34 Matching Annotations
- Jan 2021
-
publish.obsidian.md publish.obsidian.md
-
Introduction
Commonly, define terms. Make sure that the reader understands the terms that you will be using.
-
Define
Why is this period called the "Roaring 20s"
-
Interpret at least 5 significant “events” which best demonstrate this change.
-
Was this change gradual? Deliberate? Fortuitous? And/or contrary to the desires of most Americans?
evaluate the kind of change
-
By 1920 the United States had become one of the most significant “players” on the world stage.
Statement of scope.
-
American system?
our industrial and financial capitalist
-
In your evaluation, rank the successes and failures of each and their most significant limitations.
-
the Populists, the Progressives,
reform groups
-
business reform, labor reform
types of reform
-
Evaluate business reform, labor reform, the Populists, the Progressives, and efforts to expand democratic participation during our period.
-
Why was such great energy, passion, and courage committed to reform movements during our period?
-
merican system
industrial and financial capitalism of the US
-
How did WASP winners “understand” the casualties of the American system?
-
WASP
What is a WASP: white anglo-saxon protestant
-
conditions and consciousness
what do these mean?
-
WASP male “winners”
basis of comparison
-
farmers, industrial workers, women, minorities, and immigrants.
comparitives
-
Compare and contrast the conditions and consciousness of the following relative to the WASP male “winners”
-
Many did not enjoy the rewards produced by industrial and financial capitalism in the United States.
What is industrial and financial capitalism???
-
Are these issues and behaviors relevant today?
-
What behaviors did the document seek to justify
-
List and interpret the most significant issues found in the document itself and place each in a valid and revealing historical context.
-
Is it appropriate to define the European people occupying British North America as “American” prior to 1763?
-
Was there a consensus of ideology
-
Were they unique in fundamental ways?
-
Is it appropriate to define the European people occupying British North America as “American” prior to 1763?
-
Define these people and demonstrate their most significant characteristics and behaviors
-
Between the first days of the European Invasion of North America and the ratification of the constitution there were both winners and losers here. List, in rank order, the most significant groups of winners and losers. What factors best explain the relative conditions of the groups on your lists? Connect causes and consequences to each. Were these outcomes inevitable? If so, why?
Subject = American Conquest EQ = Who won and lost and why? Activities:
-
relative conditions
comparative judgement between the groups? In other words, how does one group compare to the whole (or all the others)?
-
Connect causes and consequences to each. Were these outcomes inevitable
-
groups
winners and the losers? Right?
-
What factors best explain the relative conditions of the groups on your lists?
-
List, in rank order, the most significant groups of winners and losers.
-
Between the first days of the European Invasion of North America and the ratification of the constitution there were both winners and losers here.
Lining out the scope of the question!
-