11 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2026
    1. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na/33/25

      Case: IP #5 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 44; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 25; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 135

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    2. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na/33/25/5/6/837

      Case: IP #2 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    3. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na/33/25/5/6/837/na/46/135 CSA /27 CSA /20 CSA /33

      Case: IP #8 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 27; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 33

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    4. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na/33/25/5/6/837/na/46

      Case: IP #4 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 48; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 33; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    5. 1 c.2561G > Ac.3916C > Tp.Arg854Glnp.Arg1306Trp C2028D’-E’A1htz MissenseMissenseA 17 4 26

      Case: IP #1 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 296

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

      MultipleGeneVariants:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      ClinVarID: 288

      gnomAD: absent

    6. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na/33/25/5/6/837/na/46/135 CSA /27 CSA /20

      Case: IP #7 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    7. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na

      Case: IP #3 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs:

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    8. 2–8 c.3916C > T p.Arg1306Trp C 28 A1 htz Missense A/na/O/B/O/O/A21/37/48/44/22/22/2713 RCo /na/33/25/5/6/837/na/46/135 CSA /27

      Case: IP #6 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 27

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 288

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    1. 19

      Case: Patient 19 (Family F), male, 44yo

      DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

      FamilyInfo: NA

      ParentalGenotype(s): NA

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030132, HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

      (Absence of large von Willebrand factor multimers, impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

      CaseHPOFreeText: blood group O, Platelet count x103/μl = 116, PFA 100 sec = >300, SPA % = 15.7, MADR mg/mL = 0.3, VWF:Ag U/dL = 44.7, VWF:CB U/dL = 11.8, VWF:CB ratio = 0.48, VWF:RCo U/dL = 11.4, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.71, Platelet VWF U/dL = 130, FVIII U/dL = 27.7, BAT F/M = 10

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting: NA

      GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

      PreviouslyPublished: NA

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T (p.Arg1306Trp)

      HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3916C>T (p.Arg1306Trp)

      ClinVarID: 288; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/288/

      CAID: NA

      gnomAD: absent

    2. 21

      Case: Patient 21 (Family H), male, 40yo

      DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

      FamilyInfo: NA

      ParentalGenotype(s): NA

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030132, HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

      (Absence of large von Willebrand factor multimers, impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

      CaseHPOFreeText: blood group A, Platelet count x103/μl = 158, PFA 100 sec = >300, SPA % = NA, MADR mg/mL = 0.45, VWF:Ag U/dL = 32.5, VWF:CB U/dL = 14.7, VWF:CB ratio = 0.45, VWF:RCo U/dL = 18.7, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.59, Platelet VWF U/dL = 130, FVIII U/dL = 39.0, BAT F/M = NA

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting: NA

      GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

      PreviouslyPublished: NA

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T (p.Arg1306Trp)

      HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3916C>T (p.Arg1306Trp)

      ClinVarID: 288; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/288/

      CAID: NA

      gnomAD: absent

    1. Case: P34, Chinese, female, 34yo

      DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

      FamilyInfo: NA

      ParentalGenotype(s): NA

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

      (Reduced quantity of VWF)

      CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 13; VWF:Ag (%) = 20.2, VWF:RCo (%) = 6.9, FVIII:C (%) = 32.9, VWF:CB (%) = 4.8, VWFpp (%) = 54.5, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.7, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.6, RIPA (0.5 mg/ml, %) = 65.1, PLT(×109/l) = 153

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting: NA

      GenotypingMethod: NGS

      PreviouslyPublished: NA

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3916C>T (p.Arg1306Trp)

      HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3916C>T (p.Arg1306Trp)

      ClinVarID: 288; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/288/

      CAID: NA

      gnomAD: absent