47 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2019
    1. “Every passenger on a one-stop, round-trip flight has to fork over $11.20 for the TSA Security Fee. Passengers then pay a $4.50 PFC for each takeoff or landing. This adds up to $18 for a connecting round-trip flight. In addition, a U.S. Federal Segment Fee adds $4 to every take-off on a domestic flight — $16 for a connecting round-trip flight,” Leocha explained. “Today, passengers are paying $45.20 even before they have to pay the 7.5 percent transportation excise tax that is included in the airfare.”

      Idea: match the pfc to the TSA security fee.

      Whats the US Fed Segment Fee used for? I don't think it goes back airports?

    1. Restoring the purchasing power of the current user fee –the gas tax -today is a responsible first step in paving the way for a future VMT fee.A VMT must also be tested at the national level first, which I support, before it can be considered a viable Federal user fee.Finally, we need to apply a user fee toelectric vehicles, and a VMT fee does this efficiently while retaining the user fee model.

      Stop with the pilots, just do it already.

    2. Furthermore, asking state and local governments to borrow and repay loans only further magnifies thelong-term trend of declining Federal spending.

      Financing solutions have a place, but actual funding is needed far more.

    3. This imbalance has forced Congress to transfer $144 billion from the General Fund to shore up the HTFover the last 10 years.And thisis just the beginning:CBO estimates over the next 10 years, the HTF will fall $164billion short based on continuing currently-authorized highway, transit, and safety program levels. Let me reiterate –filling this $164 billion gap simply extends the status quo -it does not include higher investment levels to make a dent in our massive needs backlog.

      Address the need for real funding

    4. STATEMENT OFTHE HONORABLE PETER A.DEFAZIOCOMMITTEE ON WAYS &MEANS HEARING ON “OUR NATION’S CRUMBLING INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE NEED FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION”March 6, 2019

      This is essentially our position in one paper.

    1. ASCE Position ASCE recommends raising the federal motor fuels tax by 25 cents per gallon and indexing the tax rate to inflation to help meet our nation’s near-term surface transportation needs.  ASCE supports exploring a mileage-based user fee through additional pilot programs to test charging motorists based on how much they use roads with the long-term goal of using mileage-based user fees to fund the HTF.  ASCE supports removing the cap on PFCs to allow airports to raise necessary funds locally for modernizing the nation’s aviation infrastructure. An increase in PFCs would support enhanced airport design, additional runway capacity and efficiency, and reduced air traffic congestion in order to help get travelers to their destinations safely and on-time. ASCE urges Congress to increase funding for the AIP in the next FAA reauthorization bill. Since 1970, the majority of AIP funding has been supported by direct and dedicated user fees through the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. The expenditure of Airport and Airway Trust Fund monies for airport improvements is critical to meeting the demands of the national aviation system. ASCE urges Congress to guarantee that the FAA implements the NextGen system over the next several years. NextGen is designed to minimize delays by reducing the time aircrafts sit on the ground, therefore making our aviation system more efficient.

      These closely match our recommendations.

    2. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 (P.L. 116-6), spending levels for key transportation infrastructure programs continued to move in a positive direction from the FY2018 Omnibus Spending Bill (P.L.115-141).  In FY2019, $86.5 billion overall for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT); $900 million for BUILD grants; $13.4 billion for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), which includes $2.55 billion for Transit CIG program; $17.5 billion for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which includes $3.35 billion for the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) with a $500 million supplemental; and $49.3 billion for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

      Good to know...

    1. Signing averts a second government shutdown; here's a breakdown of how the $45.27 billion surface transportation construction funding is expected to be spent

      2019 appropriations

    1. This bill would, commencing with the 2022–23 fiscal year and through and including the 2051–52 fiscal year, also require cities and counties to be certified in the prior fiscal year by the Department of Housing and Community Development, as described above, in order to remain eligible for an apportionment of these funds. For each city and county that is not in compliance with this requirement, the bill would require the Controller to withhold the apportionment of funds that would otherwise be apportioned and distributed to the city or county for the fiscal year and deposit those funds in a separate escrow account for each city or county that is not in compliance. The bill would require the Controller to distribute the funds in the escrow account to the applicable city or county after the city or county is certified to be in compliance and meets other specified requirements. The bill would make other technical and conforming changes.

      Same as the other bill. Again, transpo $ should be used to help make the goal. Not be punitive, but helpful.

    1. The bill would require a van-accessible parking space served by electric vehicle service equipment and a van-accessible parking space intended as a future electric vehicle charging space to be counted as at least 2 standard automobile parking spaces for the purpose of complying with any applicable minimum parking requirements established by a local jurisdiction.

      Heck why not 3 spaces? I'm of the opinion that there should be no parking requirements.

