for
- scientists warning
- 2024 state of the climate report
- adjacency - 2024 US election - Trump - scientists warning - state of the climate - cognitive dissonance - 4P knowledge framework
- Johan Rockstrom, Michael Mann, William Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Timothy Lenton, Jillian Gregg, Naomi Oreskes, Stefan Rahmstorf, Thomas Newsome
adjacency
- between
- 2024 state of the climate report
- scientists warning
- political polarization
- Trump reelection
- climate communication
- cognitive dissonance
- adjacency relationship
- The scientists warning are having limited effect as a tool for mass climate communications
- The fact that so many people are supporting climate denying candidates like Trump demonstrates the cognitive dissonance and lack of effective climate communications strategy
- It is insightful to analyze from 4P knowledge framework:
- propositional knowledge
- perspectival knowledge
- participatory knowledge
- procedural knowledge
- Every person is situated and located somewhere unique and specific in life
- 4 P knowledge is concurrent
- When climate scientists communicate propositional knowledge via mass media, it is a kind of broadcast message that can lose salience if the other 3 types of knowledge have a mismatch:
- without perspectival knowledge context, the knowledge can have no meaning or priority
- without procedural knowledge, the knowledge is theoretical and does not lead to a better life
- without participatory knowledge, the receiver feels alienated