- Apr 2024
-
-
read Thanks to what @zsviczian@pkm.social … – Interdependent Thoughts by [[by Ton Zijlstra]]
This reminds me that I ought to go back and look at Excalidraw's state-of-the-art again. It's been too long.
-
- Mar 2024
-
publish.obsidian.md publish.obsidian.md
-
PKM summit 2024
Marieke van der Vliet haar verslag van de PKM Summit 2024
-
-
start.digitalfitness.com start.digitalfitness.com
-
Hi Muhammed, Thank you so much for the workshop friday. It was Nice to hear others geek out and talk about the Zettelkasten principle and with interactive exercises it was wonderful. I have done my PhD with inspiration in Luhmann’s system for knowledge creation so I am quite familiar with it. Still I have a question for you that I am sad I didn’t get around to discuss with you in person at the summit. Instead I thought I could ask it here and hope you would still see it. Are you doing your Zettelkasten in obsidian - and if so why do you still number them? Best Agnes
/reply at Digital Fitness in response to Agnes Lausen about folgezettel
Hey Agnes, thanks a lot for attending. I rlly loved the energy and loved doing the workshop. As to your question, yes I do use obsidian for my zettelkasten. As to the numbering, it gives me a few benefits. Firstly, it forces me to make a link. If I am going to import a new note, I will have to link the note to another note, because I have to give an ID (number). This prevents orphan notes. And, it gives me a visual sense of what is going on in my zettelkasten. I can see at a glance if a section has more notes than others (my section 4, for example, has more notes.) Both the ID and the statement title, for me, gives me so much context just seeing the title without looking at the contents.
-
-
pkmsummit.com pkmsummit.com
-
jarche.com jarche.com
-
read [[Harold Jarche]] in dead blog walking at 20
-
-
www.zylstra.org www.zylstra.org