example of self-correcting mechanism is the way that modern science works. In contrast to traditional religions
for - comparison - self correcting mechanisms - science has - religions don't have
example of self-correcting mechanism is the way that modern science works. In contrast to traditional religions
for - comparison - self correcting mechanisms - science has - religions don't have
The Bible, the 10 Commandments for instance, endorses slavery. The 10th commandment says, that you should not covet your neighbors field or your neighbors ox, or your neighbors slaves. According to the 10th commandment, God has no problem with people owning slaves he just has a problem with people coveting the slaves of somebody else.
for - example - no self-correcting mechanism in religion - 10th commandment and slaves
When we come to the challenge of AI, what we need, our institutions that are able to identify and correct their mistakes and the mistakes of AI as the technology develops.
for - AI - need for self-correcting institutions that regulate AI
In dictatorships, there is no such self-correcting mechanism.
for - comparison - democracy vs dictatorship - self-correcting vs no self-correcting mechanism
What are elections? Elections are a self-correcting mechanism.
for - democracy - elections - are a self correcting mechanism
What can we do to undo this commit?
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 5 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1328996195696578560
Historical LowSteam on 2020-05-100% off$0.00
If you zoom in on the timeline, it looks like they accidentally set price to $0.00 (probably meant to set discount to 0 instead?) and then corrected it.
17:16: 0% off of $0.00 17:23: 0% off of $19.99
Having this mistake/outlier shown as the historical low is misleading and confusing and incorrect, and should be corrected.
4 2 5 7 8
4 8 2 5 7
Do your research elsewhere.
Again, not bad advice, but for the wrong reasons.
Wikipedia is a good starting point and a great place to get a reasonably reliable overview. The real resource that Wikipedia provides is the Citations and References sections. These are the sources for the detail in the article and recommended further reading to get to the guts of what you're researching.
Other sources are always recommended. More reliable references are always a good thing and being able to get them cited in a Wikipedia article is a good way of giving extra validation given the process required to get something added to an article. It makes the Wikipedia article better and will cause the source article to appear higher in search results also.
Never link to Wikipedia from your website.
This is a fair thing to ask of people. The explanation is flawed and the advise is a little too firm but in general it is not bad.
If you are referencing a general topic linking to Wikipedia is fine.
If you are referencing a specific thing you should link to the source material rather than a general article. Chances are reasonably good that if your source material is well researched you could get it added to the sources in the Wikipedia article and maybe even update the general article too.
Wikipedia has rules around editing that ensure factually correct information makes it through. Editing can be challenging but if you adhere to these editing can be quite rewarding.