then growth-oriented interests are necessarily excludedfrom city politics
There is no fight to begin with
then growth-oriented interests are necessarily excludedfrom city politics
There is no fight to begin with
often in response to threats totheir quality of life
NIMBY
has been the primary catalyst of metropolitan growth.
People are moving into places that are just homes, this is where you might consider the east side very different
continued to be nestled close to industrial areas. It was onlywith the advent of the streetcar and the automobile that the proximitybetween work and home began to widen and an entirely new type ofplace arose, the bedroom suburb
Sprawl
thereby limited in the powers theycan wield
Talked about this in class
Yonkers, Mount Vernon, and Port Chester,which are seeking jobs and economic growth.
Urbanizing the suburbs
he type of place typically equated with politicalcontroversy
Lol
de-pends upon active citizens and municipal cohesion
Which suburbanization deteriorates
suburbanization offers great promise for nur-turing America’s civic health
Sort of great personal ties in theory
In general, Ifind few effects of institutions on any civic acts outside of voting
other than aggregation of info, not the social capital
it is not a crucialfactor in shaping the civic actions of the mass public
What a boring chapter to give us
edroom suburbs,” zoningcodes bar most nonresidential development and restrict the range of localpolitical conflic
No black people
By separating racialgroups along municipal boundaries, suburbanization stifles debatearound racial issues, effectively demobilizing citizens from public life.
And halts policy progress
People of all races in predominantly white communities are muchless likely to work with neighbors, contact officials, or lobby community
Less likely to bowl
The first part of the chapter explores how suburbanization hascontributed to municipal economic differentiation
white affluent flight
The Citizen ParticipationStudy is a large-scale, two-stage survey of a random sample of Americansconducted in 1989 and 1990.
Sort of old for the suburbs
less likely to have politicalcontroversies but may have stronger ties between neighbors
Less interest, more mobilization
In some places, peopleare more familiar with their neighbors or host more local events; in otherplaces, people hardly know their fellow townsfolk. Where such people aresocially familiar, neighbors are more likely to talk about politics and re-cruit others for local activities.
This is some examples of the kind of thing that might change in the suburbs
we need to first determine why they are more interested in publicaffairs, how they acquire civic skills and resources, or why they are morelikely to be mobilized for political action.
And how suburbia changes this
interest
Maybe informal information
mobiliza-tion.
Social capital
determinants
not the avenues
not take the social or political environment of therespondent into account
More worried about what is happening internally
and that these increased opportunitiesstimulate citizen involvement
Which maybe suburbs do not
these behaviors outline the contours ofthis slippery and problematic term—“community
A place where none of this happens is hard to envision as a community
Using anysingle act as a measure, we may misrepresent the whole of suburbancivic life.
Ok so we need them all
somehow lesscommitted to the localities and less interactive with their neighbors
More caught up in their own lives
In places with aricher associational life, citizens will be able to link more easily with theirneighbors, will be informed about local issues, and will express theiropinions to local institutions
Social capital != democracy
According to manythinkers, the political norms and networks of reciprocity that citizens de-velop in voluntary organizations are vital for maintaining the health ofdemocracy.
More important for mobilization
Participating in voluntary organizations
This is putmans social capital
Attending community board meetings
Informal, has some level of citizen trust baked in
voters rarely determine specific policies and are usually justelecting representatives
Not specific enough
Voting is also thekey mechanism for controlling political leaders, with the reelection man-date ensuring some responsiveness to citizen concerns. Thus the simplestand crudest way of gauging a polity’s democratic performance is to seewhether or not its citizens are voting.
