein. A competition assay, as well as mutagenesis studies, revealed that this ~50-60 kDa plasma protein is responsible for binding much of the pumiliotoxin and a few other alkaloids known to be sequestered in the in vivo assay, but not nicotine, an alkaloid not sequestered by these frogs.

In general, their results are convincing, their methods and analyses robust and the writing excellent. Their findings represent a major breakthrough in the study of toxin sequestration in poison frogs. Below, a more detailed summary and both major and minor constructive comments are given on the nature of the discoveries and some ways that the manuscript could be improved.

Detailed Summary

The authors functionally characterize a serine-protease inhibitor protein in Oophaga sylvatica frog plasma, which they name O. sylvatica alkaloid-binding globulin (OsABG), that can bind toxic alkaloids. They show that OsABG is the most highly expressed serpin in O. sylvatica liver and that its expression is higher than that of albumin, a major small molecule carrier in vertebrates. Using a toxin photoprobe combined with competitive protein binding assays, their data suggest that OsABG is able to bind specific poison frog toxins including the two most abundant alkaloids in O. sylvatica skin. Their in vitro isolation of toxin-bound OsABG shows that the protein binds most free pumiliotoxin in solution and suggests that OsABG may play an important role in its sequestration. The authors further show that mutations in the binding pocket of OsABG remove its ability to bind toxins and that the binding pocket is structurally similar to that of other vertebrate serpins.

These results are an exciting advance in understanding how poison frogs, which make and use alkaloids as chemical defenses, prevent self-intoxication. The authors provide convincing evidence that OsABG can function as a toxin sponge in O. sylvatica which sets a compelling precedent for future work needed to test the role of OsABG in vivo.

The study could be improved by shifting the focus to O. sylvatica specifically rather than the convergent evolution of sequestration among different dendrobatid species. The reason for this is that most of the results (aside from some of the photoprobe binding results presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 4) and the proteomics identification of OsABG itself are based on O. sylvatica. It's unclear whether ABG proteins are major toxin sponges in D. tinctorius or E. tricolor since these frogs may contain different toxin cocktails. The competitive binding results suggest that putative ABG proteins in D. tinctorius and E. tricolor have reduced binding affinity at higher toxin concentrations than ABG proteins in O. sylvatica. Although molecular convergence in toxin sponges may be at play in the dendrobatid poison frogs, more work is needed in non-O. sylvatica species to determine the extent of convergence.

Major constructive comments:

Although the protein gels in Fig.1-2 show clearly the role of ABG, a ~50 kDa protein, it's unclear whether transferrin-like proteins, which are ~80 kDa, may also play a role because the gels show proteins between 39-64 kDa (Fig.1). The gel in Fig.2A is specific to one O. sylvatica and extends this range, but the gel does not appear to be labeled accordingly, making it unclear whether other larger proteins could have been detected in addition to ABG. Clarifying this issue would facilitate the interpretation of the results.

There is what seems to be a significant size difference between the O. sylvatica bands and bands from the other toxic frog species, namely D. tinctorius and E. tricolor. Could the photoprobe be binding to other non-ABG proteins of different sizes in different frog species? Given that O. sylvatica bands are bright and this species was the only one subject to proteomics quantification, a possible conclusion may be that the ABG toxin sponge is a lineage-specific adaptation of O. sylvatica rather than a common mechanism of toxin sequestration among multiple independent lineages of poison frogs. It would be helpful if the authors could address this observation of their binding data and the hypothesis flowing from that in the manuscript.

Figure 1B: The species names should be labeled alongside the images in the phylogeny. In addition, please include symbols indicating the number of times toxicity has evolved (for example, once in the ancestors of O. sylvatica and D. tinctorius frogs and once in the ancestors of E. tricolor frogs).

Figure 4B-C: Photoprobe binding results in the presence of epi and nicotine appear to be missing for D. tinctorius and those in the presence of PTX and nicotine are missing for D. tricolor. Adding these results would make for a more complete picture of alkaloid binding by ABG in non-O. sylvatica species.

Using recombinant proteins with mutations at residues forming the binding pocket of O. sylvatica ABG (as inferred from docking simulations), the authors found that all binding pocket mutations disrupted photoprobe binding completely in vitro (L221-222, Fig. 4E). However, there is no information presented on non-binding pocket mutations. Mutations outside of the binding pocket would presumably maintain photoprobe binding - barring any indirect structural changes that might disrupt binding pocket interactions with the photoprobe. This result is important for the conclusion that the binding pocket itself is the sole mediator of toxin interactions. The authors do show that one binding pocket mutation (D383A) results in some degree of photoprobe binding (Fig. 4E) but more detail on the mutations in the binding pocket per se being causal would be helpful.

Please include concentrations in the descriptions of gel lanes in the main figures. The relative concentrations of the photoprobe and other toxins (eg., PTX, DHQ, epi, and nic) are essential for interpreting the competitive binding images. For example, this was done in Fig. S1 (e.g., PB + 10x PTX).

For clarity, the section "OsABG sequesters free PTX in solution with high affinity" could be presented directly after the section titled "Proteomic analysis identifies an alkaloid-binding globulin". The former highlights in vitro experiments confirming the binding affinity of the ABG protein identified in the latter.

Fig. 6E-F should be included as part of Fig. 1 or 2. Although complementary to the RNA sequencing data, these protein results are more closely related to the results in the first two figures which show the degree of competitive binding affinity of PB in the presence of different toxins. The expanded competitive binding results for total skin alkaloids and the two most abundant skin alkaloids from wild samples are most appropriate here.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Elbaz-Hayoun et al. investigate the role of macrophages in the gliotic response of retinal Müller glia and photoreceptor cell death. Monocytes (a precursor of macrophages) were isolated from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. When injected into light-damaged retinas, a reduction in the number of photoreceptors and ERG b-wave strength (evidence of abnormal photoreceptor function) was observed. The authors reasoned that macrophages generated from the injected monocytes might be responsible for the retinal damage. To test this hypothesis, macrophage subtypes were generated from AMD-derived human monocytes and injected into light-damaged mouse eyes. Interstingly, only the human hM2a macrophage subclass mimicked the retinal degeneration of monocyte injection in mouse retinas. Similarly, human M2a (hM2a) cells cultured on mouse retinal explants and even serum-free hM2a culture supernatant were sufficient to induce photoreceptor apoptosis. These effects were not observed with hM1 cells. To identify possible diffusible factors responsible, proteins present in hM2a and hM1 culture supernatants were identified. Nine cytokines were found at higher levels in the hM2a supernatant, and three of these were ligands for the C-C chemokine receptor CCR1. The authors confirmed CCR1 expression in the retina, which was predominantly detected in Müller glia. Importantly, Müller cell expression of CCR1 in the mouse retina was significantly increased following light damage. In contrast, CCR2 and CCR5 levels were unchanged in Müller cells. The increase in CCR1 expression, gliosis, and photoreceptor death was also observed in the rd10 mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Inhibiting CCR1 activity in light-damaged eyes using the drug BX471 had impressive effects. Müller activation and photoreceptor cell death were reduced and ERG b-wave levels were partially recovered - clearly indicating a role for CCR1 in retinal degeneration. Additional evidence was provided suggesting that CCR1 activation in M2a macrophages might also play a role in stimulating the movement of other macrophages into the retina and activating retinal microglia, which migrate to the ONL. These data identify a new link between cells of the immune system and those within the retina which contribute to the progression of retinal degeneration.

The data mostly support the conclusions of this paper. However, additional controls need to be added to some experiments.

Concerns:

1) To determine the effect of diseased monocytes on retinal health, light-injured mouse retinas were injected with monocytes isolated from AMD patients (Figure 1 - figure supplement 1). This resulted in a reduction in photoreceptor number and ERG b-wave amplitude. However, the light-injured control eye was injected with PBS only, so no cells were present. The reasoning for using this control was not provided. The appropriate injection control would include monocytes isolated from non-AMD patients. This control should be performed side-by-side with cells from AMD patients.

2) The authors hypothesize, from the experiments presented in Figure 1 - figure supplement 1, that the injected monocytes generated macrophages in the retina, which were responsible for the observed neurotoxicity (Lines 143-145). However, no direct evidence was presented. This idea should be tested in vivo. This could be done by injecting tracer-labeled human AMD-derived monocytes into light-injured mouse retinas. If the authors' hypothesis is true, collected retinas should contain tracer-labeled cells that express macrophage markers. Tracer-labeled M2a macrophage cells should be present since subsequent experiments identify this subclass as being associated with retinal cell death.

3) Photoreceptor number and b-wave amplitudes were measured in light-injured retinas injected with one of four macrophage cell types generated from human AMD-derived monocytes. The authors conclude that only injection of M2a cells reduced photoreceptor number and b-wave amplitudes (Figure 1C, E). This may be true, but it is difficult for the reader to make a conclusion (especially in Fig. 1E) due to the large error bars and five different traces overlapping each other. To make these results easier to interpret, graph control cells with only one experimental sample (cell type) at a time.

4) Most injected macrophages were located in the vitreous. In the case of M2a cells, the authors note that "several of the cells migrated across the retinal layers reaching the subretinal space" (Lines 167,168). One possible explanation for why M0, M1, and M2c macrophages did not induce retinal degeneration is that they did not migrate to the subretinal space and around the optic nerve head. Supplementary figures should be added to demonstrate that this is not the case.

5) Figure 1 - figure supplement 2: Panel A, B cells were stained with CD206 to demonstrate the presence of M2a macrophages (panel B). The authors conclude that panel A contains M1 and panel B contains M2a cells. The lack of CD206 expression illustrates that panel A cells are not M2a macrophages but do not demonstrate they are M1 macrophages. A control using an M1 cell marker is necessary to show that panel A cells are M1 and M1 cells are not detected in M2a cultures.

6) Ex vivo, apoptotic photoreceptor and RPE cells are observed when cultured with M2a macrophages (Figure 2). Do injected M2a cells also induce apoptosis of RPE cells in vivo? This is important to establish that retinal explants are a good model for in vivo experiments.

7) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured to determine if M2a cell-mediated neurotoxicity was due to oxidative stress. It is concluded that a ROS increase is partly responsible (Line 218). The data do not support this conclusion. ROS was detected in cultured M2a macrophages. More importantly, however, there was no increase in oxidative damage in vivo. The in vivo and cell culture results contradict each other so no conclusion can be made. The lack of in vivo confirmation weakens the argument that ROS drives M2a neurotoxicity. Text suggesting a role for ROS in neurotoxicity should be appropriately edited (Lines including 218, 244, 401,406,481).

8) The authors ask if the photoreceptor cell death is cytokine-mediated. Multiple cytokines were enriched in M2a-conditioned media. Of particular interest were CCR1 ligands MPIF1 and MCP4. The implication is that these two ligands mediate the M2a macrophages to photoreceptor cell death through CCR1. However, there is no attempt to show that either MPIF1 or MCP4 are present in vivo, or are sufficient to induce the retinal response observed. This could be demonstrated by injection of MPIF1 or MCP4. Evidence that either ligand phenocopies M2a macrophage injection would be direct evidence that CCR1 ligands activate the retinal response. Furthermore, co-injection with BX174 should block the effect of these ligands if they work through CCR1.

Joint Public Review:

The authors employ a range of microscopy, biochemical, and virologic techniques to evaluate the efficacy of CRISPR-nuPin to relocalize DNA and the subsequent impact of HSV-1 replication. There are many compelling experiments that utilize solid approaches to HSV-1 transcription, replication, and histone association. The microscopy images are particularly stunning, strongly supported by biochemical evaluation, and consistent with most of the authors' interpretations. Overall, the manuscript presents data that suggests the dCas9-emerin fusion protein can be used to manipulate the nuclear localization of smaller DNA elements like the HSV-1 viral genome. Chromosomal DNA, as tested by telomere targeting, reveal reduced capacity and elongated kinetics for retargeting. Using this system, authors find differing effects on HSV-1 replication based on the timing of sgRNA electroporation post-infection. Further experiments support that the transcriptional effects of either inhibitory or enhancing treatments may be related to chromatin modifications and expression of the viral protein ICP0.

There are many strengths to both the methodology and analysis in this work. That said, there are several areas where a more expansive explanation of methods and data analysis combined with tempered interpretations and language will greatly improve the manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, the authors set out to identify the energy-generating protein responsible for powering heme transport through the Isd system of Staphylococcus aureus.

The manuscript convincingly demonstrates that FhuC is required for heme iron utilization and presents strong data to implicate FhuC in binding to IsdF. The authors report that IsdF localizes to functional membrane microdomains in S. aureus. These experiments would benefit from controls showing that the DRM fraction contains the functional membrane microdomains and that the fractionation was successful.

The authors also present strong data demonstrating that loss of floA prevents IsdF incorporation into the membrane although these data would also benefit from genetic complementation.

In a surprising result, the authors report that the IsdA protein is not localized in the functional membrane microdomains which are confounding since IsdA is modeled to work in concert with IsdF. These data suggest there is much more to learn regarding the spatial distribution of this transport system.

Finally, the authors report that FMMs are required for heme transport in the related organism Staphylococcus lugdunensis demonstrating the conservation of this localization across the genus.

Taken together, these exciting and significant data reveal how the canonical heme transporter of S. aureus is regionally localized and acquires energy for heme transport across the membrane.

1930s Wilson Memindex Co Index Card Organizer Pre Rolodex Ad Price List Brochure

archived page: https://web.archive.org/web/20230310010450/https://www.ebay.com/itm/165910049390

Includes price lists

List of cards includes: - Dated tab cards for a year from any desired. - Blank tab cards for jottings arranged by subject. - These were sold in 1/2 or 1/3 cut formats - Pocket Alphabets for jottings arranged by letter. - Cash Account Cards [without tabs]. - Extra Record Cards for permanent memoranda. - Monthly Guides for quick reference to future dates. - Blank Guides for filing records by subject.. - Alphabet Guides for filing alphabetically.

Memindex sales brochures recommended the 3 x 5" cards (which had apparently been standardized by 1930 compared to the 5 1/2" width from earlier versions around 1906) because they could be used with other 3 x 5" index card systems.

In the 1930s Wilson Memindex Company sold more of their vest pocket sized 2 1/4 x 4 1/2" systems than 3 x 5" systems.

Some of the difference between the vest sized and regular sized systems choice was based on the size of the particular user's handwriting. It was recommended that those with larger handwriting use the larger cards.

