- Mar 2024
-
www.pcmag.com www.pcmag.com
-
When you add to or withdraw from a goal you’ve created, the app doesn’t move funds between your accounts. You do that yourself. But the affected accounts’ balances will reflect the funds that are earmarked for a savings goal.
-
- Dec 2023
-
developer.chrome.com developer.chrome.com
-
This feature is available only in Chrome, not Chromium.
Really? It's working for me in ungoogled-chromium
-
- Jun 2023
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
Certainly you could adapt the code to round rather than truncate should you need to; often I find truncation feels more natural as that is effectively how clocks behave.
What do you mean exactly? Compared clocks, or at least reading of them. What's a good example of this? If it's 3:55, we would say 3:55, or "5 to 4:00", but wouldn't probably say that it's "3".
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
Also, people prefer association over inheritance so protected as default is difficult to perceive
-
Marking methods protected by default is a mitigation for one of the major issues in modern SW development: failure of imagination.
-
- Jan 2022
-
github.com github.com
-
Same here, and I think this is not correct. The more I think about it, the more I am convinced it's a wrong mental model.
-
- Oct 2021
-
guides.rubyonrails.org guides.rubyonrails.org
-
For instance, the application could define a class method PaymentGateway.impl whose definition depends on the environment; or could define PaymentGateway to have a parent class or mixin that depends on the environment
-
- Apr 2021
-
english.stackexchange.com english.stackexchange.com
-
I wouldn't necessarily go as far as call this a "phrase" per se.
why not? what is a phrase then?
-
We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know.
known unknown
like what?
-
-
-
But the imho easiest solution he oversaw…
-
-
www.activestate.com www.activestate.com
-
Work with the open source languages you love without the hassles of runtime management.
What is runtime management?
-
-
store.steampowered.com store.steampowered.com
-
By normal standards I wouldn't recommend it, but there's a cryptic undercurrent that escapes my perception.
-
- Mar 2021
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
It consists of two relations; the first one being exemplified in "An X is a Y" (simple hyponymy) while the second relation is "An X is a kind/type of Y". The second relation is said to be more discriminating and can be classified more specifically under the concept of taxonomy.
So I think what this saying, rather indirectly (from the other direction), if I'm understanding correctly, is that the relationships that can be inferred from looking at a taxonomy are ambiguous, because a taxonomy includes 2 kinds of relationships, but encodes them in the same way (conflates them together as if they were both hyponyms--er, well, this is saying that the are both kinds of hyponyms):
- "An X is a Y" (simple hyponymy)
- "An X is a kind/type of Y".
Actually, I may have read it wrong / misunderstood it... While it's not ruling out that simple hyponymy may sometimes be used in a taxonomy, it is be saying that the "second relation" is "more specifically under the concept of taxonomy" ... which is not really clear, but seems to mean that it is more appropriate / better for use as a criterion in a taxonomy.
Okay, so define "simple hyponymy" and name the other kind of hyponymy that is referenced here.
-
This shows that compatibility may be relevant.
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
It's not really about avoiding that association; in many situations only one or the other is correct and you can't substitute willy-nilly
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Could you explain your use case in a bit more detail? How are you using source maps without source map comments? Are you uploading them to a bug tracker?
-
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
or even configure its taskWrap
-