4 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2015
    1. nterestingly, Patchwork Girl has more citations in the humanities and social science journals primarily indexed by MUSE and ProQuest. It seems that afternoon may have influenced a broader audience of scholars, but that Patchwork Girl has influenced literary scholars more heavily. Finally, the purple column shows references in the ELMCIP Knowledge Base, which only tracks the field of electronic literature, but which is not yet complete. At the time of writing, the ELMCIP Knowledge Base is only a little over a year old.

      I may be wrong, but Patchwork Girl (and other 'classic' canonical e-lit works) were originally only purchasable on CD. I just visited the Eastgate site and now on USB stick. As with anything 'e', the archivability and obsolescence question rears its head. I've recently had to convert a couple of my own older poems from early software versions to keep them readable.

    2. Some of my inspiration for this method of studying a field comes from reading Franco Moretti’s book Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, where he talks about “distant reading” based on large quantities of data about a literary system. For instance, he looked at publication data from different countries, specifically the dates of publication of early novels. From this, he saw that it took about twenty years for the early British novel to grow from a point where only five or six novels were published annually to a critical mass with new novels being published more than once a week. Moretti ran the same test against other countries’ statistics, and found that this twenty year cycle can be seen to repeat itself in a range of countries, though with different starting points according to when novels began to be published in that country: “See how similar those shapes are: five countries, th

      This is somewhat related to Fredric Jameson's view that form is related to the social conditions that exist when works are composed (all literary works? e-lit too?)

    1. differences in cognitive patterns between print and electronic works, assumptions of what constitutes the quality of "literariness," and even requirements for tenure and promotion contribute to its lack of presence in the academy. Additionally, Grigar further argues that as video games and other popular culture digital media forms mainstream into the academy, so too will Electronic Literature. Students inculcated from birth by digital media will ultimately be the final arbiters of its popularity and growth. The call to action found at the end of the essay has given rise to this Electronic Liter

      Agree, but a truly significant factor is the link between capitalist modes of distribution/sale and canon formation. If more works of e-lit were sold and more widely distributed, probably would be bigger 'take-up' in the academy. Not that I'm advocating for this capitalist mode, just saying that this is one reason for the relatively niche position of e-lit in the academy.

    1. advocate for the preservation, archiving, and free c

      This is a really important question about the relative invisibility of e-lit. Distribution tends to rely on models which mimic academia and fandom - funny linking those two I suppose.