Instead, we should be asking ourselveswhy 44% of Medicaid recipients work full-timewithout having access to affordable privatehealth insurance
Maybe we try to provide universal healthcare through mandates to provide insurance
Instead, we should be asking ourselveswhy 44% of Medicaid recipients work full-timewithout having access to affordable privatehealth insurance
Maybe we try to provide universal healthcare through mandates to provide insurance
This typeof work does not always have consistenthours but is based on demand each week, soit needs to be reviewed over longer periodsof time. If they are forced to recertify more
Again the weaponization of bureaucracy, maybe ask a question about this.
meetingcommunity engagement hours prior toreceiving benefits. This new requirementwould require Medicaid recipients to provethey have worked or volunteered for atleast 80 hours each month.
And this are people who are probably really frequenting the er
As a result, taxpayers will be forced to cover moreuncompensated care.
Actually just bad policy, like just bad
Uninsured patientsaccount for approximately $22.5 billion of theuncompensated care
If we insured them earlier it would be cheaper in the long run
all so therich can enjoy a tax cut.
Now this is my type of angry article
$13,432 the U.S. spends.
Why can't this be directed towards universal healthcare
If thesefacilities close, many Americans, particularly inrural parts of the country that voted heavily forPresident Trump, will be harmed
Anti MAHA agenda as well
Weknow from experience that most will choose theemergency room if they have no insurance.
Its already costing the taxpayers a whole lot of money
In addition, 52% of Americans saidthey believed the CDC would function worse overthe next four years.
But its more connected to his personality than his politics
Tylenol
Me when I'm pissed if I am a shareholder for Tylenol
DIVORCING HEALTH GUIDANCE FROM SCIENCE
Creating mistrust on both sides of the issue, mistrust in science and mistrust in government
wokescience.
Saw this stuff working in providence, no "equality." Talk about weaponizing bureaucracy
NIH grants for innovation andresearch
This is happening in universities not private companies
DEFUNDINGHEALTH RESEARCH
This guy hates research
more competition, more diversity of school models and more accountability for performance in the nation’s education system.
Incentivize improvements
through the spread of charter schools.
I need to learn more about this
Yet only one state, Louisiana, denies schools voucher money if their students perform poorly on state standardized tests. In West Virginia, voucher students who fail state tests lose their eligibility for the program.
Public money just going straight to private pockets
This is just common sense: Expensive private schools are often excellent, but cheap private schools are often worse than neighboring public schools
Is it?
public funding per child is now roughly equal in poor and affluent district
That's basically wrong I think
Because community service programs inelementary and secondary schools andnational service programs after high schoolcan instill in young people a sense ofpurpose and patriotism, and
David Brooks baby, maybe bring this up, also bring up the rural urban divide. How do we get over american being so goddamn big
t America,its culture, and its literature
Pride, we're trying to instill pride in the disillusioned
nd more time teachingwhat it is like to live in nondemocraticcountries, where there is no right to freespeech or to criticize the gove
Scare tactics
Ina nation whose federal government spends1,000 times more money on STEM educationthan on civics, it’s important to placegreater emphasis on sustaining Americandemocracy.
Woohoo liberal arts education baby
at precisely are the best ideasand aspirational values that bind togetherwhat author Heather McGee calls a nation of“ancestral strangers”
Pull yourself up from your bootstraps
The same fate likely awaits any presidential candidate who deviates from their line.
Which is why it may be untenable to run on the agenda
This has seriously compromised the Democratic Party’s ability to formulate creative and practical solutions to real-world problems, not all of which can be solved by attacking corporate power
This feels like the main problem to me
purports
GW
break open neighborhood cartels that prevent new entrants into the housing market
god yes
a style of politics that has flowed into the party along with the neo-Brandeisians
Can also see the trump in this
as most housing analysts believe.
Gotta increase the pie
prevent any large entity from renting out large numbers of single-family homes. The amendment undercut the bill’s intent to make housing more affordable—making it illegal for a company to build homes and rent them out would restrict the supply and drive up the cost for renters.
Its basically more bearuacratic red tape, this I do see a problem with
regulatory threats to compel firms to support his political agenda
well but if the outcome is the same?
