2 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Encyclicals mark time. A century from now, how will we be remembered for how we met this moment? Will we be seen as having been too timid or shortsighted to prevent a small group of unfathomably wealthy and self-interested people from seizing ever greater control over the human family's shared destiny?

      Framing the AI moment through a century-long lens is the encyclical's most distinctive rhetorical move. Papal encyclicals on social issues (Rerum Novarum on labor in 1891, Laudato Si on climate in 2015) are consistently cited decades later as prophetic. The authors are betting that Magnifica Humanitas will be read the same way — as the moment the Catholic Church staked a clear position on AI governance before the outcome was determined.

  2. Jun 2022
    1. given the impacts that humans are having on the planet our flourishing can no longer be limited just by what we do in 00:07:16 our lifetimes nor our development opportunities of the current and future generations dependent only on the productive capacity that we leave as legacy but it depends on is also on the health 00:07:27 of the underlying natural systems and resources that support our well-being

      Long term thinking needs to replace short term thinking. How will we do that when political leaders are continuously influenced by industry lobbies from the monied entrenched incumbents whose deep pockets buy political influence and therefore influence policy direction?