"[A] single attempt to report an incident of harm by private actors to local police, without further harm from the police themselves or evidence of their widespread collusion with alleged persecutors, does not establish that the government, as a whole, is unable or unwilling to protect a respondent from persecution." Matter of K-S-H-, 29 I&N Dec. 307, 310 (BIA 2025).
3 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
www.justice.gov www.justice.gov
-
"Any analysis of conduct rising to the level of persecution requires the consideration of 'the cumulative effect of the allegedly persecutory incidents.'" Matter of E-M-F-S-, 29 I&N Dec. 379, 383-84 (BIA 2025) (quoting De Santamaria v. U.S. Att'y Gen., 525 F.3d 999, 1008 (11th Cir. 2008)).
-
- Jan 2026
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
We ran high-level US civil war simulations. Minnesota is exactly how they start<br /> by [[Claire Finkelstein]] in The Guardian<br /> accessed on 2026-01-21T10:07:26
Tags
- Kristi Noem
- Department of Defense’s Rules for the Use of Force
- presidential immunity
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
- United States Department of Defense
- Trump Administration
- constitutional crisis
- read
- Renee Nicole Good
- use of force
- Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law (CERL)
Annotators
URL
-