324 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. the margin of victory would have turned negative, implying that theDemocrats rather than the Republicans would have carried the state

      So basically yes, immigrant effects on voting caries massive implications

    2. Finally, we analyze the impact of theimmigrant shares (overall, low-skilled, and high-skilled) on individual attitudestoward immigrants. We find, consistently with the above results, that an inflow oflow skilled immigrants in the county increases and an inflow of high skilled immi-grants decreases the anti-immigration position of an individual

      TLDR, using pews data, they find the same sort of effect, they have done 101 credibility checks and passed them all

    3. An increase of high-skilled immigrants of 1 percent of the adult populationproduces a decline in the Republican vote share by 1.522 percentage points.

      One question is whether the effect varies by region of the US, does NE become relatively less republican with more immigrants

    4. Note that significantcorrelations with other contemporaneous variables do not invalidate the instrumentsbut suggest possible economic and demographic variables as channels of the effectof immigration on political preferences.

      TLDR: We checked for other statistical explanations and didn't find any

    5. The first threat to identifying a causal connection from immigration to votes isthat some counties have persistent economic, cultural, and institutional features thatattract immigrants and also affect citizens’ political preferences

      Confounder

    6. percentage of the population in the 1990–2016 period

      Is the overall effect negative because the effect of high-skill immigration is more powerful or is it because there are more high skill migrants in absolute terms and so the compounded effect is large?

    7. estimate the impact of the shareof foreign citizens on election outcomes using variation over time across districts inthe city of Hamburg between 1987 and 2000. The authors find evidence of a positivecorrelation between the population share of immigrants in a district and the share ofvotes received by extreme right-wing parties with a clearly anti-immigration stance.

      In part the previous studies will not capture the specific nuances of the political economy in America or the nuances if the makeup of immigrants (skill, english proficiency, etc...)

    8. A scatter plot of the change in the share of Republican votes against the changein the share of immigrants, between the years 1990–1992 and 2014–2016, shows anegative and significant correlation

      They'll say because most of the immigrants are high-skill

    9. foreign-born residents with no high-school degree. The high-skilled immigrants Hitare counted as the number of adult foreign-born residents with a high-school degreeor more

      Oversimplification but thats ok

    10. Relative to these works, our paper is the first tofocus on US elections including the whole country, using variation across countiesand isolating a causal mechanism by the use of skill-specific shift-share instruments.

      shocking

    11. A simple explanation is that immigrants to theEuropean countries analyzed above (Italy, Austria, and Germany) are on averageless skilled than immigrants to the United States.

      The migration of high skilled immigrants into NE specifically may result in a higher democratic vote share there (also histiry of immigrants?)

    12. we confirm the negative andsignificant impact of high-skilled immigrants on the vote share to the Republicansand the positive and significant impact of low-skilled immigrants

      Consistent with what we learned in migration and migration policy

    13. This implies that the vote share of the Republican Party shouldincrease if voting residents perceive immigrants as a net cost rather than a benefit

      Gonna depend on the type of immigrant, even ignorant americans know that not all immigrants are equal

    1. By recent estimates, 23.2 million of the people eligible to vote in the 2020 presidentialelection, or one-in-ten eligible voters, were naturalized immigrant citizens – a number that hasmore than doubled since 2000

      And they influence the politics of NE?

    2. Here, too, people who arrived from the Soviet Bloc at older ages are more likely to reportsupporting right-wing political parties.

      We're seeing the same phenomon in isreal even though the political climate is differnt, one question might be how differnt the political climate actually is

    3. It’s important to remember that the family fixed effect also accounts for much of thepost-migration experience for children, meaning that the primary vehicles for the assimilation ofchildren (e.g. schools, neighborhoods, social milieu) in the US are also fixed once families arrive

      Controlling for the American culture they are documented being exposed to

    4. Our results remain unchanged in thisspecification too, represented in Table B.5, suggesting that this is more consistent with exposurethan an “oldest child” effect since it is just as likely to appear in second oldest children relative toyounger siblings.