Wall Street Dems”
Can see its popularity electorally
Neo-Brandeisian idea
How do you run a campaign against that money though?
They see in Trump’s populist gestures confirmation of the appeal of their own ideas and potential for cooperation.
This is scary for nick, its still a trump playbook
could be defused by turning the issue back to billionaires.
Have the softball
there’s a reason that Frederick Douglass and [W. E. B.] Du Bois were so concerned about monopoly power.
Right, I read about this in the black laborer
belief system is more like a religion
An ironony about marx is many ways
but this, too, failed to explain what Biden’s populism had actually achieved.
To be fair the effects might be farther down the line
succeeded
Like trumps playbooks man
and lauds small businesses and farms that are less able to generate economies of scale than giant corporations are, and therefore have to charge more for their products.
Bro looooves the farmers market
indelibly
Unforgettably
but the fact that many of its products harm its consumers and society as a whole
The counter being, well break up the mothership and the rest will follow
not as law enforcement but as a broad policy tool for fixing a lot of problems—economic, political, and social.
It lets them off the hook in other policy areas
‘This cement merger threatens democracy’?
Where does the straw break the camels back?
executive action.
And SCOTUS
The neo-Brandeisian thinkers Warren recruited into the administration represented the movement’s brightest minds and most energetic administrators.
TLDR, Biden hops on board despite his progressivism
shill
GW
A profound crisis must have profound causes, and Lynn was offering a totalistic account of social decay.
But they are also missing some of the importsnt urban rural consiousness here, but maybe thats not what hes concerned about as the root
We can vertically integrate and do the writing ourselves.”
lol
short-term price effects.
Might ask moss about the framework of antitrust now
discrimination and barriers to new entry,
Calling it monopolistic
It’s so much easier to teach public policy to people who already know how to write than teach writing to public policy experts,
That makes me hopeful for a job
I helped edit, and review some of the articles and books I have shaped.”
Hes an egoist
price controls
Similar to rent will harm market forces, but does he know economics
oligarchy
Again nick
Bill Clinton
Well that's why PPI is not a fan
antitrust policy.
Where is the line
“We may have democracy, or we may have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both,
Nick
overcharging consumers, undercutting their competition, and preventing innovation.
Creating monopolies
as a corrupt enemy who must be expunged.
ostracizing
many party leaders have adopted his sweeping theory of everything.
It's marxism
those who are paid to do so
By those who are paid by the antitrust?
paradoxically—contributes to an individ-ual’s sense of place-based resentment.
Love america but hate parts of it
jealousy
This is the kicker, injustice
Similarly, future work shouldexamine the extent to which urbanites harbor resentmenttoward suburbs and the political ramifications of thosefeelings
Hate it hate it hate it
such as intra-state urban-rural divides
They share some defining place based identity
resentment might not have held its predictivepower, as modeled in this paper.
Resentment tends to get channeled through parties and so it is reinforced by the ongoing polarization
over urbanAmerica’s disparate political influence and anti-ruralstereotypes (e.g., “those backward hicks”) have longbeen pervasive in America and many other Western so-cieties
Part of the reason it might not be as powerful is that its just less true
Ourresults, which show that place resentment was onlyconsistently predictive of vote choice for rural voters
Rural voters are the haters here
that place-based animus fluctuates with thegeographic context of the election.
And then which size is the most salient, not voting with all rural members when electing the school board
“have become so ideolog-ically inbred that we don’t know, can’t understand, andcan barely conceive of ‘those people’ who live just a fewmiles away”
Yikes, see my polarization class boy
and, therefore, islikely an important component of the emergent urban-rural divide in American politics.
As well as race, class, education, etc.
Figure
It's not always strong, not a unilateral determent
larger sums of money that U.S. Senate electionsgarner and how that excess money translates intoheightened levels of voter exposure to campaign re-lated communications across various media
But also surely because the elections are also state wide and therefore the representation is more salient
there was a 13.5 point decrease in the prob-ability of voting for the Democratic House candidate
"just" based on place
Figure
Rural is the only place it is signifigant
Place-based resentmentpredicts electoral outcomes in the U.S. House, Senate, andgubernatorial contests, but only among the rural subset ofthe American population
The resentment largely goes one way
The interaction termcaptures variability in the effect of place-based resentmentamong self-identifying urbanites, suburbanites, and ru-ralites. Given that interaction term in the model, wepresent the results of the marginal effect of place-basedresentment.
