If the researches completed and proposed make a contribution, I shall be grateful; but I have also given full thought to possible practical applications. The socioeconomic demands of the present and the threatened socioeconomic demands of the future have led the American woman to displace, or threaten to displace, the American man in science and industry. If this process continues, the problem of proper child-rearing practices faces us with startling clarity. It is cheering in view of this trend to realize that the American male is physically endowed with all the really essential equipment to compete with the American female on equal terms in one essential activity: the rearing of infants. We now know that women in the working classes are not needed in the home because of their primary mammalian capabilities; and it is possible that in the foreseeable future neonatal nursing will not be regarded as a necessity, but as a luxury ---to use Veblen's term -- a form of conspicuous consumption limited perhaps to the upper classes. But whatever course history may take, it is comforting to know that we are now in contact with the nature of love.
Just as women are needed, so are men. Men/fathers are just as important in a child's life. If one is absent, the other parent adapts and teaches what needs to be learned. Women and men should be equally seen as important. In this present, 2021, a woman has proven to do what men can do and men have proven to do what a women can do, aside from giving birth. A man can stay home and the woman work, why not? Studies with fathers, animal or human, should be just as important because there are different traits but they can also adapt to teach. This comes from the learning they learned from their mothers. There are female influences just as there are men.