By the 1930's at least the Memindex tag line "An Automatic Memory" was being used, which also gave an indication of the ubiquity of automatization of industrialized life.

The Memindex has proved its success in more than one hundred kinds of business. Highly recommended by men in executive positions, merchants, manufacturers, managers, .... etc.

Notice the gendering of users specifically as men here.

Features: - Sunday cards were sold separately and by my reading were full length tabs rather than 1/6 tabs like the other six days of the week - Lids were custom fit to the bases and needed to be ordered together - The Memindex Jr. held 400 cards versus the larger 9 inch standard trays which had space for 800 cards and block (presumably a block to hold them up or at an angle when partially empty).

The Memindex Jr., according to a price sheet in the 1930s, was used "extensively as an advertising gift".

The Memindex system had cards available in bundles of 100 that were labeled with the heading "Things to Keep in Sight".

Notice the 1 1/4" x 3" cards, 2 1/4 x 4" cards in addition to the 3 x 5" and 4 x 6".

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury is a disease that appears to be linked to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), but there is a lack of model cell lines for the study of this link. To help address this problem, the authors developed ten cybrid HepG2 cell lines that have had their mitochondrial DNA replaced with the mitochondrial DNA of ten human donors. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in all of the patients' mtDNA allowed the authors to assign the donors to two haplogroups (H and J) with five patients each. The authors also present the results of several assays (e.g. oxygen consumption, ATP production) performed on all ten cell lines in the absence and presence of five clinically-relevant drugs (or drug metabolites). Significant attention was paid to differences observed between the cell lines in the H and J haplogroups. The work is methodologically and scientifically rigorous, ethically conducted, and objectively presented according to the appropriate community standards.

While I feel that the manuscript will be useful to the research field and is an important step towards improving patient outcomes, I feel that the work lacks a broad interest. Much of the paper is spent discussing small and/or statistically insignificant differences between haplogroups H and J. While some interesting interpretations and suggestions are presented in the discussion, the authors didn't perform follow-up experiments to try to nail down any particular mechanistic insights that would be useful to the broader community. I also didn't feel a strong sense that the paper produced any specific suggestions for how clinical outcomes could be improved. Accordingly, any clear insights that would be interesting to a broad scientific community would probably require follow-up studies. The structure of the paper is also not friendly to a broad audience; the results are presented without interspersed commentary that could help the reader understand the meaning or utility of the results as they are being presented. Accordingly, I often felt unsure about how the results being presented were relevant to solving the broader problem established nicely in the introduction. Finally, it wasn't clear that the generated cell lines were made available for anyone to purchase through a cell bank (perhaps the authors did do this, but I don't recall seeing a mention of it). As these cell lines appear to be the primary output of this work, it seems important to better highlight the extent to which they are being made accessible to the scientific community.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Utilizing mouse models as well as in-vitro studies, the authors demonstrate that cardiac cell mapping provides novel insights into intercellular communication drivers underlying pathological extracellular matrix remodeling during diabetic myocardial fibrosis.The work provides new perspectives to help understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of diabetes-induced cardiac pathology.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Han et al use sophisticated genetic approaches to investigate leptin-responsive neural circuits. Overall, this is an impressive series of studies that provide fairly convincing evidence for a key inhibitory pathway downstream of AGRP neurons. A few data sets require additional validation or explanation.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Demographic inference is a notoriously difficult problem in population genetics, especially for non-model systems in which key population genetic parameters are often unknown and where the reality is always a lot more complex than the model. In this study, Rose et al. provided an elegant solution to these challenges in their analysis of the evolutionary history of human specialization in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. They first applied state-of-the-art statistical phasing methods to obtain haplotype information in previously published mosquito sequences. Using this phased data, they conducted cross-coalescent and isolation-with-migration analyses, and they innovatively took advantage of a known historical event, i.e., the spread of Ae. aegypti to South America, to infer the key model parameters of generation time and mutation rate. With these parameters, they were able to confirm a previous hypothesis, which suggests that human specialists evolved at the end of the African Humid Period around 5,000 years ago when Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in the Sahel region had to adapt to human-derived water storage as their breeding sites during intense dry seasons. The authors further carried out an ancestry tract length analysis, showing that human specialists have recently introgressed into Ae. aegypti population in West African cities in the past 20-40 years, likely driven by rapid urbanization in these cities.

Given all the complexities and uncertainties in the system, the authors have done outstanding jobs coming up with well-informed research questions and hypotheses, carrying out analyses that are most appropriate to their questions, and presenting their findings in a clear and compelling fashion. Their results reveal the deep connections between mosquito evolution and past climate change as well as human history and demonstrate that future mosquito control strategies should take these important interactions into account, especially in the face of ongoing climate change and urbanization. Methodologically, the analytical approach presented in this paper will be of broad interest to population geneticists working on demographic inference in a diversity of non-model organisms.

In my opinion, the only major aspect that this paper can still benefit from is more explicit and in-depth communication and discussion about the assumptions made in the analyses and the uncertainties of the results. There is currently one short paragraph on this in the discussion section, but I think several other assumptions and sources of uncertainties could be included, and a few of them may benefit from some quantitative sensitivity analyses. To be clear, I don't think that most of these will have a huge impact on the main results, but some explicit clarification from the authors would be useful. Below are some examples:

1. Phasing accuracy: statistical phasing is a relatively new tool for non-model species, and it is unclear from the manuscript how accurate it is given the sample size, sequencing depth, population structure, genetic diversity, and levels of linkage disequilibrium in the study system. If authors would like to inspire broader adoption of this workflow, it would be very helpful if they could also briefly discuss the key characteristics of a study system that could make phasing successful/difficult, and how sensitive cross-coalescent analyses are to phasing accuracy.

2. Estimation of mutation rate and generation time: the estimation of these important parameters is made based on the assumption that they should maximize the overlap between the distribution of estimated migration rate and the number of enslaved people crossing the Atlantic, but how reasonable is this assumption, and how much would the violation of this assumption affect the main result? Particularly, in the MSMC-IM paper (Wang et al. 2020, Fig 2A), even with a simulated clean split scenario, the estimated migration rate would have a wide distribution with a lot of uncertainty on both sides, so I believe that the exact meaning and limitations of such estimated migration rate over time should be clarified. This discussion would also be very helpful to readers who are thinking about using similar methods in their studies. Furthermore, the authors have taken 15 generations per year as their chosen generation time and based their mutation rate estimates on this assumption, but how much will the violation of this assumption affect the result?

3. The effect of selection: all analyses in this paper assume that no selection is at play, and the authors have excluded loci previously found to be under selection from these analyses, but how effective is this? In the ancestry tract length analysis, in particular, the authors have found that the human-specialist ancestry tends to concentrate in key genomic regions and suggested that selection could explain this, but doesn't this mean that excluding known loci under selection was insufficient? If the selection has indeed played an important role at a genome-wide level, how would it affect the main results (qualitatively)?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript Sugatha et al. present a comprehensive study on sorting nexin 32 (SNX32) with a wide-spectrum of methodologies and model systems. Authors investigate binding to other sorting nexins involved in the same pathways (SNX1 and SNX4) as well as to its cargo in biochemical and cell-based experiments. They show the importance and explore mechanisms of SNX32 in Transferrin Receptor and Cation Independent Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptor trafficking. Moreover, this work also demonstrates the role of SNX32 in concert with Basigin in neuron differentiation.

Authors with the help of structure modelling and subsequent biochemical experiments find specific residues within the BAR domain of SNX32 that are crucial for heterodimer formation with its interaction partners on endosomal membranes: SNX1 and SNX4. Moreover, this study, by using various microscopy techniques, also demonstrates localization of SNX32 to early endosomes as well as its co-trafficking with Rab11 and Golgi marker. Furthermore, authors with knock-down and rescue experiments investigate the role of SNX32 in Transferrin Receptor and Cation Independent Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptor trafficking. With co-immunoprecipitation they show that the cargo interaction occurs via the conserved stretch in the PX domain and that single amino acid substitution can disrupt this binding. This feature is utilized in a subsequent neuroblastoma cell-based SILAC screen for SNX32 interactome that identifies Basigin (a transmembrane receptor belonging to the superfamily of immunoglobulins) as one of the most prominent interactors in these cells. Finally, authors identify SNX32 and Basigin as crucial factors involved in neurite outgrowth and network formation. Experiments demonstrate that SNX32, but not its homolog SNX6, assists in the surface localization of Basigin where this protein could potentially interact with monocarboxylate transporters crucial for neuro-glial coordination.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This is a carefully written manuscript describing the structure of a low-light inducible PSI complex from Ostreococcus tauri. The work expands our knowledge of how photosynthetic systems react to changes in light conditions and shows how this ecologically important green alga utilizes its unique antenna, Lhcp.

In general, I find that the work described in the manuscript is of high quality. The cryoEM maps obtained by the authors clearly show the addition of lhcp trimers to PSI under low light conditions and the distinction between lhcp1 and lhcp2 appears sound together with the identification of the phosphorylation site and its binding in the PSI complex.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this article, Sanz Perl and colleagues set out to use a computational whole-brain model to simulate the patterns of functional connectivity (as observed from functional MRI) that characterise different forms of dementia, namely Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). To overall goal is to develop a paradigm to model a specific disorder, and then develop an in silico assessment of the effects of different interventions. They show that superior fitting of the simulated data to the empirical data of both pathologies can be achieved when a Hopf model of brain activity is informed by patterns of combined AD and bvFTD atrophy, or by the intrinsic organisation of brain regions into canonical resting-state networks. They also show that regional differences in the fitted parameters pertain to AD and bvFTD, both in terms of location, and in terms of dynamical regime. They then use a machine learning algorithm, the variational auto-encoder (VAE), to compress functional connectivity patterns into a 2-dimensional space (given by the relative activation of the VAE's two hidden neurons). This space reveals that AD and bvFTD perturb brain connectivity along two distinct dimensions, further stratifying sub-categories of AD. Finally, through visualisation in this latent space, the authors can assess the effects of different simulated interventions on the models previously fitted to AD and bvFTD: namely, stimulation of different regions and with different dynamical regimes, to evaluate whether the resulting model is moved closer to the region occupied by healthy controls.

A strength of this work is its creative combination of different modelling approaches, combining the more biologically-informed Hopf model, which incorporates atrophy maps and connectivity, with the VAE for the purpose of dimensionality reduction and visualisation. Another strength is the use of different controls, such as an atrophy map from a different disorder (Parkinson's) or the use of randomised heterogeneities, showing that the improved fit is not just due to increased degrees of freedom: an important concern for high-dimensional models, which the authors lay to rest.

Admittedly, the stimulation paradigm shows limited success at bringing the disorder-fitted models back to the region occupied by controls - except for the AD- sub-category, which is the least affected and shows the most promise in the authors' in-silico trial. The limited success of this approach in this specific context does not invalidate the framework's promise. This may also be attributed to the fact that the authors do not use disease-specific atrophy maps to model AD and bvFTD: rather, they use a single atrophy map obtained by combining the two and use this joint atrophy map both to model AD, and to model bvFTD. Likewise, the connectivity of the model is the same for all conditions.

A weakness of this work is that, as the authors themselves acknowledge, the brain regions whose stimulation pushes the model to be least far from controls in the latent space did not match with those presenting different bifurcation parameters. In fact, it is not clear whether this is because stimulation fails to reverse the regional alterations of the dynamical regime, or whether it does succeed, but introduces new alterations - although it should be possible to extract this information from the model, to provide additional insight. This raises the intriguing question of the biological meaning of the latent space. Although the authors do show what kinds of FC correspond to the different values of the VAE hidden neurons' activation, the latent space effectively acts as a 2-dimensional goodness-of-fit - raising the question of how much of the stimulation results could be captured by simply evaluating the stimulated model's GOF against controls (while acknowledging that this would conflate the two distinct dimensions along which AD and bvFTD differ from controls).

Since stimulation is intended to mimic the effects of different real-life interventions such as tACS and tDCS, it would be helpful to see whether the regions that are suggested as most promising for stimulation, do in fact match the regions that have shown the most success in actual clinical trials that have already been carried out. This would be a powerful validation from model to real applicability.

In its essence, the work makes progress towards the authors' goal of modelling different pathologies by incorporating biologically-derived information, highlighting their differences, and enabling the evaluation of different stimulation strategies. This computational framework is widely applicable to a variety of pathological (and even non-pathological) conditions, combining evaluation and intervention in a single workflow.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript the authors use single nucleus sequencing together with in situ to profile neurons from the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. The PVT has been implicated in diverse functions and here the authors use snRNAseq to try to assign those functions to distinct cell types within the structure. They first use punches of PVT and iterative clustering and filtering to find neuronal clusters with known PVT markers. Other cell types and neurons from surrounding brain regions were also present in the dataset. These data both support the previous division of PVT neurons into Drd2+/- cells and suggest these two groups can be further subdivided into 5 distinct clusters. In a nice in situ experiment the authors assessed top marker gene expression for each cluster across the anterior-posterior axis of the PVT. This showed that the five types were largely in distinct spatial locations. Follow-up in situ with an additional set of marker genes supported the same conclusion but also showed that expression of single genes even within a cell "type" can vary. The authors discuss how the transcriptomes of the cell types could map onto known function of anterior and posterior PVT neurons. Finally, the authors integrate their sequencing data with a dataset of thalamic neurons with specific known projection patterns. Of the cells that co-cluster between the datasets, they identify specific transcriptomic populations of cells that best overlap different cortical projection patterns. The authors identify Col12a1 as a marker of one particular population of PFC-projecting cells.

The idea of spatial gradients of transcription in brain regions rather than discrete cell "types" has been shown in a number of recent studies that combine transcriptomics and in situ hybridization. Application of this idea to other important functional areas of the brain like the PVT generally enhances understanding of the parcellation of neuronal function. Combining these data with mapping of projection patterns by a lab interested in the function of this region, will be of interest to other researchers who study PVT and its role in brain circuits. The data appear to be of high quality and the discussion is scholarly.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Marjaneh et al. studied the atrial septal variation through QTL mapping of inbred mouse strains which show extremes of septal phenotypes. The analysis discovered many interesting septal QTLs. Furthermore, the authors identified high-confidence candidate deleterious variants through whole genome sequencing of parental strains and analyzed variant architecture across gene features.

