community, fueled by a strong desire to re-tain what already exists. Typically, the cases are carefully swaddled inappeals to skill, to being good enough, and to working hard enoughto make it. All these tropes are at the center of any sort of merito-cratic appeal. If the harassed were tough enough to take it, then theywould be able to reap the rewards of success. Systemic harassment setsthe terms on which players engage, giving stark advantage to thosewho are not targeted and retaining power for those who have alreadyclimbed the ladder.
There's this non-homogeneous group of white privilege people that yearn to continue playing these types of games, and that may even see themselves as activists when buying them. These may be big mainstream titles, but much like in cinema and TV, their budgets are also big. They know, and they don't mind, they wish these games be as larger and ambitious as possible, ever bigger, and more complex, and continuously "improving", and "innovating" in this sense. They see defending this kind of consumption as defending their identity, defending who they are, defending dark comedy and freedom of speech... freedom of speech, at which point does it become hate speech? Why should their tone for people that have no skin in the game and who aim to get rid of their identity, of their way of living, without asking? You see how both sides have self-reinforcing narratives, and they may even acknowledge this, and although many left-wingers would love to parse out this radically big titles, instead of talking it out and recognising the current exclusionary and biased present (not perpetuating endless debates), some prominent white privilege people push a zero-sum incompatibility competition narrative where one must survive, and it will be them.
You can't expect a person who's played 5000 hours, to quit Fifa overnight.
Also, notably, this is the argument thrown at women and leftists too, arguing for a sort of inevitability of the system we live in. It's "You got your ass touched? Thank you didn't get raped", or "You cry for those people in Sudan? Why don't you go there?"... the cynicism and instrumentalist value-ridden statements that plague these ideologies... it's a red herring distraction that allows toxic masculinity with its inherited Western binary of mind-body, that separates the psyche and tells boys not to cry, not to share their emotions, to grow a thicker skin, to not make a fuss about it, and on the grounds of "tolerance" and not being a "kill-joy" or a "virtue signaler" this allows machoism, revenge sex, and rape fantasies to remain.