    1. Introduced by Assembly Member Grayson

      Concord

    2. to be apportioned by the Controller to cities and counties pursuant to a specified formula if those cities and counties are eligible to receive an apportionment pursuant to the local streets and roads program, and if those cities and counties have been certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development to have met their very low income housing goals or low-income housing goals

      Shouldn't it be that they get the funding if it will help them meet their goals? (If even that).

    3. local streets and roads program. Before receiving an apportionment of funds under the local streets and roads program from the Controller in a fiscal year, existing law requires an eligible city or county to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. Existing law requires the commission to report to the Controller the cities and counties that have submitted a list of projects and requires the Controller, upon receipt of the report, to apportion funds to eligible cities and counties included in the report, as specified.

      All LSR fund projects go to CTC?

    4. The Planning and Zoning Law requires a planning agency, after a legislative body has adopted all or part of a general plan, to provide an annual report to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development on the status of the general plan and progress in meeting the community’s share of regional housing needs. Existing law requires a planning agency to include in its annual report specified information, known as a production report, regarding units of net new housing, including rental housing and for-sale housing that have been issued a completed entitlement, building permit, or certificate of occupancy.

      Are there any CURRENT goals for cities/counties? What is the current "stick".

    1. The bill would require a qualified taxpayer, in order to be eligible for the credit, to obtain 2 certifications from the appropriate jurisdiction with authority for local building code enforcement: one prior to seismic retrofit construction that certifies that the building is an at-risk property, and a second subsequent to construction that certifies that the completed construction is seismic retrofit construction, as defined, and specifies a dollar amount of qualified costs.

      Cities often don't have staff that with this ability. Why not just make it a PE, similar to what appraisers do?

    1. junior accessory dwelling units

      Definitiion of jADU in law?

    2. This bill would provide that, if a local agency imposes an owner-occupancy restriction, the monitoring for compliance shall not be more frequent than annually and be based on specified published documents. The bill would describe owner-occupant for purposes of that requirement.

      Seems like an odd requirement - not more than yearly?

    3. This bill would instead require a local agency to ministerially approve or deny a permit application for the creation of an accessory dwelling unit permit within 60 days of receipt.

      120 doesn't seem onerous to a submitter.

    1. DeFazio says, “The key is going to be revenues.” He proposed indexing federal fuels taxes for inflation and using that revenue to back $500 billion in bonds. He also mentions “a national pilot program” for a vehicle-miles tax. Graves is pushing a mileage fee. Finding revenue will be up to the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees. Maryland DOT Secretary Pete Rahn says, “Where I end up is, where they come up with the funds, I don’t care, as long as the funds are directed to where we need investment.”

      So we should discuss vmt with ways and means.

    2. Still, Graves says lawmakers face “a fairly short timeline.” He says, “If we don’t have something done at least out of the House of Representatives by August, I don’t believe it’s going to happen.” The reason: the run-up to the 2020 elections

      They use that excuse alot. I don't think it matter in today's climate.

    3. The staffer says a highway-transit bill probably would come first and a bigger infrastructure package would follow

      Our papers to follow

    4. In the Senate, Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), is working on the highway portion of a long-term highway-transit reauthorization. Barrasso aims to get a new measure in place before the current law, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation, or FAST, Act, expires on Sept. 30, 2020.

      Timing is good for c2c

    5. He didn’t offer a proposal for finding the additional resources the trust fund needs

      Of course not :)

    6. Barrasso and the committee’s ranking Democrat, Tom Carper (Del.)

      Add to our meeting list

    1. We face a $1 trillion surface transportation investment gap over the next 10 years to fix the infrastructure we have, meet future needs, and restore our global competitiveness. Any serious infrastructure proposal must provide sustainable, long-term federal funding so we can make these necessary investments, create millions of living-wage American jobs, increase economic growth, and decrease congestion and emissions. I will work to build bipartisan agreement around legislation, but I can’t do it alone. This will require massive effort from the White House, stakeholders, and supporters in Congress to get something real across the finish line.

      DeFazio thoughts

    1. Port Funding ∑Up to $10,200,000 annually will be distributed for the purpose to finance the improvement of the ship channel providing access to the facilities of the Alabama State Docks.

      Gas and diesel tax to pay for inland waterways, interesting.

    2. Electric/Hybrid Fees∑$250 license and registration fee on elective vehicles (EVs), $125 on hybrid-electric vehicles (HEVs).oDistribution of the first $150 on EVs, and first $75 on HEVs, shall be distributed 66.67% to the state, 25% to the counties, and 8.33% to municipalities.oRemainder shall be deposited in the Rebuild Alabama Fund to support the Electric Transportation Infrastructure Grant Program until 2% of the total vehicle registrations in AL are EVs and HEVs

      States are realizing they need the rev from electric. Will the feds? This $ would be used for electric infrastructure.

