2,892 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. The crafty and energetic Paris publisher Charlotte Guillard decided to reprint his edition of the Letters of Jerome. The Sorbonne had condemned Erasmus’s works, so Guillard (or a press professional in her shop) drew up an index of the passages in Erasmus’s commentary that most contradicted conventional Catholic wisdom. It took the form of a letter to the pious reader, warning that Erasmus’s paratexts ‘did more to cover the texts with darkness than to shed light on them’. Then it quoted a long series of passages in which Erasmus argued against practices including excessive veneration of the saints, supposedly in order to help the pious reader avoid them – but also, of course, to help the Protestant or critical Catholic reader discover them. A single index, creatively compiled, could make a big book respectable and subversive at the same time.

      Does that qualify as irony?

    2. Konrad Pellikan, who compiled the index for Erasmus’s 1521 edition of the church father Cyprian, explained that he had gathered his lemmas quickly and keyed his references only to full pages, not to smaller segments of each page, ‘to avoid easing the way for gross laziness’. Conrad Gessner, who explained in detail how to compile an index on slips of paper, insisted that indexes were vital: without them, life would be too short to master more than one subject. But he also worried about those ‘who rely only on the indexes ... and who do not read the complete texts of their authors in the proper order and methodically’. The index gave its users formidable power to find and quote adages and examples, narratives and poems, scriptural and patristic texts, whether or not they had actually read the full works they cited. That power in turn inspired anxiety, especially among those who had learned what they knew in the old-fashioned way, or claimed that they had. Would the index kill close reading?

      Obviously, we see digital parallels.

    1. The world surely contains some usurious Jews, gay paedophiles, muslim fanatics, sexually aggressive black men, hysterical women. But if you tell those ‘truths’ without the truth of others, who do not conform to such precise clichés, and without the truth that telling these certain individual truths as constitutive is a technique of oppression, then your ‘truth’ is in the service of a coercive lie. The comedian Wanda Sykes has joked that it is only since Obama that she’s able to buy watermelons: before a black president, the truth of her taste was too costly to indulge. Not because of anything intrinsic to the desire, but because of the gaze under which it fell. ‘Look at all these white people looking at me’, she says. ‘I ain’t buying a whole watermelon for your enjoyment.’

      "Stereotype threat" too glib a characterization.

    2. This is a whole other level at which the search for a ‘progressive’ content in culture can blind us. Underlying the suppleness of the system is the fact that not only does it fundamentally not matter to it which symbolic content you choose from an either-or on offer, nor even does it if you exercise that Boolean literalist rejection of the choice, except if and insofar as you undermine its power – which in capitalist culture means that you refuse its commodity-logic. We beat the system that throws up the art, the culture, not if we hate it or resent it – only, ultimately, if we stop it making money.

      Thereeee we go. Three cheers for Mieville.

    3. It is by this reversibility that such binaries works. The point of the familiar Madonna-Whore syndrome is that you can’t win by choosing one over the other. The deck is stacked, the dice loaded. It is the dyad, not one or other of its terms, that is the problem. That old insight helps show the limitations of the hunt for ‘empowering’, ‘progressive’ depictions, as well as for oppressive stereotypes. Of seeking problem and solution in representation’s content, rather in the range of choices made available.

      Hmm. I'm not sure this rings true. The Madonna is flattened, instrumentalized. Isn't it more important to have your depiction be un-flat than to present a range of flat "choices"? Seems weirdly markety.

    4. As a supplement to paranoid reading, Sedgwick draws from Klein to propose a different kind of analysis. ‘The greatest interest of Klein’s concept [of ‘position’, rather than analytical ‘type’ or ’stage’] lies … in her seeing the paranoid position always in the oscillatory context of a very different possible one: the depressive position. … [This] is an anxiety-mitigating achievement that the infant or adult only sometimes, and often only briefly, succeeds in inhabiting’. From this position, Sedgwick suggests as methodology a drive to pleasure, including aesthetic; amelioration of the everyday; and openness to surprise, both good and bad. She calls this process ‘reparative reading’. ‘The desire of a reparative impulse … is additive and accretive. Its fear, a realistic one, is that the culture surrounding it is inadequate or inimical to its nurture; it wants to assemble and confer plenitude on an object that will then have resources to offer to an inchoate self’. This is perfectly compatible with the paranoid critique of un-nurturing culture. Where it differs – complements – is in what it wants to do with that culture’s objects: [T]o use one’s own resources to assemble or “repair” the murderous part-objects into something like a whole – though … not necessarily like any preexisting whole. Once assembled to one’s own specifications, the more satisfying object is available both to be identified with and to offer one nourishment and comfort in turn. Sedgwick closes with a beautiful aspiration, to ‘extract[…] sustenance from the objects of a culture – even of a culture whose avowed desire has often been not to sustain them’.

      I understand that this is meant to be about readings of the-text-itself, or whatever, but I can't help but think of how the young Maya read queer romantic Harry Potter fanfiction. Its creators responded to a literally additive impulse. The result was more true to the world I'd later inhabit than any of the media I found around me. Banishing all of Harry Potter is therefore fraught to me, even as I realize that, you know, no money of mine should get back to the author.

    5. In an inversion of the fury of those ragefully defending texts from critics, those critics can be invested less in rigour than in the attack itself, going from diagnosis to performative dismissal, policing transgressions with surplus enthusiasm. In the addictive affect-economy of social media, this can come to mean a bleak and border-guarding backslapping.

      This use of "performative" could be used in its real sense, but then it'd be somewhat redundant, so I return to feeling betrayed.

    6. Thus we were granted one of the great political autocritiques in literature, a text that interrogates and subverts its own predecessors.

      I'd read somewhere The Elegance of the Hedgehog only exists because someone pointed out to the author how cliched the concierge who appeared in Gourmet Rhapsody was. There is probably something to be criticized in how fleshing out that cliche then necessitated making her care about the same things our author cares about -- but I love the result too much to find too much weight to it.

    1. Unlike Tokyo, a vast city held together by slippery threads of ramen

      Is Tokyo ramen considered distinctive?

    2. London’s appetites generate a colossal amount of food waste: with better organisation, it could be reduced. bio-bean is a company that collects waste coffee grounds from King’s Cross, Liverpool Street and other big London train stations and converts it to biofuel.

      I'm not sure used coffee grounds are a neat example of "waste".

    3. asparagus (or, in cockneydom, ‘sparrowgrass’)

      An excellent alias

    4. There used to be a common language of food in the city, whereas now we have incoherent Babel of many cuisines, often exciting but hard to decipher

      Food as language in this metaphor is deceiving. Language has to be shared to some extent to be useful. Novelty and unfamiliarity in food isn't disqualifying.

    5. But when it came to seasonal produce, the whole city ate in sync. Sellers put notices in The Times to announce that Jersey pears had just come into season or that East Lothian potatoes had arrived.

      Charming!

    1. n Germany, some doctors still practice Hildegardian medicine. In the town of Allenbach, for example, a clinic focuses exclusively on Hildegardian treatments. Beyond the realm of modern medicine, though, Hildgard’s work is alive and well at monasteries. At St. Hildegard Abbey, founded by Hildegard herself in Eibingen in 1165, nuns carry on her culinary traditions, making and selling “cookies of joy” along with galangal-ginger cookies, wine, and a selection of herbal liqueurs and teas.

      What wonderful tourism that'd be!

    2. she was struck by a mysterious illness after the abbot at Disibodenberg initially refused to let her leave and found her own monastery. (The abbot was reluctant to lose the prophet-nun, who’d attracted a fair share of visitors and revenue.) Hildegard lay in bed for months, unable to do anything until the will of God (i.e., her founding her own abbey) was completed. When the abbot finally relented, she made a miraculous recovery.

      Patron saint of the work stoppage.

    3. Born on the cusp of the prosperous 12th century, she was poised to reap the benefits of a booming era in European history. “It was just this far-out time,” Sweet says, adding that Hildegard was born into an era of scholastic advancement, population growth, and agriculturally beneficial weather. Although she would have lived separate from the men at the coed Disibodenberg monastery, Sweet notes that Hildegard would have likely communicated with educated monks and had access to the library, the medicinal garden, and the infirmary. The result was an education that rivaled those of leading medieval minds. “So Hildegard would have gotten the Latin-age academic tradition … the existing infirmarian tradition, and then, third, this sort of medical-women tradition with the midwives and the healers,” Sweet says. “So what she ends up giving us is a wonderful mixture of all that.”

      I think her education is debated, isn't it?

    4. The Hildegardian pharma-bakery didn’t just prescribe cookies to counter depression, but also recommended licorice-flavored cookies for nausea and ginger varieties for constipation.

      Anise saltines seem handy.

    5. Hildegard’s pharmacopoeia revolved around the kitchen and the garden. In her books Physica and Causes and Cures, she outlines herbal and culinary remedies for a vast array of ailments. For a weak heart, she proposes a daily teaspoon of “wine for the heart,” consisting of boiled parsley, honey, and wine. For stomach pain, a nightcap of wine mixed with powdered ginger, galingale (a ginger relative from Southeast Asia), and zedoary (another ginger cousin, from India). And for matters of melancholy, she offers her “cookies of joy” (or “nerve cookies”), wielding the key ingredients of spelt flour, nutmeg, cinnamon, and cloves to “calm all bitterness of the heart and mind, open your heart and impaired senses, and make your mind cheerful.”

      Look, I don't know that ginger wine wouldn't help stomach pain.

    1. The real scandal, if I may, is the fact that so many people who attended one seem to have no idea what it’s for. So let me come out and tell you what a university is for: a university is a place where people help each other access the highest intellectual goods.

      Imagine being able to blithely say people are wrong to think that college is "for" class mobility when it is necessary to experience class mobility. Imagine being able to handwave that away as an extraneous detail.

    2. In the real world, Plato’s view seemed to be that philosophers arise because occasionally a human being—for no reason, following no plan, and certainly not because he was secretly marked out as One of the Special Ones from birth—manages by sheer luck to find his way to the lone worthwhile life. Thus Socrates’s shortcomings with respect to the intellectual “talents” most valued in his era—memory and rhetorical cleverness—are often thematized by Plato. Plato’s explanation for why most people don’t get access to the best things is unsatisfying to those who are expecting either a tale of justice, such as the noble lie of the triumph of the talented, or a tale of injustice, such as the liberal account of how the equal potential in all of us is squandered when the powerful oppress the weak. But you don’t need to oppress people in order to withhold intellectual treasures from them if there is simply no reason they would find them in the first place. The intellectual goods lie hidden in plain view.