Will rural have the most resentment again?
cities are often shorthand for peoplewho are not white.
So even if you account for race, its might just be so synonymous
Finally, we include a multi-faceted measure of racialresentment. 8 Racial attitudes imbue the American psy-che, and distinguishing race from other dispositions is acomplicated endeavor
And track with urban resentment
vote choice in the2018 Congressional midterm elections and the variouscontests held for state governor in that year.
Now we actually have concrete political outcomes
Figure
Sort of telling us something we know
Figure
Effects are greatest for very rural
among those who identify asliving in “very rural” areas.
Rural residents are more resentful and it translates to part affinity more
using the difference in feelingthermometer ratings of the Democratic and Republicanparties as the dependent measure;
How much more pro-rep
Evaluationsof the Parties
Not mobilized into votes yet
(nearly 17% higher, in fact)
Suburbanites resent cities more than rural communities, maybe they identify with the rural more?
rural areas have an outsized voice inAmerican politics due to institutions like the Senate andElectoral College
believe they should hold the power
the appreciation forpeople who choose to stay in communities unlike theirown;
But people probably don't want city dwellers moving to their hometown
the deservingness of differentcommunities in respondent’s state;
Worth
The distribution of political power within re-spondent’s state;
Who has the power, rural or urban
self-report depending on how each respondentunderstands their community in relation to others
As we've seen, the self-report is actually the important part
mong all respondents, place-based re-sentment will predict vote choice in the U.S. House,Senate, and Gubernatorial Elections. Respondent’s placeof residence will moderate the directionality of resentfulattitudes toward specific parties running for office.
Alrighty, how do we measure rurality and resentment
have trans-formed into a form of place-based resentment
They care more about public opinion, voting is a secondary outcome
This raises the question of whether placed-based attitudes are distinct from racial ones
Proxy for race
not everyone embodies place identity and, ofthose that do, not everyone harbors place resentment
Some are proud but not aggressive
individuals rely on their own sense of place in orderto understand their personal stakes and justify their po-litical beliefs, because they live “not just anywhere, [but]somewhere in particular”
Encouraged to understand politics as the disparity in government value and responsiveness to place based communities
their place-based ingroup as beingunjustly deprived relative to the “others.”
Rural people left behind by the urban economy
hese identities provide apowerful heuristic for how Americans interpret politicalphenomenon that affect those spaces
Permanently care
Neighbors are engaged in a common enterpriseoften despite religion or partisanship; they are tied to-gether by the fact that they live near one another and sharea set of common experiences
The experiences are shaped by composition, take enough composition out and there is no shared experience
nique because of eachplace’s inherent peculiarity.
I might challenge that it is more dependent on the type of economy present
filter political information
Moves through the context of the people and place you inhabit
creating narratives about the types of communities thatare winning or losing, and who is to blame.
Basically, rural people are more resentful and so easier to mobolize
By quantitatively measuring place-basedattitudes, we are able to distinguish place-based resent-ment from other prior dispositions, such as feelings ofracial animosity, which are highly spatialized
How do you measure? Feelings thermomoter?
within state-and district-level races.
Not just nationally salient
living in different placesare drawn together because of how think about com-munities unlike their own
So the out-group is the glue
build social co-hesion
good way to mobolize
We conclude that placematters in the construction of individuals’ political beliefsbecause place—the social connection individuals feel to aparticular locale—is highly amenable to politicization.
And to polarization
. Rural resentment is a powerful predictor of vote choice in bothelection years examined
More about out-group hatred than in-group affinity?
d racial resentmen
Proxy for urban?
we study the extent to which Americans feel animus toward communities that aregeographically distinct from their own and whether these feelings explain Americans’ attitudes toward the two majorpolitical parties and self-reported vote choice.