Very political, very formal
they must regularlyarticulate their preferences to others and their political institutions
Constant checks
is maximizing the input of the citi-zenry.
provide the most options and hope that the best one wins out
the publicchoice model is not well suited for evaluating the democratic implicationsof suburbanization
B/c of the different resources available
such as the housing market, proximity toemployment, and such personal desires as proximity to family
Or race, economic mobility
“vote with their feet
Suburbs are in direct competition with neighboring municipalities
Theorists of community power focusmostly on larger cities. Their analyses typically presume plurality of inter-ests within a community and then work to determine how well thoseinterests are represented within the policy-making process
There isn't a pluralistic community to represent in the suburbs
Local government is the foundation of American democracy
rubber...road...etc
then we canevaluate them in concert to understand the effects of suburbanization
suburbs will be mid-sized, wealthy, white, newer, and with council-manager systems
age has become an increasingly prominent commu-nity trait
Newer=more suburban?
In today’s poly-morphous metropolis, land use distinguishes suburbs both from centralcities and from other suburbs
And again probably the homogeneity of land use
has taken theracial divisions that once separated neighborhoods within cities and insti-tutionalized them with municipal boundaries.
Became politically distinct
homogeneity
What is the variation in wealth
most architecturalcriticisms are simply too vague and unspecified to meaningfully designateplaces in the contemporary metropolis
And happen in urban areas as well
putatively
generally considered
Asidefrom their smaller size, middle-class Montclair, affluent Short Hills, andrural Hopewell have little in common that distinguishes them from grittyElizabeth or academic Princeton.
Population size is the only common denominator
18million people in the greater New York area to 56,735 people in Enid,Oklahoma
Crazy variation
Rather, the institutional change must be with the way thatmunicipal borders are drawn and land-use decisions are made.
Maybe zoning reform to diversify areas
Byencouraging certain residents to “tune out” local politics or to see them-selves as different from the greater metropolis, suburban institutions aredepriving the metropolitan community of vital civic capacity
Gift of apathy
by segregating the population and suppressing citi-zen involvement in community affairs, is depriving many localities andmetropolitan areas of their civic capacity and thus their ability to solvemany contemporary social problems
Because it takes issues out of the equation?
In other words, localitieshave relied upon their civic capacity to maintain the functioning and pro-mote the well-being of society.
Citizens have to pick up the inevitable slack
It refers toall types of civic and political activities, be they softball leagues or politi-cal campaigns
Broader
so-cial conflicts that once existed among citizens are transformed into con-flicts between local government
Does not solve the problem
Suburbs often distort this conflict mandate bydividing citizens along class and racial lines
Not true representation
should function so as to bring together most people within ageographic vicinity to collectively solve problems related to their area
Issueless politics
suburbanization is underminingthe optimal functioning of America’s local democratic institutions.
Lack of trust?
they do not revealwhether any differences that may exist between suburban and nonsubur-ban residents are systematic.
Suburb sort of get's equated to the American dream
Aswas demonstrated in Weimar Germany, a strong civil society is no guar-antee of stable democratic institutions or peaceful coexistence among the
Just good for mobilization
for example,wealthy Beverly Hills, eclectic Santa Monica, residential Walnut, and im-poverished Compton are all one kind of place (suburb), as distinguishedfrom Los Angeles (city).
East side is probably a suburb, although technically in the jusidiction
physical design and social composition of suburbs arekeeping them isolated and preoccupied with private concerns
Insular
community and fellow-ship among citizens.
Social capital
many contain nothing buthomes, nothing but white people, or nothing but the affluent.
No diversity
municipal identity
No culture
future work might pay greater attention to intra-statevariation in ballot initiative support as it pertains to the signalingmechanism
First spreads across the states and then goes to the feds
but future work might pay more attentionto the implications of substate decisions—and resulting potentialintra-state variation
Even more bottom up
i have shown thatthe policy landscapes in the states they represent affect the behav-ior of members of Congress.
Although w/ the mechanism talk, it seems like this is only the case for policies that majorly affect the economic sphere
this suggests that state-level legalization has notdisproportionately improved public opinion in the states where itis adopted, thus suggesting that public opinion shifts are not driv-ing observed effects.
Falling at the first hurdle
would make it more difficult for graham to continue toblock legislation liberalizing marijuana policy at the federal level
The lobbyists see a connection
made marijuana such a priority in the 116thCongress.
