5 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. CAPÍTULO 5: FORMULAR LA PREGUNTA DE LA REVISIÓN YDESARROLLAR LOS CRITERIOS PARA INCLUIR LOS ESTUDIOS

      CAPÍTULO 5: FORMULAR LA PREGUNTA DE LA REVISIÓN Y DESARROLLAR LOS CRITERIOS PARA INCLUIR LOS ESTUDIOS

    Tags

    Annotators

  2. Jan 2023
  3. Nov 2022
    1. PDF summary by Cochrane for planning a meta-analysis at the protocol stage. Gives guidance on how to anticipate & deal with various types of heterogeneity (clinical, methodological , & statistical). Link to paper

      Covers - ways to assess heterogeneity - courses of action if substantial heterogeneity is found - methods to examine the influence of effect modifiers (either to explore heterogeneity or because there's good reason to suggest specific features of participants/interventions/study types will influence effects of the intervention. - methods include subgroup analyses & meta-regression

  4. Nov 2021
  5. Aug 2018
    1. . ‘no reliable evidence’ does not seem an accurate reflection of the body of evidence”;

      From an e-mail conversation with an employee of Cochrane Australia about this claim:

      Happy to give some background to this.

      Cochrane Australia was contracted by NHMRC as technical advisors to provide a methodological assessment of the NHMRC Homeopathy Review (a review of the evidence that was undertaken by a third party). The statement quoted below (with vital text omitted) comes from our technical report. It’s our understanding that our report was obtained through an FOI request by Brauer; it’s not publicly available.

      We addressed this issue last year when we were contacted by The Guardian, see https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jun/30/homeopathy-company-investigated-over-ebook-advocating-treatment-of-babies.

      The statement from the report is a technical comment on generic wording used in the Review. In our report we repeatedly agree with the conclusions of the NHMRC Homeopathy Review, as reiterated in the quote from The Guardian article. The deletion of text by Brauer is misleading. (We’re essentially making the general point that you can have reliable evidence that there is no evidence of effectiveness.)