11 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2026
    1. Hprp3p and Hprp4p have been shown to interact with each other and the first 100 amino acids of Hprp3p are not essential for this interaction. These experiments suggest that both Hprp3p and Hprp4p are components of human spliceosomes.

      ExperimentName: PRPF4 physically interacts with PRPF3.

      InteractingGene: PRPF3 (HGNC:17348)

      InteractionType: Physical

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: Immunoprecipitation of endogenous PRPF3 from HeLa cell nuclear extracts pulled down PRPF4 (Figures 5 and 6).

    1. Here we identify a complex composed of seven highly conserved BBS proteins. This complex, the BBSome, localizes to nonmembranous centriolar satellites in the cytoplasm but also to the membrane of the cilium. Interestingly, the BBSome is required for ciliogenesis but is dispensable for centriolar satellite function. This ciliogenic function is mediated in part by the Rab8 GDP/GTP exchange factor, which localizes to the basal body and contacts the BBSome. Strikingly, Rab8(GTP) enters the primary cilium and promotes extension of the ciliary membrane. Conversely, preventing Rab8(GTP) production blocks ciliation in cells and yields characteristic BBS phenotypes in zebrafish. Our data reveal that BBS may be caused by defects in vesicular transport to the cilium.

      ExperimentName: BBS7 interacts with other components of the BBSome.

      InteractingGene: BBS4 (HGNC:969)

      InteractionType: Physical

      InteractionMethod: co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: Antibody-based isolation of BBS4 results in co-purification of BBS7, as well as BBS1, BBS2, BBS5, BBS8, and BBS9 in stoichiometric quantities. The co-purifying proteins are shown separated by gel electrophoresis in Figure 1F and were identified and quantified by mass spectrometry in Table S1. All 8 proteins are encoded by genes linked to Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

    1. phosphodiesterase

      ExperimentName: PDE6A forms a complex with PDE6B and PDE6G

      InteractingGene: HGNC:8786 (PDE6B, implicated in retinitis pigmentosa 40) and HGNC:8789 (PDE6G, implicated in retinitis pigmentosa 57)

      InteractionType: physical

      InteractionMethod: size exclusion chromatography

      InteractionEvidence: Purification of the cGMP phosphodiesterase complex from bovine rod outer segments yields a subunit of 88 kDa (PDE6A), a subunit of 84 kDa (PDE6B), and a subunit of 13 kDa (PDE6G), (Figure 2). This article shows that PDE6A interacts with and co-purifies with PDE6B and PDE6G in a single complex isolated from bovine retina. A subsequent article by Pittler et al. later established the position of PDE6A on chromosome 5 (PMID: 2155175).

    1. Reciprocal co-IPs confirm that RDS/ROM-1 interactions were maintained in retinal extracts from animals carrying the Y141C-RDS mutation (C).

      ExperimentName: Prph2 interacts with Rom1

      InteractingGene: ROM1 (HGNC:10254)

      InteractionType: Physical

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: Immunoprecipitation of endogenous Prph2 from mouse retinal extracts pulled down Rom1, and vice versa (Fig. 6C).

    1. Rp1L1 interacts with Rp1 in transfected cells and in retina pull-down experiments.

      ExperimentName: RP1L1 physical interaction with RP1

      InteractingGene: HGNC:10263 (RP1)

      InteractionType: Physical interaction

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: Immunoprecipitation of Rp1 or Rp1l1 from transfected 293T cells successfully led to co-immunoprecipitation of the other, indicating their presence in a complex (Figure 7).

    1. We therefore investigated potential GPR143 interaction partners, with a focus on the melanogenic enzyme tyrosinase. GPR143 co-immunoprecipitated with tyrosinase, while confocal microscopy demonstrated colocalization of the proteins. Furthermore, tyrosinase localized to the plasma membrane when co-expressed with a GPR143 trafficking mutant. The physical interaction between the proteins was confirmed using Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer.

      ExperimentName: GPR143 interacts with TYR by co-IP and FRET

      InteractingGene: TYR, which is implicated in oculocutaneous albinism types 1A and 1B

      InteractionType: Physical

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation and FRET were both performed with positive results.

      InteractionEvidence: Co-IP of the exogenously expressed GPR143 fusion protein or endogenous TYR found that IP of one protein pulls down the other as well (Figure 2). This was confirmed by fluorescent resonance energy transfer experiments (Figures 4 and 5). Use of a mislocalizing GPR143 mutant control showed that TYR localization appears to be GPR143-dependent (Figures 3 and 4).

