1,539 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Instead, we should be asking ourselveswhy 44% of Medicaid recipients work full-timewithout having access to affordable privatehealth insurance

      Maybe we try to provide universal healthcare through mandates to provide insurance

    2. This typeof work does not always have consistenthours but is based on demand each week, soit needs to be reviewed over longer periodsof time. If they are forced to recertify more

      Again the weaponization of bureaucracy, maybe ask a question about this.

    3. meetingcommunity engagement hours prior toreceiving benefits. This new requirementwould require Medicaid recipients to provethey have worked or volunteered for atleast 80 hours each month.

      And this are people who are probably really frequenting the er

    1. Yet only one state, Louisiana, denies schools voucher money if their students perform poorly on state standardized tests. In West Virginia, voucher students who fail state tests lose their eligibility for the program.

      Public money just going straight to private pockets

    1. Because community service programs inelementary and secondary schools andnational service programs after high schoolcan instill in young people a sense ofpurpose and patriotism, and

      David Brooks baby, maybe bring this up, also bring up the rural urban divide. How do we get over american being so goddamn big

    2. Ina nation whose federal government spends1,000 times more money on STEM educationthan on civics, it’s important to placegreater emphasis on sustaining Americandemocracy.

      Woohoo liberal arts education baby

    3. at precisely are the best ideasand aspirational values that bind togetherwhat author Heather McGee calls a nation of“ancestral strangers”

      Pull yourself up from your bootstraps

    1. This has seriously compromised the Democratic Party’s ability to formulate creative and practical solutions to real-world problems, not all of which can be solved by attacking corporate power

      This feels like the main problem to me

    2. prevent any large entity from renting out large numbers of single-family homes. The amendment undercut the bill’s intent to make housing more affordable—making it illegal for a company to build homes and rent them out would restrict the supply and drive up the cost for renters.

      Its basically more bearuacratic red tape, this I do see a problem with

    3. They see in Trump’s populist gestures confirmation of the appeal of their own ideas and potential for cooperation.

      This is scary for nick, its still a trump playbook

    4. and lauds small businesses and farms that are less able to generate economies of scale than giant corporations are, and therefore have to charge more for their products.

      Bro looooves the farmers market

    5. The neo-Brandeisian thinkers Warren recruited into the administration represented the movement’s brightest minds and most energetic administrators.

      TLDR, Biden hops on board despite his progressivism

    6. A profound crisis must have profound causes, and Lynn was offering a totalistic account of social decay.

      But they are also missing some of the importsnt urban rural consiousness here, but maybe thats not what hes concerned about as the root

  2. Apr 2026
    1. Similarly, future work shouldexamine the extent to which urbanites harbor resentmenttoward suburbs and the political ramifications of thosefeelings

      Hate it hate it hate it

    2. resentment might not have held its predictivepower, as modeled in this paper.

      Resentment tends to get channeled through parties and so it is reinforced by the ongoing polarization

    3. over urbanAmerica’s disparate political influence and anti-ruralstereotypes (e.g., “those backward hicks”) have longbeen pervasive in America and many other Western so-cieties

      Part of the reason it might not be as powerful is that its just less true

    4. that place-based animus fluctuates with thegeographic context of the election.

      And then which size is the most salient, not voting with all rural members when electing the school board

    5. “have become so ideolog-ically inbred that we don’t know, can’t understand, andcan barely conceive of ‘those people’ who live just a fewmiles away”

      Yikes, see my polarization class boy

    6. larger sums of money that U.S. Senate electionsgarner and how that excess money translates intoheightened levels of voter exposure to campaign re-lated communications across various media

      But also surely because the elections are also state wide and therefore the representation is more salient

    7. Place-based resentmentpredicts electoral outcomes in the U.S. House, Senate, andgubernatorial contests, but only among the rural subset ofthe American population

      The resentment largely goes one way

    8. The interaction termcaptures variability in the effect of place-based resentmentamong self-identifying urbanites, suburbanites, and ru-ralites. Given that interaction term in the model, wepresent the results of the marginal effect of place-basedresentment.

      Will rural have the most resentment again?

    9. Finally, we include a multi-faceted measure of racialresentment. 8 Racial attitudes imbue the American psy-che, and distinguishing race from other dispositions is acomplicated endeavor

      And track with urban resentment

    10. mong all respondents, place-based re-sentment will predict vote choice in the U.S. House,Senate, and Gubernatorial Elections. Respondent’s placeof residence will moderate the directionality of resentfulattitudes toward specific parties running for office.

      Alrighty, how do we measure rurality and resentment

    11. individuals rely on their own sense of place in orderto understand their personal stakes and justify their po-litical beliefs, because they live “not just anywhere, [but]somewhere in particular”

      Encouraged to understand politics as the disparity in government value and responsiveness to place based communities

    12. Neighbors are engaged in a common enterpriseoften despite religion or partisanship; they are tied to-gether by the fact that they live near one another and sharea set of common experiences

      The experiences are shaped by composition, take enough composition out and there is no shared experience

    13. creating narratives about the types of communities thatare winning or losing, and who is to blame.