Anecdotal causation
in addition to using its growing resources for lobbying andcampaign contributions, the marijuana industry has leveraged itseconomic growth to engage politically by mobilizing consumersand employees
Changing the voter base
the data reveal a sharp increasein lobbying from the marijuana industry coinciding with recentstate adoption of adult-use legalization
They been trying to get persuasive with it
$130 per capita(an average of over a billion dollars in revenue
Holy crap, looooots of money
ifind that neither time since the initiative nor score of the initiativevote is associated with pro-marijuana behavior in Congress
Ok so learning is not the primary mechanism
state legalization had a stronger effect on roll-call votes on dOJ interference (which only would affect legalizingstates) than on roll-call votes for the MOre act
Legislation that was inherently federal had more support, they could not have learned this from states
would have the strongest effects on support forsimilar federal legalization bills
Where they can apply learning
political learning, and one mentioned policylearning
How the political arena reacts vs how the policy works
i do not find thatlegalization had a statistically significant effect on roll-call votingfor this bill.
Maybe lobbying pressure was just to bring it to the floor?
Citizen initiatives and Billsponsorship Pre- and Post-Legalization Wave
Required legalization to have an effect
we would expect an associationbetween initiative rules and congressional behavior on marijuanabefore the legalization wave
needed the mediating factor
in-crease of .06 in the bill sponsorship score
More likely to try and give it the time of day, less partisan pressure
which may be driven by the fact that sponsor-ship of this bill was more partisan than the others
Party was more important than legalization
demonstrate that citizen initiative rules are astrong instrument for legalization.
Then the question is whether legalization is a mechanism for federal change
the saFe Banking act, the states act, and the MOreact
Banking, enforcement, legalization
use took placelong before the 116th Congress.
No endoginity
this suggests that initiatives are atleast conditionally exogenous to congressional behavior on mari-juana issues.
Maybe writ large but what about marijuana initiatives
generally holds more liberal views onmarijuana than representatives in state legislatures.
But you might still expect a stronger public initiative to be in a place that elects progressives
initiated a wave of state medical marijuana laws
state to state influence
total of $3.5 billion inlegal sales in 2014 to over $13.5 billion in legal sales in 2019
Big money
with a full 92% of those arrests just for posses-sion
minor
xogenous variation in likelihood oflegalization
This I do not get yet
a greater share of variation in member be-havior is explained by partisanship, so a competitive district mightbe represented very differently depending on the outcome of aclose election
More swayed by interest groups then?
Public policies can also shapethe way citizens view government, and through these interpretiveeffects (Pierson 1993) shift political behavior
Citizens will vote more on the topic
High taxes on marijuana are often used to fundstate programs in areas like education and criminal justice, andalso to bolster general fund revenues.
Becomes baked into dependencies
members of Congress have an incentive to sup-port policies that benefit business interests central to economiesin the places they represent
Intuitive
the organized interests that develop and growtheir economic presence will also have greater political sway
If it influences the economy it will bleed into politics
which types of firms establish and grow
Which types of firms lobby, which types have political control
in this way, the advocacy of regulated firmscan lead to the upward diffusion of state policies
Basically state level can create interest groups
they do not find similar resultsin the senate
More solid seats?
in particular, whetherthey generated political gains for the politicians sponsoring them
do individuals stand to benefit
this type of “snowball effect,” where prior policy adoptionat lower levels of government increases the likelihood of adop-tion at higher levels, tends to dominate a potential “pressure valve”effect—whereby lower-level adoption relieves pressure for policyadoption at the higher level
Lower uncertainty
Put simply, policy makers often prefer to enact policiesthat have been shown to be effective in other contexts
Lab rats
find that state policy decisions in the area ofelectronic commerce have only minor effects on national represen-tation in Congress that diminish over the course of the legislativeprocess
Maybe not strong enough policy area
and top-down vertical dif-fusion from the national level to the states
Congress influences RI
While there is much literature demonstrating dynamicsof horizontal policy diffusion across the states
RI affects CT
voter behavior or interest groupmobilization, but also on the actions of lawmakers in Congress
I mean it might be a first then second then congress kind of situation
these ef-fects are most likely to manifest in policy areas like energy andlabor in which both state and federal governments are active policymakers,
and generally economic issues
i find little support forthe view that effects were driven by positive shifts to public favora-bility caused by state legalization
Favor might have existed beforehand
isthat initiative votes generated a signal that allowed members ofCongress to learn about levels of constituent support
This was my guess, leads to electoral incentives
hasgenerated meaningful political-economic shifts in the states whereit was adopted.