    3. Index ∑Beginning June 1, 2023, and every otheryear thereafter:oThe Department of Revenue will calculate the National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI) issued by the US Federal Highway Association for the current year compared against the previous year.oCannot increase OR decrease by more than 1 cent

      Indexed at 1 cent up or down per year

    4. ALDOT, Counties, and Municipalities can only use the new revenue for:oMaintenance or construction of roads and bridges, match funds for federal road or bridge projects, or the payment of any debt, subject to certain limits in the Act,associatedwith road or bridge projects

      And port uses below...no non-road or bridge uses.

    5. Distribution of New Revenue∑State –66.67%∑Counties –25%∑Municipalities –8.33%

      Low number for municipalities

    6. Rebuild Alabama Act

      Red state republican governor.

    7. New Revenue∑6 Cents, Effective October1, 2019∑2 Cents, Effective October1, 2020∑2 Cents, Effective October1, 2021

      Basically, 10 cents phased in over 3 years, then indexed up to 1 cent change up or down per year thereafter.

  2. Feb 2019
    1. That means that — taken on their own — combustion vehicle sales fell from 17.03 million in 2017 to 16.91 million in 2018.Since USA total light vehicle sales have been essentially flat or slightly declining over the past four years, and EVs are now coming online in ever-increasing volumes, it’s hard to see gas vehicle sales going in any direction but south from now on. The total light vehicle market’s marginal growth in 2018 was only made possible by the arrival of the Tesla Model 3 in high volumes.Again, there’s an outside chance we may see a small up-blip, depending on the economic outlook, but that’s unlikely and the general trend for combustion vehicle sales is inexorably downwards. The reveal of the Tesla Model Y in the coming month or two also ensures that a significant number of folks will entirely avoid a gas vehicle purchase in the next year or so whilst they are waiting for their dream SUV/crossover. Again, this means that EV % market share will grow at a higher rate than the increase in absolute EV sales volume, as the competition withers away.The Global PictureSince the three largest auto markets are already seeing falling combustion vehicle sales, is there any hope left for the internal combustion engine?No. It’s firmly headed for the dustbin of history, and it is going to happen quickly. Most serious auto analysts (see here, and here, and here) postulated that 2018 would be the peak sales year for combustion vehicle sales globally. The figures we’ve discussed above support the idea of 2017 being the peak year.Japan is still indecisive about EVs, though big on hybrids, but will inevitably soon have to give up on its fuel-cell dreams (at least for LDVs) and rush to catch up with EV powertrains.India will grow to be a significant auto market in the middle of the next decade, but this will be too late to save the combustion engine. India’s LDV sales were some 3.2 million in 2017, growing around 9% from 2016. Both combustion sales and EV sales will continue to grow in India, but any short-term growth in combustion vehicles will be far outpaced by their decline in the 3 largest markets above (almost 20× the volume of India). India’s LDV buying middle class is really starting to buy vehicles at just the time when EVs are taking over from gassers. With many larger Indian cities having serious air quality problems to deal with, regulations will also be pushing in the direction of EVs, and away from polluting gassers. And before the middle of the next decade, EVs will be the less expensive option, even just on sticker price (they already are in many cases on total cost of ownership).New Delhi in smogWhat do you think about the prospects for combustion engine vehicles? Do you agree that we will look back on 2017 as the peak in these three largest markets, or will 2019 reverse the past year’s declines and see them clinging onto sales volume for another year or so? Please share you thoughts and reasoning in the comments.Related: Nissan, Toyota, Mercedes, VW, Honda, BMW, Lexus, Infiniti, & Audi Sales Drop In USA, While Ford & GM Hide    (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});   How much money can a solar roof save you in California? Profit from your roof space: find local deals on solar in your area, eliminate your power bill. Calculate My Savings! .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_copy_zip, .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_copy_zip { padding-left: 110px !important; overflow: hidden; font-size: 10px !important; } .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_img, .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_img { display: block !important; width: 100px !important; } .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_copy_zip { height: 83px !important; } .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_zip_button { top: 143px !important; } .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_input { top: 87px !important; } .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_input, .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_zip_button { width: 267px !important; } Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)1K+Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)1K+Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)MoreClick to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Flipboard (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Tags: China EV sales, Death of the combustion engine, End of oil, Europe EV sales, EV sales, Rise of the EV, Tesla, US EV sales About the AuthorDr. Maximilian Holland Max is an anthropologist, social theorist and international political economist, trying to ask questions and encourage critical thinking about social and environmental justice, sustainability and the human condition. He has lived and worked in Europe and Asia, and is currently based in Barcelona. Related Posts Hyundai Kona EV Review … Tesla Model 3 #1 Electric Car In World … Elon, Like A Boss — #CleanTechnica Top 20 → Top 10 Best Selling Fully Electric Vehicle Brands In 2019 → Top 10 Best Selling Plug-In Vehicle Brands In 2019 → Beta Technologies Pops Out Of Stealth, Is Gearing Up To Be More Than An eVTOL Startup → Back to Top ↑AdvertisementAdvertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of our readers.CleanTechnica Clothing & Cups Top News On CleanTechnica The Tesla Model 3 Is Taking Over The World Boom! Fossil Vehicle Sales Are Officially Now Decreasing In China, Europe, & USA — #CleanTechnica Report 12 Ways of Looking at a Rivian vs Tesla Matchup Volkswagen Raises EV Sales Target 50%, Says ID Production Will Be Carbon Neutral The Dream Is Over — Europe Is Waking Up To A World Of Electric Cars Hyundai Kona EV Review ... Tesla Model 3 #1 Electric Car In World ... Elon, Like A Boss — #CleanTechnica Top 20 Yes, Electric Vehicles Work In Winter — Better Than Gas Cars! Join CleanTechnica Today!AdvertisementAdvertisementFollow CleanTechnica !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");Our Electric Car Driver Report  Read & share our new report on "electric car drivers, what they desire, and what the demand."The EV Safety AdvantageRead & share our free report on EV safety, “The EV Safety Advantage.”EV Charging Guidelines for CitiesShare our free report on EV charging guidelines for cities, “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Guidelines For Cities.”30 Electric Car Benefits Our Electric Vehicle ReviewsTesla NewsCleantech Press Releases New Research Shows That Only Two Large Petroleum Companies Have Meaningful Emission Reduction Targets Koben Announces EVOLVE EVSF —Grid-Friendly Modular EV Store & Forward System The New Danish Climate Plan — Together For A Greener Future38 Anti-Cleantech Myths Wind & Solar Prices Beat Fossils Cost of Solar Panels Collapses