      Basically, rural people are more resentful and so easier to mobolize

    14. By quantitatively measuring place-basedattitudes, we are able to distinguish place-based resent-ment from other prior dispositions, such as feelings ofracial animosity, which are highly spatialized

      How do you measure? Feelings thermomoter?

    15. We conclude that placematters in the construction of individuals’ political beliefsbecause place—the social connection individuals feel to aparticular locale—is highly amenable to politicization.

      And to polarization

    16. we study the extent to which Americans feel animus toward communities that aregeographically distinct from their own and whether these feelings explain Americans’ attitudes toward the two majorpolitical parties and self-reported vote choice.

      This is less about insular personal beliefs and instead how polarization is perpetuated

    Annotators

    1. In someplaces the conflict may be primarily economic—revolving around the way ruralproperty is overvalued and taxed, for example, while in others the separation is morecultural and moral.

      I think as you migrate farther down its bound to become more connected to community and the issues are magnified

    2. . If we take two voters who are of thesame race, religion, age, education level, income, sex, marital status, and report-ing the same level of religious commitment, and one is living in the central city,and another lying well outside a metro area, there will be a difference in politicalparty affiliation.

      This is the takeway, here is the pearl

    3. This is a dubious conclusion, however, given that com-positional characteristics are themselves distributed unevenly in space, likely theresult of features associated with disparate settlement and socialization patterns.

      They are sort of entangled by definition

    4. Similarly, the probability of identifying as a leaningDemocrat declines from .18 to .16 and the probability of identifying as a leaningRepublican increases from .15 to .18. The probability of being an independent risesmodestly from .09 to .10.

      Effects are greater the more ardent you are in your political beliefs

    5. than it is on assessing the impact ofplace location net of whatever influences these controls exert.

      One question is also whether the effect of these things chnage based on how rural a place is

    6. Consider Casper, Wyoming (82601) along I-25 in eastern Wyoming.Though it is two hundred miles from Denver, the community measures nearly 1,700persons per square mile, which is more than double the median in the sample. Thereare also locations that are close to major cities but are lightly populated, includingneighborhoods near Phoenix, Arizona, and in Anchorage, Alaska.

      Limitations should be a bit obvious here

    7. Localesat approximately this distance include Woodbridge, Virginia, and Bowie, Maryland,both suburbs of Washington, DC; and Chesterfield, Missouri, a western suburb ofSt. Louis. These are middle-range suburbs, not bordering the core city but not lyingat the fringe of the metropolitan area, either.

      The summaries are just interesting evidence that people are living in the 'burbs

    8. A respondent who lives in close proximity to a citythis size is considered less rural than one living farther away.

      This feels like it could omit important geography or economic factors but it does a good job at answering the question just maybe not actually rurality

    9. we use the population density of the locale in which the respondent resides.We calculate the population density based on a ten-mile radius around the centroidof the respondent’s ZIP Code.

      This is a fine method but would catch some supposedly urban areas as we discussed in class

    10. Lower density areas are expected to adhere to morallytraditionalist positions, controlling for compositional characteristics of the popula-tion and also accounting for distance to the nearest city.

      Which is another ideological divide arising from rural-urban

    11. Small scale set-tlement encourages religious adherence and traditional views of morality becauseit accentuates group life among those with common beliefs over acting as an indi-vidual

      Maintains sameness

    12. Consequently, values in these places are more interdepend-ent and distinct

      Which will change the policies you care about, thinking more about concrete people than in the abstract

    13. Left leaning, or “progressive” ideologiesare typically those more accommodating of new modes of thought and behaviorin social and political life.

      So many fucking people how are you gonna judge them all, a little uncharitable

    14. These measures gauge the place-based differ-ences in the number of people an individual might meet within a routine work-day.

      Cities will have more diverse populations to meet which will influence what was seen above

    15. the urban–ruralpartisan gap has more than a simple source rooted in racial composition, economicconditions, age differences, or religious background.

      Partly just saying lets take the social contact theory for one

    16. Studies document the unconventionality ofurban life, running contrary to tradition in multiple domains

      Cities is where culture changes and their distance from rural areas means that they change independently

    17. Urban–rural differences in opinion may exist asa consequence of the separation of two populations from each other. As distanceincreases, so will the divergence in viewpoint.

      Well what matters is difference in political landscapes and then the lack of interaction

    18. Distance captures the degree of isola-tion of two populations and figures prominently in explaining species differentia-tion across the landscape.

      I like this idea of political belief evolution, response to differnt stimuli

    19. behavioral path dependence,” whichoccurs when “ideas, norms, and behaviors [are] passed down...[and] interact withinstitutions, reinforcing each other over time

      They become more salient as generations stayed separate fro each other

    20. more individuals moved to cities, their common economic inter-ests drove class consciousness and created political unity within urban and ruralpopulations respectively.