MONEY
can affect the ability of organ-ized economic interests to engage in politics and make demandson representatives in Congress.
Drugs are a big economy
Marijuana legaliza-tion allowed for the growth of a new industry that, once devel-oped, could sway gardner’s re-election bid
Also have to think this is so issue dependent
that is, members learn about policy innovationsadopted in the states they represent, and as a result are more likelyto sponsor and vote for similar policies nationally
Educational place, maybe something like a testing ground
has gained leverage in Colorado politics, compel-ling even conservative politicians like gardner to support industrydemands
So less about the public and more about the private powers at work
influence of industry
or lobbying groups
instrumental variables analysis indicates le-galization influenced pro-marijuana bill sponsorship and roll calls in the 116thCongress.
Makes sense, basically senators are responsive to district opinion/state legislation can make them look bad
empirically, i examine theeffects of state marijuana legalization
State legalization is more likely to lead to federal support
Members of Congress represent geographically demarcated districts em-bedded in subnational policy environments.
Represent smaller pool of constituents
The practiceof this prosecutorial discretion is surprisingly political
Scary
The purpose of this study is to show that the presidentialuse of rhetoric is consistent with his motivation for managerial control of thepublic bureaucracy
I wonder if this is true at state and local levels too
Aggregated across the 89 districts, this reveals a sub-stantial impact by presidential statements at the case-processing level
More what I'm taking away from this article is that the national shift, including the pres, towards war on drugs also increased the likelihood they were taken up
Attorneys shifted thecomposition of their caseload in areas where drugs are considered a publicproblem
could be in part the ideology of the attorney
Local Priority Opinion
This is interesting
presidential signaling in that context
I just think presidential rhetoric might be a proxy for other things
Clearly, the implementation of the War on Drugsinvolved the exercise of prosecutorial discretion.
Sort of gets mixed up where the rubber meets the road
the first examines cases handled and the second casesconcluded.
Second might be more interesting, actually would be interesting to know the outcome
which helps clarify causality andaddresses concerns about potential endogeneity
The presidential statements happen before the prosecutions
Reader’s Guide to Periodical Liter-ature (extended to cover our time span). If media changes affect the Attorneys,we expect that the drug composition increases as mentions rise.
Skeptical of this proxy
We test the hypothesis thatthe U.S. Attorneys’ agenda is positively influenced by congressional attentivenessto drug policy issues.
Which also may be in turn influenced by the president
This accounts for theresources provided by Congress and the president to the DEA for bringingcharges in drug cases.
Maybe proxy for increase in crackdown
by which cases are referredby investigating agencies
easy, hard
We expectthat the Attorneys’ offices’ attention to drug cases will be positively influencedby the degree of presidential rhetorical emphasis on drug policy.
I think reading this more for a history might be beneficial
I had to figurethese things out like any other American, by studying his speeches and reading newspapers
lol good quote
presidents’ prioritization of drug policy in their public discourse.
Proportion of speech coded
when an Attorney prosecutes it incourt.
Looking at number of cases excepted
U.S. Attorneys’ prosecution of drug crimes: as the composi-tion of presidential statements regarding narcotics increased, the narcotics com-position of the U.S. Attorneys’ caseloads also increased.
I can think of many cofounders, for one maybe the number of cases just increased. Or public opinion.
