Evidence for primary claim
What evidence is given for the primary claim?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.23.01:Correlation", "1.23.02:Cause precedes effect", "1.23.03:The correlation appears across multiple independent contexts", "1.23.04:A plausible mechanism is proposed", "1.23.05:An experimental study was conducted (natural experiments OK)", "1.23.06:Experts are cited", "1.23.07:Other kind of evidence", "1.23.08:No evidence given" ]</div>Evidence for primary claim
What evidence is given for the primary claim?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.23.01:Correlation", "1.23.02:Cause precedes effect", "1.23.03:The correlation appears across multiple independent contexts", "1.23.04:A plausible mechanism is proposed", "1.23.05:An experimental study was conducted (natural experiments OK)", "1.23.06:Experts are cited", "1.23.07:Other kind of evidence", "1.23.08:No evidence given" ]</div>Causal claims
Is a general or singular causal claim made?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.22.01:General causal claim", "1.22.02:Singular causal claim", "1.22.03:No causal claim" ]</div>Exaggerated claims
Does the author exaggerate claims?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.21.01:Yes", "1.21.02:Sort of", "1.21.03:No" ]</div>Emotionally charged tone
Does the author use outrage, snark, celebration, horror, etc?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.20.01:Yes", "1.20.02:Sort of", "1.20.03:No" ]</div>Naturalistic fallacy
Does the author suggest something is good because it is natural, or bad because it is not natural?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.19.01:Yes", "1.19.02:Sort of", "1.19.03:No" ]</div>Scare tactics
Does the author exaggerate the dangers of a situation (the appeal to fear fallacy)?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.18.01:Yes", "1.18.02:Sort of", "1.18.03:No" ]</div>Slippery slope
Does the author say that one small change will lead to a major change?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes", "1.17.02:Sort of", "1.17.03:No" ]</div>False dilemma
Does the author present a complicated choice as if it were binary?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.16.01:Yes", "1.16.02:Sort of", "1.16.03:No" ]</div>Straw man argument
Highlight straw man example #2
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Straw man argument
Highlight straw man example #1
Straw man argument
Does the author present a counterargument as a weaker, more foolish version of the real counterargument?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Confidence in claims made by sources
To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.13.01:Completely justified", "1.13.02:Mostly justified", "1.13.03:Somewhat justified", "1.13.04:Slightly justified", "1.13.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Other types of sources
Other source #1
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Other types of sources
Other source #1
Other types of sources
Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.12.01:Yes", "1.12.02:No" ]</div>Expert sources
Highlight expert source #3
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #2
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #1
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #1
Types of sources
Which of the following are cited?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08.02:Experts", "1.08.03:Studies", "1.08.04:Organizations" ]</div>Types of sources
Does the article cite sources?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>Single study?
Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Clickbaitiness
Please describe other ways in which the title is clickbaity
Answer: [[alksjd]]
Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Clickbaitiness
What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Lorem ipsum
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>How School Walkouts Test Student Rights And School Responsibilities
Title Representativeness
How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)
Choices:
<div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>Answer:
<div>1.03.01, 1.03.05, 1.03.07</div>How School Walkouts Test Student Rights And School Responsibilities
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Answer:
<div>1.02.02</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Answer:
<div>1.01.02</div>