      Well done, these were my two concerns I could think of.

    5. The fact that the effects we measure are comparable for this group of refugeesto the effects we measure for those who leave when repression is coupled with economic crisissuggests that repression is the dominant mechanism behind the effects we document in this paper

      Makes sense that it is the pirmary although I would think that if communism made you poor you woukld hate it for that

    6. The probability plateaus untilthe mid 40s, when the probability of being registered as a Democrat starts rising again. There isno trend for registering as an independent with age of arrival until the beginning of middle-age,when increasing age appears to make non-partisan registration less likely

      Young people are more radically right, ot more likely to register as repuiblican

    7. A and B of Figure 5 present a residualized binned scatter plot of the relationship between age atarrival and voting in 2016 and 2014, respectively

      The later you come, the more exposure you had to repression, the more likely you are to vote

    8. Overall therelationship between age of arrival is positive, with every additional year associated with a 0.18percentage point increase in the probability of voting in 2016

      Bad model though, need a quadratic term

    9. he trend is clearly increasing with agefor newborn arrivals up through early middle-age, flat for middle-aged arrivals through earlyretirement-age, and decreasing with age among those who arrive after 60 or 65.

      Makes sense and is consistent with what we know of immigrant voting patterns, but different compared to US pop

    Annotators

  2. Jan 2026
    1. but it might also motivate survivors toparticipate more post-migration to fulfill pent up demand for political voice, cast votes againstparties similar to oppresive ones in their birth countries, or a number of other possible psycho-logical mechanisms beyond the scope of this study

      The question is how this ties back to NE, I suspect a bulk of the population will end up there

    2. The extant literature suggests a “back-lash effect” for victims who remain in affected areas; victims are more hostile to the perpetratingregime and persistently less likely to express loyalty unless the regime can credibly threaten themagain

      Again, intuitive

    3. . Ironically, the liberalization of free expressionrules under Gorbachev’s Perestroika heralded an increase in public anti-semitic demonstrations(Gitelman, 1991), all prompting subsequent waves of emigration out of the Soviet Union thatwould continue after the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991

      Government and public was persecuting or at least discriminating against jews

    4. Moreover, we also establish similar patternswithin the same refugee population in a different national context (Israel) using data from a largemulti-election survey

      One question is if it generalizes beyond jews

    5. more likely to participatein presidential and midterm elections and to register as Republicans in the US. Our findings holdwithin our simplest within-family design,

      They stay conservative, presumably in a backlash to the regime they are fleeing, but are liable to activly participate in government

    Annotators

    1. ToEnoch was born Irad; and Irad was the fatherof Mehujael, and Mehujael the father ofMethushael, and Methushael the father ofLamech.

      Where did the not adam and eve people come from?

    Annotators

    1. Whether partycoalitions can again be disrupted depends on shifting party dynamics insome fundamental way, by some future partisan coalition- builders, in waysthat we cannot foresee.

      To me the story is this: NE always had some preference for liberal policies and for a while the party to affiliate with was less defined. After Reagan, the base of young and immigrant support FDR had grown was unable to find a home for their progressive mindsets in an increasingly evangelical republican party. Thus, they said: "We dippin" and deserted to the democrats.

    2. dominated by Southerners, and the partywas facing pressures to pursue the policies of cultural conservatives” costingthe GOP support elsewhere as “the Northeast wing was not receptive to thisemphasis”

      I think the push factors were more important than the pull here

    3. Party leaders and their strategic efforts built partisan coalitions in NewEngland during changing circumstances, often by trying to attract particulardemographic groups through outreach, party organization, and issue appeals

      Immigrants and liberalism

    4. Since Reagan, the Republican Party has become even more wed to far-right messages and has moved in an anti- government, even anti-democraticdirection, which swept in conspiracy theorists, while undermining governance(Fried and Harris 2020, 2021). Partisan polarization is increasingly racializedand asymmetric, with Republicans more extreme than Democrats (Mannand Ornstein 2012; Tesler 2016).