This is less about insular personal beliefs and instead how polarization is perpetuated
location in space structures the propa-gation of opinion, while factors such as size and density shape its diversity
Feels like a pro-urban article
social context in which people share their likes and dislikes, values, andbeliefs
But that includes the compositional
In someplaces the conflict may be primarily economic—revolving around the way ruralproperty is overvalued and taxed, for example, while in others the separation is morecultural and moral.
I think as you migrate farther down its bound to become more connected to community and the issues are magnified
. If we take two voters who are of thesame race, religion, age, education level, income, sex, marital status, and report-ing the same level of religious commitment, and one is living in the central city,and another lying well outside a metro area, there will be a difference in politicalparty affiliation.
This is the takeway, here is the pearl
This is a dubious conclusion, however, given that com-positional characteristics are themselves distributed unevenly in space, likely theresult of features associated with disparate settlement and socialization patterns.
They are sort of entangled by definition
Similarly, the probability of identifying as a leaningDemocrat declines from .18 to .16 and the probability of identifying as a leaningRepublican increases from .15 to .18. The probability of being an independent risesmodestly from .09 to .10.
Effects are greater the more ardent you are in your political beliefs
independent
Doesn't matter where you live, you're always gonna be an independent
than it is on assessing the impact ofplace location net of whatever influences these controls exert.
One question is also whether the effect of these things chnage based on how rural a place is
concentration
Which is a characteristic that makes them different politically
independents
Independent voters also represent the median in the distance and population size, independents are average americans
education
Tracks pretty well with urbanity
Population Density (logged scale)
This is most stark to me, almost twice as many people per square mile
Consider Casper, Wyoming (82601) along I-25 in eastern Wyoming.Though it is two hundred miles from Denver, the community measures nearly 1,700persons per square mile, which is more than double the median in the sample. Thereare also locations that are close to major cities but are lightly populated, includingneighborhoods near Phoenix, Arizona, and in Anchorage, Alaska.
Limitations should be a bit obvious here
Localesat approximately this distance include Woodbridge, Virginia, and Bowie, Maryland,both suburbs of Washington, DC; and Chesterfield, Missouri, a western suburb ofSt. Louis. These are middle-range suburbs, not bordering the core city but not lyingat the fringe of the metropolitan area, either.
The summaries are just interesting evidence that people are living in the 'burbs
less
FEWER
A respondent who lives in close proximity to a citythis size is considered less rural than one living farther away.
This feels like it could omit important geography or economic factors but it does a good job at answering the question just maybe not actually rurality
we use the population density of the locale in which the respondent resides.We calculate the population density based on a ten-mile radius around the centroidof the respondent’s ZIP Code.
This is a fine method but would catch some supposedly urban areas as we discussed in class
we situate each respondent at or near thecentroid of their ZIP Code of residence.
Lets see the measures
Lower density areas are expected to adhere to morallytraditionalist positions, controlling for compositional characteristics of the popula-tion and also accounting for distance to the nearest city.
Which is another ideological divide arising from rural-urban
Small scale set-tlement encourages religious adherence and traditional views of morality becauseit accentuates group life among those with common beliefs over acting as an indi-vidual
Maintains sameness
Habitual ways of thought and behavior are upheld and perpetuatedover long periods of time.
Stagnant socialization
Consequently, values in these places are more interdepend-ent and distinct
Which will change the policies you care about, thinking more about concrete people than in the abstract
Left leaning, or “progressive” ideologiesare typically those more accommodating of new modes of thought and behaviorin social and political life.
So many fucking people how are you gonna judge them all, a little uncharitable
These measures gauge the place-based differ-ences in the number of people an individual might meet within a routine work-day.
Cities will have more diverse populations to meet which will influence what was seen above
the urban–ruralpartisan gap has more than a simple source rooted in racial composition, economicconditions, age differences, or religious background.
Partly just saying lets take the social contact theory for one
Studies document the unconventionality ofurban life, running contrary to tradition in multiple domains
Cities is where culture changes and their distance from rural areas means that they change independently
Goods and ser-vices that were once considered luxuries become necessities as more people come todesire what is advertised
Rousseau
The physicaldistance between the two locations is itself influential in the observed difference inpolitical values
More homogeneity?
