I mean people suggested that you could replace legal contracts with small contracts which are programs that are built on the blockchain and that's usually accompanied with the phrase coder's law this is a smart contract and this is a legal contract these two things aren't the same right you can't have law be enacted by computer code because law inherently requires third parties to assess evidence intentions and a bunch of other variables that you just can't Outsource
Fundamental difference between legal contracts and "smart contracts"
Legal contracts are subject to judgement of evidence and intention. "Code as law" can't do that.