How will flipping to a different business model address our need for a sustainable infrastructure covering our data and code, at the same time as it is addressing this (non-exhaustive) list of missing/lacking functionalities in our scholarly literature? Link-rot No scientific impact analysis Lousy peer-review No global search No functional hyperlinks Useless data visualization No submission standards (Almost) no statistics No content-mining No effective way to sort, filter and discover No semantic enrichment No networking feature

“Simply giving people an affiliation and an e-mail address means that when they submit a paper to a journal or a conference, it will get read and their work will have a shot at surviving on its own merits,

these forensic tools are useful in the absence of transparency, but they are no substitute for it.

There is, of course, the risk that we will go too far in the other direction and impose so many burdens on scientists to make everything transparent that science will grind to a halt (Lewandowsky & Bishop, 2016).