      Wow, how cool that we can resort to analyzing this all in terms absolutely devoid of the empirical sociological research that might suggest that there are more factors at play than "sheer luck", that it isn't "for no reason" that "most people don't get access to the best things". I love philosophical thought experiments and I've never understood how some people despise them until now.

    3. A university is a world inside the world, a haven, a bubble, and those who reacted to the college-admissions scandal tried to pop that bubble. My initial impulse was to see this as an act of aggression and hostility: they are trying to blame us for everything! But with hindsight, I have begun to entertain the possibility of a different interpretation. Maybe the sentiment driving the scandalmongering was marked as much by envy as indignation. After all, one reason you might try to pop a bubble is because you want in.

      Whose money funds the bubble's wall? Whose society is shaped by it? Do you imagine it is your abstract interests that fuel the engine? Do you imagine that your sense of satisfaction at sharing the Iliad with students ought to be enough? Do you not see the material structures that hold up what you do?

    4. And it’s totally amazing that human beings can do this

      This is the closest the author comes to justifications. It's "amazing to witness the birth of scientific thought". It's "amazing that human beings" can "form intellectual communities." I'm so glad you get to be amazed.

    5. “It is happening right here—this is what universities are for: reading Aristotle together.” All the arguments about elitism and corporatization and donations were as irrelevant as the ivy growing on the walls.

      My god, my god, my god. How do you think any of this is paid for? How do you think it is that you are bought the time, the freedom, the space, the energy to read Aristotle together? How do you think you owe nothing back?

    6. If I had left the university after college, I believe the intellectual life I occasionally glimpsed as an undergraduate would have faded into a nostalgic memory.

      Why should I care about this? What is the point of you? What is the point of your intellectual life? Why do you think it doesn't need to be justified? Why do you think it ought to be enough for the university's critics? How is a philosopher this careless about leaving a good in-and-of-itself asserted without support?

    7. Our society has many questions and uncertainties about the just and correct manner of distributing wealth, or health care, or honor, or political power; but these difficulties seem insignificant in comparison to the gaping chasm of total cluelessness we have when it comes to the problem of distributing the very highest goods of all—the intellectual ones.

      Jesus. You think that who spends time in your "let's talk about dead Greeks" course is more significant than who is allowed to die without health care.

    1. The same is true for many of my close high-school classmates: If they left for college, most have never returned for longer than a few months at a time. Practically all of them now live in major metro areas scattered across the country, not our hometown. The kinds of jobs they are now qualified for—in corporate or management consulting, nonprofits, media, and finance—don’t really exist in Yakima.

      What the hell kind of social circle were you running in?

    1. Plavchan has considered offering a separate course on directory structure — but he’s not sure it’s worth it.

      Please, I'm begging you, talk to a single librarian at your university. Please talk to a single librarian at your university.

    2. Plavchan agrees that there are limits to how much he can bridge the generational divide. Despite his efforts to tailor his teaching, “some of the tools we use rely on some knowledge that our students just aren’t getting.”

      Sometimes the way that academics interact with computers -- particularly non-CS academics -- is to construct their own peculiar individual mental models of how things should be done, and demand that students absorb them. Maybe you should be figuring out a better standard workflow that your students can "get"!

    3. A cynic could blame generational incompetence. An international 2018 study that measured eighth-graders’ “capacities to use information and computer technologies productively” proclaimed that just 2 percent of Gen Z had achieved the highest “digital native” tier of computer literacy.
    4. It could also have to do with the other software they’re accustomed to — dominant smartphone apps like Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube all involve pulling content from a vast online sea rather than locating it within a nested hierarchy.

      This is a weak comparison in my mind, because Instagram and TikTok don't even have the kind of functional search that allows you to really relate to content in that way; you're relying on their algorithms to surface what you must have wanted, not able to filter results, order them by various attributes, etc.

    5. The primary issue is that the code researchers write, run at the command line, needs to be told exactly how to access the files it’s working with — it can’t search for those files on its own. Some programming languages have search functions, but they’re difficult to implement and not commonly used. It’s in the programming lessons where STEM professors, across fields, are encountering problems.

      So... not exactly.

      At work, I have tools that set up my relevant directory structures for me for the different projects I work with. I use tools that have their own directory structures in which they present content. My experience of using these tools is almost always approximately equivalent to navigating an app that presents options on multiple screens. With the native tab-complete, cd src<TAB>/Package<TAB>/lib is a bit like clicking through nested menus. At work, it is exceedingly rare that I ever have to indicate the kind of complicated relative paths that require a mental model of location beyond "you're here, click here, now you're here, click here...".

      This is not true with my personal projects, because I am lazy and I have not set up tooling that would make things neat and straightforward. Relative paths are common, mental models are necessary, and I'll admit that when these fail there's a certain amount of fallback to recursive grep -- the unindexed brute-force search of eras past.

      Academic programming contexts are kind of uniquely unprofessional, and I don't like that this is being presented as "there's nothing we can do, computers are just like this!" when that's not really the case. Standard directory structures enforced by tooling change how you relate to the whole thing.

    6. Guarín-Zapata was taught computer basics in high school — how to save, how to use file folders, how to navigate the terminal

      🎶one of these things is not like the others🎶

    7. Colling’s courses now include a full two-hour lecture to explain directory structure.

      This is nonsense. This is nonsense. I remember despising college courses doing this.

    1. despite the slick approach of several of these businesses, at the heart of it, the broad objective of almost all of them is to protect the Indian cow from slaughter. The profit surpluses generated by many of them are either entirely offered or generously shared with cow shelters. They believe that unlike cows of foreign species, which have undergone many genetic mutations, the Indian cow is special.

      Huh, I didn't know this was an aspect of the high value on cows. Makes sense, I guess. Are foreign species viewed as bad (like how I think French bulldogs shouldn't exist)?

    2. Unadulterated cow urine and dung have always been procured from cow-shelters by the traditional for use at home and in temple pujas. What’s recent is the array of therapeutic and beauty products flooding the market that use these as ingredients. There are face packs, bath scrubbers, mosquito coils and incense sticks that contain cow dung. There are creams, cough syrups, body oils, health tonics, weight-loss tonics, and floor disinfectants that contain distilled cow urine. You name it, they have it. And the names of gau mutra or gau arka (cow urine) or cow dung are not hidden away in long lists of fine print on the packages. It is star-lighted right up front as the chief ingredient in bold letters.

      I suppose the incense makes as much sense as anything else, but I'll confess the body products seem troubling. I wonder if they're pasteurized?

    1. The peaks correspond to the symbols: “a”, “c”, “e”, “i”, “o”, “s” and “y” of the EVA alphabet.

      e, i, s, and y being potentially vowelish consonants (like y in English)

    Annotators

    1. D0 Soil is dry; irrigation delivery begins earlyDryland crop germination is stuntedActive fire season beginsWinter resort visitation is low; snowpack is minimal D1 Dryland pasture growth is stunted; producers give supplemental feed to cattleLandscaping and gardens need irrigation earlier; wildlife patterns begin to changeStock ponds and creeks are lower than usual D2 Grazing land is inadequateProducers increase water efficiency methods and drought-resistant cropsFire season is longer, with high burn intensity, dry fuels, and large fire spatial extent; more fire crews are on staffWine country tourism increases; lake- and river-based tourism declines; boat ramps closeTrees are stressed; plants increase reproductive mechanisms; wildlife diseases increaseWater temperature increases; programs to divert water to protect fish beginRiver flows decrease; reservoir levels are low and banks are exposed D3 Livestock need expensive supplemental feed, cattle and horses are sold; little pasture remains, producers find it difficult to maintain organic meat requirementsFruit trees bud early; producers begin irrigating in the winterFederal water is not adequate to meet irrigation contracts; extracting supplemental groundwater is expensiveDairy operations closeFire season lasts year-round; fires occur in typically wet parts of state; burn bans are implementedSki and rafting business is low, mountain communities sufferOrchard removal and well drilling company business increase; panning for gold increasesLow river levels impede fish migration and cause lower survival ratesWildlife encroach on developed areas; little native food and water is available for bears, which hibernate lessWater sanitation is a concern, reservoir levels drop significantly, surface water is nearly dry, flows are very low; water theft occursWells and aquifer levels decrease; homeowners drill new wellsWater conservation rebate programs increase; water use restrictions are implemented; water transfers increaseWater is inadequate for agriculture, wildlife, and urban needs; reservoirs are extremely low; hydropower is restricted D4 Fields are left fallow; orchards are removed; vegetable yields are low; honey harvest is smallFire season is very costly; number of fires and area burned are extensiveMany recreational activities are affectedFish rescue and relocation begins; pine beetle infestation occurs; forest mortality is high; wetlands dry up; survival of native plants and animals is low; fewer wildflowers bloom; wildlife death is widespread; algae blooms appearPolicy change; agriculture unemployment is high, food aid is neededPoor air quality affects health; greenhouse gas emissions increase as hydropower production decreases; West Nile Virus outbreaks riseWater shortages are widespread; surface water is depleted; federal irrigation water deliveries are extremely low; junior water rights are curtailed; water prices are extremely high; wells are dry, more and deeper wells are drilled; water quality is poo

      A found poem, via Meg Bernhard.

    1. However, he added, “I don’t know of a medical society that doesn’t serve alcohol.” Even the attendees at the Research Society on Alcoholism get two drink chits at the opening reception, he said.

      ...oof.

    2. “When you extinguish a learned habit, it doesn’t disappear,” Koob said. “All you’re doing is replacing that habit with a different habit.” Volkow compared my behavior to a binge. “It’s an automatic compulsive behavior,” she said.

      I mean, sure, but when my dad used dumdums to stop smoking, that was still good. Do people imagine there is a life they can lead "clean" of all habits?

    3. Also, as a young father, I was thinking of the positive impact this could make

      What on earth? This is a step beyond the typical "now that I have fathered a daughter, I understand that women are people."

    4. I could manage a meal in a restaurant, but if anyone proposed a toast I felt as if I were inviting bad luck to the table by raising my glass of water.

      At work events, back when we used to have work events, my then-very-Russian org used to toast with juice or lemonade or tea or something. It was a nice equalizing bit of fuss.