      This seems to me a primary factor

    5. New England, bycontrast, continued its tradition of electing mostly moderate Republicanswho were pro-choice, comparatively feminist and, particularly in comingdecades, pro-LGBTQ+ rights.

      In part whats gonna happen is the relative extremism is gonna make people who were once rep. democrats

    6. As this chapter noted at the start, the Democratic Party’s embrace of civilrights in the latter decades of the twentieth century is key to understandingparty transformation in New England.

      Again progressivism rears its beautiful head

    7. Muskie and Reagan: Post-FDR Coalition-Buildersand New England Politics

      We just got the pull factors, now we will get the push. Reagans social conservatism will not be good for his new england base

    8. Franklin Roosevelt’s highly successful NewDeal coalition was to graft more liberal elements— mainly ethnic and urbanliberals— onto the party’s traditional Southern base

      The north was always more progressive, and there was a time when the republican part provided that, but as the population become younger and catholic and immigrant, the democrats were actually the party that had the opportunity for liberalism

    9. Perhaps it was the Democrats’ confirmed status as a nationalminority that made them more risk acceptant by 1928 when they nominateda Tammany Hall- affiliated northerner

      Wonder if we will see parallels in modern politics

    10. New England’ssupport for the GOP was mostly uniform due to the lingering resentmentsof the Civil War and to Republicans’ continuing support of nationalizing,coordinative efforts as they related to commerce.

      But isn't this not analogous to today since the views on states rights would flip which party it found a home under

    11. based in the South, were,among other things, committed to states’ rights and slavery protections.When late Jacksonian era Democrats,

      ironic given that new england almost started the revolution with a want of states rights

    12. New England’s swing in party supporthas been at least as dramatic as what occurred in the former confederacy.

      But hasn't given new england the same voting power as the south

    Annotators

    1. This methodology is called “textual criticism” because itis a way of assessing a text through critical comparisonof its different copies.

      Basically, being ok with the fact that there are differences

    2. n response to this critique of their canonical status,the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation position wasto declare these works definitively a part of the Bible.The Catholic church to this day maintains the canoni-cal status of Tobit, Judith, the longer version of Esther,1 and 2 Maccabees, the Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach,Baruch (including the Le*er of Jeremiah), and the Addi-tions to Daniel. The Orthodox churches also maintainedthe canonical status of these works, and in addition re-garded some or all of the following books as canonical:1 Esdras, the Prayer of Manasseh, Psalm 151, 3 Maccabees,2 Esdras, and (in an appendix) 4 Maccabees. The NRSVincludes headings within the Apocryphal/Deuteroca-nonical Books calling a*ention to the varying canonicalstatus of these works.

      Canon because they wanted to politically oppose to keep power

    3. continued to cite the Greek Bible, though argu-ing for the superiority of the Hebrew text and canon.

      For people party it was on hand but it must have also been colonial motivations

    4. This is, fundamental-ly, a typical ancient Near Eastern process: Instead of cre-ating a small, highly consistent text, as we perhaps mightnow do, those responsible for the process included manyof the viewpoints in ancient Israel, incorporating differ-ing and even contradictory traditions into this single, andsingular, book—the Hebrew Bible

      DEI

    5. Canonization is fundamentally a process of selection,but we cannot reconstruct why particular texts were can-onized while others were not

      But again gives an opportunity for SELF selection of whats important

    Annotators

  3. Nov 2025
    1. During this period of bipartisan attempts, from 2006 to 2008, deportation of unauthorizedimmigrants increased by 27%, while border apprehensions simultaneously fell by 35%.17

      Part of the problem is that in such an executive heavy political space, the approval ratings or cha nce of reelction can quicly halt reform

    2. the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, and this policy hasremained prominent in immigration enforcement well into the 21st century by allowing local lawenforcement officials to be trained to carry out parts of the detention and deportation processesusually executed by then Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) and now Immigrationand Customs Enforcement (ICE).