Overall, this is a comprehensive study that will provide a useful reference for the field. It will be a useful tool for hypothesis generation, which could lead to research on therapies that target atrial septal or common congenital heart disease.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, single neurons were recorded, using tetrodes, from the parahippocampal cortex of 5 rats navigating a double-Y maze (in which each arm of a Y-maze forks again). The goal was located at any one of the 4 branch terminations, and rats were given partial information in the form of a light cue that indicated whether the reward was on the right or left side of the maze. The second decision point was uncued and the rat had no way of knowing which of the two branches was correct, so this phase of the task was more akin to foraging. Following the outbound journey, with or without reward, the rat had to return (inbound journey) to the maze and start to begin again.

Neuronal activity was assessed for correlations with multiple navigation-relevant variables including location, head direction, speed, reward side, and goal location. The main finding is that a high proportion of neurons showed an increase in firing rate when the animal made a wrong turn at the first branch point (the one in which the correct decision was signalled). This increase, which the authors call rate remapping, persisted throughout the inbound journey as well. It was also found that head direction neurons (assessed by recording in an open field arena) in the same location in the room were more likely to show the rate change. The overall conclusion is that "during goal-directed navigation, parahippocampal neurons encode error information reflective of an animal's behavioral performance" or are "nodes in the transmission of behaviorally relevant variables during goal-directed navigation."

Overall I think this is a well-conducted study investigating an important class of neural representation: namely, the substrate for spatial orientation and navigation. The analyses are very sophisticated - possibly a little too much so, as the basic findings are relatively straightforward and the analyses take quite a bit of work to understand. A difficulty with the study is that it was exploratory (observational) rather than hypothesis-driven. Thus, the findings reveal correlations in the data but do not allow us to infer causal relationships. That said, the observation of increased firing in a subset of neurons following an erroneous choice is potentially interesting. However, the effect seems small. What were the actual firing rate values in Hz, and what was the effect size?

I also feel we are lacking information about the underlying behavior that accompanies these firing rate effects. The authors say "one possibility is that the head-direction signal in the parahippocampal region reflects a behavioral state related to the navigational choice or the lack of commitment to a particular navigational route" which is a good thought and raises the possibility that on error trials, rats are more uncertain and turn their heads more (vicarious trial and error) and thus sample the preferred firing direction more thoroughly. Another possibility is that they run more slowly, which is associated with a higher firing rate in these cells. I think we, therefore, need a better understanding of how behavior differed between error trials in terms of running speed, directional sampling, etc. A few good, convincing raw-data plots showing a remapping neuron on an error trial and a correct trial on the same arm would also be helpful (the spike plots were too tiny to get a good sense of this: fewer, larger ones would be more helpful). It would be useful to know at what point the elevated response returned to baseline, how - was it when the next trial began, and was the drop gradual (suggesting perhaps a more neurohumoral response) or sudden.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this paper, the authors present evidence from studies of biopsies from human subject and muscles from young and older mice that the enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) is expressed at reduced levels in older organisms associated with elevated levels of lipid peroxides. A series of studies in mice established that genetic reduction of GPx4 and hindlimb unloading each elevated lipid peroxide levels and reduced muscle contractility in young animals. Overexpression of GPx4 or N-acetylcarnosine blocked atrophy and loss of force generating capacity resulting from hindlimb unloading in young mice. Cell culture experiments in C2C12 myotubes were used to develop evidence linking elevated lipid peroxide levels to atrophy using genetic and pharmacologic approaches. Links between autophagy and atrophy were suggested.

Experiments on GPx4 expression levels, lipid peroxide levels, muscle mass and muscle force generating capacity were internally consistent and convincing. I thought the experiments supporting the view that autophagy contributed to atrophy were convincing. The hypothesis that altered lipidation of autophagy factors contributed was tested or supported in my view. Evidence for muscle atrophy in response to genetic or pharmacologic manipulations is a bit inconsistent throughout the paper, possibly because the small N of some experiments does not provide sufficient power to detect observed numeric differences in the means. The pattern of muscle fiber atrophy by fiber type is consistent throughout the paper but there is variability in which comparisons reached the threshold for significance, again, possibly because of the small N of the experiments. I agree with the authors that altered activity of enzymes in the contractile apparatus provides one explanation for the observed weakness but respectfully wish to point out there are others such as impaired excitation-contraction coupling which is well known to occur in aging.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, the authors characterize the impact of histone deacetylation on spatial regulation of gene expression in the early gastrula embryo. They utilize Xenopus tropicalis as a vertebrate model embryo and focus on maternal HDAC1 and HDAC2 deacetylases to characterize the regulatory role of histone acetylation on zygotic transcription. In particular, they are interested in whether this epigenetic mark positively or negatively regulates gene expression for the presumptive germ layer and contributes spatially to cell lineage integrity in gastrulation.

Using gene expression analysis, they find that HDAC1 and HDAC2 are present maternally in the egg and throughout blastula and gastrula stages. By performing HDAC1 ChIP-Seq, they find that the deacetylase is already bound as early as the Stage 8 blastula - time of genome activation - and that HDAC1 peaks located within promoter regions generally increase over time from blastula to early gastrula, Stage 10.5. Interestingly, the binding of HDAC1 is not dependent on the zygotic transcript, as HDAC1 ChIP-seq peaks show little difference upon alpha-amanitin treatment. Many of the HDAC1 peaks correlate with peaks of both FoxH1 and Sox3, suggesting their role in its deacetylase recruitment to the genome. Examination of epigenetic signatures of HDAC1 bound regions using previously published datasets identifies distinct chromatin binding categories: authors find a strong correlation with H3K27-Ac and pan-H3Kac, and that HDAC1 generally binds to regions free of repressive marks such as H3K9-me3. The authors find that a majority of HDAC1 peaks contain H3K27Ac but not H3K37me3 peaks and approximately ten percent of HDAC1 loci have both activating and repressive marks.

The authors investigate a functional role for histone deacetylation by inhibiting it, using the broad inhibitor TSA, and HDAC1 specific inhibitor VPA. Importantly, they spatially characterize pan-H3K acetylation and gene expression changes in animal cag (AC) and vegetal mass (VG) regions on the embryo. These are very useful datasets that provide new insights into how histone acetylation is tied to the maintenance of lineage integrity. At a global level, they find that TSA inhibition leads to gastrulation arrest and leads to widespread upregulation of H3K acetylation (pan-H3Kac); suggesting that proper regulation of histone acetylation is required for development. Further, they find that previously repressed regions, marked by H3K27me3 show the most upregulation of pan-H3Kac upon TSA treatment. Regionally, they find a number of interesting results upon inhibition of histone acetylation. First, TSA treatment causes dysregulation - upregulation - of the animal cap (AC) pan-H3Kac peaks in vegetal mass (VG), and upregulation of VG peaks in the animal cap. This suggests that lineage specifically is likely maintained in part by HDAC-mediated de-acetylation of germ layer genes. Gene expression characterization in AC and VG explants +/- TSA treatment supports this conclusion as inappropriate upregulation of VG gene expression is found in AC and inappropriate upregulation of AC genes is found in VG. Somewhat surprisingly, HDACs also appears to play a positive regulatory role in germ layer expression. Focusing on genes near HDAC1 peaks containing H3K27Ac, the authors show that genes downregulated upon TSA treatment tend to be spatially restricted; downregulated genes in AC tended to be AC genes and downregulated genes in VG tended to be VG genes. This suggests that HDACs play both positive and negative roles in regulating germ layer expression in the gastrula.

Strengths of the work include the demonstration that histone deacetylase HDAC1 binds to the genome by the onset of genome activation, accumulates in promoters as the embryo develops through early gastrula, and that inhibition of histone deacetylation disrupts germ layer lineage integrity. New datasets include ChIP-seq of HDAC1 from blastula to gastrula, panH3Kac ChIP-seq within animal and vegetal regions of the embryo, and regional RNA-seq of embryos with and without TSA inhibition of histone acetylation. This study helps demonstrate and clarify that HDAC enzymes play both a positive and negative role in gene expression regulation, and that histone acetylation is required to maintain spatial specificity of germ layer expression in gastrula. Some of the weaknesses of the work include the correlative nature of the experiments and missing analysis. Overall, the research is interesting and impactful, contributing to a growing body of work about the role of histone acetylation in the spatial regulation of earliest cell fate decisions in the embryo.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this work, the authors investigated the mechanism by which ions are selected in ATP-gated P2X receptor channels using patch-clamp electrophysiology. P2X receptors are known to be cation-selective channels, but one of them (the P2X5) also displays anion permeability through a molecular mechanism that is unclear. Here, the authors identify in P2X2 a glutamate residue (E17) which plays a critical role in determining ion selectivity. This residue is localized in the intracellular side of the permeating pathway and is part of three large intracellular lateral fenestrations that are thought to be potential exit/entry pathways for ions. The authors elegantly show that when the side chain of E17 was substituted for cysteine, it became accessible to water-soluble, thiol-reactive methanethiosulfonate (MTS) derivatives that were applied from both sides of the membrane. By mutating E17 into lysine, which reverts the charge, they show that mutated channels displayed increased anion permeability, although channels still remained largely cation selective. However, reverting the charge in the mouse P2X5 (K17E and K17D), they provide evidence for a complete ion selectivity switch (that is mutated P2X5 became cation selective). Therefore, although the mechanism by which P2X2 selects cation versus anion still remains incompletely understood, it seems that K17 is a key determinant for P2X5 anion permeability.

The conclusions of this paper are well supported by data. The work should advance our understanding of ion selectivity in P2X receptors and will likely provide the foundation for further studies.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Authors aimed to decode signatures linked to tremor, slowness and effective motor control using different types of signals acquired from a group of Parkinson's disease patients during deep brain stimulation surgery. They were able to identify distinct frequency bands which corresponded to different symptoms and conclude that multi frequency band and cortical decoding surpass single frequency band and subthalamic nucleus-based decoding.

The main strength of the study is the recording types used to decode symptoms emerging during the same experimental task: authors leveraged micro and macro level recordings from the subthalamic nucleus and ECoG recordings from the motor cortex, enabling them to provide decoding performance across distinct recording scales and from two critical structures linked to Parkinson's pathophysiology. This allowed the authors to contrast rhythm-based signatures and timescales of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms.

The primary weakness is the level of description used to describe key methods which makes it difficult to unpack the results: authors should pay particular attention to validating and justifying metrics used for assessing behaviour (e.g., tremor, slowness, and effective motor control). Also, the relationship between behavioural measures and UPDRS scores should be further justified. For instance, (1) what is the definition of tremor amplitude probability density in the absence of tremor and what is its relationship to relevant subcategories of clinical tremor severity?; (2) why did the authors link tremor while performing a task to UPDRS rest tremor scores? ; (3) why did the authors opt for normalised cursor speed as a metric for slowness?; (4) Are there any implications of this normalisation when exploring slowness across participants? Authors consider cortical and subthalamic recordings separately: if these recordings were acquired simultaneously, analysing the relationship between the two signals (i.e., envelope, phase, phase-amplitude) would significantly improve the paper.

Authors aimed to decode signatures linked to different symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Results support their primary conclusions that cortical decoding performs better than subthalamic decoding and that using a multi-dimensional feature space improves the performance of the decoder. The paper and data generated will contribute to movement control, movement disorders, and brain stimulation fields.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Temporal patterning allows a neural stem cell to generate different neural identities through the course of development. While this relationship has been demonstrated in many instances of stem cells and/or neurons, it is unclear how birth order translates to target specification. In this manuscript, the authors use live imaging and new tools generated from single-cell RNA sequencing data to address this issue.

They find that neurons born from a given time window (at the resolution of early>middle>late) innervate together - and distinctly from - those born at different temporal windows, though the specifics of the innervations differ between neural stem cell lineages. They also find that neurons achieve this by extending their dendrites in exploratory directions and selectively stabilising the ones in the appropriate direction. This process likely occurs at the sub-second timescales. Finally, they also demonstrate that embryonic-born (larval-specific) neurons that remodel to integrate into adulty-specific circuitry simultaneously perform pruning and dendrite extension to integrate into the circuitry at the appropriate time.

This is a valuable description of how developmental programmes imparted to neurons at the time of their birth might translate to their targetting and connectivity. It lays down a framework for understanding the defects in these processes.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Previous studies from this group reported that PEG10 is increased in the spinal cord from Ubiquilin 2-/- mice as well as PEG10 being elevated in models of Ubiquilin 2-mediated ALS. In this study, the authors provide evidence supporting the concept that the proteasome factor Ubiquilin 2 regulates the activity of the Gag-pol retrotransposon gene (PEG10). Mutations in Ubiquilin 2 underlie a portion of the familial forms of ALS. It is found that in spinal cord tissue from sporadic ALS patients PEG10-pol levels are elevated, leading to the conclusion that altered regulation of PEG10 levels by Ubiquilin 2 and a subsequent alteration in genes regulating axon remodeling may contribute to all forms of ALS pathogenesis. Strengths of this work include the extensive analyses and direct data on the mechanism by which Ubiquilin 2 regulates PEG10 levels in human cells resulting in less PEG10. They further show that peptides generated by the self-cleavage of PEG10 alter the expression of genes involved in axon function. The major weakness of this study is the complete absence of data that directly show that an alteration of PEG10 by Ubiquilin 2 is critical for ALS pathogenesis. As noted by the authors, multiple pathways have been broadly implicated in genetics and sporadic forms of ALS. Thus while the study provides interesting data on the regulation of PEG10 by Ubiquilin 2, the extent to which this pathway underlies ALS pathogenesis and/or progression is speculative.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Jigo et al. measured the entire contrast sensitivity function and manipulated eccentricity and stimulus size to assess changes in contrast sensitivity and acuity for different eccentricities and polar angles. They found that CSFs decreased with eccentricity, but to a lesser extent after M scaling while compensating for striate-cortical magnification around the polar angle of the visual field did not equate to contrast sensitivity.

In this article, the authors used classic psychophysical tests and a simple experimental design to answer the question of whether cortical magnification underlies polar angle asymmetries of contrast sensitivity. Contrast sensitivity is considered to be the most fundamental spatial vision and is important for both normal individuals and clinical patients in ophthalmology. The parametric contrast sensitivity model and the extraction of key CSF attributes help to compare the comparison of the effect of M scaling at different angles. This work can provide a new reference for the study of normal and abnormal space vision.