      Class consciousness and affinity for proximity

    21. dominated by sectional interests defined by the “greatcrop regions, founded on climate and

      There will eventually be not enough rural population to support the divide

    22. first, the geo-graphic distance between small towns and major central cities, and second, differ-ences in population concentration.

      Interested to see what the measurement of rurality is

    23. Third, the concentration and density of urban Democrats have reinforced theirparty loyalty and progressive-leaning over time with a similar development occur-ring among geographically dispersed Republicans, thereby heightening the diver-gence in political preference by location

      Urban rural is a good indication of dem vs rep

    24. We find that sizable urban–ruraldifferences persist even after accounting for an array of individual-level characteris-tics that typically distinguish them

      There is something about the place and values place imparts

    Annotators

    1. This might be the case not just for developmentof political attitudes in the US South but also in other arenaswithin American politics and elsewhere in the world

      I'm not sure American has an institution as prevalent as slavery

    2. As affirmative support, we showed that greaterprevalence of slavery predicts more conservative (for manyyears more Democratic) presidential vote shares, higher ratesof radical violence, and decreased wealth concentrated inblack farms in the decades after Reconstruction

      The system was never in doubt

    3. (i) partisan identification,(ii) attitudes on affirmative action, (iii) levels of racial re-sentment, and (iv) attitudes toward blacks

      Directly, not just through institutions

    4. What these correlations show is that children withracially conservative parents in 1965 are more likely to beracially conservative themselves at least through age 50,which is evidence of intergenerational socialization.

      Lowkey how is this possible, maybe only people that stay in the south

    5. which measured the racial attitudes of anational probability sample of high school senior studentsin 1965 along with their parents

      The data that exists is so fucking cool

    6. 10 percentage point increase in proportion slave leads to a1.8 percentage point drop in the percent of whites whoidentify as Democrat today (95% confidence interval:[22.7, 21.0]). Where mechanization grew rapidly, with0.06 more tractors per 100,000 acres (90th percentile), thesame change in proportion slave leads to only a 0.2 per-centage point decrease in the percent Democrat (95%confidence interval: [21.1, 0.06]).

      There is an economic story that some counties dodge with mechanization

    7. in comparison to white farmers, blackfarmers in former high-slave areas were significantly worseoff than those in other areas of the South. They were morelikely to be under tenancy agreements and less likely to owntheir own farm.

      The perpetuation of slavery in places that had high levels of population antebellum had greater racism afterwards

    8. In both states,perhaps surprisingly, there is little evidence of a strongrelationship between slavery and vote choice, even in anelection that focused so heavily on the issue.

      I wonder if this was just because the populations were not that politically active

    9. suggesting that there is some decay in these geographicallybased relationships over time

      But I also think that there is some floor where racial attitudes will always exist

    10. poor whites were complicitwith the landowning elite and would engage in and supportviolent acts toward blacks, even though such violence couldpresumably also lower white wages

      Acting against their interest to maintain racial hierarchy

    11. emancipation brought blacks some freedomover the amount of labor they supplied, and many ex-slaveschose to work for themselves rather than for the white rulingclass

      And so they were to be economically controlled

    12. bypromoting racially targeted violence, anti-black norms, and,to the extent legally possible, racist institutions.

      I mean partly the story is just that this also still exists today. Slavery –> redemption –> Jim Crow, the line is pretty clear

    13. discrimination against blacks because they are, on average,poorer than whites

      I mean one thing worth noting is even when it is not direct, the legacy of slavery is so freaking pervasive

    14. For geographic sorting to explain our results, patterns ofmobility into (and out of ) the former slaveholding areaswould have to differ from non-slaveholding areas

      Would have to specific to those counties

    15. Second, because counties may have had different norms aboutrace, we include controls for (vi) the proportion of total pop-ulation in 1860 that is free black.

      These aren't the best proxies

    16. reacted more sharply toemancipation by curtailing blacks’ rights and oppressing newlyfreedmen and their mobility

      At the time, and the answer is its naive to think those feelings just went away

    17. the historical persistence of attitudes orig-inating in slavery and (ii) contemporary factors, includingcontemporary demographics and geographic mobility.

      Of course in reality somewhere in the middle

    18. abruptly increasing black wages, raising la-bor costs, and threatening the viability of the Southern plan-tation economy

      In other words, back towards slavery attitudes still exist today

    19. that un-dermined Southern whites’ political and economic power.

      It started as a "racial threat" but then it just exists in the minds of these Americans for generations afterwards

    20. We show thatthese differences are robust to accounting for a variety offactors, including geography and mid-nineteenth-centuryeconomic and social conditions.

      Not just an economic thing

    21. weshow that whites who currently live in counties that hadhigh concentrations of slaves in 1860 are today on averagemore conservative and express colder feelings toward Af-rican Americans than whites who live elsewhere in theSouth.

      So is this the more rural places, the isolation through generations I suspect is also not good

    22. Following the Civil War, Southern whites faced political and economicincentives to reinforce existing racist norms and institutions to maintain control over the newly freed African Americanpopulation.

      Du Bois

    Annotators