1,095 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2023
    1. Butcher, Le Roi. 1971. “The Anderson Affair.” In Let the Niggers Burn: The Sir George Williams University Affair and its Caribbean Aftermath, edited by David Forsythe, 76–110. Montreal: Black Rose Books. Google Scholar

      Same comment as above

    2. Abraham 2021

      Cite legal ramifications (just make it a starvation source, a volume source if you will.

    3. e, I had a political history and a conviction which was “Misdemeanour – Illegal occupation of the computer centre at Sir George University.” T

      Legal ramifications - difficulty acquiring green card for US work where she eventually moved to / married in.

    4. I used to travel to the US a lot. After the trial, I often couldn't get across the border. I would get stopped all the time; I believe my name was on an “undesirable” list. At the time, I used to work with an international land development company with

      Legal ramifications -> still on list so limited international travel

    5. e had a jury trial, but we did not achieve a not-guilty verdict as we should have. I

      Didn't receive not-guilty verdict (jury influenced by media?

    6. Most of the foreign students were represented by their countries’ consulates, and after the first trial, they pleaded guilty, were fined, and had to leave Canada.15 M

      Legal ramifications, foreign students

    7. Well, I was certainly on the list that the RCMP and police departments kept of the “usual suspects” that they would call “revolutionaries,” “agitators,” or “radicals.” Anytime there w

      Kept on suspect list of radicals following protests despite being an activist (legal ramifications, etc.)

    8. re was. For instance, we went to Halifax on more than one occasion. Halifax was like the Southern United States with more Black people who were discriminated against, and many were living in very poor conditions, and everybody knew it. C

      Halifax tidbit

    9. We felt it was deliberate. Because if you're a student, you don't have any money, how are you going to live when you have no job and now you can't go back to school? Because you are banned from the university, and you have to live for six months before you go back to court again. This went on for years.

      Legal complications / suffering of students

    10. was not a riot, it was a protest that the police came in and disturbed. S

      Directly contradicts press reports

    11. After we were arraigned and charged, nobody was given bail for days. The men were in the men's jail and the women were in the women's jail. And when the bail finally got set, i

      No mention of, for instance, the harm done to protestors here for lack of bail options / imprisonment for several days on end.

      ALSO -> implicitly blames protestors entirely for act and just admin for creating conditions where a violenet protest (like the act itself/response) was possible as opposed to justifying student action of any kind or sympathizing with complaints

    12. People like me stayed behind to clean up the computer centre before we left. But I believe it was part of their strategy, because had we not thought that it was over, there would have been more like three hundred students arrested as opposed to ninety-seven.

      Part of strategy to accept students' demands? Basically, students had left en masse -> Dash offers to clean up centre overnight -> arrested next day

      Allegedly GUARDED machines too -> but emergency plan was to reocate to this room to prevent escalation for fear of property damage Police storm at 4am yikes -> THEN barricaded (so contradiction in accounts) -> need to reconcile differences in testimonies? Regardless of what's right, paper doesn't even mention black side of testiomny, just takes white side as a given -> taken out and processed at police station in groups

    13. sit-ins were very common at universities. The

      SIT INS also very common -> SO extra racist here because this is somewhat common occurance? Basically says this sit in was doomed to violence, but because of lack of communication between B/W -> instead of because of racist violence at hands of police / admin

    14. ssues were not being dealt with seriously by the university. Once I knew about the sit-in, I familiarized myself with the facts and started interacting with the other students involved and by then the sit-in was starting to grow larger

      Instead of sensitivity -> actually "not being taken seriously" by the university -> article does not acknowledge that

    15. After a mostly peaceful protest, police were called on the morning of February 11, 1969, and the students were arrested and jailed. After formal charges, they were hauled before the courts in lengthy legal trials that f

      Something like: conemporary scholarship now agrees that x events happened regarding the police and that force on their part was unjust or what escalated the pace of evacuation into violence -> however contemporary white Canadian sources still up for debate, etc (primary docs)

    1. ack Voice (May 1972 to October 1974). These groups andinstitutions made critical contributions to the social development and quality oflife of black Montrealers and Canadians at a crucial stage in the community'sevolution. And in so doing, they also m