The conclusions of this paper are mostly well supported by data, but some aspects of data collection and analysis need to be clarified and extended. 1) In addition to the key CSF attributes used in this paper, the area under the CSF curve is a common, global parameter to figure out how contrast sensitivity changes under different conditions. An analysis of the area under the CSF curve is recommended. 2) In Figure 2, CRFs are given for several SFs, but were the CRFs at the cutof-sf well-fitted? The authors should have provided the CRF results and corresponding fits to make their results more solid. 3) The authors suggested that the apparent decrease in HVA extent at high SF may be due to the lower cutoff-SF of the perifoveal VM. Analysis of the correlation between the change in HVA and cutoff SF after M scaling may help to draw more comprehensive conclusions. 4) In Figure 6, it would be desirable to add panels of exact values of HVA and VMA effects for key CSF attributes at different eccentricities, as shown in Figures 4B, D, and F, to make the results more intuitive.

More discussions are needed to interpret the results. 1) Due to the different testing distances in VM and HM, their retinae will be in a different adaptation state, making any comparison between VM and HM tricky. The author should have added a discussion on this issue. 2) In Figure 4, the HVA extent appears to change after M-scaling, although the analysis shows that M-scaling only affects the HVA extent at high SF. In contrast, the range of VMA was almost unchanged. The authors could have discussed more how the HVA and VMA effects behave differently after M-scaling. 3) The results in Figure 4 also show that at 11.3 cpd, the measurement may be inaccurate. This might lead to an inaccurate estimate of the M scaling effect at 11.3 cpd. The authors should discuss this issue more. 4) The different neural image-processing capabilities among locations, which is referred to as the "Qualitative hypothesis", is the main hypothesis explaining the differences around the polar angle of the visual field. To help the reader better understand this concept, the author should provide further discussions.

The authors should also provide more details about their measures. For example, high grayscale is crucial in contrast sensitivity measurements, and the authors should clarify whether the monitor was calibrated with high grayscale or only with 8-bit. Since the main experiment was measuring CS at different locations, it should also be clarified whether the global uniformity of the display was calibrated. In addition, their method of data analysis relies on parametric contrast sensitivity model fitting. One of the concerns is whether there are enough trials for each SF to measure the threshold. The authors should have included in their method the number of trials corresponding to each SF in each CSF curve.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Pasquereau and Turner investigated the encoding of reward and delay information in subthalamic (STN) neurons in behaving macaques. They record during a forced-choice task with three levels of reward and two levels of delay, using rejection rates to model subjective value. Task-dependent neurons, those which encoded reward and/or delay, were identified with a sliding-window regression model. They then investigated the time course of reward and delay information using a principal component analysis approach. They find that the strength of the first and four principal components varies systematically along the anteroposterior axis of the STN, suggesting a spatial distribution of value coding. These data, recorded in a controlled task, add to the understanding of STN function.

The data, collected from a well-defined brain area and with appropriate motor and oculomotor controls included during a straight-forward task, are a good foundation for investigating STN function. However, the statistical procedures used are not completely described and may not be appropriate, particularly in the sliding window analysis. Given this analysis underlies some of the further analyses, it must be clarified or corrected for the conclusions to stand. Further, the analysis only explores the encoding of delay at the time of a cue and does not consider how the value of delay may change over time.

The sliding window analysis, a common approach in investigating time-course data, necessitates multiple comparisons (188 time-bins here) and so requires a controlling procedure to keep the family-wise error-rate low. The authors describe, not completely, how the pre-instruction period was used to establish the boundaries for significance for each coefficient. The pre-instruction period, by the authors' own account, is a period of lower variance and so it would be expected that the boundaries for significance would be lower and the number of task-dependent neurons is therefore an overestimate. The shuffling process the authors use when they determine significance in their principal components analysis is a more appropriate method.

The task design and analysis provide a limited test of delay encoding. As only two levels of delay were tested, it is not possible to directly test whether the subjective discounting function is hyperbolic or exponential and hence whether the delay is encoded subjectively or objectively. Further, the task has several variable interval lengths (hold in: 1.2-2.8 s, short delay: 1.8-2.3 s, long delay: 3.5-4s) that frustrate interpretation. The distribution of these delays is not described, for example as it reads it seems possible that some long delay rewards are delivered with shorter latency between cue and reward than some short delay rewards (1.2 + 3.5 = 4.7s vs. 2.8+2.3 = 5.1 s). The authors have not considered that if the delay value is encoding, then the value, both objectively and subjectively, may be changing as the delay elapses. The variation of these task intervals may have an effect on the value of delay.

The principal components analysis is an interesting way to explore patterns of encoding and the spatial distribution of these patterns. In particular, the finding that Discounting- neurons, those whose firing rate increases with increasing reward cues and decreases with increasing delay cues, are preferentially found in the posterior STN, which the authors demonstrate with both the principal component analysis and the sliding-window classification analysis, challenges previous ideas of STN organization.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this work, Pan et al. investigate the properties of the underexplored snake venom phosphodiesterase (svPDE) from a genomic, transcriptomic, and structural perspective. These analyses are complemented by comparisons with similar ENPP proteins to better understand the elements that may underline the specific role of svPDE in envenomation. The data support a role for svPDE that may be related to its interactions with partner proteins or due to its phosphodiesterase activity to enhance the cytotoxic effects of other venoms present in the environment.

Overall, the authors have done a good job of investigating the origins and function of svPDE. The evolutionary analyses are adequate and informative, which are expanded by further experiments to determine the structure and interactions of svPDE. The protein-protein interaction experiments and the svPDE activity experiments with different substrate types shed light on the possible role of the protein in the context of its cellular environment and point to the potential role of glycosylation as part of the mode of action of svPDE. These results will pose a good prelude for further research into the mechanism and interactions of svPDE from other species. Further, the mechanistic insights from this work may also help the development of antivenom compounds that target svPDE.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

ARL15 forms a complex with the TRPM7 channel and CNNM transporters and is involved in the regulation of the TRPM7 function. To understand the regulatory mechanism, the authors performed biochemical and structural characterizations. In this work, they determined the crystal structure of ARL15 in complex with CNNM2 CBS domain, performed the mutational analysis based on the structure, and successfully revealed the binding mechanism between ARL15 and CNNM.

However, the detailed mechanism of TRPM7 inhibition by ARL15 remains unclear because the structure of TRPM7 in complex with ARL15 is still unknown. Furthermore, despite the structure determination of ARL15 in complex with CNNM, the effect of ARL15 on CNNM function is still unclear.

Nevertheless, the structural information on the ARL15-CNNM complex provided by the authors is valuable for the related research field, and the structure-based CNNM mutants specifically targeting disruption of binding to either ARL15 or PRL would also be useful.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

These authors use a mouse model of gestational intermittent hypoxia (GIH), a component of sleep apnea during pregnancy, to test the hypothesis that GIH induces inflammation in the central nervous system that impairs respiratory functions, in a sex-dependent manner. The major finding of this work is that spinal cord inflammation, mainly driven by activated microglia cells, impairs inactivity-induced inspiratory motor facilitation (iMF). The authors successfully test this hypothesis and their results support their conclusion.

Major strengths of this work include a robust study design, a well-defined translational model (GIH that sets on later in pregnancy), complementary biochemical and experimental methods such that correlated findings are followed up by interventional studies, and sufficient power to evaluate sex differences. In particular, the authors note the upregulation of several NF-kB regulates genes and increased concentration expression of inflammatory markers in the spinal cords of male mice. These mice also have deficits in the iMF response. By depleting microglia and blocking Ik-kinases, the authors convincingly demonstrate that the increased spinal inflammation is causative in the disruption of respiratory plasticity.

The major limitation as the manuscript is currently written is a clear rationale for evaluating the iMF response as a primary endpoint. One of the corresponding authors is an expert in iMF, but there is no rationale for why it is expected that this aspect of plasticity might be disrupted. The authors discuss breathing and respiratory function in the introduction, but these have not been measured here. It is not known whether GIH impacts respiratory response or baseline breathing in a spontaneous breathing model, including baseline frequency and tidal volume and the ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Shortening the introduction to offer a clear rationale would be beneficial, given the wide audience of this journal. The limitations of this model, including vagotomy, mechanical ventilation, hyperoxic ventilation, and recording from the phrenic nerve in lieu of respiratory measures, should also be discussed in the discussion for readers not familiar with this model outside of the respiratory control field.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The paper starts with a general explanation of the method behind temporal response functions (TRFs), an analysis technique for M/EEG data that has led to many new findings in the last few years. The authors touch upon convolution and show how a linear model can be used to model non-linear responses. The methods section provides a practical introduction to the TRF, in which advice on general analysis steps - such as EEG preprocessing and centering the predictor variables - is intertwined with explanations of the use of the toolbox Eelbrain. The results section outlines how to use the outcome of a TRF model to answer (cognitive) neuroscientific questions and provides a comparison between ERPs and TRFs. The discussion section touches upon a couple of considerations, the most important one being a discussion of the Sparsity prior/Boosting algorithm.

A first great merit of this paper is that it manages to clearly explain both the analysis and the important decisions a researcher needs to make in just a few pages. When following the steps outlined in (in particular) the methods section, the researcher will know how to implement a TRF model using Eelbrain, as well as have a general idea about the decisions that one needs to make in the process. Furthermore, the explicit comparison between ERPs and TRFs will help many understand what TRFs are, and in which ways they allow for more fine-grained analysis of the data than ERPs. For these reasons, this work is a suitable starting point for anyone who wants to get started with TRFs, and a good addition to the existing set of papers on this topic, such as Crosse, Di Liberto, Bednar, and Lalor (2016) and Sassenhagen (2019).

An important contribution of this work is the implementation of the Boosting algorithm. Although it is yet to be determined whether this algorithm creates better models of the neural data than previous implementations of the TRF, the authors provide good arguments for the suitability of this algorithm for the analysis of neural time-series data.

On the practical side, the tutorial analyses are well-designed for the target audience, with interpretable questions and contrast relevant to the field of cognitive neuroscience. The corresponding scripts are clear and well-commented. Finally, the implementation of this method in Python will be greatly appreciated - especially by those who do not have access to a MATLAB license.

All in all, this is a highly didactic paper that will help many researchers get started with temporal response functions both theoretically (to understand the method) and practically (to work with the toolbox). As such, this work has the potential to be of great importance in the field of cognitive neuroscience.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors propose that the ER-resident large GTPase Sey1, a homolog of mammalian atlastin, localizes to LDs and promotes their association with the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV); They also propose that the effector LegG1 contributes to this process by activating the host GTPase RanA on the LCV surface. Once LDs associate with the LCV, the authors favor a model where LDs are taken up into the LCV lumen where they are consumed by L. pneumophila as a carbon source. They propose that the fatty acid transporter FadL, Lpg1810, is involved in the transport of palmitate across the bacterial membrane.

Strong points of this study are the use of Dictyostelium as a genetically tractable model system, the finding that FadL and the addition of exogenous palmitate positively affect intracellular bacterial growth, and the fact that LDs can be detected within LCVs which, if confirmed, would be of significant biological importance.

The main concern is that the molecular mechanism underlying LCV-LD dynamics and LD uptake have only been superficially described. It needs to be determined how exactly proteins like Sey1 or LegG1 promote LD recruitment to LCVs. Does this process really depend on Ran GTPases and if so, do constitutively inactive Ran mutants phenocopy the defects? And by what mechanism are LDs delivered across the LCV membrane into their lumen? The authors themselves raise that question in the discussion, but provide no explanation or supporting data. How commonly can LD uptake into LCVs be observed across a population of cells? And are the phenotypes observed upon deletion of Sey1 direct effects, or are global changes in the ER/host cell protein or lipid landscape indirectly causing those phenotypes? These are some of the questions that, once addressed, would improve the impact of this study.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, the authors were trying to achieve the generation of continuous cell lines after lineage-restricted mis-expression of RasV12 in vivo followed by primary cell culture. They used glia-, epithelia-, and muscle-specific Gal4s, to get glial, epithelial, and muscle cell lines, as well as the RU-inducible Gene Switch Gal4, to get neuronal and blood cell lines. They performed RNA-seq analysis of the cell lines and showed that they are most similar to each by principal component analysis. They compared their RNA-seq to the Fly Cell Atlas and showed that the cell lines were quite similar to their in vivo counterparts. They treated cell lines with the steroid hormone ecdysone and found that many of the cell lines differentiate. These cell lines also contain an attP site, allowing for CRISPR-based screens. These cell lines could be passaged for many generations, but robust effects were found in the early passages. These cell lines have been deposited at a public resource center (The Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, DGRC).

The major strengths of the paper include rigorous analysis of characteristics, gene expression, and differentiation potential of the cell lines. There were only a few minor weaknesses related to editorial changes in the manuscript.

The authors provide convincing results that support their conclusions and as such the authors achieved their aims.

This work is likely to have a positive impact on the Drosophila community. These cell lines will serve as a solid foundation for both low- and high-throughput screens.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study aimed to estimate contact parameters associated with the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in unvaccinated South African households over one year. The authors found no correlation between the frequency or duration of contacts and infection risk. Similar parameters (e.g., sharing a room with the index patient) also failed to yield an association. Reassuringly, a robust association was found with the Ct of the index case; female sex and individuals aged 13-17 years were also associated with increased risk. In a more general analysis, obesity, age >5 and <60 y, and non-smoking status were associated with increased risk.

Strengths of the study are its relatively large size (131 households involving 497 people) with detailed proximity data; frequent testing to enable high ascertainment of infections; and ability to exclude individuals seropositive at baseline. Additionally, several outcomes were evaluated in the models, partly to accommodate uncertainty in the index case. Different model structures were evaluated to gauge robustness.

Limitations of the study include the fact that many index cases were likely enrolled after their infectious period, and it is possible that apparent secondary cases in the household arose from a shared exposure with the index case but had a longer latent period. Each of these factors could weaken the perceived effect of close contacts. Statistically, there is the vexing question of what age (gender, smoking, etc.) really represents mechanistically, and whether the models may be conditioning on a collider. Another statistical consideration is that many household contacts were excluded from the study because they were seropositive at baseline. In effect, their households may already have been "challenged" with the virus, and there may be heterogeneities in household susceptibility that are not fully considered by the simple exclusion of individuals with evidence of prior infection. Separating these household types in the analysis might have yielded different results.

