这一巨大的认知鸿沟揭示了AI领域中的严重沟通危机。专家和公众对AI影响的看法存在显著分歧，可能导致政策制定过程中的脱节和社会对AI技术的抵制，需要更好的公众参与和透明度。

高管与员工之间52个百分点的信任差距揭示了AI实施中最危险的断层。这种信任鸿沟不仅阻碍了AI工具的有效使用，还可能导致组织内部的严重分裂，最终影响AI投资的回报率。

令人惊讶的是：员工与高管之间在AI信任度上存在惊人的52个百分点差距。这种巨大的信任鸿沟揭示了决策层与执行层对AI技术价值的认知差异，可能导致技术投资与实际需求严重脱节。

• for: hard problem of consciousness - UTok, question - consciosness - UTok mind 1a, Gregg Henrique

• comment

• question - consciousness - UTok mind 1b
  • This is a great diagram and conveys a lot in a succinct manner.
  • However, I have a gut feeling that the Mind 01a is not quite the right representation
  • If language and analysis is in the Mind 3 domain, then it is combined with Mind 1b as neurocognition is itself a mental construction, rather than an object
  • All this addresses that there is a deep entanglement between many scientifically analytically rich "objects" and constructed ideas
    • Scientific objects are spoken about and mixed with non-scientifically-laden objects in the world as if they are one and the same. They are not. Scientifically-laden objects have a huge amount of analytic theory behind them. Without familiarity with that theory, the object loses its validity, especially to the lay person.
    • This could be a possible explanation of why scientists are losing their credibility in modernity and giving rise to alternative facts, misinformation and fake news
      • https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/

Larson, H. J., Cooper, L. Z., Eskola, J., Katz, S. L., & Ratzan, S. (2011). Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. The Lancet, 378(9790), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8