    1. But here’s the truth: Annotation is just a comment box you can put anywhere on a web page. Some annotations are great! If you have a coherent community with shared goals and common values, they can be amazing and create something on a Wikipedia scale. But they have all the flaws of the comment box, too — namely, they’re a great place to see people be assholes to one another, and most people don’t much of unique value to add to the discussion.

      Why should I have to have a "coherent community with shared goals and common values" to make annotations valuable? Above, they're being snarky:

      “We could annotate ExxonMobil’s site everywhere they talk about green power! That’ll teach The Man!”

      But genuinely: shouldn't part of the promise of annotations be what they can introduce where people don't share goals and values?

    1. To my surprise, IRC is making a comeback

      Is it though

    2. The small web is for the rest of us. Those of us who don't live in America (or Germany), don't make six-figure salaries and can't even dream of flying to a meetup on another continent. Those of us who struggle to be heard at all.

      Analyzing the exclusivity of altweb movements in material terms divorced from "so can a non-technical person get into this" seems silly to me, given that... well... with the meaningful exception of their insistence on personal domain names, all the IndieWeb stuff is free too.

    3. Over on the IndieWeb wiki, Tantek Çelik claims the small web is just what they've been doing, under another name. Uh, no. Hands off. You already have a community, with a fancy brand name, international events and so on. Leave us alone.

      Both sides of this feel silly. The IndieWeb has way too specific ideologies to encompass what's nice about e.g. Neocities. On the other hand, if you look at the IndieWeb and see "ah, yes, corporatism" because... they have a fairly nice-looking logo... or something... then you are probably not looking in good faith.

    1. In fact, making a leaf-less salad not only expands your concept of what a “salad” could be, it makes you a more creative, more adaptable cook and vegetable-eater by removing a component you may have been leaning on a bit too heavily.

      Leafy salads are terrible! They are unpleasant flavor-wise and texturally and I don't care if they're good for me. I would always rather eat my spinach wilted. Claire Lower is the brave voice we need.

    1. And if you’re wondering about horrisonant, it’s “< stem of Latin horrēre (see horripilation n.) + sonānt-em sounding” and means “Sounding horribly; of terrible sound.”

      Cf. assonant, consonant, etc.

    1. Last Best Hope was inspired, Packer says, by “political pamphlets from other periods of crisis.” In the best tradition of Carlyle and Swift, he spends much of the first half of the book summarizing year-old tweets.

      This is... brutal.

    1. The end goal of both zine and indieweb technologies is ownership of your own identity without a filter. Before proceeding, let me put you in a good vibe with 666 casino where great casino games are placed on a site. Join today to receive awesome welcome rewards! Just as subcultures and those whose experiences are marginalized by mainstream media have flocked to zines to find community and express (possibly unpopular) opinions, the Indie Web has the potential to be a great tool for those who do not find corporate social media to fit their needs.

      I have never seen inline advertising like this. Dear Lord.

    1. That’s how London became a preferred place for Hollywood to record: a large population of well-trained musicians, whose union doesn’t insist on residuals. Several London-based singers I spoke with suggested that the reason Hollywood doesn’t record in, say, Germany as often is that singers in continental Europe have steadier income and are less dependent on session work. And once a producer decides that even London-based musicians are too demanding — well, then there’s always Prague or Budapest. The gorgeous voices you heard in a John Ford Western were the sound of unions and full-time employment; in a Hollywood score today they are monuments to the globalizing power of the gig economy.

      How many luxuries in our lives could be analyzed this way?

    1. Workers get paid when they accept and complete a delivery, and a gamelike system of rewards and penalties keeps them moving: high scores for being on time, low scores and fewer orders for tardiness, and so on. Chavez and others call it the patrón fantasma, the phantom boss — always watching and quick to punish you for being late but nowhere to be found when you need $10 to fix your bike or when you get doored and have to go to the hospital.

      Who is accountable for system behavior?

    1. In March, the researchers said Instagram should reduce exposure to celebrity content about fashion, beauty and relationships, while increasing exposure to content from close friends, according to a slide deck they uploaded to Facebook’s internal message board. A current employee, in comments on the message board, questioned that idea, saying celebrities with perfect lives were key to the app. “Isn’t that what IG is mostly about?” he wrote. Getting a peek at “the (very photogenic) life of the top 0.1%? Isn’t that the reason why teens are on the platform?” A now-former executive questioned the idea of overhauling Instagram to avoid social comparison. “People use Instagram because it’s a competition,” the former executive said. “That’s the fun part.”

      Elsewhere in the article, it says Facebook does not make the data available to outside researchers that they would need to really dig into potentially negative effects. This means public regulation based on public data is not going to be thorough or effective. In the absence of regulation, it's only Facebook's leadership and employees that can act on any findings, public or internal. Because of this, the mindset that tech industry people have on this issues is crucially important and disproportionately influential.

    2. In five presentations over 18 months to this spring, the researchers conducted what they called a “teen mental health deep dive” and follow-up studies. They came to the conclusion that some of the problems were specific to Instagram, and not social media more broadly. That is especially true concerning so-called social comparison, which is when people assess their own value in relation to the attractiveness, wealth and success of others. “Social comparison is worse on Instagram,” states Facebook’s deep dive into teen girl body-image issues in 2020, noting that TikTok, a short-video app, is grounded in performance, while users on Snapchat, a rival photo and video-sharing app, are sheltered by jokey filters that “keep the focus on the face.” In contrast, Instagram focuses heavily on the body and lifestyle. The features that Instagram identifies as most harmful to teens appear to be at the platform’s core. The tendency to share only the best moments, a pressure to look perfect and an addictive product can send teens spiraling toward eating disorders, an unhealthy sense of their own bodies and depression, March 2020 internal research states. It warns that the Explore page, which serves users photos and videos curated by an algorithm, can send users deep into content that can be harmful. “Aspects of Instagram exacerbate each other to create a perfect storm,” the research states.

      These claims are explicitly laid out as being specific to Instagram's design, not "teenage girls being teenage girls" or "social media is harmful".

    3. Among teens who reported suicidal thoughts, 13% of British users and 6% of American users traced the desire to kill themselves to Instagram, one presentation showed.

      Even a very small percentage swing in suicidality should be serious and notable. This portion is not very small.

    1. G & O owner Oil notes that the he’s already seeing this populist political effect. “Before electric assist and electric cargo bikes became as reliable as they are now, you’d see a very specific, very homogeneous type of person at city hall to speak up on behalf of cycling,” Oil said. “And they were typically wearing recreational clothing or they were typically retirees and most of them were men. Now those public hearings are always packed with mothers and young children, good people to listen when it comes to safety. The same thing goes for disabled people. Electric-assist makes cycling more accessible to people living with disabilities and mobility challenges.”

      I loved commuting on an e-bike, and I'm not The Type to bike. It's cool to hear that they're opening things up for people.

    1. “Once you teach a man how to shelter himself and feed his own face, then fuck you,” Tommy explains. “You can say that to everybody. It's a powerful thing. They don't want to teach you that. In fourth grade they should put seeds in your hand. They want control. But nobody else is in control—you are.”

      Except of course that each one of us would have perished at birth without our relationships of dependency

    2. The magazine was launched the same year as Gloria Steinem's Ms. and found a similar audience, with its distribution at one point hitting 9,000 copies.

      I gotta ask Mom if she ever subscribed

    3. I'd been thumbing through an issue of the Whole Earth Catalog, a compendium of self-help advice and product reviews, founded and edited by Stewart Brand, that became the bible for back-to-the-landers when it was first published in 1968. (Steve Jobs would later call it “Google in paperback form, 35 years before Google came along.”) What struck me most was the opening statement: “We are as gods and might as well get used to it. A realm of intimate, personal power is developing—power of the individual to conduct his own education, find his own inspiration, shape his own environment, and share his adventure with whoever is interested.”

      This says a lot about Google, and is supposed to be inspiring, yet strikes me as bleak...

    4. Berg didn't know it then, but when he joined the commune he became part of the greatest urban exodus in American history. From the late '60s to the mid '70s, nearly a million young people went back to the land. Nowhere was the urge to reconnect with nature more keenly felt than in San Francisco, where droves of young people were suddenly fleeing a city overrun by heroin, speed, and bad vibes. Cops were shooting down Black Panthers in Oakland and the military was tear-gassing students in People's Park in Berkeley. Vietnam veterans were looking for a salve for their PTSD. Faithful Marxists aimed to put their ideals to the test. Some just wanted to get high in the woods.

      There's something disconcerting about the pairing of the fate of the cities and this dramatic form of white flight

    1. a while back for april fools if you clicked the april fools link your icon got a little top hat on the dashboard, which accomplished nothing and literally only showed up on the dash and yet still annoyed enough people that they made userscripts to hide the hatsand i’m not gonna lie, i think there are a lot of people out there who might not pay to give their icon a little hat but who might instead pay one dollar to give another user of their choice a little hat for a day which could at any time and without recourse be overwritten by another user paying a dollar to give that icon a different hat for a day, leading to lucrative hat wars

      $1 for most hats, $2 for especially dumb hats, $5 for hat removal.

    1. Many communities-in-recovery follow some sort of shared rubric for identifying and relinquishing a desire to control or manage one’s own unproductive anger or resentment, not because the ideal state for the sober alcoholic is one of constant imperturbability, but because the delusion that repeated attempts to control one’s circumstances through sheer force of will is a particularly damaging one, and we are often able to live much more sanely and usefully on another basis. The design is not to rid oneself of the experience of anger completely. Anger is often a perfectly appropriate, powerful, necessary, practical, and even restorative state. Rather, the design is to seek out a steadier foundation for living, to distinguish our angers from our fears, our shames, our desires, our delusions, our hopes, our ambitions, our securities, and to seek out appropriate support, counsel, freedom, and possible courses of action (even sometimes possible courses of inaction, as the case may be).

      Anger not as a moral failure to purge, but as an unsteady option for a basis on which to live.

    1. It is “detracting from the enjoyment of the volunteer editors who actually contribute to this encyclopaedia,” he writes.

      Won't someone think of the volunteer Nazi-fans?

    2. The article tells how “the division acquitted itself well” even against “stiffening resistance,” how it “held the line” and earned the “grudging respect” of skeptical commanders. One contributor has used the eyebrow-raising phrase “baptism of fire.” It’s as if the editors don’t see the part lower down the page where a soldier uses the phrase “and then we cleaned a Jew hole.”

