- May 2017
-
www.npr.org www.npr.org
-
But let's properly define the problem. History and experience tell me it's not a post-truth era: Facts have always been hard to separate from falsehoods, and political partisans have always made it harder. It's better to call this a post-trust era.
We are not post-truth, we're post-trust.
Kind of. A lot of people "trusted" the Denver Guardian because it fit within their pre-existing narrative framework. Maybe we are "post-trust" with the institutions and organizations that got us this far: traditional mainstream media, higher ed, researchers and scientists.
-
- Feb 2017
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
the liar, whom no one trusts and everyone excludes.
I wonder what Nietzsche would think about the Trump Administration's rise to power. The "success" of D. Trump and his cronies (Spicer, Conway, etc.), who lie time and time again, seems to contradict this comment?
-
hus "truth" is u rhetorical construction arising from the creative use of lan-guage to make an effective social arrangement.
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
however, seem not so much to have disagreed in their conceptions of the nature of the same thing, as lo have had dif-ferent things in view while they employed the same term.
...could we also use this distinction to support the existence of alternative facts?
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
Rather, taste is the basis of judgments not only about what is beautiful (or personally pleasing) but also about what is virtuous.
A curious conflation of opinion, virtue, and beauty. I like this understanding of "taste" as I think it expresses the attitude that opinion is equivalent to fact that has emerged in the past few years with the rise of social media.
-