1,831 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. If you’ve got these microclots, they block up the microcapillaries, preventing red blood cells from going through so oxygen doesn’t get to the tissues. The tissues that have been blocked from getting oxygen are the ones that are going to manifest disease
    2. All patients were experiencing lingering symptoms of shortness of breath, low oxygen levels, heart palpitations, constant fatigue, joint and muscle pain, brain fog, sleep disturbances, digestive problems, or kidney problems.
    3. Long COVID, they found that no thrombin was needed to start the fibrinogen amyloid microclot process because the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein was capable of starting the microclot process.
    1. it has been shown that suitable and closely monitored ‘triple’ anticoagulant therapy that leads to the removal of the microclots also removes the other symptoms
    2. Although the symptoms of Long COVID are multifarious, we here argue that the ability of these fibrin amyloid microclots (fibrinaloids) to block up capillaries, and thus to limit the passage of red blood cells and hence O2 exchange, can actually underpin the majority of these symptoms
    3. symptoms such as breathlessness, fatigue, ‘brain fog’, tissue damage, inflammation, and coagulopathies (dysfunctions of the blood coagulation system) persist long after the initial infection
    4. Biochem J. 2022 Feb 25; 479(4): 537–559. Published online 2022 Feb 23. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220016PMCID: PMC8883497PMID: 35195253A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications
    1. Prevalence of symptoms, comorbidities, fibrin amyloid microclots and platelet pathology in individuals with Long COVID/Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Etheresia Pretorius  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9108-23841,5, Chantelle Venter1, Gert Jacobus Laubscher2, Maritha J Kotze3, Sunday O. Oladejo4, Liam R. Watson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7016-92294, Kanshu Rajaratnam4, Bruce W. Watson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-18374 & …Douglas B. Kell  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-79631,5,6 Show authors Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 21, Article number: 148 (2022) Cite this article
    1. Research Article| August 20 2021 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 induces fibrin(ogen) resistant to fibrinolysis: implications for microclot formation in COVID-19 In Collection Coronavirus Lize M. Grobbelaar; Lize M. Grobbelaar Sample analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft 1Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Chantelle Venter; Chantelle Venter Data curation, Project administration 1Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Mare Vlok; Mare Vlok Software, Formal analysis, Investigation 2Central Analytical Facility: Mass Spectrometry Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Campus, Room 6054, Clinical Building, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Malebogo Ngoepe 0000-0002-3639-9063 ; Malebogo Ngoepe Methodology 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa4Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Gert Jacobus Laubscher; Gert Jacobus Laubscher Writing—review and editing 5Private practice clinician, Mediclinic Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Petrus Johannes Lourens; Petrus Johannes Lourens Writing—review and editing 5Private practice clinician, Mediclinic Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Janami Steenkamp; Janami Steenkamp Project administration, Writing—review and editing 1Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa6PathCare Laboratories, PathCare Business Centre, PathCare Park, Neels Bothma Street, N1 City 7460, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Douglas B. Kell 0000-0001-5838-7963 ; Douglas B. Kell Writing—review and editing 1Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa7Department of Biochemistry and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, U.K.8The Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet 200, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark Correspondence: Etheresia Pretorius (resiap@sun.ac.za) or Douglas B. Kell (dbk@liv.ac.uk) Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Etheresia Pretorius
    2. However, there was a complete failure to dislodge or disturb COVID-19 PPP clots from the channels.

      Complete failure. Could not even get it off. …. The first suspect is that the COVID plasma is richer in various coagulation factors. Raising the question of a need for anticoagulant therapy.

    3. COVID-19 clots, on the contrary, could not be displaced or dislodged and remained intact, even with the force of high-speed water flow in a small flow channel.

      WTF. Something is critically different about post COVID plasma beyond just spike clothing that makes these clots super sticky. And to naked plastic. What are these tubes made of? Is it polyethylene? See polyalanine tract fibrin amyloid pathology studies

    4. Clots also formed with the PPP with the addition of the spike protein, but not as disruptive as the COVID-19 PPP clots

      So this is saying….PPP of never infected people showed clotting when spike S1 was added, but it was worse in PPP (i.e. clear and clean of clots or masses) of prior COVID infected people? So meaning, not only is spike bad, but COVID adds/changes/induces introduction of something to or into the plasma (eg protein, antibody, altered protein, viral accessory protein, ions, molecules, etc)?

