521 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2016
    1. probably receive a teaching award

      Actually students are good judges. They tend to award these for good teaching, not for lolz Of course, when you're well taught, you often enjoy it.

    2. that lectures rank well below Twitter, Tumblr, or Snapchat.

      You know that saying about any teacher who can be replaced by a recording should be? Well, if you are not engaging students so they are turning to their phones, then who's likely to be to blame for that?

    3. half of my humanities students

      But this does not say anything about other students, or give reasons why they don't want to be there (I am avoiding making an obvious inference here ...)

    1. We strived to make our work as participant-researchers transparent and dialogic by sharing tentative findings and engaging in dialogue about our inquiries into learning in CLMOOC online, as well as offline in conferences with CLMOOC participants in attendance.

      Being open about what we are doing as participant researchers is vital - always give opportunities for opt out and remind folk that conversations might be used.

    2. Responding participants either requested to have their online identities remain connected to their professional learning artifacts by affirming the use of their first names, or indicated they would like a pseudonym used.

      I think this is important. Creators have a right not to be anonymised in research if they wish

    1. This finding confirmed the excitement and motivation that an experimental pedagogy can generate,but alsorevealed more negative outcomes experienced by someparticipan

      Isn't this just true of all pedagogies?

    Tags

    Annotators

    1. Above ground it may look like a forest of many different trees, but it’s actually a single giant sprawling root.

      I don't think that botanical metaphors are helpful. This is better imo: "Wasp and orchid, as heterogeneous elements, form a rhizome." ATP page 10

    1. hides conversations

      Notice how our conversations are fractured - they are on the blog, in the margins, on Twitter, G+, Facebook, other blogs. Not all of us are in all of those places yet there is nothing elite about any of them. This is interesting.

    2. “this is not metaphor”

      Saying something is a metaphor is saying that one thing is a bit like another thing. D&G are not saying that. They are saying that the rhizome is a concept - a thing. The orchid and the wasp are not a bit like a rhizome, together they become a rhizome.

    1. STORY.

      "In personal communication, Dave said, 'D&G hate the word metaphor… I have certain feeling[s] about how the word translates into English. It's the reason I now use the word story.'" Here

    1. I don’t think it makes sense to talk about technologies until everyone has a passing comfort with them.

      Pfff. If Terry/Kevin are comfortable and I am not (yet) I'm happy to talk about them.

    2. cheating and sharing

      No. Because cheating implies something covert, whereas collab learning acknowledges that sharing is going on (and that often it's not poss to say who owns or invented an idea)

    1. This is the most rhizomatic end of the continuum. From here students are not only engaging with the content, making knowledge with it in their own way, they are starting to make connections with that content. Learning how to use it with their peers, to build and make stuff with it, is an important step towards internalizing a context. To being able to work within a context… to learning.

      How is this different than connectivism?

    2. refers to a responsibility on the student’s part for the creation of things they are going to learn.

      But you can have this with behaviourist models as well. It might be necessary, but it's not sufficient as a definition?

    1. Detail your learning journey I’m going to learn WAY more from the ways that you have learned than from the final product of that learning. What wrong turns did you make? What were the important lessons that allowed you to move forward? What good ideas did you have that you didn’t have time to follow up?

      Yes. Celebrating failure is also important

    2. new understanding, or to get a sense of a new context

      Or they are old friends joining together to play, or to be more than the sum of their parts. Need not be anything new about this.

    1. sometimes you need to remember

      No - sometimes I just will be the person who remembers. I don't need to carry memories around in case someone else needs them. (I used to often be the person who had a light as I smoked. One I stopped I was not that person any more.)

    1. Addressing this feeling of loneliness as a natural part of the process and something that a person can do something about with focused effort might be just the thing that some students need.

      How would this be addressed?

    1. none of these barriers here

      I think we do. One problem is that we don't know what will offend others, what they assume should be going on. The danger is we broadcast our western ideals out and do not notice that our community is not "really" diverse.

    2. Then, it meant you could recite the whole poem from memory. Now, it generally means you know what the title refers to, and may know the gist of the story. The the act of knowing (and by extension, the act of learning) is impacted by the technology available at a given time. How would The Odyssey have been taught 2500 years ago or a 1000? A hundred? How can we teach it now?

      More importantly: his is it learnt nowadays

    3. whereas after the printing press it necessarily would.

      Surely not. So the blind can't be knowers? Some used to look down on dyslexics for not being clever enough to raad, but I hope we're beyond that now.

    4. t it’s tough to say it’s important in the same way.

      Depends what you're taking about. I can do mental arithmetic more quickly than any machine, and that memory is not challenged by the internet.

    1. cons

      I think there is the possibility that the annotations will get messy as more than one cohort tried to annotate the same page. There will be good and bad things about this, of course, and using a group to share to can keep the comments confined, but this won't be to everyone's taste

    2. What are your experiences w open annotation in teaching, learning?

      I use it to play lie this as I chat with friends, and I am also using it (alongside Zotero) to build up a body of annotations for my own research topics.

    1. A system of this kind could be called a rhizome. A rhi-zome as subterranean stem is absolutely different from roots and radicles. Bulbs and tubers are rhizomes. Plants with roots or radicles may be rhizomorphic in other respects altogether: the question is whether plant life in its specificity is not entirely rhizomatic. Even some animals are, in their pack form. Rats are rhizomes.

      Definition of a rhizome

  2. Feb 2016
    1. How frequently should readers annotate a course text

      How often should they (we) read it? Should they (we) begin annotating straight away, or should they (we) read first then annotate later?

    1. will

      Is this an impossibility? Could there be schools that taught this? Or is this just the case for ideological reasons? (E.g. it's against the interest of a neo-liberal state?)

    1.  including graduate education, online learning, and asynchronous text-based discussion.

      Are these never designed for play? Again, I think that this is too strong a statement - not traditionally designed for play? Not typically?

      By contrast, things like #rhizo #clmooc etc are explicitly designed for play imo

    2. “Playfulness assumes one of the core attributes of play: appropriation. To be playful is to appropriate a context that is not created or intended for play”

      This strikes me as an odd definition. I don't think I agree with it. Chambers agrees wih me:

      playful adj 1 full of fun; frisky. 2 said of a remark, etc: humorous. playfully adverb. playfulness noun.

    1. In the real world, however, highly unionized areas of the country, such as the Northeast, produce students with scores higher than the national average in standardized tests; the Deep South, where union teachers are more scarce, produces scores that are lower.

      Correlation or cause?

    2. we are failing to produce an effective workforce;

      I loather the neo-liberal reduction of education to training for the capitalist machine. What about producing good citizens? Well rounded humans? Happy people?

    3. Everyone celebrates his or her personal memory of individual teachers, yet, as a culture, we snap at the run-down heels of the profession.

      Isn't this always the way though with generalisations?

    Tags

    Annotators

    1. s useful as an instruction manual for a derelict ship's engine.

      Less useful, perhaps - as the instruction manual might give hints on how to build a new engine, or mend a similar one.