designs ~ot to copy anything really existing, but to denominate and rank things as they come to agree with those archetypes or forms it has made
This kinda sounds like a posthuman critique of humanism.
designs ~ot to copy anything really existing, but to denominate and rank things as they come to agree with those archetypes or forms it has made
This kinda sounds like a posthuman critique of humanism.
abstract independently existing “object”
Since forever, apparently, science has relied on Aristotle's "Unmoved Mover," in a sense. Not a god exactly, but some real or imagined unaffected observer whose presence serves as a fixed point from which to accumulate data. Why are we tempted to think this way? Aren't we all moving? What fixed point is there? I'm tempted to go back to the analogy of floating baskets tied together. There is an illusion of being grounded, but we aren't really.