Their relative independence puts a premium on other less formalcontrol mechanisms
Rhetoric
but the U.S. Attorney retains the final decisionto prosecute
They are in charge of "putting bad guys away"
Overall, total federal spending increased from 1.5 billiondollars in 1981 to 9.7 billion dollars in 1990
These are much more tangible changes
by“communication, exhortation, [and] symbolic position taking
Mostly they just get to bring issues to the table but they can do this too
political leaders mayexercise agency leadership by choosing and expounding common goals throughpublic rhetoric,
Speak it into existence
because of specific monitoringproblems inherent in principal-agency settings
They might not carry out the job as the president intended
Rhetoric is a means for pres-idents to offer and secure a national agenda
I feel like it is more of a signal
We address the president’s ability toaffect the attention patterns of public agencies by sending policy priority signalsthrough public rhetoric.
Arguing that this is casual is crazy though
exercised in part through politi-cal appointees
But this is not spoken influece
shows that presidential atten-tion drives public concern in economic, foreign, and civil rights policy
Ok so it would also do so on drugs, interested to see the empirical evidence
Presidential rhetoric shapes the priorities of the administra-tive agents over whom he seeks managerial control
influence the people who actually carry it out
twenty-first century
Hard article, warranted a reread if I had time
state’s second face and must work to build a less distortedaccount of American politics that reflects—as more than an unfortunate anomaly—the politicallives of RCS communities.
For one just accepting that the state is not benevolent
repression, subjugation, and social control
Which it primarily does through police
rather than as resourceful, creative, anddeliberate political actors
Just working outside the normal bounds
strengthen racial learning,diminish faith in the American Dream, reduce individuals’ senses of their equal worth, exacerbateperceptions of individual and group discrimination, and cultivate “serious misgivings about theextent of equality
yikes
genuine physi-cal education through which the individual interiorizes his social position
Taught to be subbordinate
In this way, police act as messengers for therules of a racialized class system, teaching people in RCS communities what to wear and howto comport themselves, which public spaces to avoid, and what kinds of actions are forbidden tothem
They reflect the state but they also reflect society, a hotbed for creating the rules of race relations and reinforces stereotypes about them
assuming the position of a second-class citizen, or three-fifths of a citizen, or a denizen, oran at-will citizen allowed autonomy only at the discretion of the law officer
Forced to play into the definition the state/police are setting
take thestand” to demonstrate their law-abidingness before ever going to court
Guilty until proven innocent
experiences of pain into collective narratives
Candyman
of identity and practices ofsocial valuation
But also must create a negative self view to a degree
criminal stigmabecomes a wellspring of racial stigma
Making these the same
Brandedas criminals, individuals experience limited access to social, political, and economic goods, rangingfrom jobs, professional licensing, and even school opportunities to social welfare benefits andvoting
Back to the political effects
basis of appearance: baggy pants, red or blue clothes
On no real grounds
symbolically marking RCS communities as in need of oversightand contrasting their residents against “law-abiding” citizens who need protection from threat-ening elements in RCS communities
Vicious cycle
Police encounters in public spaces functionas daily rituals indicating who is suspicious, who can be trusted with freedoms, and who deservesthe benefits afforded to citizens in full standing;
Defining worth and citizenship, creating race with this definition
Rather, political actors construct and reconstruct race as they use institutions to dividepopulations, define the terms of their relations, and subject them to different modes of governance
Juts a denomination for control
Yet our subfield has little to say about how policing and criminal justice constructrace and class themselves, or indeed how policing itself may “recreate and enforce the country’sracial divide
Policing is a stereotype now
functions that provided broad and amorphous powers to deeply intervene into the daily lives ofthe urban poor
Lowkey didn't have to be a bad thing
In the JimCrow South, welfare officials facilitated the exploitation of black workers by applying “employablemother” rules, using vague eligibility rules to deny benefits, inspecting homes for moral violations,or simply shuttering the welfare office when hands were needed in the fields
Police as a way to enact government beyond just criminal proceedings
“mental health facilitators,school disciplinarians, public housing managers, and guards against park trespassing
Among other things, just not work they are trained to do
to discipline clients and aggressively investigate and prosecutecases of welfare fraud as felonies
Policing bleeds into everything
this profile fits nearly perfectly the classic Europeanmodel of a state against which the U.S. is usually contrasted.