      I wonder if it's helpful when no-names like me can flag this kind of thing.

    3. In her neighborhood, she remembers fondly, there was a recycling kiosk that rewarded you with literature. “For this number of kilos of paper you could get these books,” she says. “Classics: Pushkin, Tolstoy. Reading was encouraged.”

      This isn't deeply related to the rest of it but I find it very charming.

    4. Coffman knows the book is legit, because she happens to have a copy on loan from the library. When she goes to the cited page, she finds a paragraph that appears to confirm all the Wikipedia article’s wild claims. But then she reads the first sentence of the next paragraph: “This is, of course, nonsense.”The level of bad faith is eye-opening for Coffman. She is “very appalled.” She sees that her confidence in Wikipedia was “very much misplaced.”

      There is probably a very disconcerting parallel within any "democratized" medium. Is the truth available simply for free the same truths available to those with free time and money?

    1. "No temperature rise is 'safe'," the editorial says. "In the past 20 years, heat-related mortality among people over 65 years of age has increased by more than 50%."

      Wow, what a number! This seems like a really clear figure to wave in people's faces.

    1. When successful, the website shall transmit a feeling of "unknowable depths" to visitors.

      I like this goal, and it's entirely at odds with the contemporary sense that you should present all your Content neatly arranged for your Users

    2. As an accessory to and representation of my person, the website should be continuous with my sense of "self" in a manner equivalent to e.g. my irl clothing.

      I wonder if so many people get nervous about this because they haven't sorted out how they express themselves with their clothing either?

    3. My limitations in making and organizing a website shall be considered acceptable

      Expressions of one's own incapacity are also expressions of self, just as much as showing off what you can do is.

    1. There are just only so many retainers a king can keep a personal relationship with – and so on down the line. Second, those retainers aren’t ‘on retainer’ to serve forever. They are obliged to a certain number of days of military service per year. Specifically, the standard number – which comes out of William the Conqueror’s settlement of his vassals after taking the English throne – was 40 days. The entire point of this system is that the king gives his vassals land and they give him military service so that no one has to pay anyone anything, because medieval kings do not have the kind of revenue to maintain long-term standing armies. It is no accident that the most destructive medieval conflicts were religious wars where the warriors participating were essentially engaged in ‘armed pilgrimage’ and so might stay in the field longer (God having a more unlimited claim on a knight’s time than the king).

      This is really interesting -- a weird limit on the duration of conflicts

    2. In that context – where the Romans are at war with an entire people, then the entire people became valid military targets. And the Romans behaved as such. Polybius describes the Roman process for sacking a city – “When Scipio thought that a sufficient number of troops had entered [the city] he sent most of them, as is the Roman custom, against the inhabitants of the city with order to kill all they encountered, sparing none,

      Insert my usual indignant muttering about how-dare-they-call-what-came-after-"the Dark Ages"

    3. While the Middle Ages was a period of frequent (small) wars, it also saw some of the first efforts to curtail violence in a general sense, arising out of the Catholic Church: the Peace of God and Truce of God movements. The Peace of God (10th-11th cent.) gave religious protection to the peasantry and the clergy (along with women and widows) as non-combatants. The Church encouraged knights and lords to swear oaths to the effect that they would not violate the peace by attacking the peasantry.

      Gotta read more on this!

    1. The mad schemes degrowthers advocate are a fantasy that distracts us from real efforts to save the planet

      Okay, this is the last one that gets me to unfollow this newsletter. "Because we've got these massive inequalities in global wealth and power, any fair approach to fighting climate change would penalize the people with all the wealth and power, and that's not possible, so we don't have to talk about it. Wouldn't you rather hear about how your standard of living can be further augmented? Never mind on whose backs." I don't even read a ton of degrowthy stuff; I could probably be convinced the disruption in the global economy would be bad for even the people the economy clearly now exploits -- but this just seems too blithely callous for me to want to read more of this guy's stuff.

    2. China and India and the rest will be able to take advantage of the efficiency-inducing technologies created by the developed countries, like solar power (indeed, they are already doing so). And they will be able to embrace “dematerialized” goods and services like social networks and video games (sorry, Xi Jinping) very early in their growth path. So these countries’ resource use trajectories won’t look quite like the U.S.’ or Europe’s.

      Sorry, how do video games decrease resource use?

    3. A lot of growth is figuring out how to substitute plentiful resources for rare ones

      Interesting if true, needs citation

    1. Now, normally when you ask what the ancients knew of the gods and how they knew it, the immediate thought – quite intuitively – is to go read Greek and Roman philosophers discussing on the nature of man, the gods, the soul and so on. This is a mistake. Many of our religions work that way: they begin with a doctrine, a theory of how the divine works, and then construct ritual and practice with that doctrine as a foundation.

      For the record, I don't really believe this is how our religions work either, but Protestantism introduced a fashion for saying so.

    1. Before I knew anything at all about the world, I could hear history traduced down through my father’s mother’s Arkansas accent, which distinguished her from the kin and kind of my mother’s mother, which endowed her with a different nature. Everything I have learned since, about the Dustbowl migrations, about class and identity in America, has been an accretion on top of that primary experience of my tabula-rasa consciousness. No knowledge replaces what was heard and seen and felt before anything was known, but only ever adds topsoil to the bedrock of those primary sensations.

      Some things my mother carefully kept me ignorant of, in order that I might learn other things. That ignorance was primary too, and constructed, not natural. The order in which you encounter truths is never insignificant.

    2. while the internet will probably tell you this was an instance of “appropriation”,

      This is not the only contrarian pick-me-ism in the piece, which is a shame

    1. Lihotzky, with all her research into pantry placement, didn’t seem very concerned when peasants' pantries were made fatally empty.

      This seems like a very bad-faith sentence.

    1. In doing so, DeviantArt created templates for later social sites, rolling out the ability to create avatars and write on each other’s profiles, the latter of which would eventually be adopted by Myspace and Facebook. In addition, “[DeviantArt] had the ability to follow people long before that ever became an idea,” Jarkoff explained.

      [citation needed], my friend. Those features felt pretty standard, at least by the time I was aware.

    2. When “Deliciously Deviant Deviant Art!” went live in August 2000, it focused on wallpapers and webskins

      Huh! I spent long enough on that website I ought to have known this.

    3. Broskoski, of are.na, who was involved in net art communities in the 1990s, remembered making a site called “Welcometohell.com,” which listed links to other websites—a common practice at the time. “You were sort of making or creating who you were by pointing at the other things that you liked,” he explained.

      This is one of the biggest motivations for me for how I approach the internet. "Blogging is pointing at things and falling in love."

    1. deliberately and carefully think about what is absent.

      Negative space is cited. "Who isn't in the room." What would a person never think about in this context?

    1. Array.from(document.querySelectorAll("li > span")).forEach(e => {if (e.innerText == "(1)" || e.innerText == "(2)") {e.parentNode.remove()}})

    1. That's one of the consumer impacts of Amazon is that there's this narrowing of the products that we see, and thus a narrowing of that we might find.

      blinks in BBW-MMF-werewolf-romance trend (Really, though, does this not count KDP as Amazon, or....)

    2. There's some data that shows that if you're in a physical bookstore, you're in a local bookstore in particular, you're about three times as likely to discover some book that you didn't know about that you'd like to read than if you're shopping on Amazon.

      I would really like to see this data, and also how it weighs up against people's frequency of visiting a physical bookstore vs. Amazon

    1. “As enclosure by the lords increased national productivity by denying the individual peasant to keep a few sheep,” Illich continued, “so the encroachment of the loudspeaker has destroyed that silence which so far had given each man and woman his or her proper and equal voice. Unless you have access to a loudspeaker, you now are silenced.”

      Hmm. What is the mythical before here where people had equal voices?

    2. What if we saw attention in the same way that we saw air or water, as a valuable resource that we hold in common? Perhaps, if we could envision an ‘attentional commons,’ then we could figure out how to protect it.”

      The job we do at protecting air and water is shoddy enough that I don't find this vision inspiring.

    3. the drive to render our experience quantifiable and subject to computational analysis. Life conducted within the metaverse is already reduced to data. If we were running up against the limits of profitably data-mining human experience in the so called “real world,” then translating even more of our experience into a realm of virtual simulacrum would open up a new frontier. Alternatively, if you’ve run out of physical goods to sell and physical spaces in which to place ads, then a new persistent virtual realm solves those problems.

      This sounds like it lends too much credence to the sales pitches of digital ad people. Better to say that people are starting to catch on to the true value of all the ads-ads-ads, so to have a new bubble to hawk, you must tell people it's a New Paradigm.

    4. There is now no time during which it is not possible to engage in commercial activity, and I am hard pressed to think of instances where it is discouraged by the force of custom or principle.

      Hosting still has this: you can't charge guests you've invited into your home for any aspect of the experience.

    5. This is not to discount the fact that digital media has, in fact, has been a boon to many, helping, for example, to alleviate the loneliness of those who might remain isolated and alone without it, or supplying opportunities for many who would’ve languished otherwise. But one can acknowledge and celebrate such things without disparaging “reality” or implying that a good life for most people will depend on their immersion in ever more elaborate digital simulations.

      And also: what can we learn about how we should shape our non-digital practices and spaces from the good that's come of certain attributes of digital culture?

    6. The problem is recast as one of ontological deficiency rather than economic or political failure. It suggests that what is broken is reality itself rather than what we have made of it. Thus the solution is building a technologically mediated simulation that can improve on this broken reality rather than the work of building a more just society.

      Yes, yes, yes.

    7. To note one recent example, when Clubhouse, an audio-only social platform, was a big deal earlier this year, it was not uncommon to come across someone claiming that it marked the return of oral culture, culture characterized by the spoken word rather than writing. (There were, to be sure, more and less sophisticated versions of this claim.) But this was always impossible. Better to say, I think, that Clubhouse or Discord might retrieve certain aspects of orality, but there can be no return to orality because you cannot undo the effects of literacy.

      This doesn't seem right to me. Within one discipline you can't "go back", maybe, but individuals are incredibly plastic and absorb different norms in their different spheres of activity. Socializing online used to be more literate, and now it's more oral, and saying it's Not Really That seems wrong.