All that said, it is telling that in these households, infection is not clearly linked to typically defined close contacts. This is an important result that complements other strong evidence that aerosols are the dominant route of transmission for SARS-CoV-2. This information is critical for the design of effective intervention strategies. Additionally, the authors outline how future studies can be designed to improve on this work.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

FLC is a gene involved in cold-dependent induction of flowering, as prolonged cold exposure leads to a progressive decrease in the level of this floral repressor as a result of a digital switch from an ON to an OFF state occurring asynchronously in cell populations. In this work, the authors analyze the contribution of analog and digital regulation to FLC expression in the absence of cold exposure. To do so, they use a genetic trick to be able to perform this analysis in the wild-type Ler ecotype where the molecular tools are available to do such an analysis. In Ler, an activator of FLC is missing due to a natural mutation and FLC expression is repressed during vegetative development by a pathway called the autonomous repressive pathway, allowing for a rapid transition to flowering. The authors used two mutant allele in one component of the autonomous pathway, the FCA gene. In the strongest allele, FLC is highly expressed and the plant are late flowering while in the weaker allele FLC shows a weaker expression and the plant requires an intermediate time between Ler and the strong fca allele to flower.

The authors demonstrate that the expression levels of the FLC gene vary quantitatively in the three genetic background they use (Ler and two fca alleles), and that mutating FCA leads to an analog increase in FLC expression. The quantifications performed by the authors indicate that increased level of FLC correlate with a decrease in the proportion of cells that can switch OFF FLC, with the strong fca allele showing a negligible amount of cells that can switch OFF FLC. The authors further measure the half-life of FLC mRNA and FLC protein, and show that FLC expression switch from ON to OFF is a one-way-switching. They used these data to build a computational model of the regulation of FLC expression and show that the model can reproduce the dynamics of FLC protein level at the cell population level in a time-course with measurement at 7, 15 and 21 days after sowing. Taken together their work suggest that, at least in the weak fca mutant, a combination of analog and digital regulation of transcription explains the population-wide dynamics of FLC expression. The authors propose that this regulation could be explained by high level of transcription of FLC preventing the digital switch, as a result of the short half-lives of FLC mRNA and FLC protein.

The finding of this work are potentially of wide interest to understanding transcriptional regulation by providing a functional link between the digital and analog mode of regulation of gene expression. However, the evidence of a link between expression levels resulting from analog regulation and the digital regulation are only partly supported by correlations from cell population-wide analysis of FLC expression. The authors did not provide experiments to more directly test that higher level of transcription could indeed prevent the OFF switch of FLC. It is likely but not shown that the ON to OFF switch of FLC is regulated similarly in the absence of cold exposure (this study) and upon cold exposure. Also, in their model, the authors used the assumption that FLC switches off at division but they do not test this important assumption. Finally it is unclear whether this combination of analog and digital regulation is relevant to FLC regulation in wild-type plants or is only relevant to the laboratory-induced mutants studied in this work.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors present a nice collection of analyses identifying the likely causal locus and pigmentation basis underlying color polymorphism in a model aposematic moth system. In general, the writing and presentation are very clear. There are several areas of the text, however, that could benefit from more clarity and attention to detail. Those changes should be very simple for the authors to make.

My primary concern however is the interpretation of their findings, in light of the lack of analysis of recombination, as well as the flanking region of their identified gene duplication. Specifically, while the authors do an OK job characterizing the genomic region 3' of their identified novel insertion/duplication associated with white coloration, I could not find an analysis of the 5' region, in which there could be other functional elements that could give rise to their "complex polymorphism". Additionally, the authors discuss their findings and the potential of their duplicated region to "provide a region of reduced recombination" (lines 249-251). However, they need to be much more clear with the reader that this is a hypothesis that they have not measured (even though they have WGS data from a sufficient number of individuals estimating LD, which I find strange).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript the authors proposed a novel system by which they can suppress the expression of any gene of interest precisely and efficiently with a pre-validated, highly specific and efficient synthetic short-hairpin RNA. The idea of identifying potent artificial RNAi (ARTi) triggers is intriguing, and the authors successfully identify six ARTi with robust knockdown efficiency and limited to no off-target effects. As a proof-of-concept, the authors examined three oncology targets for validation, including EGFRdel19 (which already has a clinically approved drug for validation), KRASG12R (for which there are no in vivo compatible inhibitors yet) and STAG1 (which has a synthetic lethal interaction with recurrent loss-of-function mutations of STAG2). The authors demonstrated significant suppression of colony formation and in vivo tumor growth for all three oncology targets.

This novel system could serve as a powerful tool for loss-of-function experiments that are often used to validate a drug target. Not only this tool can be applied in exogenous systems (like EGFRdel19 and KRASG12R in this paper), the authors successfully demonstrated that ARTi can also be used in endogenous systems by CRISPR knocking in the ARTi target sites to the 3'UTR of the gene of interest (like STAG2 in this paper).

ARTi enables specific, efficient, and inducible suppression of these genes of interest, and can potentially improve therapeutic target validations. However, the system cannot be easily generalized as there are some limitations in this system:

• The authors claimed in the introduction sections that CRISPR/Cas9-based methods are associated with off-target effects, however, the author's system requires the use CRISPR/Cas9 to knock out a given endogenous genes or to knock-in ARTi target sites to the 3' UTR of the gene of interest. Though the authors used a transient CRISPR/Cas9 system to minimize the potential off-target effects, the advantages of ARTi over CRISPR are likely less than claimed.

• Instead of generating gene-specific loss-of-function triggers for every new candidate gene, the authors identified a universal and potent ARTi to ensure standardized and controllable knockdown efficiency. It seems this would save time and effort in validating each lost-of-function siRNAs/sgRNAs for each gene. However, users will still have to design and validate the best sgRNA to knock out endogenous genes or to knock in ARTi target sites by CRISPR/Cas9. The latter is by no-means trivial. Users will need to design and clone an expression construct for their cDNA replacement construct of interest, which will still be challenging for big proteins.

• The approach of knocking-out an endogenous gene followed by replacement of a regulatable gene can also be achieved using regulated degrons, and by tet-regulated promoters included in the gene replacement cassette. The authors should include a discussion of the merits of these approaches compared with ARTi.

Often instructive quotations aren't appropriate for the current situation because they have been stripped of their original context which doesn't apply to the new situation in which it is being used.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Van Dongen et al. investigated the methylation signature of smoking found in the blood among monozygotic twins ascertained from the Netherlands Twin Register. With their unique study design (which by design controls for the influence of age and sex), the authors shed light on DNA methylation levels that vary with smoking status, as well as with smoking cessation. The authors novel study design examined of twin pairs concordant or discordant for smoking status (current, former, never). The authors performed an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) and identified 13 genome-wide significant CpGs that were differentially methylated between the discordant twin current-never smoking pairs. Another EWAS conducted by the authors found 5 additional genome-wide significant CpGs among current-former smoking discordant pairs. Each of the 13 identified CpG sites between current-former twins have been previously identified as associated with smoking. The authors found that 3 of these 13 CpGs are located within 1Mb of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) previously associated with smoking initiation, suggesting a role for the SNP in both genetic susceptibility of smoking as well as methylation. The authors tested for enrichment of the 13 CpGs within traits and pathways and found enrichment among smoking related traits, as well as the dopaminergic synapse pathway. Interestingly, the authors found that twin pairs discordant for former smoking (former smoking-never pair) had methylation levels that nearly returned to baseline (never smoking) after smoking cessation. These data broaden our understanding of methylation signatures in the blood using a concordant/discordant smoking and twin study design. The authors evaluated within-twin pair methylation differences for the 13 significant CpGs and found twins concordant for smoking status had very little difference between their methylation levels, yet those discordant for smoking status had larger differences with the current-never smoking twins having the largest differences. Importantly, using a dataset with both methylation and RNA sequencing data, the authors found higher methylation at three CpGs was associated with lower gene expression providing functional context for their findings. The authors correctly acknowledge the limitations of only having blood to evaluate methylation signatures and using a methylation array rather than bisulfite sequencing.

There are a couple of aspects that would be useful to help with interpretation of their findings, such as whether presentation of a formal test for trend shows a linear relationship between overall DNA methylation and smoking pack-years and smoking quit time. It would help the reader if the authors could put their findings into context with what has been previously identified in studies such as the Framingham Heart Study or the prior twin study with concordant/discordant twins. While the findings are interesting, the moderate sample size and use of a methylation array rather than sequencing may ultimately lead this work to have only moderate impact on the field.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Warren et al., presents evidence suggesting that aberrant Yap signaling plays a role in epithelial progenitor cell dysregulation in lung fibrosis. This work builds on a body of work in the literature that Hippo signaling is aberrantly regulated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. They use a combination of single nuclear and spatial transcriptomics, together with in vivo conditional genetic perturbations of Hippo signaling in mice, to investigate roles for Yap/Taz signaling in alveolar epithelial homeostasis and remodeling associated with exposure to a fibrosing agent, bleomycin. They show that Taz and Tead1/4 are most abundantly expressed by alveolar type 1 (AT1) cells, but Nf2 immunoreactivity (upstream activator of Hippo) is observed predominantly within airway and AT2 cells. Bleomycin exposure was associated with reduced p-Mst in regenerating alveolar epithelium, that inactivation of Yap/Taz arrested AT2>AT1 differentiation, and inactivation of either Nf2 or Mst1/2 promoted AT1 differentiation after bleomycin exposure and reduced matrix deposition/fibrosis. They go on to show that compromised alveolar regeneration resulting from inactivation of Yap/Taz results in enhanced bronchiolization of injured alveoli. Experiments are well designed and include quantitative endpoints where appropriate, data of high quality, and results are generally supportive of conclusions. These studies provide valuable new data relating to roles for the Hippo pathway in regulation of alveolar homeostasis and epithelial regeneration/remodeling in injury/repair and fibrosis.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors of the current study investigated the effect of the suspension of the Australian breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening program for 3, 6, 9, or 12 months on cancer outcomes and cancer services.

The major strengths of the current study are the usage of the validated Policy1 modelling platform to estimate the effects of delays in the screening program on cancer outcomes. Furthermore, they described a wide range of different scenarios and looked at all three national screening programs together. A clear and detailed description of the screening programs was given. The results are well-described and detailed.

The authors reached their aim. They showed how a disruption of the breast cancer screening program of 12 months led to less screen-detected and interval invasive cancers, and to an increase in the percentage of tumours with a tumour size of more than 15mm or with nodal involvement. In addition, suspension of the bowel screening program for 12 months led to upstaging for 891 tumors. Suspension of the cervix screening program for 12 months let to 27 upstaged tumors, and to 69 extra tumors. On the contrary, suspension of the breast screening for 3 months did not lead to a higher percentage of tumours with a tumor size of more than 15 mm or to a higher percentage of tumors with nodal involvement. Suspension of the bowel screening program for 3 months led to upstaging of 261 tumors, and suspension of the cervical screening program for 6 months led to 21 extra tumors and to 9 upstaged tumors. The conclusion of the authors that 'maintaining screening participation is critical to reducing the burden of cancer at a population level' is therefore not completely correct, as suspension for 3 months might be needed in situations with limited resources and will not have a very large impact on the cancer burden.

This paper predicts upstaging due to the disruptions in the screening program. This information can be used by hospitals so they know what they can expect, and can be used in the future if decisions need to made about suspending the screening program.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Overall, the paper by Dang and colleagues is an interesting addition to the field. This study investigates the relationship between socioeconomic status and lifetime obesity using group-based trajectory modeling. The authors identified three trajectories overall, the most prevalent being stable normal BMI. Overall, higher SES was associated with a greater risk of obesity, which is contradictory to studies that examine the relationship among developed countries. Their findings and conclusions are supported by their analysis/data, however, some consideration and additional details are needed to help understand and be more confident in the final results.

Strengths of this study include:

- The use of novel techniques to investigate the relationship between SES and lifetime obesity, which is important for understanding the life course of disease and for designing future public health interventions and strategies.<br /> - A large sample size.<br /> - The use of a population-based sampling strategy to recruit participants, which helps the generalizability of findings and limits volunteer bias.<br /> - The availability of data on SES and height/weight over a 20-year follow-up, including objectively measured weight and height.<br /> - The availability of important confounders (e.g., physical activity, energy intake).

While overall it is an interesting study, there are some considerations and unclarities that should be addressed.

Weaknesses of this study include:

- Lack of clarity on how the authors conceptualize and define socioeconomic status in some sections of the paper. A limitation is the definition of SES only encompasses educational attainment and occupation, and not other aspects (e.g. income, social class). However, most studies published to date also focus mostly on education and occupation.<br /> - A large majority (~90%) of participants were excluded from the analysis due to missing data on exposures and outcomes. This is a substantial proportion, and it is quite possible that this may have resulted in selection bias for those included vs. those not included, and may limit the generalizability of the findings.<br /> - As with all studies that use self-reported data, there is some potential for information bias. However, the authors do acknowledge this as a limitation in their study.<br /> - There is a lack of clarity with some of the methods (e.g. how multinomial logistic regression was used, latent classes, and how confounders were chosen). The paper would benefit from the inclusion of these details.

a 6. sor első mondata fejezi ki a vers alap helyzetét: Itthon vagyok : ezt a gondolatot fejti ki a költő a következő pár sorban, apró életképekkel: mit jelent számára a haza? ismerős bokrokat, házakat, embereket és ismerős fájdalmakat is, melyeket a háború okozott: a költőt a nyári alkony színei a fehér ház falán a lefolyó vérre emlékeztetik - valószínűleg abban a házban is siratnak valakit, akit a háború szakított el családjától

Reviewer #1 (Public Review)

There has been a lot of work showing that multi-peaked tuning curves contain more information than single peaked ones. If that's the case, why are single-peaked tuning curves ubiquitous in early sensory areas? The answer, as shown clearly in this paper, is that multi-peaked tuning curves are more likely to produce catastrophic errors.

This is an extremely important point, and one that should definitely be communicated to the broader community. And this paper does an OK job doing that. However, it suffers from two (relatively easily fixable) problems:

I. Unless one is an expert, it's very hard to extract why multi-peaked tuning curves lead to catastrophic errors.

II. It's difficult to figure out under what circumstances multi-peaked tuning curves are bad. This is important, because there are a lot of neurons in sensory cortex, and one would like to know whether multi-peaked tuning curves are really a bad idea there.

And here are the fixes:

I. Fig. 1c is a missed opportunity to explain what's really going on, which is that on any particular trial the positions of the peaks of the log likelihood can shift in both phase and amplitude (with phase being more important). However Fig. 1c shows the average log likelihood, which makes it hard to understands what goes wrong. It would really help if Fig. 1c were expanded into its own large figure, with sample log likelihoods showing catastrophic errors for multi-peaked tuning curves but not for single peaked ones. You could also indicate why, when multi-peaked tuning curves do give the right answer, the error tends to be small.

