- 
for: sensory ecology, conservation biology, adjacency, adjacency - sensory ecology - conservation biology, anthropogenic sensory pollutants 
- 
title: Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology 
- author Davide M. Dominoni et al.
- date: Mar. 2020
- abstract- Global expansion of human activities is associated with the introduction of novel stimuli, such as - anthropogenic noise,
- artificial lights and
- chemical agents.
 
- Progress in documenting the ecological effects of sensory pollutants is weakened by sparse knowledge of the mechanisms underlying these effects.
- This severely limits our capacity to devise mitigation measures.
- Here,we integrate knowledge of animal - sensory ecology,
- physiology and
- life history
 
- to articulate three perceptual mechanisms—- masking,
- distracting and
- misleading
 
- that clearly explain how and why anthropogenic sensory pollutants impact organisms.
- We then - link these three mechanisms to ecological consequences and
- discuss their implications for conservation.
 
- We argue that this framework can reveal the presence of ‘sensory danger zones’, hotspots of conservation concern - where sensory pollutants overlap in space and time with an organism’s activity, and
- foster development of strategic interventions to mitigate the impact of sensory pollutants.
 
- Future research that applies this framework will provide critical insight to preserve the natural sensory world.
 
- Global expansion of human activities is associated with the introduction of novel stimuli, such as 
 1 Matching Annotations
        
        - Oct 2023
- 
            
ceres.ens.psl.eu ceres.ens.psl.eu
-