    1. There is, however, one Fuggerei rule that remains difficult to enforce. Original residents of the Fuggerei were asked to offer three prayers a day for Jakob Fugger and his family. Several residents currently living in the complex were coy about their adherence to the rule. Several said they interpret it more broadly, spending a few minutes a day reflecting on things they're grateful for. 

      I don't know why this irritates me so much. You are paying $1.30 a year for an apartment and you can't be bothered to send up a "good luck, Fugger" when you eat?

    1. Readers of the future are likely to want even more digital content, but it may not look the same as it does now. Audible, which is owned by Amazon, has already made listening to books more like streaming, with subscribers gaining access to a shifting catalogue of audiobooks that they do not need to buy separately. “We have moved away from owning, to accessing,” Mirela Roncevic, a longtime publishing and library consultant, told me.

      Yes, we've moved from owning to accessing, but that's what I was always using the library for! In some sense, I don't like the emphasis on "isn't it weird that these books aren't like physical ones" because it's so important not to miss what's really going on: control shifting further to the most powerful/wealthy entities in this whole ecosystem.

    2. Books, like music and movies and TV shows, are increasingly something that libraries and readers do not own but, rather, access temporarily, from corporations that do.

      I was fine not owning books and accessing them temporarily from a library that does, because my library is democratically governed by my community for the good of all.

    3. But, Inouye added, OverDrive’s influence is an important counterweight to the largest publishers and to Amazon, which dominates the consumer e-book market and operates as a publisher in its own right. (Amazon did not make its own e-books available to libraries until May, when it announced a deal with the Digital Public Library of America.) When I asked Potash about the concern that consolidation could also give OverDrive too much influence over the market, he called that “a far-fetched conspiracy theory.”

      I feel like "well, we layered a monopoly over our slice of the market, but the other slices are also super concentrated so really we're the good guys" is not a great argument.

    1. The process starts with concept art, and then the artists start building props and other elements of the diorama. Once completed, the set is photographed, turned into a 3D model, and transported into the game engine, where it can then be enhanced with effects like lighting or fog.

      I adore photogrammetry in the creation of virtual spaces. There's one post from back in the day I'm still trying to find, from the same folks who later did this, I think, where they show a mushroom being scanned in. The physical creation of assets gives a totally different feel, like being able to move around inside a Laika set.

    1. Normally people solve this by simply block quoting themselves, but this is a waste of an opportunity. The indented block quote is a print medium invention almost as old as typesetting. The block quote is plaintext, it is not actually linked to the original text or its context. I’ve been experimenting with one idea for a solution, and if you’ve read the last couple blog posts you’ll have seen it there. My stab at an answer is an iframe which shows the quote within its original context and gives a hint at its surroundings. Effectively, it’s a transclusion within my own blog.

      I believe very firmly that this is the Correct way of doing such a thing. All the hairs on my arms stand up -- in a good way -- at the iframe being returned to semantic use.

    2. To quote yourself, you’ll need to create an <a> anchor tag in the markdown file for the post you want to quote. If you wish to highlight a specific piece of text, instead create a <span></span> around the section you want to quote. Note that this can only be on your own website—it doesn’t work cross domain.

      Boy, we of the Markdown persuasion sure do have some catching up to do with the outliners where this kind of thing is concerned...

    3. “Hypertext books,” online books which are made up of an abundance of interlinked HTML pages, are mostly unpopular. The failure of this experiment is, in my opinion, very revealing.

      I just don't think you can say this is true in a world where Wikipedia exists. Sure, "[facts] are only rendered meaningful within narratives", and linear narratives are the digestible ones, but non-linear structures enable the reader to construct a narrative via the linear encounter they have with the text. (Naturally, my supporting citation here is going to be "Taft in a wet t-shirt contest".)

      If I want to be a different kind of insufferable about this, I could say a (linear) path is necessarily created in the traversal of a graph.

    1. This was the original vision of the Web.

      Lots of "original visions" for things are worse than what supplants them. This isn't meaningful.

    2. I'll end with my original claim: If your personal website turns into an "app", you're doing it wrong.

      Do you like how the author never addresses the differences in functionality between the websites? If you want something that can't be done in a document paradigm, you are bad for wanting that, because documents are what the web is for, because everything that can be done in documents can be done in documents anyway.

    3. Like most websites, mckinley.cc doesn't need much more than basic formatting and hyperlinks, so why shouldn't it work well on NCSA Mosaic 2.7?

      This is putting the burden on an extremely weird side of the argument without justifying it. Why should one put any attention or effort into making it work on NCSA Mosaic 2.7? Do you have friends using that? How is this more reasonable than using a tech stack for fun?

    4. They are h2 tags, for some reason, and they require JavaScript to implement hyperlinking functionality. The user can't even see where the links go by hovering over them with his mouse. Why was it designed this way? I couldn't tell you

      Couldn't have anything to do with the fact the site was made by a college student, right? Who might still be learning? Let's just call it idiocy!

    5. Not only does it require over 200 kilobytes of JavaScript to put text on the screen, most of it is external JavaScript, served from a CDN.

      And why are all these restaurants serving foreign food? We're in America!

    6. You must also choose to allow the owner of that website to execute arbitrary code on your computer.

      I also prefer websites that work without js! But let's not pretend that Stallman constitutes the midpoint of the tech use spectrum...

    7. you must have a new or advanced enough Web browser capable of running a (probably poorly written) script to fetch the document and put it on the screen

      If we're complaining about term use, I would like to nominate "new" referring to 15+ year old stuff.

    8. Your serverless, headless, Micropub-powered personal website is unreliable precisely because you chose to introduce unnecessary complexity. Just use a static site generator like mkws and call it a day.

      What a nasty way to talk about someone's project linking to a post where they say

      It’s massively over-engineered! But that’s the point: learn, have fun and enjoy slowly hacking away after the kids go to bed.

      Yeah, screw fun and learning, amirite?

  2. Aug 2021
    1. I did not believe that a Cause which stood for a beautiful ideal, for anarchism, for release and freedom from conventions and prejudice, should demand the denial of life and joy. I insisted that our Cause could not expect me to become a nun and that the movement should not be turned into a cloister. If it meant that, I did not want it. “I want freedom, the right to self-expression, everybody’s right to beautiful, radiant things.

      I'm not going to pretend I'm well-read enough to have Thoughts about Anarchism, but "freedom, the right to self-expression, everybody's right to beautiful, radiant things" is something I am tucking deep into my heart.

    1. A 2017 study found a correlation between high levels of PFAS in the air and in human blood serum, and the new study used modeling that found that kindergarteners were probably exposed to more PFAS by breathing them in than by ingesting the compounds.

      Poor kiddos.

    2. Also notable are the types of PFAS that the study detected. Among the most prevalent was 6:2 FTOH, a compound used in floor waxes, stain guards and food packaging.

      One thing I've been really curious about is how the pandemic has changed what we've all been exposed to. I live in a new-construction building, and the ventilation is terrible For The Sake Of The Environment. Being in here means that whatever I'm breathing in, I'm breathing in a lot of.

      But there are no industrial cleaners in my home, no "commercial-strength" anything. Certainly no floor wax. How does this differ from being in an office or a school?

    1. For years, Netflix has identified its competition as “leisure” at large:“As discussed in our Long-Term View, we compete with all the activities that consumers have at their disposal in their leisure time. This includes watching content on other streaming services, linear TV, DVD or TVOD but also reading a book, surfing YouTube, playing video games, socializing on Facebook, going out to dinner with friends or enjoying a glass of wine with their partner, just to name a few.” - Netflix IR

      The varying value of all these things to the individual / society is staggering.

    1. You know this is how it works, right? It has to be. You can infer it from how bad the ads are.

      I like the universalization of anecdote. Actually, my Instagram ads are really great, and they're really great in ways that involve sophisticated profiling, and none of that has anything to do with the fact that I, a person who has never gotten a driver's license or learner's permit or owned even a fragment of an automobile, see car insurance ads on YouTube pretty constantly.

    2. Let's be clear: the best targeted ads I will ever see are the ones I get from a search engine when it serves an ad for exactly the thing I was searching for. Everybody wins: I find what I wanted, the vendor helps me buy their thing, and the search engine gets paid for connecting us. I don't know anybody who complains about this sort of ad. It's a good ad.

      This is where I discover the author has not thought as much about ads as they think they have.

      Consider: why would someone pay for this ad? What result would the search engine be incentivized to offer organically if no ad were present?

    3. Someone who works on web search once told me that they already have an algorithm that guarantees the maximum click-through rate for any web search: just return a page full of porn links. (Someone else said you can reverse this to make a porn detector: any link which has a high click-through rate, regardless of which query it's answering, is probably porn.) Now, the thing is, legitimate-seeming businesses can't just give you porn links all the time, because that's Not Safe For Work, so the job of most modern recommendation algorithms is to return the closest thing to porn that is still Safe For Work. In other words, celebrities (ideally attractive ones, or at least controversial ones), or politics, or both. They walk that line as closely as they can, because that's the local maximum for their profitability. Sometimes they accidentally cross that line, and then have to apologize or pay a token fine, and then go back to what they were doing. This makes me sad, but okay, it's just math. And maybe human nature. And maybe capitalism. Whatever. I might not like it, but I understand it.

      This deserves an essay. Is it fundamental to human nature that this be true? Are there other attributes that guide us toward this?

    1. I can hardly remember the days before I became a man of tungsten. How distant those days seem now, how burdened by the apparent heaviness of everyday objects. I laugh at the philistines who still operate in a world devoid of tungsten, their shoulders thin and unempowered by the experience of bearing tungsten. Ha, what fools, blissful in their ignorance, anesthetized by their lack of meaningful struggle, devoid of passion.Nietzsche once said that a man who has a why can bear almost any how. But a man who has a tungsten cube can bear any object less dense, and all this talk of why and how becomes unnecessary.

      I didn't want one before reading this.

    1. To Jeremy’s point, the onus should not be on web developers to keep track of older APIs in danger of deprecation. substr is an API that’s been in browser since, well, as far back as caniuse.com tracks browser support. alert, confirm, and prompt are the same. Green boxes back to the year 2002.

      It is now necessary to include megabytes and megabytes of instruments in a page to play MIDI files that used to Just Work. I resent this deeply.

    1. On questions of the divine and the ineffable, do philosophers really have more access to truth than, say, clergy?

      This isn't what the concept of "being out of your lane" is about.