      History review

    Annotators

  4. Oct 2025
    1. We left Syria when she was in 6th grade.That was the last time she had any schooling. And then the next time she was in school againwas in NJ. She was placed in 10th grade because she was 16 years old. She was very confusedand struggled in school. She eventually dropped out of H.S.

      So not only will there be cultural divides but also a fallout from whatever they were fleeing

    Annotators

    1. A cohesive elite structure is marked by consensus reached by decision-makers acrossall sectors on the agenda and the approach for Chinatown development

      Success of a chinatown isndependent on how well the de facto leaders get along

    Annotators

    1. Participants showed that CBPinconsistently screened or accounted for fear of return,trafficking, or age.

      I wonder how much this represents a mandate from the higher ups

    2. Approximately 51percent reported that CBP did not explain the documentsthey signed (e.g., Form I-770) prior to their repatriationto Mexico, and nearly half reported not knowing whatforms they signed. Fourteen percent reported feelingforced or pressured to sign documents

      They should be given some leniency because they are minors but instead they are taken advantage of

    3. Overall, the results demonstratethat CBP does not comply with the major policies articu-lated in the Flores Settlement, its internal guidelines, orthe TVPRA, as per the detention, screening, or repatria-tion of Mexican UAC.

      Not surprising still wondering why

    4. . As nongovernmental organizations and human rights groups have documented, however, CBP hasrepeatedly violated these legal standards and policies, and subjected UAC to abuses and rights violations

      Why, whats the incentive

    Annotators

  5. Sep 2025
    1. Other research shows thatminorities regard their ethnoracial and national identities as more compatible when they perceivethat the host community values their group

      So they are studying the opposite

    2. n spite of high levels of integration, continuesto navigate contexts in which politics and policies frame Latino ethnicity as “illegal” and fo

      Because its more of a mislabel?

    Annotators

    1. are transferred to DHS and restructured to become three new agencies: USCustoms and Border Protection (CBP), US Immigration and Customs Enforcement(ICE), and US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

      Which is what we know today and was born from a security decision following 9/11

    2. he law defines a “refugee” as any personoutside the person’s country of nationality who is unable or unwilling to return tothat country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on accountof race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or particularopinion.

      This is where we accept but still do not ratify international law

    3. The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act (known as the Hart-Cellar Act) (79Stat. 911) abolishes the national-origins quota system and replaces it with a systemwhereby immigrants are admitted based on their relationship to a US citizen orlawful permanent resident family member or US employer. While caps are placedon the total number of immigrants who may be admitted each year in most family-based and employer-based categories, the law provides that there will be no cap onthe number of “immediate relatives” (spouses, parents, and minor children) of UScitizens admitted each year. Like immediate relatives, immigrants from the WesternHemisphere countries are also exempted from the law’s system of “preferencecategories” for those who are admitted. However, the law provides that beginning in1968, there will be a cap of 120,000 on the total number of permanent residents whomay be admitted from the Western Hemisphere.

      System we still use today

    4. by Nazi persecution to immigrate to the United States.The law also states that up to 15,000 individuals residing in the United States as ofApril 1, 1948 who meet the displaced person definition may adjust their status andbecome lawful permanent residents. President Truman signs the law “with very greatreluctance,” expressing concerns that the law’s requirements will exclude many Jewishrefugees

      First instance of refugee assistance

    5. ough the law exempts students, as wellas certain professionals (e.g. teachers, government officers, lawyers, physicians, andchemists), and their wives and children.

