We stand by this defense in depth strategy. It reduces the risks posed by Fable, making them comparable to the risks of existing models already deployed across the industry.
大多数人认为深度防御策略只是临时措施，不足以应对AI安全威胁，但作者认为这种策略已经将Fable的风险降低到与行业现有模型相当的水平，挑战了对AI安全需要完美解决方案的主流认知。
So, cyber security of tomorrow will not be like proof of work in the sense of 'more GPU wins'; instead, better models, and faster access to such models, will win.
作者提出了一个颠覆性的观点：未来网络安全的关键不是计算资源的多寡，而是模型质量的优劣。这挑战了当前AI安全领域过度关注计算能力的趋势，暗示我们应该重新思考AI安全研究的投资方向。
The "move fast and break things" ethos of Silicon Valley is incompatible with the security demands of superintelligence
for - progress trap - AGI - Silicon Valley move fast and break things strategy - incompatible with security of AGI
Australia's Cyber Security Strategy: $1.66 billion dollar cyber security package = AFP gets $88 million; $66 million to critical infrastructure organisations to assess their networks for vulnerabilities; ASD $1.35 billion (over a decade) to recruit 500 officers.
Reasons Dutton gives for package:
What is defined as critical infrastructure is expanded and subject to obligations to improve their defences.
Supporting cyber resilience of SMEs through information, training, and services to make them more secure.