    5. formation of spontaneous and anomalous fibrin(ogen) deposits with an amyloid nature, were prominent in all the samples incubated with spike protein, without the addition of thrombin
    1. Is the Child’s Therapist Part of the Problem? What Judges, Attorneys, and Mental HealthProfessionals Need to Know About Court-related Treatment for ChildrenLYN R. GREENBERG, PH.D.*, JONATHAN W. GOULD,PH.D.**, DIANNA J. GOULD-SALTMAN, ESQ.***,PHILIP M. STAHL, PH.D.****I.

      Family Law Quarterly

    1. nTrauma exposure leads to various psychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, bipolar disorders, personality disorders, psychotic disorders, and trauma related disorders, especially posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD
    1. Apart from their delusion or delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behavior does not necessarily generally seem odd.[
    2. Delusional disorder, traditionally synonymous with paranoia, is a mental illness in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect.[7][8] Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be bizarre or non-bizarre in content;[8] non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being harmed
    1. Alicia told me that the Bernhardts “can be victims, too.” Once the system “put this idea in their heads that adoption could be an achievable goal for them, it damaged our family, and my son, and the foster parents’ family.”

      Ridiculously "fit" and "capable". Something an ACTUAL EXPERT, could have assessed and testified to years ago, and would have done without competition as there wasn't 1 even nearly qualified provider involved, except for the one psychologist who was, who was not objecting the child be returned to the parents

    2. We didn’t do any of this for any reason other than to make sure that Carter has the best life,” J’Lyn told me later. “He deserves that.”

      Pathological. They were never assessed. Yet the biological and fit parents were repeatedly assessed by non-"experts"

    3. he is on target developmentally, and even “potentially gifted.” When I mentioned to Baird that there is little sign of the attachment trauma she predicted, she said this just demonstrates that Carter knows he has to “hero on.”
    4. Can we tell Dad I slept so good?” he asked his mom with excitement one morning, and Alicia wondered if he knew or sensed that his sleep problems had been debated for years.
    5. February, the judge asked for an explanation of what, exactly, was still unfit about Alicia and Fred as parents

      JESUS FUCKING CHRIST. ....JUST NOW, SOMEONE IS ASKING THE QUESTION??!! RPC,ORPC, WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN??? WHY ISN'T THERE A MOTION EVERY 2 WEEKS FROM YOU ASKING THE ON THE RECORD?? AND IMMEDIATELY APPEALING IT?

    6. Two days later, a letter from an attorney representing Washington County revealed that an internal investigation had found improprieties in the handling of Carter’s case. (The investigative report is under a gag order, and neither Smith nor the new director would elaborate on the resignation.) The trial was cancelled
    7. Washington County had spent more than three hundred and ten thousand dollars on Carter’s case: on his brain-mapping and medical exams, on the many expert evaluations, on Baird’s travel to and from Denver, on payments to the Bernhardts, and so on
    8. They filed a Colorado Open Records Act request, and soon received dozens of invoices.

      RPC, why are your clients having to do this? Is that not a clue to you? And if this actually was necessary, why aren't you doing it? Why aren't you adding an investigator to your case?

    9. Last year, the Kempe Center’s director asked Baird in an e-mail to stop using the Kempe name to describe her protocol an

      Now that is what an expert would do, because....see above

    10. Baird has long called her technique for evaluating

      Experts don't "create" techniques, at the very least which can be testified to as evidence backed clinical standards of care

    11. judge, for his part, lamented all the medical tests. “We’re going to turn this kid into a lab rat,” he said

      So judge, why aren't you taking control and asking for what you need, let alone holding the county accountable. RPC, why aren't you arguing this fact?

    12. Janina Fariñas, another clinical psychologist who evaluated him for the county, told me, “There was almost a need for Carter to not be O.K.”

      Now finally only the 2nd arguable ACTUAL EXPERT in a case that's mentioned "lots of experts". An actual Clinical Psychologist. And she's CALLING BULLSHIT.

      And AGAIN, RPC?!?! How do you not have the competence to obliterate this case with the autumn of this expert witness, HIRED BY THE OPPOSITION?

    13. therapist

      Neither an expert nor an "assessment". And lots of "screenings" and "tests" are developed by people who arguably could serve as experts in a case, but the tests they created are neither intended to serve as an expert best interests assessment nor are they meant to be conducted by others who have the credentials to give such an assessment. Just like x ray techs aren't doctors.

