This is the most striking factual claim in the article — AI-assisted targeting in a major military conflict causing mass casualties. Embedded in a paragraph about shareholder resolutions, it grounds the abstract governance discussion in lethal concrete consequences. The juxtaposition of 'proxy season' and 'missile strikes that killed hundreds' captures the scale mismatch between available accountability mechanisms and actual AI harms.

for - Claude AI - prohibition against developing weapons - can be jailbroken

for - AI - progress trap - Youtube - bioweapons is not the only threat. Nano technology and many others can be turned into weapons of mass destruction - RDeepSeek R1 just caught up with OpenAIs o1 - There is no moat@ What does this mean? - David Shapiro - 2025, Jan 29

for - progress trap - AI and even more powerful weapons of destruction

progress trap - AI and even more powerful weapons of destruction - The podcaster's excitement seems to overshadow any concern of the tragic unintended consequences of weapons even more powerful than nuclear warheads. - With human base emotions still stuck in the past and our species continued reliance on violence to solve problems, more powerful weapons is not the solution, - indeed, they only make the problem worse - Here is where Ronald Wright's quote is so apt: - We humans are running modern software on 50,000 year old hardware systems - Our cultural evolution, of which AI is a part of, is happening so quickly, that - it is racing ahead of our biological evolution - We aren't able to adapt fast enough for the rapid cultural changes that AI is going to create, and it may very well destroy us