      After SGW, Black ORGANIZATION is definitely more effective / takes off -> Black Theatre Workshop, etc appear in MTL

    2. central figure in the organizing of theactivities of the Caribbean Conference Committee and the Congress of BlackWriters, by 1969 he was a seasoned political activist who had established ties withStokely Carmichael and other prominent black political leaders in the UnitedStates and across Canada. A

      Ok, so All Roads acknowledges this -> by calling Douglas both a Maoist and Conservative -> downplays role as organizer here (sophistication)

    3. als. He accused the students of momentarilytransforming "radical politics into a pseudo-Freudian passion play in which eachparticipant could become his own hero, martyr,

      Is Genovese Black? (no lol) A leading Marxist and historian of slavery / US south -> Calls the SGW Affair a "pseudo-freudian passion play" of heroes, martyrs, and saviours (ie, he emphasizes individual responsibility and violence) SO could be counter to All Roads' point that racism was confronted n Canada -> here prominant SGW prof was notably still racist

    4. many ways, this shift in consciousness was symbolized by thesupplanting of "Negro" and "Colored" with "Black," although many among theolder generation obstinately refused to identify with the word "Bla

      Author claims this is evident because "Negro" etc were supplanted with Black -> what evidence is there of this?

    5. n the l

      test

    6. he Canadian public could no longer turn a blind eyeto the ugly face of racism in Canada because it had been placed right on theirdoorstep.

      Hmm...Counter to #Thesis?

      Here, claims that SGW affair forced Canadians to examine their own racial biases instead of mocking the US -> but we could say there is little evidence of this -> racism by downplaying, etc

    7. s the Sir George Williams Affair, more than any other single event,that illustrated the militancy of the black Canadians in the face of white racism

      Militancy backfires? SGW Affair is biggest event to demonstrate the militancy of black Canadians in face of white racism

    8. Some of the students were forced to return to the Caribbean indisgrace in the eyes of family members, and without their coveted degrees.Others lost job prospects in Canada and faced insults from bewildered and angrywhite Canadian

      Thesis

      Aftermath

      Douglas and Cools identified as ringleaders and imprisoned for several months each Others returned to Caribbean forcibly Others had to end their coveted degree Others still lost job prospects and all Coralee Hutchinson lost her life from police beatings (source: an unpublished interview) Died of brain tumor a year after incident (head trauma) Hector finds OPTIMISM -> showed Black Montrealers were prepared to fight for their dignity / humanity

    9. dia and general public seemed to be moreconcerned with the fact that the university's computers had been destroyed thanwith the impact of the incident on the students.74 While the students would betried and punished for damaging the university's property, neither the professornor the university, Hector lament

      Thesis

      Aftermath

      • Media was more concerned with impact on COMPUTERS / DAMAGE than violence or imprisonment against students
    10. ety-seven people had been arrested fortheir roles in the Sir George Williams Affair, forty-two of whom were black.73 Agreat deal has been made of the damage to the university's pr

      Aftermath

      • 42/97 arrested were Black -> most participants were white (leaders black or at least perceived as such)
    11. firmed. Some among the crowd outside began the incendiary chantof "Let the Niggers Burn!

      Thesis

      Could this chant even be evidence of the thesis? That this is ultiamtely calling them lowly / thugs -> no betrayal of sophistication of earlier conferences, etc

    12. n a large crowd had gatheredoutside the Sir George Williams Hall Building. For weeks, the general public hadbeen saturated by the media with the idea that the protesters were rabble-rousers,violent communists, or Maoist agents.71

      Thesis

      Violent communist or Maoist agents -> what media had churned up at time (maybe only in advance?

    13. me of the protesters fire-hosed the police as they tried to enter thecomputer room.

      InitialEvent - THIS leads to RESISTANCE against police -> even firehose them lol - Part of why image is seen as criminal?

