2 Matching Annotations
- Mar 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
This is a copy of the "AMD" document in the repo, kept here to maintain historical links. If this document differs from the one in the repo, the repo version is the correct one.
Why not just make this document empty (besides a link) and link/redirect to the canonical version?
That way it is impossible for them to disagree.
Tags
- avoid duplication: impossible for them to disagree/diverge if there's only one version/copy
- I have a question about this
- maintaining redirect/copy at old URL in order to maintain historical links (broken links)
- canonical version
- avoid duplication
- make it impossible to get wrong/incorrect
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2018
-
readwriterespond.com readwriterespond.com
-
With Radio3, the publicised links connect to the corresponding site, whereas when I bookmark using my site, it shares the link to my post rather than the original site. This has me rethinking why I bookmark and POSSE. Maybe I do not need to share links to the original source, especially when my bookmarks have secondary information.
I wonder about this sometimes as well and have even contemplated crazy machinations for changing the canonical URL of my own posts to point to the originals.
I'm still a long way from figuring this out completely.
-