II. What the reader really wants to know is: would sensory processing in real brains be more efficient if multi-peaked tuning curves were used? That's certainly hard to answer in all generality, but you could make a comparison between a code with single peaked tuning curves and a _good_ code with multi-peaked tuning curves. My guess is that a good code would have lambda_1=1 and c around 0.5 (you could use the module ratio the grid cell people came up with -- I think 1/sqrt(2) -- although I doubt if it matters much). My guess is that it's the total number of spikes, rather than the number of neurons, that matters. Some metric of performance (see point 1 below) versus the contrast of the stimulus and the number of spikes would be invaluable.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Buglak et al. describe a role for the nuclear envelope protein Sun1 in endothelial mechanotransduction and vascular development. The study provides a full mechanistic investigation of how Sun1 is achieving its function, which supports the concept that nuclear anchoring is important for proper mechanosensing and junctional organization. The experiments have been well designed and were quantified based on independent experiments. The experiments are convincing and of high quality and include Sun1 depletion in endothelial cell cultures, zebrafish, and in endothelial-specific inducible knockouts in mice.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In mammals, a small subset of genes undergoes canonical genomic imprinting, with highly biased expression in function of parent of origin allele. Recent studies, using polymorphic mouse embryos and tissues, have reevaluating the number of allele-specific expressed genes (ASE) to 3 times more than previously thought, however with most of these novel genes showing a very low ASE (50%-60% bias toward one parental allele). Here, the authors undergo a comparison of 4 datasets and complete bioinformatic reanalysis of 3 recent allele specific RNAseq to study potential novel imprinted genes, using recently released iSoLDE pipeline. Very few genes have been confirmed with true ASE in the different studies and/or validated by pyrosequencing analysis, However, the authors show that most of the newly discovered ASE genes are lying in close proximity of already known imprinted loci and could be co-regulated by these imprinted clusters. This is important to understand how and to which extent imprinted control regions control gene expression.

This manuscript highlights the number of potential false discovered imprinted genes in previous datasets that could result to either lack of replicates, weak allelic ratio or low gene expression and lack of read depth. But the lack of overlap in the ASE called genes (at the exception to the known imprinted genes) between the different datasets is worrying and important to discuss, as the authors did. I would have appreciated more details into the differences between the different datasets that could explain the lack of reproducibility : library preparation protocol, sequencer technology, SNP calling, number of reads per SNP, bioinformatics pipeline.

Studying allele specific expression of lowly expressed genes is difficult by technology based on PCR amplification (library preparation, pyrosequencing) and could result on a bias expression only due to the random amplification of a small pool of molecules. Could the author compare the level of expression of their different classes of genes? The more robust ASE genes in their study could be the more highly expressed? Several genes were identified only in one or two of the previous studies, were they expressed in the other studies when not define as ASE? This would also allow defining a threshold of expression to study allelic bias in the future. To conclude, this study is an important resource for the epigenetic field and better understand genomic imprinting.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In humans, mutations in specific ribosomal protein genes and ribosome assembly factors cause a group of diseases collectively known as ribosomopathies. Patients with these diseases typically display a number of remarkably similar tissue specific phenotypes including anemia and craniofacial abnormalities. The causes of the tissue specificity of these disorders have long remained an outstanding question in the field, and more recent evidence points to the induction of nucleolar stress which triggers a p53-dependent response and cell death. In previous work, the authors have shown that loss and gain of Drosophila Rps12 causes a number of unexpected phenotypes. This current paper seeks to investigate the function of Rps12 in mice.

The authors generate a conditional knockout allele within the mouse Rps12 locus and show that homozygous loss of Rps12 results in early embryonic lethality, while heterozygous mutants display a number of cell specific defects in the hematopoietic system. The authors provide evidence that haploinsufficiency of Rps12 results in erythropoiesis defects that worsen with age, a decrease in the number of hematopoietic progenitor cells, and disruption of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) quiescence correlated with a failure of mutant HSCs to reconstitute peripheral blood. Strikingly, loss of Rps12 results in increased translation in HSCs and early progenitors, marked by activation of MEK/ERK and ARK/TOR signaling pathways.

Strengths<br /> The paper provides new evidence that loss of Rps12 results in a number of specific defects in the hematopoietic system. The phenotypic characterization is rigorous and clearly described in the text. The observations Rps12 heterozygotes exhibit increases in protein synthesis and loss of HSC quiescence are interesting and warrant further investigation. This paper will have broad appeal to those interested in development, stem cell maintenance, ribosome biology, and ribosomopathies.

Weaknesses<br /> The Rps12 gene has two embedded snoRNAs, the disruption of which could contribute to all of the described phenotypes. Additional work is needed to confirm that the mutant phenotypes are caused specifically by loss of Rps12

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study aims to identify the existence of hedonic feeding and to distinguish it from homeostatic feeding, in Drosophila. The authors use direct observation of feeding events, a novel automated feeding event detector, inventive behavioral assays, and genetics to separate out the ways that Drosophila interacts with food. Using two choice assays, the authors find an increased duration of interactions with high-concentration sugars under conditions of expected satiety, which is considered to be hedonic feeding.

Strengths:

The technical advances in the measurement of animal interactions with food will help advance the understanding of feeding behavior and motivational states.

The correlation of specific types of food interactions across satiation state, sex, and circadian time will help drive forward the understanding of the scope of an animal's goals with feeding, and likely their relation between species and eating disorders.

The assessment of mushroom body circuitry in a type of food interaction is helpful for understanding the coding of feeding control in the brain.

Limitations:

All feeding data presented in the manuscript are from the interactions of individual flies with a source of liquid food, where interaction is defined as 'physical contact of a specific duration.' It would be helpful to approach the measurement of feeding from multiple angles to form the notion of hedonic feeding since the debate around hedonic feeding in Drosophila has been ongoing for some time and remains controversial. One possibility would be to measure food intake volumetrically in addition to food interaction patterns and durations (e.g. via the modified CAFE assay used by Ja).

Some of the statistical analyses were presented in a way that may make understanding the data unnecessarily difficult for readers. Examples include:

1) In Table I the authors present food interaction classifications based on direct observation. These are helpful. However, the classification system is updated or incompletely used as the manuscript progresses, most importantly changing from four categories with seven total subcategories to three categories and no subcategories. In subsequent data analyses, only one or two of these categories are assessed. It would be helpful, especially when moving from direct observation to automated categorization, to quantify the exact correspondences between all of the prior and new classifications, as well as elaborate on the types of data that are being excluded.

2) The authors switch between a variety of biological and physiological conditions with varying assays, which makes following the train of reasoning nearly impossible to follow. For example, the authors introduce us to circadian aspects of feeding behavior to introduce the concept of 'meal' and 'non-meal' periods of the day. It is then not clear in which of the subsequent experiments this paradigm is used to measure food interactions. Is it the majority of the subsequent figure panels? However, the authors also use starved flies for some assays, which would be incompatible with circadian-locked meals. The somewhat random and incompletely reported use of males and females, which the authors show behave differently, also makes the results more difficult to parse. Finally, the authors are comparing within-fly for the 'control environment' and between flies for their 'hedonic environment' (Figure 3A and subsequent panels), which I believe is not a good thing to do.

3) Statistical analyses are not always used consistently. For example, in Figures 3B and C, post hoc test results are shown for sucrose vs. yeast interactions, but no such statistics are given for 3E and 3F, preventing readers from assessing if the assay design is measuring what the authors tell us it is measuring.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work describes a novel high-throughput approach to diverse transgenesis which the authors have named TARDIS for Transgenic Arrays Resulting in Diversity of Integrated Sequences. The authors describe the general approach: the generation of a synthetic 'landing pad' for transgene insertion (as previously reported by this group) that has a split selection hygromycin resistance gene, meaning that only perfect integration with the insert confers resistance to the otherwise lethal hygromycin drug. The authors then demonstrate two possible applications of the technology: individually barcoded lineages for lineage tracing and transcriptional reporter lines generated by inserting multiple promoters. In both cases, the authors did a limited 'proof of concept' study including many important controls, showcasing the potential of the method. The conclusions for applications of this method in C. elegans are supported by the data and the authors discuss important observations and considerations. In the discussion, the authors expand the application of the method beyond C. elegans, which is speculative at this point given that a nontrivial aspect of the success of the method in worms is the self-assembly of DNA into heritable extrachromosomal arrays (a feature that is absent in most other systems).

EDPB rightly smacks the IE SA around a bit for generally cocking this all up.

Now we're moving on to #legitimate_interests and Article 6(1)(f)

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work provides a comprehensive assessment of volumetric-MRI-based brain age estimates in relation to AD-related biomarkers and AD risk factors. Brain age modeling has been studied extensively in recent years. Brain age estimates are suggested surrogate markers for aging-associated changes in the brain. This paper provides findings on how brain age estimates are associated with AD-related amyloid and tau accumulation, cerebrovascular white matter disease, and unspecific neurodegeneration detected by plasma NfL and to some extent CSF NfL as well. The authors also provide important results on sex-specific differences in these associations.

Strengths:

Modeling and analyses were performed on different observational cohorts. Analysis was repeated for the cognitively unimpaired, and individuals with MCI separately.

Weaknesses:

Although the authors concluded that brain age prediction is a biomarker of AlD pathology, only associations were assessed in this study. Further analyses are required to truly assess the biomarker value of brain age prediction for AD pathology.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study uses a rigorous methodological approach to chart thalamocortical tracts originating from distinct thalamic nuclei, coupled with a model to characterize relative tissue and fluid components along these tracts. This allows a precise description of changes specific to tracts between thalamic nuclei and distinct cortical projection areas. In conjunction with analyses of the microstructure at various distances along the tracts between the thalamus and cortex, these results demonstrate a remarkably consistent organization of thalamic projections as early as 23w, while also highlighting specific gestational-age (GA) dependent processes specific to each tract. This provides a strong step forward in characterizing the development of fetal white matter tracts from non-invasive diffusion MRI data.

Performing detailed neuroimaging analyses of fetal brain development incurs myriad technical challenges, and significant effort has been applied to overcome these. Nevertheless, several aspects of the approaches employed would benefit from better justification. For example, while acquisition parameters necessarily differ from those used in studies in post-natal developmental, or even adult, diffusion MRI studies, this raises several questions regarding the applicability of the modeling analyses employed (in particular, MSMT-CSD with low b-value dMRI data). Additionally, the normalization approach for assessing location-specific differences along each tract is complicated by the gross changes in brain size occurring during this period. Distinguishing the contribution of location-specific changes in microstructure from topographical change (e.g., terminal zones may constitute a smaller relative portion of the tract at later GAs), would enhance the inferences drawn from these results.

It's unclear from the methods how mothers were recruited to get the range of GAs represented, and whether this incurred any demographic correlations to GA. Some more description of recruitment, and a demographic comparison to GA, to clarify that there was not likely to be bias in who was scanned at different times (e.g., 2nd vs 3rd trimester) would strengthen the generalizability of these results.

The statistical basis for comparison among GA groups in the analysis of location-dependent changes in microstructure is not clear. E.g., the characterization of the depths at which GA-dependent differences in tissue fraction occur should be more clearly laid out, such that these observations can be demonstrated quantitatively, rather than reported descriptively.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, Harada et al. build upon prior studies in honeybees and mammalian cells that high levels of mannose impair proliferation, glucose entry into glycolysis. Here, they find that an inability to adequately metabolize mannose results in dNTP depletion and impaired DNA synthesis at replication forks, which sensitizes to chemotherapy. They provide solid evidence that dNTP depletion is sufficient to impair proliferation and increase chemosensitivity, although causality in the context of an inability to metabolize mannose is not established.

Strengths:<br /> This is a very rigorous, well-designed study and the findings are valuable and broadly interesting for the metabolism and cancer communities. The methods are comprehensive and the experimental details in the legends are complete.

Weaknesses:<br /> When giving context to their work, the authors focus heavily on what is known about mannose metabolism in honeybees and do not discuss thoroughly what is known in cancer cells, including prior work that performed very in-depth metabolic phenotyping of mannose phosphate isomerase low and high cells. The claim that the activity of the pentose phosphate pathway is not affected by mannose is not completely justified by the data presented, as pathway flux is not examined. Moreover, the mechanistic connection between mannose and dNTP depletion is not established. Finally, causality for dNTP depletion in cell cycle perturbation and chemosensitivity is not established.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

It is now widely accepted that the age of the brain can differ from the person's chronological age and neuroimaging methods are ideally suited to analyze the brain age and associated biomarkers. Preclinical studies of rodent models with appropriate neuroimaging do attest that lifestyle-related prevention approaches may help to slow down brain aging and the potential of BrainAGE as a predictor of age-related health outcomes. However, there is a paucity of data on this in humans. It is in this context the present manuscript receives its due attention.

Comments:

1) Lifestyle intervention benefits need to be analyzed using robust biomarkers which should be profiled non-invasively in a clinical setting. There is increasing evidence of the role of telomere length in brain aging. Gampawar et al (2020) have proposed a hypothesis on the effect of telomeres on brain structure and function over the life span and named it as the "Telomere Brain Axis". In this context, if the authors could measure telomere length before and after lifestyle intervention, this will give a strong biomarker utility and value addition for the lifestyle modification benefits.

2) Authors should also consider measuring BDNF levels before and after lifestyle intervention.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In the paper, the authors illustrated a novel method for Electrolytic Lesioning through a microelectronics array. This novel lesioning technique is able to perform long-term micro-scale local lesions with a fine spatial resolution (mm). In addition, it allows a direct comparison of population neural activity patterns before and after the lesions using electrophysiology. This new technique addresses a recent challenge in the field and provides a precious opportunity to study the natural reorganization/recovery at the neuronal population level after long-term lesions. It will help discover new causal insights investigating the neural circuits controlling behavior.

Several minor concerns are summarized below:

It was not always clear what the lesion size was. This information is important for future applications, for example, in the visual cortex, where neurons are organized in retinotopy patterns.