    14. pread that a putative settlement had been reached between theadministration and the students, they finished cleaning up the computer centerand began trickling out.69 It was only when the police stormed the computerroom that the hapless remaining occupants realized that no form

      InitialEvent

      • Protestors think that a deal has been reached but this isn't the case -> start to leave but now cops start storming the place and ~somehow~ a fie starts
    15. with the university administration, insisting that their complaint be addressed.As discussions between the students and university officials floundered, thestudents decided to up the ante of their grievance. Following an impromptu rallyon 29 January 1969, over 20

      InitialEvent

      • Protests "begin" with Perry Anderson complaints
      • Many complaintants (being of West-Indian origin) had participated in the Black Writer's Conference
      • This event and the "Hemispheric conference to end the Vietnam War" in November (Black Panthers, Quebecqois, etc had militarized the students -> driving them to occupy building
    16. ing among the students wasthat the complaint was not being taken seriously.66 Several of the complainantsand eventual protesters at Sir George had either attended the e

      InitialEvent

    17. protest itself began the previous year whenseveral students, most of whom were black (along with Asians) lodged acomplaint to the university administration against Perry Anderso

      InitialEvent

    18. duced to a dismissivefootnote at the end of the book where Winks describes the event as a"thoughtless, needless, and frustrated destruction of the twentieth century'ssymbol of quantification, the ultimate equality?Sir George WilliamsUniversity's computer centre," before casually adding that the event "set offextensive Black Power rioting in Trinidad."

      Thesis

    19. n Quebec the French Canadians are not subject tothis irrational racism that has done so much wrong to the workers, white andblack, of the United States. They can take no credit for that, since in Quebecthere is no 'black problem

      Thesis

    20. side from the McGill Daily which,along with Quartier Latin of the Universit? de Montr?al, was one of theexemplary student papers of that era, Walter Rodney lamented the fact that thepress was primarily concerned with reporting on "nice little juicy bits aboutviolence" and failed to recognize the historic significance of this internationalgathering on Canadian soil.44

      Thesis

    21. t "modern whiteoppression ... has always sought to justify its oppressive control over the otherraces by resorting to arrogant claims of inherent superiority, and attempting todenigrate the cultural and historical achievements of the oppressed peoples."

      Thesis

    22. Rosie Douglas of Dominica, a founding member of the CCC, who addressedthe issue of racism in Canada.2

      Rosie Douglas role

    23. gave birth to what may rightly be termed a Canadiandimension of the evolving "Black Radical Tradition" that political scientist CedricJ. Robinson describes as being rooted in the history of black resistance and "anaccretion, over generations, of collective intelligence gathered from struggle

      Thesis

      Global

      CCC and collabs w/ James are the establishment of a Canadian dimension to the "Black Radical Tradition" described by Robinson -> collective intelligence gathered through struggle -> CLR James key figure here so association important -> directly links CCC to global struggle -> Passing torch to younger generation - Very Che Guavera like DENIS FORSYTHE -> CCCs conferences play vital role in organizing Blacks GLOBALLY / throughout Canada

    24. George Lamming had the following remarks ofpraise for the Conference Committe

      global

      "World scale" quote -> NOT just Caribbean's in US/Canada -> fighting same international struggle in London, etc

    25. idea of going back home to "make a contribution" towards building postcolonial Caribbean societies. It was with this goal in mind that a small group ofCaribbean women and men?among them Robert Hill, Anthony Hill, AlvinJohnson, Hugh O'Neile, Rosie Douglas, Anne Cools, Franklyn Harvey, and AlfieRoberts?came together in Montreal in 1965 to form the Conference Committeeon West Indian Affairs, or the Caribbean Conference Committee (CCC

      Origins of Caribbean Conference Committee

    26. ressured the Canadian government to retract its "climateunsuitability" clau

      lmao

    1. They represented the familiar circle of kin, neighbours and friends: acelebration of identity

      A CELEBRATION OF IDENTIFTY (based on your experiences/close connections)

    1. cu

      empire -> washed out by victory prsonal experience / memory of suffering a

    2. s rammed into his rectum with a stick. Women were gang-raped by the guards. Peopl

      Like Nanking

    1. Japan as former militaryviolence and Japan as postwar economic and cultural desire.

      KEY KEY KEY

    2. odyguards of the Last Governor belongs to the Hong Kong cinemagenre that is replete with crass inside jokes, political satire, and local refer-ences. The anti-Japanese scene described above, however, poignantly re-veals the duality of “Japan” in postwar East Asia:

      Reminds me of "Ain't no Catholics left"

    1. Some students of colonialism are rereadingthose archives and doing oral histories with people who lived those archivedevents to comment on colonial narratives of them.