      So low skill labor basically

    1. . You hear it all the time but that doesn’t mean it makessense. Whiskey is supposed to be bracing but what it is is awful. I want either teaor beer, no whiskey. Mary nods again and heads into the kitchen

      I'm having anxiety reading it

    2. . An hour later I go back andthe office is empty. When I erase the blackboard nally, I can see where she laidher hands carefully, where the numbers are ghostly and blurred

      Bob dies but why?

    3. You have control over this,” he explains in his professor voice. “You can decidehow long she suffers

      Dog represents the marriage perhaps, but also maybe her own suffering

    4. . “I have to talk to youright now,” he says grimly. “Where are you? I can never nd you.”“Try calling your own house,” I say to the machine. In his second message he hascomposed himself.“I’m ne now,” he says rmly. “Disregard previous message and don’t call me back,please; I have meetings.” Click, dial tone, rewind

      The fuck is his problem

    5. This is an affront to the two younger dogs, who knowthe couch belongs to them; as soon as I settle in they creep up and nd theirplaces between my knees and elbows

      Solitary

    6. Or that the dog at the bottom of the stairs keeps having mild strokes, which causeher to tilt her head inquisitively and also to fall over. She drinks prodigiousamounts of water and pees great volumes onto the folded blankets where shesleeps

      Analogy?

    7. ake up. She’s staring at me with her head slightly tippedto the side, long nose, gazing eyes, toenails clenched to get a purchase on thewood oor. We used to call her the face of love.

      Poetic way to describe owning a dog

    Annotators

    1. It’s not yourfault, but you may choose to take this misfortune as a sign of God’s displeasureand torture yourself with guilt and self-loathing for many years to come.

      Really apparent tone shift bc of the format

    2. We regret to inform you that it will be quite a while before you grow up,and it will take some cataclysmic events in your life before you really begi

      All voice of expierince

    3. We understand why you took refuge in themusic of the Grateful Dead, dancing until you felt yourself leave your body,caught up in their brand of enlightenment.

      Nice line

    4. After all, who knew that the semester you decidedto come to uc Berkeley would be so tumultuous. That unsavory business withJim Jones and his Bay Area followers left us all reeling.

      ?

    Annotators

    1. They conclude that nationalismdepresses support for immigration, national policies to mitigate climate change, andinternational cooperation to that end

      Not surpising, at least the migration piece

    2. or to believe thatthey will suffer, both from climate mitigation policies that raise prices or reduce jobsin the carbon industries and from competition or threat from new immigrants

      Easily manipulated voter base

    3. Research on how to scale up mental health resources to meet theneeds of sudden large numbers of disaster migrants is needed

      Obviously important but doesn't scream to me the way the others do

    4. here is reason to believe that previous regular,measured and successful immigration paves the way for successful integration of refugeesand other immigrants who arrive suddenly and in greater numbers

      Just as an immigrant community can help receive new migrants, they also soften the landing of society around them to be less discriminatory

    5. minorities and became less supportive of anti-immigration parties compared to individ-uals living farther away

      But I think this will somewhat depend on the place and like mindset of where they are being integrated

    6. be concentrated in order to maximize social network ties and co-ethnicsupport, creating an ethnic enclave, or dispersed in order to avoid overburdening receiv-ing communities, and providing more opportunities for immigrants and natives to inter-act?

      How much say does a host country really have

    7. 5000 people relocated to Buffalo.Some went back, but many stayed. In the 2020 US Census Buffalo showed its first popu-lation increase in 70 years (National Academy of Sciences, Medicine and Engineering2024).

      Countries can get benefits from bolstering dying cities

    8. By leveraging what we know about migrants –that they send economic remittances in amounts that dwarf international economicaid, and that they create welcoming communities that ease the integration and furtherthe success of countrymen who follow, the use of visas for strategic migrants can benefi-cially shape future migration and help sending communities hit hardest by climatechange

      This is smart, take advantage of the human disposition already at play

    9. Providing anumber of visas to countries that are experiencing severe climate change will seedfuture migration through social networks and support those unable to move who needto adapt in place through remittances.

