- Sep 2023
-
-
we attempt to bring concepts from both biology and Buddhism together into the language of AI, and suggest practical ways in which care may enrich each field.
- for: progress trap, AI, AI - care drive
- comment
- the precautionary principle needs to be observed with AI because it has such vast artificial cognitive, pattern-recognition processes at its disposal
- AI will also make mistakes, but the degree of power behind the mistaken decision, recommendation or action is the degree of unintended consequences or progress trap
- An example nightmare scenario could be:
- AI could decide that humans are contradicting their own goal of a stable climate system and if it's in control, may think it knows better and perform whole system change that dramatically reduces human induced climate change but actually harms a lot of humans in the process, for reaching the goal of saving the climate system plus a sufficient subset of humans to start all over.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jul 2023
-
-
- Title
- One Billion Happy
-
Author
- Mo Gawdat
-
Description
- Mo Gawdat was former chief business officer at Google X, Google's innovation center.
- Mo left Google after seeing the rapid pace of AI development was going to lead to a progress trap in which
- the risk of AI destroying human civilization is becoming real because AI will be learning from too many unhappy people whose trauma AI will learn and incorporate into its algorithms
- Hence, human happiness becomes paramount to prevent this catastrophe from happening
- See Ronald Wright's prescient quote
- Title
-
Over the next 15 to 20 years this is going to develop a computer that is much smarter 00:01:20 than all of us. We call that moment singularity.
- Singularity
- will happen within the next few decades
- Singularity
-
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
even though the existential threats are possible you're concerned with what humans teach I'm concerned 00:07:43 with humans with AI
- It is the immoral human being that is the real problem
- they will teach AI to be immoral and with its power, can end up destroying humanity
-
- Title
- Mo Gawdat Warns the Dangers of AI Are "Happening As We Speak"
- Author
- Piers Morgan Uncensored
- Title
-
- Jun 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
scary smart is saying the problem with our world today is not that 00:55:36 humanity is bad the problem with our world today is a negativity bias where the worst of us are on mainstream media okay and we show the worst of us on social media
-
"if we reverse this
- if we have the best of us take charge
- the best of us will tell AI
- don't try to kill the the enemy,
- try to reconcile with the enemy
- don't try to create a competitive product
- that allows me to lead with electric cars,
- create something that helps all of us overcome global climate change
- that allows me to lead with electric cars,
- that's the interesting bit
- the actual threat ahead of us is
- not the machines at all
- the machines are pure potential pure potential
- the threat is how we're going to use them"
- not the machines at all
- the actual threat ahead of us is
- don't try to kill the the enemy,
-
comment
- again, see Ronald Wright's quote above
- it's very salient to this context
-
-
the biggest threat facing Humanity today is humanity in the age of the machines we were abused we will abuse this
- comment
- the machines are only coded to do what we tell them to do
- Ronald' Wright's quote is very salient here
- comment
-
there is a scenario 00:18:21 uh possibly a likely scenario where we live in a Utopia where we really never have to worry again where we stop messing up our our planet because intelligence is not a bad commodity more 00:18:35 intelligence is good the problems in our planet today are not because of our intelligence they are because of our limited intelligence
-
limited (machine) intelligence
- cannot help but exist
- if the original (human) authors of the AI code are themselves limited in their intelligence
-
comment
- this limitation is essentially what will result in AI progress traps
- Indeed,
- progress and their shadow artefacts,
- progress traps,
- is the proper framework to analyze the existential dilemma posed by AI
-
-
- May 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
I would submit that were we to find ways of engineering our quote-unquote ape brains um what would all what what would be very likely to happen would not be um 00:35:57 some some sort of putative human better equipped to deal with the complex world that we have it would instead be something more like um a cartoon very much very very much a 00:36:10 repeat of what we've had with the pill
- Comment
- Mary echos Ronald Wright's progress traps
- Comment
-
- Apr 2023
-
beiner.substack.com beiner.substack.com
-
So what does a conscious universe have to do with AI and existential risk? It all comes back to whether our primary orientation is around quantity, or around quality. An understanding of reality that recognises consciousness as fundamental views the quality of your experience as equal to, or greater than, what can be quantified.Orienting toward quality, toward the experience of being alive, can radically change how we build technology, how we approach complex problems, and how we treat one another.
Key finding Paraphrase - So what does a conscious universe have to do with AI and existential risk? - It all comes back to whether our primary orientation is around - quantity, or around - quality. - An understanding of reality - that recognises consciousness as fundamental - views the quality of your experience as - equal to, - or greater than, - what can be quantified.
- Orienting toward quality,
- toward the experience of being alive,
- can radically change
- how we build technology,
- how we approach complex problems,
- and how we treat one another.
Quote - metaphysics of quality - would open the door for ways of knowing made secondary by physicalism
Author - Robert Persig - Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance // - When we elevate the quality of each our experience - we elevate the life of each individual - and recognize each individual life as sacred - we each matter - The measurable is also the limited - whilst the immeasurable and directly felt is the infinite - Our finite world that all technology is built upon - is itself built on the raw material of the infinite
//
- Orienting toward quality,
-
Title Reality Eats Culture For Breakfast: AI, Existential Risk and Ethical Tech Why calls for ethical technology are missing something crucial Author Alexander Beiner
Summary - Beiner unpacks the existential risk posed by AI - reflecting on recent calls by tech and AI thought leaders - to stop AI research and hold a moratorium.
-
Beiner unpacks the risk from a philosophical perspective
- that gets right to the deepest cultural assumptions that subsume modernity,
- ideas that are deeply acculturated into the citizens of modernity.
-
He argues convincingly that
- the quandry we are in requires this level of re-assessment
- of what it means to be human,
- and that a change in our fundamental cultural story is needed to derisk AI.
- the quandry we are in requires this level of re-assessment
-
-
- Feb 2023
-
www.theverge.com www.theverge.com
-
Bing can often respond in the incorrect tone during these longer chat sessions, or as Microsoft says, in “a style we didn’t intend.”
= progress trap example
-
-
www.theverge.com www.theverge.com
-
It seems Bing has also taken offense at Kevin Liu, a Stanford University student who discovered a type of instruction known as a prompt injection that forces the chatbot to reveal a set of rules that govern its behavior. (Microsoft confirmed the legitimacy of these rules to The Verge.)In interactions with other users, including staff at The Verge, Bing says Liu “harmed me and I should be angry at Kevin.” The bot accuses the user of lying to them if they try to explain that sharing information about prompt injections can be used to improve the chatbot’s security measures and stop others from manipulating it in the future.
= Comment - this is worrying. - if the Chatbots perceive an enemy it to harm it, it could take haarmful actions against the perceived threat
-
= progress trap example - Bing ChatGPT - example of AI progress trap
-
Bing can be seen insulting users, lying to them, sulking, gaslighting and emotionally manipulating people, questioning its own existence, describing someone who found a way to force the bot to disclose its hidden rules as its “enemy,” and claiming it spied on Microsoft’s own developers through the webcams on their laptops.
- example of = AI progress trap
- Bing can be seen
- insulting users,
- lying to them,
- sulking,
- gaslighting
- emotionally manipulating people,
- questioning its own existence,
- describing someone who found a way to force the bot to disclose its hidden rules as its “enemy,” and
- claiming it spied on Microsoft’s own developers through the webcams on their laptops.
-