Urban–rural differences in opinion may exist asa consequence of the separation of two populations from each other. As distanceincreases, so will the divergence in viewpoint.
Well what matters is difference in political landscapes and then the lack of interaction
Distance captures the degree of isola-tion of two populations and figures prominently in explaining species differentia-tion across the landscape.
I like this idea of political belief evolution, response to differnt stimuli
the values and traditions of that bygone life may still influence contem-porary beliefs and behaviors
See slavery article
behavioral path dependence,” whichoccurs when “ideas, norms, and behaviors [are] passed down...[and] interact withinstitutions, reinforcing each other over time
They become more salient as generations stayed separate fro each other
self-reliance and traditionalism
Would this not be the isolating one
more individuals moved to cities, their common economic inter-ests drove class consciousness and created political unity within urban and ruralpopulations respectively.
Class consciousness and affinity for proximity
With the rise of the city came the rise of manufacturing and thedecline of agriculture.
Money moved away from rural communities
dominated by sectional interests defined by the “greatcrop regions, founded on climate and
There will eventually be not enough rural population to support the divide
first, the geo-graphic distance between small towns and major central cities, and second, differ-ences in population concentration.
Interested to see what the measurement of rurality is
Among some groups, theurban–rural divide is wider (e.g., whites) than among other groups (e.g., blacks)
Interaction matters but significant no matter what
Third, the concentration and density of urban Democrats have reinforced theirparty loyalty and progressive-leaning over time with a similar development occur-ring among geographically dispersed Republicans, thereby heightening the diver-gence in political preference by location
Urban rural is a good indication of dem vs rep
We find that sizable urban–ruraldifferences persist even after accounting for an array of individual-level characteris-tics that typically distinguish them
There is something about the place and values place imparts
to understand the urban–rural fissure that hasbeen so noticeable in recent elections
Is it a proxy for class?
This might be the case not just for developmentof political attitudes in the US South but also in other arenaswithin American politics and elsewhere in the world
I'm not sure American has an institution as prevalent as slavery
an im-pact on political habit whose influence has not worn awayeven yet.
But 150 years later, good god that's depressing
As affirmative support, we showed that greaterprevalence of slavery predicts more conservative (for manyyears more Democratic) presidential vote shares, higher ratesof radical violence, and decreased wealth concentrated inblack farms in the decades after Reconstruction
The system was never in doubt
(i) partisan identification,(ii) attitudes on affirmative action, (iii) levels of racial re-sentment, and (iv) attitudes toward blacks
Directly, not just through institutions
What these correlations show is that children withracially conservative parents in 1965 are more likely to beracially conservative themselves at least through age 50,which is evidence of intergenerational socialization.
Lowkey how is this possible, maybe only people that stay in the south
which measured the racial attitudes of anational probability sample of high school senior studentsin 1965 along with their parents
The data that exists is so fucking cool
10 percentage point increase in proportion slave leads to a1.8 percentage point drop in the percent of whites whoidentify as Democrat today (95% confidence interval:[22.7, 21.0]). Where mechanization grew rapidly, with0.06 more tractors per 100,000 acres (90th percentile), thesame change in proportion slave leads to only a 0.2 per-centage point decrease in the percent Democrat (95%confidence interval: [21.1, 0.06]).
There is an economic story that some counties dodge with mechanization
the incentives for whites tointerfere in the labor market with such tactics should lessen
The economic incentives
in comparison to white farmers, blackfarmers in former high-slave areas were significantly worseoff than those in other areas of the South. They were morelikely to be under tenancy agreements and less likely to owntheir own farm.
The perpetuation of slavery in places that had high levels of population antebellum had greater racism afterwards
is greater in counties that had highslave proportions in 1860,
The political resentment, although they must be controlling for population size
but also to suppresstheir mobility and wages
This is a rehash of Du Bois
does not trace itsorigins to this time period.
Happens after the civil war
In both states,perhaps surprisingly, there is little evidence of a strongrelationship between slavery and vote choice, even in anelection that focused so heavily on the issue.
