6 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2021
    1. he claimed that he’d been offered a job by Politico as a researcher

      POLITICO—told me his bosses wanted my research secretly, without my name on the articles even as a researcher.

      I declined

      https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1359915956559052801

      I told CJR asked me to be an unpaid, uncredited researcher providing info exclusively to them (I declined). CJR falsely reported I said I was "hired" as a "job."

      https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1359944678850887682

    2. On his podcast, and in his first Proof book, he makes arguments based on the Steele dossier. (Remember the Steele dossier? You know, the pee tape thing.) The reliability of the Steele dossier is, to put it mildly, in question; a report by Michael Horowitz, the inspector general, found that the dossier was dubious, unvetted, and shady as hell.

      Over and over and over I wrote that 30% of it isn't accurate. I have never said otherwise.

      https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1359948200615022593

    3. Abramson doubled down, responding to complaints by insisting that his survey of applicants was scientific and trustworthy

      For some reason @CJR claims I called the P&W rankings "scientific." The opposite is true: across six years of doing them—and 75 pages of methodology articles—the rankings were consistently called "probative but non-scientific." Why lie about that?

      https://www.pw.org/content/the_2012_rankings_of_graduate_programs_in_creative_writing_frequently_asked_questions

      https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1359908816989679617