      Contrast btw colonial narrative of events stashed in archives and students doing oral histories OF subjects featured in said archives Anti colonial stance

    1. tted her memories of the war, and her c

      Specifically tie it back to aims of paper -> different age cohort and lifestyles (lack of involvement in the Church?)

  2. Jan 2023
    1. Confederacy is 5,000,000, and, therefore, to fill up the ranks of the proposed army, 600,000, about ten per cent of the entire white population, will be required. In any other country than our own such a draft could not be met, but the Southern states can furnish that number of men, and still not le

      Interesting: Only reason south can field such a large army (comparable to the Union) is a matter of percentages: - BECAUSE of slavery -> 10% draft can be met of ENTIRE pop which in North/anywhere else -> economy would fall apart if so many were drafted - But, obv, slaves fill in the gaps here -> why "general strike" cancels Confederate movement

    2. ? If all labor, black as well as white, became free -were given schools and the right to vote -what control could or should be set to the power and action of these laborers? Was the rule of the mass of Americans to be unlimited, and the right to rule extended to all men regardless of race and color, or if not, what power of dictatorship and control; and how would property and privilege be protected? This was the great and primary question which was in the minds of the men who wrote the Constitution of the United States and continued in the minds of thinkers down through the slavery controversy

      Question of labor key here

    3. he system of slavery demanded a special police force and such a force was made possible and unusually effective by the presence of the poor whites. This explains the difference between the slave revolts in the West Indies, and the lack of effective revolt in the Southern United States. In the West Indies, the power over the slave was held by the whites and carried out by them and such Negroes as they could trust. In the South, on the other hand, the great planters formed proportionately quite as small a class but they had singularly enough at their command some five million poor whites; that is, there were actually more white people to police the slaves than there were slaves. Considering the economic ri

      Whites outnumber blacks (vs west indies -> revolts) POLICING roles of poor whites POOR WHITES KEY TO UNDERSTANDING HERE

    4. specially where authority must be sometimes delegated by the planter to agents of inferior education and coarser

      REMEMBER HOW we discussed German memory of the war? Interesting to see how different narratives arise -> whereas w/ WWII it was frowned upon to have German perspective and emphasize the "overall" victims -> civ war in US is typically remembered with the lost cause / etc -> white 'suffering" first over black suffering

    5. It was in part psychological, the enforced personal feeling of inferiority, the calling of another Master; the standing with hat

      Masculinity / control / dominance aspect

      Overall seems like we're going to be looking at how Civ War is remembered through racial lens (obv)

    6. d and undermined it. He must not be. He must be suppressed, enslaved, colonized. And nothing so bad could be said about him that did not easily appear as true to slaveholders.]

      So successful blacks are THREAT to slavery because they contradict it -> relates to postwar keeping blacks down?

    7. [Again in 1716, Jews and Negroes, who had been voting, were expressly excluded. In Georgia, there was at first no color discrimination, although only owners of fifty acres of land could vote. In 1761, voting was expressly confined to white me

      Again, race at heart of democracy here -> voting laws banning blacks/jews

    8. Black labor became the foundation stone not only of the Southern social structure, but of Northern manufacture and commerce, of the English factory system, of European commerce, of buying and selling on a world-wide scale; new cities were built on the results of black labor, and a new labor problem, involving all white labor, arose both in Europe and America.