The police are a mode of dictatorship?
This engendersin him a distrust and resentful attitude toward all public authorities and law officers
Forced self disenfranchisement
hey are subject to state failures to provide securityfrom violence and deprivation (see, e.g., Kennedy 1998, Muhammad 2010, Fortner 2015, Leovy2015, Miller 2016), yet also subject to state projects of repression and discipline that work to sus-tain subjugation
Vicious cycle if I've ever seen one
Residents turnto the police in an effort to mobilize state powers on their behalf, and they target police when theyrise up to contest state powers over their lives.
Seems similar to the second point
police stops and criminal custody have become normal and expected experiencesof government
gonna lessen trust in the state and political involvement
governcitizens, regulate their behaviors, revoke their freedoms, redefine their civic standing, and imposeviolence on them
Police are the mechanism for this
apolitical
not
ordinary citizens
But we just saw that they have millions of contacts with ordinary citizens in a given year
urban neighborhoods and serviced race- andclass-based residential segregation
The advance team of disadvantaging black communities for other policy to swoop in later
The new regime “creat[ed]hundreds of thousands of additional contacts between police and the policed
and by extension, means of control
urban problem solvers
This is facts, and this is how people view them, this all stems from broken window stuff?
disciplining poor and disordered communities,targeting people not because they were serious criminals but because they were precarious andpowerless: policing based on “their status as people with problems but without property
This is where the failure of the first face perpetuates the second face
Yet scores of studies revealed troubling evidence:High-volume stops and low-level arrests were weakly correlated with crime but showed a strongconnection to race, poverty, and place
Wasn't even working
were to the newgeneration what the Jim Crow rituals had been to the generation before
and more ubiquitous
target areas, find suspicious individuals, question them until they consent to search, and get luckyby finding something on them
Race and poverty getting intertwined here
elimination of disorder and theregulatory enforcement of codes against disordered people and places.
Perceived
Figuratively speaking, it was thewindows community members had broken and failed to repair that now conveyed and fomenteddisrespect and disregard for the law
Crime became synonymous with degradation
Civil order violations and misdemeanor offenses rosequickly and became a far more frequent gateway to criminal adjudication, as arrested individualsfrequently pled guilty to small-time infractions to avoid sitting in jail
Problem with Clintons three strikes
argument was that police should moveaggressively against minor infractions, no matter how peripheral to public safety they seemed
Yiiiiikes
federal resources flowed to local police with little categorical restraints onhow they should be spent.
Also reflective of public opinion to empower them
(and what they teach by what they do) has implications beyond policing.
Police have the power to shape public opinion
expanded, deepened, and routinizedpolice involvement in the daily lives of RCS communities
Made them an institution against their will
the growing infrastructure of immigrationpolicing
I am interested in this
including those with police, jails, courts, bail offices, housingauthorities, and the gamut of other street-level bureaucracies that encircle the poor.
We are learning the buildup to the jail lecture
from too much government engagement—in the forms of supervision,interference, and predation.
Too much of the second face of gov combined with not enough of the first
has been diverted from serious political analysis of policing andrelated criminal justice operations by its steady focus on national contests over electoral and policyoutcomes
Not paying attention to the right things
officials that exercise social control and encompassvarious modes of coercion, containment, repression, surveillance, regulation, predation, discipline,and violence.
First face is the bad/good job they are supposed to be doing, second face is what they do with their power
second face
second face is the implied power that comes with being in the government
black and Latino residents as suspect populations andsubjecting them to similar projects of “extractive policing” and “government seizure”
Ways to extort ethnic politics
extract revenues for the municipality
Corruption still