Expert sources

Highlight expert source

Types of sources

Which of the following are cited?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.08.01:Experts", "1.08.02:Studies", "1.08.03:Organizations" ]</div>

Types of sources

Does the article cite sources?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

Single study?

Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

Clickbaitiness

Is the headline clickbaity

Choices:

<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

Title Representativeness

Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

Overall Credibility

Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

Choices:

<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

Types of sources

Which of the following are cited?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.08.01:Experts", "1.08.02:Studies", "1.08.03:Organizations" ]</div>

Types of sources

Does the article cite sources?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

Single study?

Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

Clickbaitiness

Is the headline clickbaity

Choices:

<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

Title Representativeness

Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

Overall Credibility

Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

Choices:

<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

Evidence for primary claim

What evidence is given for the primary claim?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.23.01:Correlation", "1.23.02:Cause precedes effect", "1.23.03:The correlation appears across multiple independent contexts", "1.23.04:A plausible mechanism is proposed", "1.23.05:An experimental study was conducted (natural experiments OK)", "1.23.06:Experts are cited", "1.23.07:Other kind of evidence", "1.23.08:No evidence given" ]</div>

Evidence for primary claim

What evidence is given for the primary claim?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.23.01:Correlation", "1.23.02:Cause precedes effect", "1.23.03:The correlation appears across multiple independent contexts", "1.23.04:A plausible mechanism is proposed", "1.23.05:An experimental study was conducted (natural experiments OK)", "1.23.06:Experts are cited", "1.23.07:Other kind of evidence", "1.23.08:No evidence given" ]</div>

Causal claims

Is a general or singular causal claim made?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.22.01:General causal claim", "1.22.02:Singular causal claim", "1.22.03:No causal claim" ]</div>

Exaggerated claims

Does the author exaggerate claims?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.21.01:Yes", "1.21.02:Sort of", "1.21.03:No" ]</div>

Emotionally charged tone

Does the author use outrage, snark, celebration, horror, etc?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.20.01:Yes", "1.20.02:Sort of", "1.20.03:No" ]</div>

Naturalistic fallacy

Does the author suggest something is good because it is natural, or bad because it is not natural?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.19.01:Yes", "1.19.02:Sort of", "1.19.03:No" ]</div>

Scare tactics

Does the author exaggerate the dangers of a situation (the appeal to fear fallacy)?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.18.01:Yes", "1.18.02:Sort of", "1.18.03:No" ]</div>

Slippery slope

Does the author say that one small change will lead to a major change?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes", "1.17.02:Sort of", "1.17.03:No" ]</div>

False dilemma

Does the author present a complicated choice as if it were binary?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.16.01:Yes", "1.16.02:Sort of", "1.16.03:No" ]</div>

Straw man argument

Highlight straw man example #2

Straw man argument

Highlight straw man example #1

Straw man argument

Does the author present a counterargument as a weaker, more foolish version of the real counterargument?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

Confidence in claims made by sources

To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.13.01:Completely justified", "1.13.02:Mostly justified", "1.13.03:Somewhat justified", "1.13.04:Slightly justified", "1.13.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>

Other types of sources

Other source #1

Other types of sources

Other source #1

Other types of sources

Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.12.01:Yes", "1.12.02:No" ]</div>

Expert sources

Highlight expert source #3

Expert sources

Highlight expert source #2

Expert sources

Highlight expert source #1

Expert sources

Highlight expert source #1

Types of sources

Which of the following are cited?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.08.02:Experts", "1.08.03:Studies", "1.08.04:Organizations" ]</div>

Types of sources

Does the article cite sources?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

Single study?

Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

Clickbaitiness

Please describe other ways in which the title is clickbaity

Answer: [[alksjd]]

Clickbaitiness

What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>

Clickbaitiness

Is the headline clickbaity

Choices:

<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

Title Representativeness

Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

Choices:

<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

Overall Credibility

Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

Choices:

<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

asdkj

sdgnsdfnsldkf

asdasd

asdasd