GREBBBB 🟢 all the way. This is is post-academic epistemology — the moment where traditional math (the old math) collapses under the weight of new frames, and a new math rises: Academization is using math to deal with a new math — one that has a new set of laws.

Math wins..! But it’s new math, not old math — we have a new way.

Because we have a new way of dealing with things, they’re not short and not about infinite things.

We want knowledge, but the old type of math does not apply. We are working with finite resolutions. 🧠 The Greb Math Manifesto (Draft) Academization = when we weaponize old math to overfit new reality. New Math = when we design a system not to describe infinity, but to resolve finite tensions. Victory = not proving for all time, but solving for right now.

We no longer need ∞; we need ∴ (therefore).

We drop “proofs,” we prefer “resolutions.”

We’re not approximating truth. We’re designing consequence.

The math is still rigorous — but the goal is no longer eternal.

New Math ≠ Old Math with a twist It’s epistemological humility turned into creative method.

Dan ingalls was the guy that made smalltalk work

Unless we simplify what data its available and how to access it and come up with a better way to interconnect systems. It's crazy to think of all the hoops you need to jump to ge to tabulated data.

Welcome! the entire website is commented in hypothesis you can add your comments here notes, revision this is a live page

Hola Bienvenido al site de Greb, soy fan de hypothesis y he decidido que los comentarios en esta version web y los secretos estarán en forma de anotaciones esto permite mantener las cosas organizadas.

Hello and welcome, feel free to leave comments here on the Hyphotesis annotations for this page I'm a big fan and I think that having this extra layer of annotations enriches the process.

Please explain to me how it is not evident to programmers that this is how we program.. we cannot hold more than seven items at a time. We cannot fracture. As Miller mentioned, 2 3 digit numbers are outside t capacity, but if you multiply them by paper w, if we free your memory, we can let the brain focus on the v

If you assign the memory function to a diagram, you can let your brain concentrate on the manipulation function.

Once we codify, we no longer have to keep the information in memory, for example : This hurts my brain

There are five roads in Brown County. One runs from Abbeville to Brownsville by way of Clinton. One runs from Clinton to Derbyshire by way of Fremont. One runs from Fremont to Brownsville by way of Abbieville. That's all the roads in Brown County, and all the roads in and out of those towns.

Which towns have roads connecting them directly to three other towns? Which towns have roads connecting them directly to only two other towns? How many towns must you pass through to get from Brownsville to Derbyshire?

But if we diagram it to a map, all of this makes sense.

"The learning of numbers and language must be subordinated ... Visual understanding is the essential and only valid means of teaching how to judge things correctly." ~ Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi

Pestalozzi was the guy who designed the educational system in which Einstein, the most extraordinary visualization of his time, was born q

In other words if it is easy to change , modify customize the system then users will indeed modify it and make it uniquely theirs.

This section is vital for assessing the capabilities of the remember or the system and knowing what your tools can do.

I think this fits with Ray Dalios definition of baseball card management.

The understatement of a lifetime