    2. Who is to say that Dawkins is not a scholar of religion now?
    1. Get someone to review it Get a lot of someones to review it

      While this is good process, I don't think it's good advice. A lot more people could be doing a lot more cool blogging if they didn't view each post as a mini-book. I know I'm the type to endlessly flog The Garden and the Stream, but... we're on the internet. You can go back and improve things after they're out. You don't need to plan publication like a Supreme drop.

      It can also be true that a blog post can usefully be "hey look at this." Kottke here has a sentence of context, a chunk excerpted, then a chunk of his own reaction. This is a totally fine way to blog. More people should do more of it because it adds more value than letting algorithms sort things with hearts and upvotes.

    2. What should the title look like? yes yes yes: I discovered bees can talk but unfortunately they are racist i’m begging you not to do this: It’s not just Barry from Bee Movie who might have a secret The title should represent the post as much as possible. It should prepare the reader emotionally for the clown carnival ride you are about to take them on. It should be the opposite of clickbait.

      I've had a lot of fun approaching titling with the approach of attracting the reader who will enjoy the piece. One reason why the latter example is bad is that if I'm imagining spicy interpersonal (interbee?) drama, click through to find a bee soap opera, and then find an indictment of bee racism, I will be disappointed. If you find the detail "those pavé eternity rings were created because they needed to sell smaller diamonds from the Soviet Union" interesting, you're probably going to enjoy the whole longread linked to, never mind its main thesis. Sometimes just summarizing e.g. that "a merriam-webster.com editor had some fun writing about the words supposably and supposedly" does the trick.

    1. As we begin to rely on ever more complex technological systems, the shadow work required to support them balloons, as does the need for increasingly stringent, technocratic regulation.

      I'm not convinced "regulation" is a villain here, but I bet I'm missing a lot through not having read the book.

      I would love to have a good reference to point to about how computers' productivity gains aren't really realized through, you know, offices becoming unnecessary, so much as typists becoming spreadsheet masters.

    2. The importance of limits is a key touchpoint in Illich’s thought. He identified the “vernacular” domain as fundamental to the flourishing of human autonomy. From the Latin vernaculum, meaning “homebred, homespun, homegrown, homemade,” Illich took it to comprise the broad spectrum of agricultural techniques, building styles, culinary traditions, and language patterns that emerge when non-economic, non-standard modes of being are allowed to thrive.

      Cf. Tim Bray and efficiency. Also, cf. my own thoughts about everything I love in this world being somehow an expression of inefficiency.

    3. Here, he draws on Karl Polanyi, author of the 1944 book The Great Transformation, who saw the transition to a market-based system as a historical turning point in human relations. Polanyi famously noted that as the market comes to dominate, “instead of economy being embedded in social relations, social relations are embedded in the economic system.”

      ...woof.

    4. He saw modern-day institutions as successors of the Church, which evolved into a homogenizing, bureaucratic apparatus that made individuals dependent on its authority to fulfill the Christian vision of the good. In other words, stripping people of the capacity for autonomous decision-making and action — whether via professionalization, technocratic governance, or otherwise — is not always worth the added safety that regulation provides. As Illich writes in Tools for Conviviality, “institutions are functional when they promote a delicate balance between what people can do for themselves and what tools at the service of anonymous institutions can do for them.”

      This is very strange, because nothing about the Church as she is meant to be can possibly be read as "anonymous." I wonder if this is mostly non-Catholic reading of the text.

    5. In a memorable quote from Deschooling Society, he refers to the “pedagogical hubris” that is “our belief that man can do what God cannot, namely, manipulate others for their own salvation.”

      This also points to the idea that it isn't that -- you know, it isn't that people should build their homes without any access to expert knowledge any more than it makes sense to seek salvation outside of relation with the God Illich is comparing to.

    6. Modern humans have created instruments of such immense power that hyperregulation has become necessary to circumvent catastrophic harm. Since we have cars, most people would prefer that those permitted to drive them pass a test demonstrating their ability to do so without causing damage or injury.

      This rings hollow to me because I was just reading about the percentage of men who died of cart accidents in the haying season in medieval England.

    7. Meanwhile, employment in the formal economy can only be sustained by “shadow work,” a term Illich coined for unpaid tasks like domestic labor, grocery shopping, and car maintenance that drain people of time and energy for other pursuits.

      Weird to segment this out as "draining" when of course all of the "doin' it for ourselves" aspect of the pre-professionalized labor that's being idealized here is the same

    8. Whereas people used to build their own homes according to their unique specifications, today such an undertaking is discouraged, or even illegal. Instead, plans are drawn up by a licensed architect, and construction carried out by a team of wage workers. “When dwelling by people is transformed into housing for people,” Illich writes, paraphrasing architect John Turner, “housing is changed from an activity into a commodity.”

      Reminds me strongly of that piece about 2000s beige.

    9. Arguably, as careers have become increasingly specialized, we have ceded too many spheres of activity to experts, institutions, and markets.

      I am less interested in the idea of our needing to do those things by ourselves for ourselves, and more in the idea that "experts" and "institutions" and "markets" mean not just that we're not doing it ourselves, but that it's not being done within the context of a social relationship with the other who might do it / help us.

    10. Illich connects the creation of scarcity and the loss of specificity to the rise of professional authority on which we have become overly reliant.

      I really like this aspect, and I think it needs a lot more exploration by people who aren't just saying "and therefore let's all whittle our own spoons." I like how zine culture embodied an idea of "it's not that this isn't too important to do ourselves, it's that it's too important to leave to others."

    11. By erasing specificity — which encapsulates the history of each thing, its kinship with other beings, and its participation in a community that defines it according to its own cultural and social norms — the world can be reconfigured in terms of resources amenable to any and every use, and which are always in limited supply.

      Contra animism, which demands we consider each Thing as an entity with identity.

    1. You know you’re at least supposed to try to establish a sense of unity and proportion for the overall composition of your memory palace, right? Do you think your enemies have been going in there when you’re not looking and making it worse? Because that’s honestly the only explanation I can think of that makes sense. You know why it’s called a primary organizing detail? Because there’s just one. You can’t just slap a bunch of bell towers and colonnades wherever and think it’s going to result in a memorably-arranged, discretely-distinct floor plan. It’s not. I mean, it is memorable, but not at the level of detail. I remember that your memory palace is a fucking mess, but I wouldn’t put, like, a premise in there fore safekeeping. Great job cultivating a genteel retreat for your most private self inside your fucking mind, dude. I wouldn’t even put a fucking inference in there. Have some self-respect.

      As far as I can remember, this is a new ironically adopted tone for Daniel (among his many successful adopted tones, he might as well run a sanctuary for Senior Adopted Tones) and I'm loving it. 10/10

    1. Before reading any farther on this site, This website is not made for poser vamps, close-minded people, or those who think that they are, or claim to be a vampire because they think the spirit of a vampire entered them at some time making them a vampire. We call these people posers, which they are; they are confused lost children. This site is not here for them in any way! It is for real vampires, curious people, and open-minded skeptics.

      You know, I used to find this kind of thing incredibly cringe-inducing, but I no longer do. Sure, guys! Be "real vampires." Life's rich tapestry. Think of the chutzpah it takes to publish this, all the way out on Al Gore's internet where anybody can run into it. Fabulous.

    1. Fashion and the public space upon which it depends are both participatory zones in which culture is created, and neither is meant to be consumed individualistically. Fashion can be understood as a collective experience of the zeitgeist in which everyone can participate, which is open to innovations from outsiders. The tech industry would like to reimagine it as a series of fully instrumentalized status signifiers that attest to our social rank and are always already integrated into branded “universes” of intellectual property.

      This is a bit too shiny a view on fashion, I think -- consider its long-tortured relations with luxury and exploitation.

    2. Like its disdain for fashion, tech’s myopically optimistic take on the metaverse exposes its contempt for public space.

      What could make a virtual space public? Material structure, protocols, cultural norms...?

    3. Fashion on platforms is simply an informational commodity that translates into algorithmic rankings, ad valuations, and cash transactions. Those platforms monetize what was previously more difficult to cash in on: the everyday value in looking and being looked at — the process that constitutes Arendt’s reality. In digitally mediated or augmented spaces, the benefits created by fashion can be more readily captured by the wearer: The views, likes, and followers that accrue to an influencer or a brand equate to potential advertising revenue or direct merchandise sales, with less spillover. The value of that data also accrues to the platform itself, which can synthesize the behavior of its aggregate user base into far more valuable information products, such as ad targeting, trend identification, and other marketing efforts. Social media platforms thus structure a reality in which all “shared appearances” are also implicit transactions that can and should be priced. As long as fashion is happening in public, from this perspective, it is essentially a waste.

      How can I target my energies to positive "waste" externalities?

    4. In other words, fashion conveys not just specific trends or an individual’s personal style but a sense of the public itself, of shared space. Fashion implies a desire to see and be seen while affirming the need for public spaces and occasions where that seeing can occur. The manner in which fashion circulates and evolves speaks to the kind of shared reality that we are constituting for one another. To the tech world, however, those positive externalities look suspiciously inefficient. These unpaid-for pleasures are externalities that could, with the right technological fixes, be reinternalized and made into someone’s property again.

      One might also go down the belligerent psychoanalysis route toward our tech industry figures: if I can't be celebrated in this shared reality, if I struggle in it, if I'm not the one with power in it, then down with the whole thing!

    1. And it gets worse: recommendation algorithms are also known to have an anchoring effect, in which their output reinforces users’ unconscious biases and can even change their preferences over time.

      And it's so high-effort to change!! Ask me how I know

    2. An algorithm that interprets your behavior inside such a filter bubble might assume that you dislike people with darker skin.

      Bad phrasing because of the agency/consciousness in "assume"

    3. “In China, the beauty standard is more homogeneous,” she says, adding that the filters “erase lots of differences to our faces” and reinforce one particular look. 

      As does the older technology of cosmetics, of course.

    4. Amy Niu researches selfie-editing behavior as part of her PhD in psychology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. In 2019, she conducted a study to determine the effect of beauty filters on self-image for American and Chinese women. She took pictures of 325 college-aged women and, without telling them, applied a filter to some photos. She then surveyed the women to measure their emotions and self-esteem when they saw edited or unedited photos. Her results, which have not yet been published, found that Chinese women viewing edited photos felt better about themselves, while American women (87% of whom were white) felt about the same whether their photos were edited or not.

