Most companies where I worked have a history of rebuilding their applications every 3 to 5 years, some even 2 years. This has extremely high costs, it has a major impact on how successful the application is, and therefore how successful the company is, besides being extremely frustrating for developers to work with a messy code base, and making them want to leave the company. A serious company, with a long-term vision, cannot afford any of it, not the financial loss, not the time loss, not the reputation loss, not the client loss, not the talent loss.

It is prudent to maturewell before improvements are adopted. Improvements rashlyintroduced may give cause for regret when it is too late to turn back.

மனதிலிருந்த கதையில் இருந்த மாயக்கொப்பளிப்பு புறயதார்த்தத்துடன் ஒன்றவில்லை. ஒரு செவ்வியல் காவிய வடிவை உருவகித்தபின், செவ்வியல் அளிக்கும் வடிவச் சுதந்திரத்தைப் பயன்படுத்திக்கொண்டு உள்ளே யதார்த்தவாதம் உட்பட எல்லாவகையான எழுத்துமுறைகளையும் கையாளும் வெண்முரசின் எழுத்துமுறையே இதற்கு உகந்தது. ஆனால் அதைக் கண்டுபிடிக்க பன்னிரண்டு ஆண்டுகள் மேலும் தேவைப்பட்டிருக்கின்றன. இது ஒரு மானசீகமான பாவனைதான். ஆனால் இதுதான் இலக்கியத்திற்கு அடிப்படையானது. ஆசிரியன் தன்னை எப்படி நினைத்துக்கொள்கிறான் என்பது. நான் என்னை ஒரு ‘காலம்கடந்த’ கதைசொல்லியாக உருவகிக்கவேண்டியிருந்தது. மாநாகத்தில் இருந்தது ஒரு அரசியல். வெண்முரசில் எல்லா அரசியல்களும் உள்ளன.

Not sure how to add content to GitHub? Check out our guide

See what’s expected

View Template

Please follow the Naming Convention guidelines found in the writing style guide.

Note-Taking Formatting Guide

Note-Taking Team Process

Note-Taking Template

See summaries of past meetings

Consult the Writing Style Guide and Reviewer Guides for additional information.

Do not use backticks when referring to generalized system language.

Table of ContentsStandard Operating ProcedureGetting StartedRolesWorkflow

**Summaries** Read summaries of past meetings

**Frequent Topics** See what's discussed in meetings

**Audio Recordings** Listen to past meetings

Earn Dai by Taking NotesNotes are a primary way to document discussions and decisions. They make the content more accessible to the people who can't make the meetings or don't have time to watch the full recordings.Join our Summary Team, and we’ll pay you!

Discussion PlatformsWriting Platforms

In studying economics, we will explore ideas such as:

You might not always notice, but Material Design is constantly evolving and iterating based on research.

This is a breaking change so it'll have to go into a major release. I was working on a v4 release but it's too much. I think I'm going to pair it back and we can add this to the new v4. When I have that ready, I'll rebase the merge onto that branch.

If we renamed things more often, then it probably wouldn’t be so hard to name them in the first place.

Got a bit sidetracked into refactoring the Element visitor code, so haven't actually started on the event handler stuff per se, but that'll come soon. Element stuff is starting to feel a bit more logical and easier to follow.

It is important to notice that if you are planning on making your application a PWA, you don’t have to rewrite all the logic.

that will advance justice and opportunity for college athletes. The proposal will guarantee fair and equitable compensation, enforceable health and safety standards, and improved educational opportunities for all college athletes.

the institution of a far less expensive, voluntary intramural system that is typically practiced at the community college level. 

But maybe this PR should still be merged until he finds time for that?

You are not sure which path to take between the big re-write or continuous improvements(using refactoring)

With a single file in the repository, everyone with read access can see the contents, making it much more inviting to improve and review the build scripts.

However, since problems are only addressed when they arise, maintenance is reactive rather than proactive. Small problems left unaddressed can balloon into major failures due to focus on cost.

Potential for political focus on building new features over technical improvements (such as refactoring)

Open science is about the way researchers work, collaborate, interact, share resources and disseminate results.

This box is all about organic then local