    1. To test the binding between SOST and LRP5 as well as LRP6, we produced CM containing a SOST-IgG fusion protein, which tags SOST with the constant region of immunoglobulin heavy chain, and the extracellular portion of LRP5 and LRP6 tagged with the Myc epitope (LRP5N-Myc and LRP6N-Myc). We found that SOST showed specific interactions with LRP5 and LRP6 but not with a similarly tagged low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLRN-Myc) (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, when LDLRN-Myc was mixed in large excess together with LRP5N-Myc and LRP6N-Myc, SOST specifically bound to LRP5 and LRP6 (Fig. 3A). As an additional control for the binding specificity, we used Fz8CRD-IgG, which has a similar molecular mass to that of SOST-IgG. Despite much higher abundance in the CM, Fz8CRD-IgG was unable to precipitate any detectable amount of LRP5 or LRP6 protein (Fig. 3A).

      ExperimentName: LRP5 interacts with SOST

      InteractingGene: SOST (HGNC:13771)

      InteractionType: Physical

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: Immunoprecipitation of an exogenously expressed IgG-SOST fusion protein from conditioned medium pulled down the Myc-tagged soluble portion of LRP5 (and LRP6, but not control targets) (Fig. 3A). Subsequent experiments identified SOST as an LRP5/6 antagonist that attenuates canonical Wnt signaling through these receptors (Figure 4).

    1. All four proteins, NR2E3, NR1D1, NRL and CRX, could be co-immunoprecipitated from the bovine retinal nuclear extract, suggesting their existence in a multi-protein transcriptional regulatory complex in vivo. Our results demonstrate that NR2E3 is involved in regulating the expression of rod photoreceptor-specific genes and support its proposed role in transcriptional regulatory network(s) during rod differentiation.

      ExperimentName: NR2E3 physical interaction with NRL and CRX

      InteractingGene: HGNC:8002 (NRL), HGNC:2383 (CRX)

      InteractionType: Physical interaction

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: Immunoprecipitation of NR2E3, NRL or CRX from bovine retinal nuclear extract successfully led to co-immunoprecipitation of the others, indicating their presence in a transcriptional regulatory complex (Figure 6).

    1. We show that, in the retina, CEP290 associates with several microtubule-based transport proteins including RPGR, which is mutated in ~15% of patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

      ExperimentName: Co-IP showing interaction of RPGR with CEP290

      InteractingGene: CEP290, which is implicated in Leber congenital amaurosis 10 and multiple syndromic phenotypes (Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndrome, and Senior-Loken syndrome).

      InteractionType: Physical

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation was performed with a positive result, while yeast-2-hybrid (Y2H) was performed with a negative result.

      InteractionEvidence: Co-IP with an RPGR antibody (Figure 4A) or CEP290 antibody (Figure 4B) successfully immunoprecipitates both proteins from wild-type mouse retinal extracts. The two (endogenously expressed) proteins also co-localize in IMDC-3 cells (Figure 4C). However, yeast 2-hybrid experiments do not confirm this interaction as direct (data not shown).

    1. Cell expression studies show that RD3 mediates the export of GC1 from the endoplasmic reticulum to endosomal vesicles, and that the C terminus of GC1 is required for RD3 binding.

      ExperimentName: GUCY2D protein-protein interaction with RD3

      InteractingGene: HGNC:19689 (implicated in LCA12)

      InteractionType: Physical (protein-protein) interaction

      InteractionMethod: Interaction was established by coimmunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (Table S1), confirmed by western blotting (Figure 2A).

      InteractionEvidence: Mouse Rd3 was immunoprecipitated by monoclonal antibody and co-purifying proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS. The highest-scoring interacting partner was Gucy2e, the mouse ortholog of GUCY2D (Table S1). This was confirmed by western blotting (Figure 2A) and found to be dependent on the C-terminus of Gucy2e (Figure 5).

    1. To assess whether the CLN5 polypeptide would interact with other lysosomal CLN proteins, we examined all possible combinations of CLN1, CLN2, CLN3, and CLN5 by coimmunoprecipitation assay.

      ExperimentName: Interaction with TPP1 and CLN3

      InteractingGene: TPP1 (formerly known as CLN2) and CLN3

      InteractionType: Physical (protein-protein) interaction

      InteractionMethod: Co-immunoprecipitation

      InteractionEvidence: PPT1 (aka CLN1), CLN3, and CLN5 were exogenously expressed in COS-1 cells. Immunoprecipitation of endogenous TPP1 (Fig. 5A) or exogenously expressed CLN3 (Fig. 5B) successfully co-immunoprecipitated CLN5 (demonstrated by western blotting). Immunoprecipitation of GST-CLN5 successfully co-immunoprecipitated TPP1 and CLN3 (Fig. 5C). This evidence helps validate the link between CLN5 variants and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, as both TPP1 and CLN3 have also been linked with this disease state.