      KEY KEY KEY FOR ABOVE COMMENT

    9. First

      Very fabric –as DB claims– of American economy/society built on slavery -> plantation economy, tech developments of steam power

      THEREFORE -> slaves/race at very heart of Civ War and foundation of NEW nation

    10. and to appease the moral sense of civilization

      First mention of "moral civilization" -> Before, would morality have even been a consideration in war? See later in wars of 20th century -> but here could be AMONG first uses (also, doesn't go away -> obv WWI started out w/o all that humanity talk)

    11. two points of view, so obvious to Americans, and then without further ado, I am assuming the truth of the first. In fine, I am going to tell this story as though Negroes were ordinary human beings, realizing that this attitude will from the first seriously curtail my audience.

      Damn. Ok, so Du Bois automatically assumes most of his audience here are people who view racial science as corrct and see black folks as lesser somehow So...tells you how MEMORY OF WAR is carried out -> do northerners actually care about anti-black atrocities, etc?

    1. bout the impact and life of somebody like John A. Macdonald, but rather that we began thinking about the impact of his policies and decisions from a broader and more diverse range of perspectiv

      Genocide debate reflects broader shift in history to examine more people -> ask broader questions, etc

    2. Ultimately, debates around Macdonald’s legacy and genocide have been driven primarily (but not entirely) by forces outside of the academy, primarily – in this case – by conservative critics as well as Indigenous activists, scholars, communities, nations, and their allies.

      Key -> not driven by historians -> but by outside politics/culture

  3. Oct 2022
    1. ertrude Stein would write, differently, via itself asrepetition -like a copy or perhaps more like a ritual- as an echo in the ears of a confidante, an audiencemember, a witness.

      Performance (reenactment, oral testimony) less of a COPY and MORE of an ECHO

    2. Whether that ritual repetition is the attendance todocuments in the library (the acts of acquisition,the acts of reading, writing, education) or thefamily oral tales of lineage (think of the AfricanAmerican descendents of Thomas Jefferson), orthe myriad traumatic re-enactments engaged inboth consciously and unconsciously, we refigure'history onto body-to-body transmission. In linewith this configuration performance does notdisappear, but remains as ritual act- ritual actswhich, by occlusion and inclusion, script disap-pearance. We are reading, then, our performativerelations to documents and to documents' ritualstatus as performatives within a culture that privi-leges object remains. We are reading, then, thedocument as performative act, and as site ofperforman

      So... EVERYTHING is a body-to-body performance -> even reading and citing documents -> PERFORMING authority and knowledge (checking them out, citing them, etc) Same as oral tales or reenactments

    3. Indeed performance in this light can be figuredas both the act of remaining and a means of appear-ance.

      BASICALLY -> civil war example - Civil war reenactor Hodge is noted for his ability to perform as a corpse on the battle field. Is this a document? Is this performance valid? Does it say something? Is it not a ridiculous copy of a real bloated corpse?

      For "living historians" this remarkable feat IS historic knowledge -> even MORE authentic than some document -> evidence

      AGAIN -> performance isn't what disappears -> it;s a continuous act -> therefore evidence doesn't have to be "only bones" so to speak

    4. undo anunderstanding of performance as remaining

      DOING SO (preventing "loss" of performance) actually contributes to loss of performance as an enduring entity

    5. 'radically new kinds ofarchives, of which the most characteristic are oralarchives'

      Again, oral and performative history are more welcomed now into historical scholarship, but only within the context of incorporating these into some kind of archival studies

    6. It isarguably foreign to practices in popular culture,such as the practices of American Civil Warre-enactors who, often motivated by a distrust ofdocuments, consider performance as precisely away of keeping memory alive - making sure it doesnot disappear.

      Intriguing -> performance WITH documents too (ie, uniforms, etc)

      This is a bit of a weird line though. Is reenactment not informed by records and documents?

    7. ebased if notdownright feared as destructive of the pristineideality of all things marked 'original

      Aha, so touches on the idea of fearing how information in performance can evolve over time because its a type of living document or text

    8. eclaring that thepractices of'body to body transmission', such asdance and gesture, meant that 'you lose a lot ofhistory'. Such statements assume that memorycannot be housed in a body and remain, and thusthat oral storytelling, live recitation, repeatedgesture, and ritual enactment are not practices oftelling or writing history.