It would be helpful if the author could add some discussion about whether and how this method could be used in other types of array/multi-contact electrodes, such as passive neuropixels, S-probes, and so on. In addition, though an op-amp was used in the design, it would still be helpful if the author could provide a recommended range for the impedance of the electrodes.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This paper presents a highly compelling and novel hypothesis for how the brain could generate signals to guide navigation towards remembered goals. Under this hypothesis, which the authors call "Endotaxis", the brain co-opts its ancient ability to navigate up odor gradients (chemotaxis) by generating a "virtual odor" that grows stronger the closer the animal is to a goal location. This idea is compelling from an evolutionary perspective and a mechanistic perspective. The paper is well-written and delightful to read.

The authors develop a detailed model of how the brain may perform "Endotaxis", using a variety of interconnected cell types (point, map, and goal cells) to inform the chemotaxis system. They tested the ability of this model to navigate in several state spaces, representing both physical mazes and abstract cognitive tasks. The Endotaxis model performed reasonably well across different environments and different types of goals.

The authors further tested the model using parameter sweeps and discovered a critical level of network gain, beyond which task performance drops. This critical level approximately matched analytical derivations.

My main concern with this paper is that the analysis of the critical gain value (gamma_c) is incomplete, making the implications of these analyses unclear. There are several different reasonable ways in which the Endotaxis map cell representations might be normalized, which I suspect may lead to different results. Specifically, the recurrent connections between map cells may either be an adjacency matrix, or a normalized transition matrix. In the current submission, the recurrent connections are an un-normalized adjacency matrix. In a previous preprint version of the Endotaxis manuscript, the recurrent connections between the map cells were learned using Oja's rule, which results in a normalized state-transition matrix (see "Appendix 5: Endotaxis model and the successor representation" in "Neural learning rules for generating flexible predictions and computing the successor representation", your reference 17). The authors state "In summary, this sensitivity analysis shows that the optimal parameter set for endotaxis does depend on the environment". Is this statement, and the other conclusions of the sensitivity analysis, still true if the learned recurrent connections are a properly normalized state-transition matrix?

Overall, this paper provides a very compelling model for how neural circuits may have evolved the ability to navigate towards remembered goals, using ancient chemotaxis circuits.

This framework will likely be very important for understanding how the hippocampus (and other memory/navigation-related circuits) interfaces with other processes in the brain, giving rise to memory-guided behavior.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

stdpopsim is an existing, community-driven resource to support population genetics simulations across multiple species. This paper describes improvements and extensions to this resource and discusses various considerations of relevance to chromosome-scale evolutionary simulations. As such, the paper does not analyse data or present new results but rather serves as a general and useful guide for anyone interested in using the stdpopsim resource or in population genetics simulations in general.

Two new features in stdpopsim are described, which expand the types of evolutionary processes that can be simulated. First, the authors describe the addition of the ability to simulate non-crossover recombination events, i.e. gene conversion, in addition to standard crossover recombination. This will allow for simulations that come closer to the actual recombination processes occurring in many species. Second, the authors mention how genome annotations can now be incorporated into the simulations, to allow different processes to apply to different parts of the genome - however, the authors note that this addition will be further detailed in a separate, future publication. These additions to stdpopsim will certainly be useful to many users and represent a step forward in the degree of ambition for realistic population genetics simulations.

The paper also describes the expansion of the community-curated catalog of pre-defined, ready-to-use simulation set-ups for various species, from the previous 6 to 21 species (though not all new species have demographic models implemented, some have just population genetic parameters such as mutation rates and generation times). For each species, an attempt was made to implement parameters and simulations that are as realistic as possible with respect to what's known about the evolutionary history of that species, using only information that can be traced to the published literature. This process by which this was done appears quite rigorous and includes a quality-control process involving two people. Two examples are given, for Anopheles gambiae and Bos taurus. The detailed discussion of how various population genetic and demographic parameters were extracted from the literature for these two species usefully highlights the numerous non-trivial steps involved and showcases the great deal of care that underlies the stdpopsim resource.

The paper is clearly written and well-referenced, and I have no technical or conceptual concerns. The paper will be useful to anyone interested in population genetics simulations, and will hopefully serve as an inspiration for the broader effort of making simulations increasingly more realistic and flexible, while at the same time trying to make them accessible not just to a small number of experts.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Sun and colleagues outline structural and mechanistic studies of the bacterial adhesin PrgB, an atypical microbial cell surface-anchored polypeptide that binds DNA. The manuscript includes a crystal structure of the Ig-like domains of PrgB, cryo-EM structures of the majority of the intact polypeptide in DNA-bound and free forms, and an assessment of the phenotypes of E. faecalis strains expressing various PrgB mutants.

Generally, the study has been conducted with a good level of rigor, and there is consistency in the findings. However, I do have some specific technical concerns relating to the study. Although the PX work has been expertly undertaken, the Cryo-EM structures reported are both at ~10-angstrom resolution. Visual inspection indicates that the positioning of the PrgB domains into the EM envelopes is somewhat questionable and this needs to be addressed. The narrative of the manuscript very much hinges on this being correct. In addition, wrt the PrgB mutant studies, it could be that the loss of function observed in specific mutants is simply a consequence of mutation-induced misfolding of those polypeptides. Experimental evidence supporting the direct interaction between the PAD and the stalk domains in PrgB is also lacking.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Dominici et. al. show that small molecule inhibition of Type I PRMTs in muscle stem cells (MSCs) can result in the expansion of this cell type in vitro, solving a major limitation in the field. Importantly, once the inhibitor is removed these stem cell differentiate "normally". This advance will likely facilitate CRISPR-based screening approaches and stem cell engraftment therapy. Furthermore, they show that when a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy is treated with these same inhibitors these mice rather rapidly gain grip strength, demonstrating the therapeutic value of these findings.

Strengths:

- Previous studies from the same group have shown that the conditional ablation of PRMT1 in MSCs results in the expansion of this cell type, but this expanded PRMT1-null MSC pool cannot terminate the myogenic differentiation program. This raises the question of whether PRMT1 small molecule inhibition of MSCs will also facilitate the expansion of these cells, and if the removal of the inhibitor after expansion will result in a large functional pool of MSCs, which could then be used for both in vitro and in vivo studies.

- Using a combination of muscle fiber culture, myoblast culture and single cell RNA-seq, this is indeed what they show.

- They also perform two types of in vivo experiments to validate their cell culture findings; 1) MSCs expanded under the treatment of MS023 were washed clean of the inhibitor and engrafted into the tibialis anterior muscle. These cells were marked with GFP to allow efficient tracking. Mice receiving the MS023-treated MSCs produced more than double the mature GFP+ muscle fibers than cells treated with DMSO. 2) A mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy displayed grip strength improvement after just one treatment of MS023.

- MS023 is a Type I PRMT inhibitor and thus can also target CARM1. CARM1 has been implicated in MSC function by the Rudnicki group. Importantly, they exclude a role for CARM1 in the expansion of MSC cell number by treatment with a very specific CARM1 inhibitor, TP064. Thus, indicating that PRMT1 inhibition is likely the main driver of this expansion phenotype.

Weaknesses:

- Very few weaknesses.

- The in vivo efficacy of MS023 does not seem to be very great. The mice treated with MS023 display a very small reduction in ADMA levels and a small increase in SDMA levels (Fig S6A).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Using health insurance claims data (from 8M subjects), a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study was performed (450K in both groups) to quantify associations between biphosphonate (BP) use and COVID-19 related outcomes (COVID-19 diagnosis, testing and COVID-19 hospitalization. The observation periods were 1-1-2019 till 2-29-2020 for BP use and from 3-1-2020 and 6-30-2020 for the COVID endpoints. In primary and sensitivity analyses BP use was consistenyl associated with lower odds for COVID-19, testing and COVID-19 hospitalization.

The major strength of this study is the size of the study population, allowing a propensity-based matched-cohort study with 450K in both groups, with a sizeable number of COVID-19 related endpoints. Health insurance claims data were used with the intrinsic risk of some misclassification for exposure. In addition there probably is misclassification of endpoints as testing for COVID-19 was lmimited during the study period. Furthermore, the retrospective nature of the study includes the risk of residual confounding, which has been addressed - to some extent - by sensitivity analyses.

In all analyses there is a consistent finding that BP exposure is associated with reduced odds for COVID-19 related outcomes. The effect size is large, with high precision.

The authors extensively discuss the (many) potential limitations inherent to the study design and conclude that these findings warrant confirmation, preferably in intervention studies. If confirmed BP use could be a powerful adjunt in the prevention of infection and hospitalization due to COVID-19.

DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead031

Resource: ZFIN_ZDB-ALT-070406-1

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-ALT-070406-1

What is this?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This is a welcome contribution investigating proteomics in different physiological muscle types in a particular murine (DHT) Ryr1 abnormality. This recapitulates a particular human clinical condition. It emerges with a comparative analysis of the expression not only of RyR1 protein but also of other functional proteins. The work emerges with insights into pathological mechanism of congenital myopathies linked to mutations in a range of other genes related to excitation contraction coupling.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors present normative modeling results using both structural data and functional connectivity data to demonstrate the strength of normative modeling in investigations of group effects, classification tasks, and brain-behavioral modeling. The models are built across 3 large data sets and tested in a rigorous manner. The strengths of this work are in the clarity or presentation, the demonstration of the value of normative modeling, the availability of the models and code, and the statistical rigor supporting the results. The work will have a significant impact on the field in that such models (built in large data sets) can be applied to smaller studies of specific populations of interest, therefore, facilitating research on many populations in a statistically rigorous manner.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript describes a relatively novel approach to discovering combinations of herbal medications that may help modulate immune responses, and in turn help treat diseases such as cancer. The authors use breast plasma call mastitis as a disease in which they present results from a non-blinded clinical trial with modest results.

The main shortcomings are a lack of rigor around standardizing the control group given steroids versus the treatment group given the combinations of herbal medications. There needs to be a detailed statistical analysis of the comparison in tumor size, stage, invasiveness, etc. as well as consideration of confounding disease states (autoimmune disease, prior cancers, diabetes, etc.). While the results are interesting in that the use of herbal medications is often overlooked in Western medicine, the manuscript needs great detail in the clinical comparison in order to provide convincing evidence for an effect.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this work, the authors set out to use contact tracing and whole-genome sequencing to track the elimination of dog-mediated rabies in Pemba island, Tanzania. A major strength is the use of multiple data types in the analysis. A major limitation is the rudimentary health economics approach to make claims about the cost-effectiveness of different approaches. The work will likely have an impact on influencing the practical policies that can be implemented to target the elimination of dog-mediated rabies in other regions/contexts.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors developed a new concept: Skeletal age, which is chronological age + years lost due to suffering a low-energy fracture.<br /> There seem to be conceptual problems with this concept: It is not known if the years lost are lost due to the fracture or co-morbidities. In addition, with the possible exception of zoledronate after hip fracture, we have no evidence that this increased risk of mortality can be changed with interventions. Furthermore, it is not clear why the authors think that patients and doctors will better understand the implications of older "skeletal age", on future fracture risk and the need for prevention, for example, the 10-year risk of MOF? Knowing that my bones are older than me, could make a patient feel even more fragile and afraid of being physically active. The treatment will reduce the risk of future fractures, but this study provides no information about the effect on mortality of preventing the subsequent fracture or the risk of mortality associated with recurrent fractures.

Introduction:<br /> The statement that treatment reduces the risk of dying, needs modification as the majority of clinical trials have not demonstrated reduced mortality with treatment.<br /> It is not clear how the skeletal age captures the risk of a future fracture. The other difference between the idea of "skeletal age" and for example "heart age" is that there are treatments available for heart disease that reduce the risk of mortality, as mentioned above this has not been shown consistently in clinical trials in osteoporosis.

Discussion:<br /> The prevalent comorbidities; cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes, suggest that fracture patients die from their comorbidities and not their fractures.<br /> The discussion should be more balanced as there is a number of clinical trials demonstrating reductions in vertebral and non-vertebral fractures without effect on mortality. There may be specific effects of zoledronate on mortality, but that has not been shown for the vast majority of treatments.<br /> It is not correct that FRAX does not take mortality into account? It does not tell you specifically how high the risk of dying and how high the risk of a fracture is but integrates the two. "Skeletal age" does not provide either information, it just tells you that your skeleton is older than your chronological age - most patients and doctors will not associate that with an increased risk of dying - only of frailty.<br /> The statement that zoledronate reduces the "skeletal age" by 3 years, has not been demonstrated and it is not clear how this can be demonstrated by the analysis reported here. As the reduced mortality has only been shown for the Horizon RFT, this cannot be inferred for other treatments and other fracture types.<br /> The information provided by the "skeletal age" is only that the fracture you already had took x years of your remaining lifetime. With the exception of perhaps zoledronate after hip fracture, we have no indication from clinical trials that the treatment of osteoporosis will change this.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors demonstrate that modest oscillatory changes in the E-I ratio occur throughout the day and are linked to changes in both synaptic excitation and inhibition. These conclusions were based on adequately sampled electrophysiological data of stimulation-driven and non-evoked excitatory and inhibitory currents. For these studies, a fixed stimulation was not used across slice recordings but was limited to intensities where the E-I ratio was stable. Two points may need further clarification in the text. Firstly, authors might comment on whether current magnitudes plateau at these stimulation intensities. Secondly, make clear why the cause of E-I balance changes was not elucidated from convergent, evoked measurements in the same cell, but instead relied on non-evoked measures of spontaneous miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs and mIPSCs) that were recorded separately in different cell populations. mEPSCs and mIPSCs data analysis relied on statistical scrutiny within genotype and could gain additional rigor and benefits to study reproducibility by applying tests ( e.g. two- way repeated measures (RM) ANOVA) that consider the influence of both genotype and time of day. With this approach, the authors could determine in figures 3 and 4 whether control (B6) mice exhibit the predicted increase in mEPSCs and reduction in mIPSCs at ZT0 when compared to its ASD mouse model. In a noteworthy experiment, the authors connect abnormalities in inhibitory oscillations to altered endocannabinoid signaling using measurements of spontaneous (s) IPSCs, where changes in sIPSC charge were noted. The measurements used to make the paper's conclusion lacked consistency and the authors can bridge these differences by testing whether WIN agonist treatment can restore normal daily E/I oscillation in FMR1 KO and BTBR mice using the stimulation-evoked measurements from figure 1. The study used male and female BTBR mice and only male Fmr1 KO mice. Sex- effects in the study were not disclosed, so it is unclear whether daily E/I oscillation changes were similar in male and female BTBR mice or occur at all in female Fmr1 KO mice. Lastly, numerous studies have noted significant changes in the magnitude of the E-I ratio in an autism mouse model and causally linked these changes to alterations in disorder-related behavior or homeostatic regulation of circuit activity. However, in this current study, neither the loss nor reversal of daily E/I ratio oscillation were causally linked to alterations in sleep timing and architecture or any change in behavioral phenotype. On a promising note, the authors did find a slight decrease in NREM delta power in the Fmr1 KO and a larger decrease in the BTBR mice. Future mechanistic studies on this topic may aim to buttress support for E/I oscillations rather than alterations to the overall E/I level in causing autism-related phenotypes by providing supporting examples of biological significance.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Pathological conformation and aggregation of tau protein are involved in several neurodegenerative diseases such as tauopathies and Alzheimer's disease. Identifying drug-candidates capable of interfering with pathological transformation of tau remains a challenge for which sensitive and specific assays are needed. This article describes the development and characterization of tau biosensors based on NanoBit technology (nanoluciferase complementation). It is a well-designed and precise study providing very interesting new tools.