      This is fascinating! What does this have to do with the ways people see their social media as expressive vs. communicative?

    5. Historically, when African-Americans were enslaved, those with lighter skin were often given more domestic tasks where those with darker skin were more likely to work in the fields.

      This is a complicated thing for complicated reasons (sun exposure making causality work the other way, the rape of enslaved women) and I don't think it should have been included so summarily.

    1. I argue that these more feminized, pink-collar corners of the internet are also part of broader gig and piecework economies and help broaden the definition of “tech worker,” which is still often perceived in narrow, masculinist terms.

      I was interested in how these roles fit into "tech work" but that argument wasn't actually made in the piece. My instinct is that these piecework systems involve a vulture class (organizing capital), a tinkerer class (building the systems), and an exploited class (the gig workers, etc.). It isn't necessarily the tech skills necessary that define who's in the tinkerer vs. exploited class -- but analyzing "tech worker" maybe properly does involve limiting its scope to "builders of the system." And I do think that's a relevant category because... while interesting dynamics can arise contra system designers' intent, the kind of systems that make up modern "tech" industries have very unilateral control, especially where we start focusing in on following the money.

    1. AGAMEMNON How are women to master men? HECUBA Numbers are a fearful thing, and joined to craft a desperate foe. AGAMEMNON True; still I have a mean opinion of the female race.

      I'd like a different translation of Hecuba's line here to be sure I'm getting it right.

    1. I had always avoided writing about my sister’s death. At first, in my reticence, I offered GPT-3 only one brief, somewhat rote sentence about it. The AI matched my canned language; clichés abounded. But as I tried to write more honestly, the AI seemed to be doing the same. It made sense, given that GPT-3 generates its own text based on the language it has been fed: Candor, apparently, begat candor.

      Maybe this is why this is the first piece of art that deployed GPT-3 I've seen that actually feels real.

      It has something of the tone of someone echoing back what they think you said, trying to confirm.

    1. The Zohar comments on this verse that the word eleh, i.e., “these,” implies multiplicity, whereas the word mi, i.e., “who,” refers to the Creator. If we put these two words together and rearrange the order of the letters, it will read Elokim,[20] implying that Elokim is the source of multiplicity in the world. The name Elokim acts as an “interface” between the absolute oneness of the Creator and the multiplicity of the creation. If its modus operandi is from-one-to-many, it is the role of humanity to do the reverse—to sublimate the multiplicity of the creation into its source in the one Creator, from many-to-one. This is done by uncovering the underlying godly nature of the physical world and by revealing its hidden unity. The Tzemach Tzedek stresses that “even after multiplicity is created by the name Elokim, everything is included in the unity of Havayah just as before the creation of the world; and, in truth, there is no separate existence—all is one seamless unity.”

      I am not at all impressed by the segue into physics but there's something about the one-to-many, many-to-one here that's really valuable.

    1. By abstracting our interactions into a placeless world of symbolic interchange, which generates the conditions of what Jay Bolter has labelled digital plenitude, digital media appears to undermine rather than sustain our capacity to experience a common world, which in turn sustains a common sense.

      I'm not sure this is true. It seems clear there are ways in which it undermines it. Can't there also be ways in which it sustains it? "DAE", an initialism of the internet age...

    2. Illich believed that we need to rediscover modes of perception and a richness of sensory experience, which had been lost to us by our encasement in a human-built world.

      Cf. the "human-built" nature of the Mass, which is intensely sensory

  3. multiverse.plus multiverse.plus
    1. Humans are incapable of true multi-tasking, and as a species we have trouble keeping much at all in our active memories. Depending on the language you speak, there's somewhere between five and thirteen items you can keep in your head at once. The introduction of tabs into the toolbox of Web users single-handedly destroyed any hopes we may once have had of the Web being a source of infinite, global potential that could reach across borders and create a better, more meritocratic society.

      It's rare to come across a take so truly contrarian.

      I opened browser windows before I had a browser with tabs; in the days before whatever fun TCP multiplexing they have now, it helped maximize the juice I got out of our creaking dialup. I loved that when traversing Wikipedia, if your windows opened just to the right of the open window, you could go all the way down one depth-first rabbit hole and pop back up to the next path. Even if that non-linearity was less efficient somehow, I love it fiercely.

    1. At-home vet care

      I should probably write a blog post about this now that I'm a bit further out.

    2. Write on a post-it note affixed to a greeting card rather than on the greeting card itself, so the recipient can throw away the post-it and reuse your card Employ similar logic for any disposable/consumable item

      Hmm, I wonder how we could establish norms to make this work even as The Point is signaling you care enough to pick something out and spend a bit of money on it, write a nice note...

    3. Treat fines like payments E.g. park illegally and let yourself think of the (expected value of the) fine as a parking fee

      Wow, it's like someone wanted to boil down the asocial nature of wealth into four words!

    4. Engage a human productivity monitor I know two people who have hired people to sit next to them or frequently contact them to keep them on-task Examples: focusmate.com and coding-pal.com

      How do you do this if you work on confidential stuff? How embarrassing to reach out internally at your company.

    5. Travel to friends just to visit them Move close to friends

      What habits would I set up if I wanted to deploy my personal resources to getting to be closer to my herd?

    1. The choiceless mode of relating to meaningness has no “becauses.” In the systematic mode, when you ask “why,” a system answers “because…”. The “becauses” hang together in ways that make everything make sense. In the choiceless, or pre-systematic mode, that’s not necessary—or even conceivable.

      This is all unnecessarily condescending. Someone operating within a traditional context can say in answer to "why" "because it is traditional." When then asked "why is it good to do what's traditional" she can then point around her to everything she sees as good and explain how it comes from tradition. She can point to much suffering and explain how it comes from divergence from tradition. And if you then think, well, okay, but isn't that pretty circular, why did she decide those things are good if not through the same adherence to tradition, then I would point you off towards Foucault or Derrida or Nietzsche or whoever to ponder your own systems of justifications' circularity. Saying "ah yes we invented the systematic mode and this represents a fundamentally different approach" is giving too much credit to the modernizers' PR.

    1. a Westerner concerned about Islamic expansionism globally

      😒

    2. Genuine traditions have no defense against modernity. Modernity asks “why would you believe that?” and tradition has no answer (besides, perhaps, “we always have”). Modernity’s innovation was to construct systems of justification that answer all questions of meaning. Fundamentalisms try to rebuild their traditions into systems—in imitation of modernity.

      This is sort of right and sort of wrong. One justification amenable to tradition is social proof, that the right sort believes it. This is a heuristic, but not just a heuristic; scratch many of your own beliefs and you'll find it.

    1. Holding this bone, you have an extraordinarily intimate connection with its original owner, now dead. You will probably never touch the bones even of the people closest to you.
    2. You probably already have at least a couple of femurs around the house. However, it is usually best to find one whose original owner no longer has any use for it. This can be something of a challenge.

      The drying time alone makes this approach more sensible.

    1. According to Greg Woolf, “One of the things Mary has taught is to look at the window, not through it, because there isn’t really anything behind it.”

      This is incredibly postmodern, and I love it.

    2. This is also how she teaches – with an unusually sincere attachment to the principle that the pedagogical process should be rooted in an encounter, a relationship and a dialogue.

      An encounter, a relationship, and a dialogue -- marvelous that she's managed to maintain this even in publication.

    3. It was an unlikely project for a young classics don, but was an example of Beard’s pedagogical instinct in action: reading it, you can sense she didn’t want to waste painfully acquired knowledge if it could be useful to others.

      What an impulse! I love this.

    4. The learned but approachable figure you see on TV translating Latin inscriptions, carving up a pizza to explain the division of the Roman empire, or arguing about public services on Question Time, is precisely the Beard you encounter in private, except that in real life, she swears magnificently and often. (“She’s always spoken fluent Anglo-Saxon,” said Woolf.)

      Dear God what #lifegoals.

    1. Interestingly, this watershed did not receive wastewater treatment plant effluent, so it’s likely these compounds are coming from leaky sewer pipes. Improvements to aging infrastructure could reduce this source of harmful compounds to urban streams and other waterways, the researchers say.

      How about we do some of that for economic stimulus next time? Instead of a Cheesecake Factory bailout or whatever??

    1. That would probably be this article, which incorrectly states that there is somehow a lack of available dogs for adoption in New York City (there are a lot)

      Sorry, what? I went and looked and there are precisely two dogs under the age of 7 and under 25 pounds. There are a lot of dogs if you are looking to adopt a senior or if you are looking to adopt a pit bull mix. If you want to be snippy about people not wanting that, go ahead, but don't pretend that the shelter situation is normal these days.

    1. When they’re around you, non-gifted friends never want to discern their own spirits. “Can you tell me whether this is good or evil?” “Uhh, sorry, is this the influence of God, Satan, or the flesh?” I know it will take you a bit longer than it would take me, but you should at least try to figure it out for yourself.

      I am probably going to refer to this piece completely incomprehensibly every time anyone ever mentions "gifted kids" again.

    1. When in Wilmington, he mostly stays at home, though he sometimes leaves to attend Catholic Mass or to play golf.

      What a weird phrasing. One is a Catholic, and one attends Mass. Or one is Orthodox, and one attends Mass.

    2. The Biden administration has approved a significant and permanent increase in the levels of food stamp assistance available to needy families — the largest single increase in the program's history.

      Food stamps are one of the best things the government can spend on, and anyone enthusiastic about UBI should also support them. They have sometimes-cumbersome eligibility processes, but they make a huge difference for individuals and families, and their infrastructure is already set up.

      And from the economic side, they're one of the most effective things government can spend on to boost the GDP:

      The model finds $1 billion in new SNAP benefits would raise GDP by $1.54 billion, implying a GDP multiplier of 1.5.

    1. Farmers in Arizona will be the first to feel the pain of the cuts. In one county, farmers will receive 65 percent less water next year. The desert state continues to grow water-intensive crops like cotton and alfalfa in part because of the Central Arizona Project, a 336-mile long series of canals, pumping stations, and reservoirs that was completed in 1993 and draws from the Colorado River. The aqueduct has encouraged farmers to stop pumping groundwater, though many will undoubtedly restart the unsustainable practice as their fields begin to run dry. Others will have to switch to lower-water crops or let their fields lie fallow. Dry, fallow fields contribute to dust storms that envelop the region.