      AHA so exactly what you were talking about -> Performance as loss is a colonial/western mindset because (even if its taken as a good disruptive thing) it assumes performance doesn't carry the same "factual" weight as documents. So its "difficult" to record performance (Need to actually see it to understand) in this manner -> but complaining about this and leaving it at that ignores the possibility of performance itself (oral history, Nahuatl writings, even Shakespeare) can be capital H history

    9. And yet, in privileging anunderstanding of performance as a refusal toremain, do we ignore other ways of knowing, othermodes of remembering, that might be situatedprecisely in the ways in which performanceremains, but remains differently

      Performance CAN remain and DOES -> but we're just privelaging this western definition of it being ephemeral (and tehrefore also disruptive like the disruption element is PART of the western definition

    10. erformance can rupture the ocularhegemony

      POLITICAL dimension to performance

    11. rmance cannot reside in its materialtraces, and therefore it 'disappears'

      Inherently ephemeral MEANING -> impermenant -> no skeleton beneath the flesh which rots

    12. ogic of the archive, perform-ance is that which does not remain

      Key definition of performance - ie no physical documents of it -> its the fat of experience that's skimmed off.

    13. If we consider performance as a process of dis-appearance, of an ephemerality read as vanishment(versus material remains), are we limiting ourselvesto an understanding of performance predeterminedby our cultural habituation to the logic of thearchive?

      Thesis question. Also, what?

    14. performance

      Critiques:

      Performance of romance that defies the state: - American comics roast presidents -> just saying the truth lol - performance as underground -> Russian literary critiques used to get around censors SO...give a lot of posiitvity to cultural performnace -> but organizational and tech performance also operate our lives (currency as performance of value, the national anthem making us stand still -> Performance of relations to police, etc

      Performance complicated -> what silenced do you hear?

      "Just a song"

      Performance in fascism etc

      Spectrum of performance - NON identffying some is compliance with authority/the state

      Place des Arts as performnace of nationalism

    15. archive

      Archive fever -> some countries (France) more applicable than others

      Archon (Greek) -> person who controls documents is the ruler of society (what is law? What is history ? What is memory?)

      SO... be careful w/ archives

    16. Remains

      Turn of ideology -> performing in regards to current power dynamics in relation to state. Hailed by state -> police say "hey you there" when you TURN that's the performative subjectivity to the state / ritualistic.

      Many versions of the "hail" a lot of different "hey you there"

      Applies to gender -> "Ladies and gentlemen" your response to identification w/ either

      Hey cool kid! you turn...

      Also what's left out -> what if you don't feel hailed? (Again, ladies and gentlemen for NB)

      THEREFORE -> performance is something that constitutes itself THROUGH REPETITION

    17. Flesh, that slippery feminine subcutaneousness, isthe tyranny and oily, invisible-inked signature of theliving.

      Damn

    18. As theories of trauma and repetition mightalso instruct us, it is not presence that appears inperformance but precisely the missed encounter-the reverberations of the overlooked, the missed,the repressed, the seemingly forgotten. Taken fromthis perspective, performance does not disappearthough its remains are immaterial- the set of actsand spectral meanings which haunt material inconstant collective interaction, in constellation

      KEY

    19. Performance

      Performance doesn't mean "nothing" or "false" it means "continuative" "reenactment" etc

    1. sang

      New network maps of touring networks -> tell us how popular culture moves, railway networks, how people move at this time (also Thompson opera civil war ones ) Obv community histories and diasporic performances like ehre

    2. were sponsoring groups of Opera performers to go perform in Chinatowns across North America.

      Chinatown itself as performnace? Never thought about China's relationship to these?

    3. to hear her voice over the dramatic Chinese music. It felt shocking to my English-speaking ears. 

