9 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2022
  2. Apr 2022
  3. Jan 2022
    1. Many bibliography databases supply a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or arXiv eprint number with BibTeX entries. However, the standard BiBTeX style files either ignore this information or print it without hyperlinking it correctly. Here’s how you can get working clickable links to both DOI and arXiv eprints.
      • BIBTEX standard doesnt use them
    1. For the new style arXiv identifiers (April 2007 and onwards) we recommend these bib-style extensions: **archivePrefix = "arXiv"**, **eprint = "0707.3168"**, **primaryClass = "hep-th"**,
      • for "old style ID":
      • **eprint = "hep-ph/9609357"**
  4. Dec 2021
    1. In order to use this entry properly the macro \mnras must be defined in your document and it must give the correct replacement text.

      AHA! "\x" son macros!

    2. Pagina acerca de los ERRORES de SINTAXIS y ESTILO de los "bib entries" generados por las webs

  5. Jul 2020
    1. usaremos la exportación en BibTex, lo que genera un archivoque podemos incluir mediante Pandoc

      Para quien desconoce esta terminología pueden parecer confuso: pandoc? bibtex?

  6. Jun 2016
    1. If the RRID is well-formed, and if the lookup found the right record, a human validator tags it a valid RRID — one that can now be associated mechanically with occurrences of the same resource in other contexts. If the RRID is not well-formed, or if the lookup fails to find the right record, a human validator tags the annotation as an exception and can discuss with others how to handle it. If an RRID is just missing, the validator notes that with another kind of exception tag.

      Sounds a lot like the way reference managers work. In many cases, people keep the invalid or badly-formed results.

  7. Dec 2015
    1. Shiney.

      So what exactly does Hypothes.is get out of this annotation processes?

      So its tagging. Or adding on notes.

      Basically from what I see you get to add comments as if it were a word document.

      Added bonus, you can do LaTeX math: $$\cos (2\theta) = \cos^2 \theta - \sin^2 \theta$$

      So, no BibTex integration either.

      So a person could add math, but not a BibTeX reference of where that math comes from.


      What it looks like is a method of funnelling users from other web pages through Hypothes.is website for data collection.

      To grab user generated content related to external web content.

      It would be a powerful tool to map network connections...but, we won't know. Since we can't actually cite anything.