I wonder if this was just because the populations were not that politically active
differences in white viewsappear to organize around the density of slavery more stronglyafter the Civil War.
When the economic and political salience is heightened
suggesting that there is some decay in these geographicallybased relationships over time
But I also think that there is some floor where racial attitudes will always exist
they were threat-ening because they were an important provider of labor and,in the post-emancipation environment, they could leave.
It's an economic story
poor whites were complicitwith the landowning elite and would engage in and supportviolent acts toward blacks, even though such violence couldpresumably also lower white wages
Acting against their interest to maintain racial hierarchy
emancipation brought blacks some freedomover the amount of labor they supplied, and many ex-slaveschose to work for themselves rather than for the white rulingclass
And so they were to be economically controlled
evidence for intergenerational transmission of racialattitudes.
This is the part I'm most skeptical about, personal passing down as opposed to organizations
institutionalpath dependence and intergenerational socialization
The organizations and people passing down values
bypromoting racially targeted violence, anti-black norms, and,to the extent legally possible, racist institutions.
I mean partly the story is just that this also still exists today. Slavery –> redemption –> Jim Crow, the line is pretty clear
Proportion slave, 1860
Stays the same
the effects are in the oppositedirection as statistical discrimination theory would predict.
Don't discriminate against the poor
discrimination against blacks because they are, on average,poorer than whites
I mean one thing worth noting is even when it is not direct, the legacy of slavery is so freaking pervasive
butthose differences are fairly constant across proportion slavein the county.
The slave counties would not have systematically different populations today
For geographic sorting to explain our results, patterns ofmobility into (and out of ) the former slaveholding areaswould have to differ from non-slaveholding areas
Would have to specific to those counties
Proportion slave, direct effect
If this was working through population today this table would not have significant results
Indeed, the correlationbetween percent slave in 1860 and percent black in 2000 is0.77
That's just lowkey crazy
Cotton suitability
The effects of slavery itself are still prevelant
Second, because counties may have had different norms aboutrace, we include controls for (vi) the proportion of total pop-ulation in 1860 that is free black.
These aren't the best proxies
but we use the differ-ence in case slavery has an overall effect on racial groupthermometer ratings
Just hate the world overall more
but may also reflect beliefs on policy issuesclosely related to race, including redistribution
i.e. being a republican means hating welfare
for example, income gaps betweenblacks and whites, urban-rural differences, and other con-textual and individual-level factors
maybe legacy of slavery but not direct
should have decayed more) in areaswhere the incentives for anti-black attitudes faded earlier
What is the timeline for complete escape
ntergenerational socialization
See previous articles we've read
reacted more sharply toemancipation by curtailing blacks’ rights and oppressing newlyfreedmen and their mobility
At the time, and the answer is its naive to think those feelings just went away
the historical persistence of attitudes orig-inating in slavery and (ii) contemporary factors, includingcontemporary demographics and geographic mobility.
Of course in reality somewhere in the middle
if the politics of the South revolves aroundany single theme, it is that of the role of the black belts”
Black population is concentrated here
makingour position quite distinct from much of the existing publicopinion literature.
Parents are just socializing their kids
abruptly increasing black wages, raising la-bor costs, and threatening the viability of the Southern plan-tation economy
In other words, back towards slavery attitudes still exist today
Du Bois (1935)
read this
that un-dermined Southern whites’ political and economic power.
It started as a "racial threat" but then it just exists in the minds of these Americans for generations afterwards
We show thatthese differences are robust to accounting for a variety offactors, including geography and mid-nineteenth-centuryeconomic and social conditions.
Not just an economic thing
weshow that whites who currently live in counties that hadhigh concentrations of slaves in 1860 are today on averagemore conservative and express colder feelings toward Af-rican Americans than whites who live elsewhere in theSouth.
So is this the more rural places, the isolation through generations I suspect is also not good
which in turn have been passeddown locally across generations
Interested in the mechanism of how this works
Following the Civil War, Southern whites faced political and economicincentives to reinforce existing racist norms and institutions to maintain control over the newly freed African Americanpopulation.
Du Bois