    14. A clinical psychologist found that he had normal social functioning for his age but that the fuzz-eating could be attributed to pica, a condition marked by eating non-food items, and that other signs of distress might be caused by “upbringing away from parents.”

      So 1 or more people failed here. RPC did not ask CP to assess for "as an expert, is it medically in the best interest for the child to return to the parents and be raised by them and why or why not, and support that with heavily cited evidence and clinical justification", or this psychologist was not the right specialty, or this psychologist was negligent and did not advise RPC regardless of they were asked what was the ultimate best interest of the child or the need and the how or how to get to that assessment evaluation"

    15. experts

      Again ORPC, are we seeing yet the weight that these people hold and the complete misuse of the application of non-"experts"? And where are the services the RPC is advocating for? Not only are those of great value to the parents, but those workers would supply an abundance of supporting training to reinforce an actual EXPERT assessment

    16. tests

      Tests are not experts. Tests require experts, who can expertly interpret them, and will include them in expert created assessment reports and expert recommendations and expertly speak to how the results apply as evidence to support their findings and the tests limitations and risks.

    17. Paul Spragg, a Colorado forensic psychologist

      A forensic licensed psychologist is not necessarily an expert, but is the only one who could be argued as one in this story so far other than the AAP, and he is raising the bullshit flag because he actually is trained and licensed and likely actually qualified to assess and make recommendations that are truly healthful and not ridiculously dangerous.

    18. What is the process at this point?” she wrote. “Will I hear from you or should I expect to hear from someone else? Is there anything else I can/should be doing to be prepared for baby and court? Should I plan a visit to Colorado to meet [the child] or to meet persons involved?”

      Misconduct. Didn't meet reasonable Efforts Standards.

    19. She has significant experience,” the judge said,

      RPC, and ORPC, are you seeing yet the lever that determines a judges decisions??? EXPERT TESTIMONY. As in GET AN EXPERT. An ACTUAL EXPERT.

    20. , as Eirich underlined to me, though parents have a constitutional right to their child until such right is terminated

      Jesus Christ. The opposing attorney knows this, WHY DOESN'T THE RPC?

    21. in reality, children may be dysregulated for any number of reasons—perhaps they miss their parent, feel confused, or are simply behaving as toddlers do.” Green used to employ the dysregulation claim in her own cases, she said. She now regrets it.

      Dude.......

    22. social worker had explained that Eirich and Baird “went around the state together,” arguing for the termination of birth-parents’ rights

      AND WITH THIS WITNESS?

    23. Another judge, recognizing Fred’s transformation, had recently granted him full custody of his other son, Robert, who was twelve years old.

      I mean what the fuck RPC, you can't win the case immediately armed with that alone?

    24. The problem was that Alicia and Fred would not give up.

      This is supposed to be, "the RPC would not give up and launched a storm of conditional law, judicial review, recruited actual experts, and complaints to oversight bodies and law enforcement....and the parents got their kids back immediately with funded ongoing support services and DHS responded they have begun a task force to review conduct and policy and the judges and caseworkers at a minimum in that district are on alert to not keep trying to pull this bullshit again and statewide all judges an attorneys know to get real serious when they see the names eirich or Baird"

    25. saying that their visits with him were threatening his primary attachment and causing “a biologic hyperarousal that not only burns calories but self-perpetuates”—a state that becomes worrisome when a child spends “twenty-five to fifty-seven per cent of their time, or whatever,” in it. Rupturing a primary attachment could ultimately cause “sociopathy” in a child, she said.

      ?!! ....a judge heard this. A judge thought this person was a "credible expert". RPC did not pounce all over this which includes 1) arguing she is not only not an expert but that this is wildly anti-expert, 2) discrediting DHSs complete management competency at the very least in this case 3) realizing the need or having the knowledge ability to get a REAL EXPERT 4) petitioning immediately for judicial review and or change of venue or other mediatory discussions directly with the judge

    26. Although hired as a consultant by Washington County in this case, Baird had a long-standing independent agenda: helping foster parents across Colorado succeed in intervening and permanently claiming the children they care for. Often working hand in hand with Tim Eirich
    27. Did Baird not understand how hard it is to bond with a baby you’ve been allowed to see for only a few hours a week, while masked, or in fifteen-minute stints on Zoom
    1. c) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
    1. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States
    2. Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct.  Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law.
    3. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards.  However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.