      How in God's name was this allowed to happen? Why would you think Arizona is the place for cotton, or cotton the thing for Arizona?

    1. As we sat in traffic and drove through Manhattan, one thing stuck out: the people in front of me only consumed content created within the last 24 hours. No exceptions. The structure of our social media feeds place us in a Never-Ending Now. It sucks us into a temporal myopia

      It seems to me that the most meaningful engagement is always with both now-and-the-past; a Jane Austen fan club has a vibrant and social Now even as it joyfully plunges its hands into the waters of the Past.

    2. Soon, I will experiment with “atemporality.” For days or weeks at a time, I will escape the present moment and only consume content published in a different decade.

      This is a fun idea. I once did a small version of this, seeking out new-to-me music from 1971 to 1973, years that seemed to dominate in my dad's musical tastes.

    3. By doing so, I’ll embody the mindset of people in a bygone era and gain new perspectives on the here and now.

      "Embody" is a big claim.

    4. I’d love to hear your feedback. Send me your thoughts, criticisms, and ideas in a direct message on Twitter. When you do, please don’t nitpick. Constructive feedback will lead to a more productive dialogue that’ll be better for both of us.

      In my world, whether a criticism is "nitpicking" or not is orthogonal to whether it is "constructive feedback".

    1. which substance(s) are you using, to what end, and how much range is there in your spectrum?

      One thing I think about is that this requires brutal honesty about the potential gaps between your intent and the result's effect. Probably this isn't something that a person can figure out alone. It requires social modulation, probably among others who understand the practice, to maintain healthily.

    2. Clubs are currently designed for drug use and are terrible places to be in when they’re empty or when you’re sober.

      There's also a lot of collective action problems. I've gone to a lot of shows where I could have a good time sober, but I needed the crowd to have drunk enough to get a better vibe. That... doesn't feel like an optimal system.

    3. In the traditional Alcoholics Anonymous model, sobriety is seen as a type of chastity, with purity and cleanliness achieved through total abstinence.

      Framing things that don't work that way as virtue and sin: one of the biggest throughlines through otherwise inexplicable phenomena in "rational" "secular" society.

    4. There’s no idealised level of fun that you’re missing out on, and that you need to achieve through drinking or doing drugs. This feeling of not being »enough« presupposes deficiency as a starting point, which is a capitalist logic leading to a market-based solution: you need to exchange money for a drink or a drug to make yourself better.

      Also interesting are the communal practices inducing trance-like states. What can get you where you want to be that you can't pay for?

    1. For some reason, a lot of smart college students end up with the idea that “solving hard technical problems” is the best thing they can do with their life. It’s a common refrain in Hacker News comments, job ads and interview questions. Why does this happen? Probably because that’s the only thing they’ve been rewarded for over the past 15 years. School is a closed-world domain—you are solving crisply-defined puzzles (multiply these two numbers, implement this algorithm, write a book report by this rubric), your solution is evaluated on one dimension (letter grade), and the performance ceiling (an A+) is low. The only form of progression is to take harder courses. If you try to maximize your rewards under this reward function, you’ll end up looking for trickier and trickier puzzles that you can get an A+ on.

      You also don't learn the social dynamics around ambiguity.

    1. (6) Speak to the healthy part of the person. Maybe your audience has bought some propaganda, or maybe they are wounded and acting out a trauma. Don't talk to those parts.

      This isn't a phrase I'd known; I like it.

    2. You may feel alone, but that just means that you haven't found your community yet. Although you are surely unique in many ways, you are also human, and you are a product of places and times. Whatever you care about, no matter how personal it feels, lots of other people care about it too. Your job is to imagine that community of practice out there, its members all thinking together, however quietly, about the topic that most concerns you. Your community needs a language, it needs an association, it needs a clubhouse, and it needs a voice. Your voice. That's how it works. Your zine is your hook in the ocean, your magnet attracting all of the other people who share your values. As you hear from them, you will have the interlocutors you need to develop your voice. You'll never hear from most of them, but you can imagine them. Imagining your community also prevents burnout: your community's members are all out there doing great things, and so the whole weight of the world is not on your shoulders. Burnout helps no one.

      The internet community as half imagined, half real...

    3. Caring about something is a big deal, and it's hard for some people. It's not just being against something, and it's not just wanting to have a community. It means having values that make the world make sense. Once you know what you care about, then you can hunt for a community. Maybe that community already exists, or maybe you have to build it.

      What a wonderfully utopian place to begin with, thinking about the possibilities of the internet!

    4. When speaking in public, you do not have the same immediate feedback from your audience. The public audience is diverse, you only hear from a few of them, the ones you hear from are not representative, and you don't get their responses in real time. As a result, where the internalized interlocutor in your head should be, instead you have a vacuum. The natural mechanisms for internalizing an audience don't work, and the results can be painful. You may sit down to write an op-ed column for the newspaper, and find that nothing comes out, or what comes out sounds nothing like an op-ed column. You aim, but you shoot wide, and the result doesn't even sound like you. You *feel* that vacuum, and it sucks all kinds of paranoid fantasies into it. That is where stage fright comes from, or freezing up at the idea of contributing to an online forum.

      Since the internalized interlocutor is so often made up from only what one thinks about another person, not their real internal experience, it's easy for the imaginative sort to construct one out of people never met. Oscar Wilde always gave the impression that his funny bits were things he found funny, not jokes told for the amusement of the masses -- at least not on a first-order level, only on that higher-order Freudian etc. etc. level.

    5. To have a public voice, you must learn to combine two seemingly contradictory goals: being true to your own experience and values while also serving as a consciously designed intervention in an ongoing public debate.

      Does this characterize the way I feel about my website?

    1. In Lewisham, a 9-year-old girl had seizures for three years before dying as a result of a polluted road nearby. And I hear that and ask, would it be so bad to get rid of cars entirely. Which sounds like a huge loss of life and pleasure to people who are accustomed to a driving way of life, who like getting about; but had Lewisham council proposed we sacrifice a 9-year-old and scatter her blood on the site of the road ahead of building, it would have been shocking. But the child would be no less dead.

      ....the trolley problem indeed.

    2. But the reality is that, most of the innovations of modern living don't benefit me

      This is something I don't think a person can know without having lived without modern living.

    1. But buried in Internet Kraken’s analysis is an unconscious proposition that we’ll call the “Systemic Stability Principle”:If the change in the systems outputs can be explained by a change to the systems inputs, then the system itself didn’t change, only the inputs.The mistake Internet Kraken (and the rest of us, implicitly) made was assuming that because experience with Cheibriados characters could explain Brannock’s sudden improvement in winrate, then it must be the whole explanation; when, in fact, it was experience plus the double damage bug. The Systemic Stability Principle is clearly false. But why did we make this unspoken assumption? Answer: because believing in the Systemic Stability Principle makes you good at Dungeon Crawl: Stone Soup, and many other things besides. In fact, it’s almost a prerequisite to improving in highly formal domains! If you die of more damage than you were expecting and tell yourself “that one must have been double damage”, then you can’t learn anything. All of that stuff I said earlier about rigor and self-improvement starts with you holding the system constant enough that you can evaluate your changes over time. In a well-designed roguelike, it’s hardly an exaggeration to say that the more you can internalize the Systemic Stability Principle, the better you’ll be.

      This is also an interesting reason that people want to play games like this in the first place. Reality can be full of ambiguity and shifting circumstances. Nice clean formal domains are like sugar to the mind (part of mind? kind of mind?) that does well at this stuff.

    1. A major survey in the UK six years ago found one in three young women considered garments “old” if they had been worn just twice. 

      What the fuck

    1. The first sees Americans as victims of past injustices in need of redress, which implies an inferior status by group.

      If I take away Mary's apple, then give her an apple, and I leave George and his apple alone, have I implied George inferior by not including him in the group of "people to whom I gave an apple"? Have I implied Mary inferior?

      There is a certain obdurate refusal to consider past injustices as part of current reality, and it ends up sounding a bit like this: a lack of social object permanence.

    2. In defining and calculating fairness by ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, disability, and other categories, equity divides Americans along exactly these lines.

      Wouldn't the argument be that equity begins its calculations in the world where Americans are already divided along those lines, and it doesn't pretend not to see those divisions? Packer seems to be doing the "if I close my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears, that's fairness" laicity or whatever, and I'm not impressed by it.

    3. It would diminish the all-or-nothing stakes of obtaining a degree from the right college by, for example, raising the status and improving the conditions of jobs that don’t require one.

      No one wants to talk about how this is actually a bit more zero-sum than this lets on...

    4. “You can’t expect civic virtue from a disfranchised class,” Walter Lippmann wrote in 1914. And also: “The first item in the program of self-government is to drag the whole population well above the misery line.”

      I'm not convinced by Packer, but I sure do like this line.

    5. Equality also leads to the individualism that always threatens to tear apart our social bonds and make this country ungovernable. In a society of equals, people focus on their own affairs as if they owe nothing to others and expect nothing from them.

      Does it? Do they? How linked are these things really?

    6. His out-of-touchness has allowed him to avoid most of the traps that lie in wait for Democratic politicians. When it comes to the culture wars over issues like race and gender, crime and policing, and immigration, Biden comes down on the side of common decency and common sense, then he moves on.

      Ah, yes. Biden. Famous for not getting real involved in politics over... crime.

    7. Instead, Free America answers the ambitions of the business class and corporations; Smart America describes the utopia of educated professionals; Real America voices the resentments of the white Christian heartland; Just America believes in a metaphysics of group identity that divides the working class.

      Notice how he can't bring himself to say "Just America expresses the discontents of young and nonwhite Americans" in a construction parallel to the others, because that wouldn't adequately convey how much scorn he feels for this last.

    1. But I’m interested in this as a sort of lifecycle of information. An idea starts out with what it means to you, the “I” in this situation. Then it pings around a social network and is discussed (the “you” phase). And then in the final phase it sort of transcends that conversation, and becomes more expository, more timeless, less personal, more accessible to conversational outsiders.

      Hmm. Is this true?

      I often feel like the connections people make are exactly the most personal part, and necessarily must be sloughed off as one tries to explicate the essence of the thing in Wikipedia-like neutrality. My annotations often look nutty for that reason -- because an anecdote someone's telling about mushroom hunting isn't at its core an expression of a narrative that then inherently calls out to be categorized as such in a way that I can then say "this reminds me of the cozy web".