ConfidentialityInformation regarding families shall remain confidential and available only for the purposesauthorized by federal or State law as described in Section 3.609.73, Protections to the Individual.
32 Matching Annotations
- Jun 2023
-
www.sos.state.co.us www.sos.state.co.us
-
-
In cases whereverification is incomplete, the county department shall provide the client with a statementof required verification
-
The application form shall be used as the primary source of information
-
The countydepartment/agency must provide specific reasons for the proposed action, and theapplicable state department's rules or county policy.
uhhhm....because um, that's our policy
-
The person designated to conduct the conference shall be in a position which, based onknowledge, experience, and training, would enable him or her to determine if theproposed action is valid. This could include, but is not limited to, a supervisor, qualityassurance personnel, or a manager with no previous knowledge of the case
Lauren, whomever she is, did not say a word. AND,
She obviously had knowledge of the case because she was CCed on all the email exhibits
-
The county worker or contractor who initiated the action in dispute shall notconduct the county conference.
Elizabeth Antus was obviously the one who initiated because she was the one emailing FCS
-
The county conference shall be held before a person in the county department or agency wherethe proposed decision is pending who was not directly involved in the initial determination of theaction in question
-
The county department, prior to taking action to deny, terminate, recover, initiate vendorpayments, or modify financial assistance provided under the Colorado Works program to a client,shall, at a minimum, provide the client an opportunity for a county conference.1. The right of a client to a county conference is primarily to ensure that the proposed actionis valid, to protect the client against an erroneous action concerning grant payment
-
The client shall be offered an in-person interview at redetermination
-
-
www.coloradosos.gov www.coloradosos.gov
-
4.803.2 Determination of an IPV /Fraud [Rev. eff. 1/1/16]A. An intentional program violation shall be established only if an administrative disqualificationhearing official or a court of appropriate jurisdiction has found a household member hascommitted an intentional program violation or fraud or if a signed waiver of administrative hearingor a signed disqualification consent agreement has been obtained.
If I intentionally did it, I'd be afforded a trial before any removal of benefits. AND
The evidence against me, which the burden is on the agency, would need to be clear and convincing. .... “Clear and convincing” means evidence which is stronger than a “preponderance of evidence” and which is unmistakable and free from serious or substantial doubt
-
The right of a household to a DRC and state-level hearing is primarily to ensure that a proposed eligibilitydetermination or action is valid, to protect the person against an erroneous action concerning benefits,and to ensure reasonable promptness of local office action.
-
The local office shall send a verification request notice requesting the household toprovide the specific information or verification within ten (10) calendar days plus one (1)additional calendar day for mailing.
-
additional verificationis required in the following instances:A. Unclear Information1. If the local office receives information about changes in a household's circumstances butcannot determine if or how the change will affect the household's benefits and theunclear information is:a. Fewer than sixty (60) days old relative to the current month of participation; andb. Was required to have been reported per simplified reporting rules; orc. Appears to present significantly conflicting information about the household’scircumstances from that used by the local office at the time of certification,including changes to the household’s categorical eligibility tier, then:
-
on reported changes
-
If the reportedchange has not been verified, or is considered questionable, and it cannot be determined whetherbasic categorical eligibility, expanded categorical eligibility, or standard eligibility criteria should beused, a request for verification shall be initiated.
SHALL BE INITIATED
-
4.504.6Information Considered Verified Upon Receipt
Reading the case notes of a TANF meeting is not on the list of "Verified Upon Receipt".
-
In cases in which the information from another source contradicts statements made by thehousehold, the household shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to resolve the discrepancyprior to an eligibility determination
-
If written verification cannot be obtained, theeligibility technician shall substitute
-
4.504 Sources of VerificationThe local office shall accept any pertinent documentary evidence provided by the household and shall beprimarily concerned with how adequately the verification proves the statements on the application, duringrecertification
-
Ifinformation is considered questionable or if an alternate source of verification was requested, the reasonfor additional verification
-
Such statements must be sufficiently detailed to supportthe determination of eligibility or ineligibility
-
The local office shall provide each household at the time of application for initial certification, redetermination, and periodic report form with a notice that informs the household of verification requirements that the household must meet as part of the application, redetermination, or periodic report process.
Need for verification
-
shall not be required unless these eligibility factors are not already collected andverified by the other PA program, are considered questionable,
-
The household has the primary responsibility for providing documentary evidence for requiredverification and to resolve questionable information.
-
The case record shall consist of statements and documentation regarding the sources and resultsof verification used to determine a household’s eligibility. Such statements must be sufficientlydetailed to support the determination of eligibility or ineligibility
-
The local office must act on all changes reported by those households filing a PRF.
-
In cases where verification is incomplete, the local office shall provide the household with astatement of required verification on the state-prescribed notice form and offer to assist thehousehold in obtaining the required verification.
-
The eligibility technician shall not simply review the information entered on the application butshall explore and resolve with the household unclear and incomplete information
-
4.201 APPLICATION PROCESSINGA. Local offices shall not apply additional conditions or processing requirements that are beyondthose prescribed by State SNAP rules.
-
- Jan 2023
-
preferredmd.io preferredmd.io
-
Explaining benefits verification, prior authorization, and verification of pre-authorization processes
Learn a couple of ways to make benefits verification, prior authorization, and verification of pre-authorization processes less painful and stressful.
-
- Sep 2022
-
preferredmd.io preferredmd.io
-
Benefits verification
Insurance Benefits Verification Upon receiving a booking form, insurance benefits can be verified allowing the facility to make a quick determination of the patient's responsibility and profitability of the case.
-
-
preferredmd.io preferredmd.io
-
Vendor management
Vendor Coordination Vendors are linked with the booking form so they are informed of any changes in schedule or procedure. With email and text confirmation tracking vendors show up at the right place, at the right time, with the right products freeing up your materials manager!
-