of consciousness is absurd
critical philosphy dogma
materialism can account for everything
deny existence of consiousness
devoted to description
what cannot be captured in description rejected as unreal
only what is "descrbed" is externalized shareable communicable knowledge, though
hostility to tacit *knowing
not knowledge for sure
ineffable is real
post-critical account
returns us to First Person experience
experience is not reducible to sense data
*ionsider thinking itself as experience and "spiritual sense data"
particula in context supplied by a Whole
wholeness and its implicate order for sure
changes our understanding of our experience
adequatio intellectus et rem
correct statement about what is the case
not correct but articulation formulation rendering the feeling communicable
don't prepare te words prepare the feelings
correct understanding is when what we say something that is a correct statement about what is the case
knowing is grounded in an attempot to make sense of our experience
do not forget intentions
alligned with intention at whatever time scale
violation of our common sense