      360/200 is nearly double, 180% increase

    1. A nickel per year – U.S. Chamber/Earl Blumenauer proposal.

      Good proposal with a catchy name. 5x5+indexing. 5 cents per year for 5 years, then index to inflation.

    1. The grim statistics provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also show that drivers on rural roads die at a rate 2.5 times higher per mile traveled than on urban highways. Urban drivers travel twice as many miles but suffer close to half the fatal accidents.
    1. And EV car prices could soon be on the rise. On October 7, Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, introduced a bill to remove the tax credit early and instead tax EV owners more. Moves like this, in tandem with President Trump’s attempts to freeze fuel-efficiency requirements and devolve regulation of coal-fired power plants, are a hard push against meaningful efforts to combat climate change
    1. For example, many of our rural communitiessee broadband and high-speedcommunications as a transportation investment, on par with roads, bridges and freight rail
    2. The next authorization bill should change these restrictions so that these types of innovation projects can thrive
    3. We need to removethe currentrestrictions on our federal transit funds to allow our projects –most of which are promotingshared rides and multiple passengers in vehicles –to be eligible for funding
    4. Civic Lab.

      We should get an update on all these various initiatives under civic lab. Like sac state campus Olli.

    5. Among other things, we should testcreative time-of-day pricing much like energy ratescurrentlyusedby the utility sector

      Agree, but not for the reasons stated above. It would be good for reducing PEAK HOUR congestion. Benefits: air quality and raising money ideally used for maintenance of that roadway.

    6. A rural resident who drives 20 miles ona lightlytravelled two-lane road doesn’t impose anywhere near thecostof an urban resident who travels 20 miles on a congested interstate highway in the middle ofrush hou

      I'm confused by this statement...Don't they impose exactly the same damage? And also isn't it more costly to support rural roads due to their great number. And aren't they less efficiently used than urban roads?

    7. economic prosperity, accessto opportunityfor disadvantaged populations, traffic safety, and environmental sustainability includingresilienceto extreme weather events

      sounds good but too wonky for me to grasp

    8. will need to be tested and deployed in a majority of the states before it’s adopted at a national level

      There has been testing. Have we not learned enough from it? How much testing was done on the original gas tax?

    9. The Sacramento region is one of the nation’s most diverse. We’re diverse in terms of our people, our politics and our places. Indeed, our region covers the booming urban core of Sacramento, vibrant suburbs, historic towns and main streets, newly developing exurbs, rural farmland and thousands of acres of forests. We are truly a microcosm of America,

      Nice summary of our region

    1. Both parties should be able to unite for a great rebuilding of America’s crumbling infrastructure.  (Applause.) I know that Congress is eager to pass an infrastructure bill, and I am eager to work with you on legislation to deliver new and important infrastructure investment, including investments in the cutting-edge industries of the future.  This is not an option.  This is a necessity.

      Theme of bipartisanship, "new and important" investment, investment in cutting edge industries. Not much to go on here.