Strengths<br /> 1/ The authors have developed a variety of tau biosensors: some that can be used for basic research to monitor pathological tau transformation and others with properties suitable for drug screening. All biosensors make it possible to evaluate the action of different agents (chemical products, purified proteins, cell or tissue extracts) in a living cell.

2/ The intermolecular biosensors developed from a shortened version of tau (K18), or the full-length tau, and carrying the P301L mutation possess sensibility and specificity allowing their further development to identify drug-candidates interfering with tau self-interaction.

3/ The characterization of the tau probes confirmed the physiological and pathological knowledge concerning the tau protein: - proximity of full-length tau when bound to microtubules, - conformational changes of tau during its phosphorylation and - tau-self interaction induced by pathological seeds.

Weaknesses<br /> 1/ The suitability of tau biosensors for high-throughput screening needs to be further developed as experiments were only performed in 96-well plates. No scaling up in 384- or 1536-well plates was attempted. Moreover, the transfection of the biosensors could be tedious.

2/ The models used are basic (HEK-293T cells associated with tau aggregates, Aβ oligomers or mouse brain lysates). The number of drugs tested is also quite low.

Collectively, the conclusions drawn by the authors are supported by the results. These new biosensors will be easily usable by the scientific community in fundamental research and could also be of interest to pharmaceutical laboratories wishing to carry out screenings of molecules capable of impacting the pathological transformation of tau.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors use a newly developed object-space memory task comprising of a "Stable" version and "Overlapping" version where two objects are presented in two locations per trial in a square open field. Each version consists of 5 training trials of 5-min presentations of an object-space configuration, with both object locations staying constant across training trials in the Stable condition, and only one object location staying fixed in the Overlapping condition. Memory is tested in a test trial 24 hours later where the opposite configuration is presented - overlapping configuration presented for the Stable condition and stable configuration presented for the Overlapping condition - with the thesis that memory in this test trial for the Overlapping condition will depend on the accumulated memory of spatial patterns over the training trials, whereas memory for the test trial in the Stable condition can be due to episodic memory of last trial or accumulated memory. Memory is quantified using a Discrimination Index (DI), comparing the amount of time animals spend exploring the two object locations.

Here, animals in other groups are also presented with an interference trial equivalent to the test trial, to test if the memory of the Overlapping condition can be disrupted. The behavioral data show that for RGS14 over-expressing animals, memory in the Overlapping condition is diminished compared to controls with no interference or controls where over-expression is inhibited, whereas memory in the Stable condition is enhanced. This is interpreted as interference in semantic-like memory formation, whereas one-shot episodic memory is improved. The authors speculate that increased cortical plasticity should lead to increased and larger delta waves according to the sleep homeostasis hypothesis, and observe that instead increased cortical plasticity leads to less non-REM sleep and smaller delta waves, with more prefrontal neurons with slower firing rates (presumably more plastic neurons). They further report increased hippocampal-cortical theta coherence during task and REM sleep, increased NonREM oscillatory coupling, and changes in hippocampal ripples in RGS14 over-expressing animals.

While these results are interesting, there are several issues that need to be addressed, and the link between physiology and behavioral results is unclear.

1) The behavioral results rely on the interpretation that the Overlapping condition corresponds to semantic-like memory and the Stable condition corresponds to episodic-like memory. While the dissociation in memory performance due to interference seen in these two conditions is intriguing, the Stable condition can correspond not just to the memory of the previous trial but also accumulated memory of a stable spatial pattern over the 5 testing trials, similar to accumulated memory of a changing spatial pattern in the Overlapping pattern.

Here, it is puzzling that in the behavioral control with no interference (Figure 1D), memory in the Stable and Overlapping condition is unchanged in the test trial, with the DI statistically at 0 in the test trial. In the original description of the Object Space task by the authors in the referenced paper, the measure of memory was a Discrimination Index significantly higher than 0 in both the Stable and Overlapping conditions. This discrepancy needs to be reconciled. Is the DI for the interference trial shown in Fig. S1 significantly different than 0? No statistics or description is provided in the figure legend here.

2) The physiology experiments compare Home cage (HC) conditions to the Object Space task (OS) throughout the manuscript. While some differences are seen in the control and RGS14 over-expressing animals, there is no comparison of the Stable vs. Overlapping condition in the physiology experiments. This precludes making explicit links between physiological observations and behavioral effects.

3) The authors speculate that learning will result in larger and more delta waves as per the synaptic homeostasis hypothesis. It should be noted here that an alternative hypothesis is that there should also be a selective increase in synaptic plasticity for learning and consolidation. The authors do observe that control animals show more frequent and higher-amplitude delta waves, but rather than enhancing this process, RGS14 animals with increased plasticity show the opposite effect. How can this be reconciled and linked with the behavioral data in the Stable and Overlapping condition? Similarly, there is an increase in slower-firing neurons in RGS14 over-expressing animals. Slower-firing neurons have been proposed to be more plastic in the hippocampus based on their participation in learned hippocampal sequences, but appropriate references or data are needed to support the assertion that slower-firing neurons in the prefrontal cortex are more plastic.

4) It is noted that changing cortical plasticity influences hippocampal-cortical coupling and hippocampal ripples, suggesting a cortical influence on hippocampal physiological patterns. It has been previously shown that disrupting prefrontal cortical activity does alter hippocampal ripples and hippocampal theta sequences (Schmidt et al., 2019; Schmidt and Redish, 2021). The current results should be discussed in this context.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors push a fresh perspective with a sufficiently sophisticated and novel methodology. I have some remaining reservations that concern the actual make-up of the data basis and consistency of results between the two (N=16) samples, the statistical analysis, as well as the "travelling" part.

I previously commented on the fact that findings from both datasets were difficult to discern and more effort should be made to highlight these. Also, a major conclusion "the directionality effect [effect of attention on forward waves] only occurs for visual stimulation" only rested on a qualitative comparison between studies. The authors have improved on this here, e.g., by toning down this conclusion. One thing that is still missing is a graphical representation of the data from Foster et al. (the second dataset analysed here) that would support the statistical results and allow the reader a visual comparison between the sets of findings.

Also, for any naive reader, the concept of travelling waves may be hard to grasp in the way data are currently presented - only based on the results of the 2D-FFT. Can forward and backward-travelling waves be illustrated in a representative example to make this more intuitive?

Finally, the way Bayes Factors from the Bayesian ANOVA are presented, especially with those close to the 'meaningful boundaries' ⅓ and 3, as defined in the 'Statistical analysis' section, requires some unification/revision. For example, here: "We found a positive correlation between contra- and ipsi- lateral backward waves, and occipital (all Pearson's r~=0.4, all BFs 10 ~=3) and -to a smaller extent- frontal areas (all Pearson's r~=0.3, all BFs 10 ~=2).", where the second part should strictly be labelled as inconclusive evidence. In the same vein, there is occasional mention of "negative effects", where it should say that evidence favours the absence of an effect.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Silva et al. "Evaluation of the highly conserved S2 hairpin hinge as a pan-coronavirus target" seeks to evaluate a new epitope target on the S2 domain of SARS-CoV2 Spike protein and evaluate its potential as a pan-coronavirus target. This is an impressive combination of extensive structural, HDXMS-based dynamics and antibody engineering approaches. What is missing is a detailed correlation of HDXMS with Spike dynamics. The authors have not examined the allosteric effects of 3A3 binding to the Spike trimer, specifically cooperativity in antibody binding. Does binding of one Fab positively or negatively impact the subsequent binding of antibody? In this regard, readers would benefit from HDXMS spectral envelopes in figures, at least for the epitope locus peptides. Further, what is the effect of the intrinsic ensemble behavior of the Spike protein on 3A3 interactions? In a broader sense antibody binding is assisted by intrinsic trimer ensemble behavior, as observed by the lowered binding to the omicron variant- but are there induced binding effects? It would help to better integrate HDXMS with cryo-EM and antibody engineering. It is a novel, less explored epitope target on the S2 domain. Overall, a more definitive mechanistic conclusion for how targeting the S2 hinge can advance future pan-coronavirus strategies is missing.

Major Comments:

1) Given that the authors have demonstrated ensemble switching behavior from 4 ℃ to 37 ℃ (Costello et al. (2021)) why is this not factored in how the HDXMS is carried out? The samples were stored, frozen at -80 ℃, thawed, and equilibrated for 20 min at 20 ℃ with or without antibody present and analyzed by HDXMS. However, the reported t1/2 for trimer tightening at 37 ℃ is t1/2 = 2.5 h (Supplementary Fig. 7). The samples should ideally be analyzed under standardized conditions with the stable conformer. Sample heterogeneity from HDXMS is likely due to any of the following contributing factors:<br /> i) Intrinsic ensemble heterogeneity (Costello et al. (2021)), Kinetics of RBD- up and down conformational switching<br /> ii) Cooperativity of Fab binding.<br /> iii) Partial occupancy of trimer epitopes with bivalent IgG.<br /> iv) Combination of cooperativity effects and partial binding effects

I would predict for any of the above reasons, it is intriguing why are there no bimodal kinetics of deuterium exchange reported. Partial occupancy should be evident from HDXMS paratope analysis.

2) Pan-coronavirus neutralization potential is clearly evident. It is intriguing that the antibodies were isolated after immunization with an authentic MERS S2 domain but showed better selectivity to full-length 6P-engineered Spike. How is cooperativity built into antibody binding, given that the epitope site is occluded to various extents by the S1 domain and access is contingent upon RBD up-down kinetics?

3) I am surprised that there is no allostery described for 3A3 (Supplementary figures 5, 6).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Nephronophthisis (Nphp) is a multigenic, recessive disorder of the kidney presenting in childhood that is characterized by cysts predominantly at the cortico-medullary junction and progressive fibrosis. An infantile form of the disease presents earlier with more diffuse cystic change. The condition is considered a ciliopathy because most of the genes linked to the condition encode proteins involved in ciliary biogenesis or function. Germline mutations in NPHP2 are associated with a particularly severe, infantile form of the disease. Given that interstitial fibrosis is a more prominent feature of Nphp compared to many other forms of polycystic kidney disease, the authors sought to determine the mutant cell types responsible for the phenotype.

In the current study, the authors generated and characterized mouse lines with Nphp2 selectively inactivated in either renal epithelial cell or stromal cell lineages and found that inactivation in renal epithelial cells was both necessary and sufficient to cause disease. They further showed that markers of interstitial fibrosis and proliferation increase in mutants prior to the onset of histologically evident cystic disease, suggesting that aberrant epithelial-stromal cell signaling is an early and primary feature of the condition (Figures 1-4). The study design was straightforward and appropriate to address the question, and the results support their conclusions.

They next tested whether the cilia-dependent cyst-activating pathway (CDCA) that is "unmasked" by loss of other PKD-related genes is similarly active in Nphp2 mutants by generating Nphp2/Ift88 double mutants. Their studies found that the severity of cystic disease and markers of proliferation and fibrosis was attenuated in double-mutants (Fig 5, 6). These studies were also appropriate for testing the hypothesis and the results were similarly consistent with their interpretation.

In the last set of studies, they tested whether valproic acid (VPA), a drug that has multiple modes of action including acting as a broad inhibitor of HDACs and previously used by the investigators in other forms of polycystic kidney disease, would have similar effects in Nphp2 mutants. The authors tested daily injection from days P10 through P28 in both control and Nphp2 mutant mice with VPA or an appropriate vehicle control and found that VPA was beneficial (Fig 7). The study design was acceptable and the results generally support their conclusions. The one perplexing result is shown in Fig 7B. The Nphp2 mutants, regardless of treatment status, have body weights (BW) that are significantly lower than the controls, with treated mutants even trending lower than their untreated mutant counterparts. This is unexplained and should be addressed. In the mutants with more widespread epithelial cell knock-out of Nphp2 (Ksp-Cre, Fig 1), total body weight decreased as mice became more severely cystic with renal impairment. In the milder form of disease produced with the Pkhd1-Cre (Fig 7), total body weight is inexplicably approx. 2g lower on average despite having much more modestly elevated KBWs and BUNs. Moreover, one might have expected that mutants treated with VPA would have had BWs intermediate between untreated mutants and controls since the severity of the disease was moderately attenuated. These differences raise the question as to whether body weight differences are due to factors independent of disease status, the most likely of which would be that the controls were not littermates. This prompted a careful review of the text for descriptions of the control mice. Throughout the study, the investigators describe selecting animals from the same "cohort", but this term is imprecise. There is little information provided about background strains, whether any of the lines were congenic, or whether any of the studies were done using littermate controls. This must be addressed. It would help if the investigators identified the litter status in their plots. This would clearly show relationships between animals and the number of litters that had animals with these properties. If littermates were not used for each study, the authors must explain both why they didn't do so and how they then selected which animals to use. This information is especially important for interpreting the results of their genetic interaction and drug treatment studies.

Several other considerations. The authors state that the effects of VPA are mediated through the drug's inhibition of HDACs and suggest that future studies could be directed at refining the specific HDAC. While this is certainly possible, the authors should acknowledge that VPAs have been reported to have numerous pharmacologic effects and targets and which of these is mediating the effects in their model is unknown. They would need mechanistic studies to show this, though it doesn't discount their possible efficacy as a therapy for PKD. The authors also state in their abstract that their double knock-out studies "support a significant role of cilia in Nphp2 function in vivo." It is not clear to me how their studies show this nor how they can exclude that ciliary activity is operating in an Nphp2-independent, parallel fashion that modulates some common downstream pathways.