      It can be a borderline one time thing

    10. Instead, they would just provide a path to perma-nent migration for a stream of migrants from the sending country, whether or not theindividual migrants report that they are experiencing adverse effects of climate change.

      Who gets to allocate then? Just a lottery system, and how does one verify that it is for climate reasons (although maybe that isn't important)

    11. One avenue forward is that visas could be issued for countriesfacing all three types of migration – disaster, strategic, and managed retreat

      requires so much individual generosity on the part of the country

    12. A new legal and bureaucratic category of a climate migrant would be very difficult, ifnot impossible to administer.

      We need a more strict definition of climate migrant b/c climate change so often works in tandem with other push factors, the scope needs to be narrower

    13. ea level rise and destruc-tion of ecosystems and livelihoods will cause two types of migration: strategic migrationand managed retreat. Strategic migration is a choice made by individuals. It can beeconomically motivated or specifically because of a perception that staying in placewill be impossible or costly because of climate change (Castro 2023). Managed retreatis the organized movement of communities away from hazards. It will become inevitablein some places, like low lying island nations and other places that become uninhabitable,yet it is highly undesirable and often fiercely resisted

      Strategic migration is more economically or individually motivated while managed retreat will happen as that place slowly becomes unlivable (as opposed to rapidly in the case of disaster)

    14. involving ‘conflict, disease, pol-itical change and economic crises’ (Kemp et al. 2022, 6). Should such large scale societaldisruptions occur, migration would surely follow

      Making me want to be a damn climate activist

    15. Estimating the volume of climate migration produces highly varied estimates. Ques-tions about how much the climate will warm, whether the effects will be linear or includetipping points that drastically change climate and cause sea level rise, the role of climatechange as a threat multiplier leading to conflict and government collapse, and the ways inwhich countries will adapt to rising numbers of potential migrants by closing or openingborders are all implicated in these estimates.

      TLDR: It makes everything worse bozos

    16. argue that while climate migration will pose many chal-lenges, it also can be framed positively, and we can use what we know from migrationscholarship to craft policies and to further research that will lead to better outcomesfor both migrants and receiving communities

      What are the good outcomes for receiving communities

    17. successful integration of largenumbers of migrants fleeing climate change should be a toppriority not least because this success will help to preserve thesocial trust that is necessary for successful climate mitigationefforts

      But you are actively fighting against the dominant american thought

    18. is for richcountries to allocate extra visas to poorer countries that aresuffering the effects of climate migration, partly as reparations forclimate injustice.

      Good fucking luck bro

    Tags

    Annotators

    1. TPSis a blanket form of humanitarian relief which allows qualifying nationals of designated countries toremain in the United States and obtain work authorization.

      This I definitely agree with, and it does not seem as reliant on precedented legal definitions

    2. While the asylum and refugeeprotection systems offer protection to some individuals impacted by climate change who have alsosuffered other persecution, there are no formal protection pathways for climate-displaced people underU.S. law. Temporary designations, such as humanitarian parole, do not offer a systemic response toprovide lasting protections to those displaced by climate change

      The counter argument here is that it will sooooooo expand the definition of refugee ironically "opening the floodgates"

    3. Jozef said that after HBA replaced the tents destroyed by theJanuary 2023 bomb cyclone, additional rain storms in late February 2023 destroyed the new tents

      Climate change is both a multiplying factor for why families migrate as well a a direct reason why migrating itself is so difficult

    4. migrants to cross dangerous terrain by foot, making them vulnerable to the adverseeffects of climate change along the journey to the United States-Mexico border

      Vicious cycle

    5. will further endanger asylumseekers and refugees, including those displaced in the context of climate change, by making themineligible for protection based solely on their manner of entry.

      Talked about this in class

    6. asylum in 2015 after the government illegally appropriated their tribal lands,leaving them vulnerable to homelessness and gang violence

      This is persecuation along the lines of a group so it makes them count as refugees

    Annotators