2 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2023
  2. Local file Local file
    Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
    1
    1. parikshith91 27 Apr 2023
      Clearly this type of reasoning has an argumentation scheme. One premisedefines or describes a goal. The other premise describes a means of achieving thegoal. The conclusion directs the agent towards action to carry out the means.6But this type of reasoning is so common and distinctive, having manyvariants and subspecies of argumentation, that it is misleading to call it anargumentation scheme. Better to call it a type of reasoning that can be used inargumentation in different types of dialogue (as in Walton, What Reas., 1990).
      • Agential Network
      • Case and Inferential Qualifications
      • Conclusions and Goal Relations
      • Normative Framework
      Agential Networks Inferential Qualification Case and Statment Sequence Normative Reasoning Frameworks Important

    Tags

    Annotators

  3. Aug 2020
  4. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    No Effect of Partisan Worldview on Corrections of Political Misinformation
    1
    1. katietaylor_99 24 Aug 2020

      Ecker, Ullrich, Brandon Sze, and Matthew Andreotta. ‘No Effect of Partisan Worldview on Corrections of Political Misinformation’, 20 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bszm4.

      is:preprint lang:en partisan worldview political misinformation corrections reasoning world-view driven motivated reasoning asymmetrical politically-conservative worldview effects inconsistent embezzlement inferential reasoning Republicans Democrats
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/bszm4/