      So is a Cantonese/oriental performance

      Generational gap of language, etc

    4. or Jacqueline i

      Rename -> also wonderful name -> stage AND westernization? No oriental name? Interesting

    1. But this is also a book about minstrels, or more generally, about pop-ular culture. It was through the minstrel show and popular music thatLavallée found opportunities to see the world and attain a degree offame, if not fortune. It is through the minstrel show paper trail – adver-tisements, reviews, and published songs – that we track his movementsas a travelling music director. Details about the performances he led re-veal much of the changing social landscape of the 1860s and 187

      POPULAR CULTURE ARTIFACTS -> posters, tickets, etc allow us to track his rise and fall and physical/temporal/social movements

    2. At the same time, he remains active within theFrench-Canadian community in New England, composing occasionalpieces and organizing concerts to raise funds for Catholic charities, forpro-annexation organizations, and for the family of Louis Riel

      Pro Louis Riel when abroad in NE

    3. ean-Baptiste. Not long after this event, he once again left for the UnitedStates, this time with no intention of returnin

      LEAVES IMMEDIATELY FOR US AFTER composing hymn

    4. erformed, taught, and lobbied thegovernment on behalf of the arts.

      BECOMES ASSOCIATED W/ GOVT -> LOBBIES ON BEHALF OF ARTS

    5. pposition to Confederation lefthim with a difficult decision after it was approved by a vote in the legis-lature in March 1865.

      opposed to confederation

    6. Blackening his face

      ???

    7. s. It was, in sum, an exercisein nation building that was without precedent in Canada.

      KEY -> USING funerals as performance for nation building

    8. by the police

      police presence

    1. e word at the end of a poetic line should bear the weight of imaginative or musical scrutiny. The end word of a line is highly visible and audible. Never end lines on weak words unless there is a strong expressive necessity. The end words—rhymed or unrhymed—should generate energy for the poem.

      END words are key hmmm...maybe feeding into end words too?

    2. overall formal power of the poem cannot be achieved if lineation is done carelessly.

      But DONT wing lineation -> should be intentional (maybe copy one? But then isn't that conforming to structure before hand ? ugh

    3. t is one reason that poetry can be quoted with such advantage.

      So...question I have is how to approach this?

      Like, should I not fit a patterns and then alter lines for meaning afterwards? Or should I just create a series of meaningful lines that then conform to a pattern? That's terrifying to me. That's like asking me to freeze water without cold

    4. ndividual line is the microcosm of the total poe

      Like openings to stories

    5. Filling out a pattern is not sufficient justification for a line of verse.

      BULLET HOLE -> contrasts to literally my only approach to poetry (Nuns fret not)

    6. Each poetic line has two complementary obligations—to work well within the total pattern of the poem, and to embody in itself the power of poetic language. The successful poem does not merely balance those differing obligations; it uses them as partners in a seamless dance. Unless they dance, there isn’t poetry, only versified language.

      Basically, every line must contribute to or interact w/ the rhythm, but also must stand on its own with poetic use of language

    7. pressive value of all disruptions should be greater than the loss of momentum and the breaking of the pattern’s spell.

      So about actually knowing when to break up rhythm

    8. ine length should be consistent within a poem

      EVEN IF FREE VERSE -> LINE LENGTH SHOULD BE CONSISTENT

    9. eate a gentle hypnotic state that lowers the listener’s resistance and heightens attention.

      Knausgaard? How do we use rhythm in prose?

    10. establish a rhythm of expectation that heightens the listener’s attention and apprehension

      ABOUT ESTABLISHING RHYTHM

    11. ntuitively

      Comes down to intuition though - can kinda get behind this (especially when structured into sonnets)

    12. There should be a reason why every line ends where it does. Line breaks are not neutral

      Agree, but when actually writing it out ya need to just riff ya know? The issue is I'm such a line-by-line writer that this can be harc to accomplish

    13. each passive detail weakens the overall force of the poe

      KEY -> RR -> everything that's not intentional in a poem weakens it through passivity

  4. Sep 2022
    1. Denis

      LEC: - Some poets write line breaks WITHOUT intending pitch shifts (WIlliam Carlos Williams Plum poem)

      • Always ask about intent -> if assumption is intentional, easier to move forward in workshop
    2. Crippled

      IS IT BECAUSE IT CHANGES WHERE WE PUT EMPHASIS

      So... line breaks change the emphasis and myster of poetry of each line (ie state of heightened anxiety) but also how we literally pronounce them out loud (what pitch we use)

    3. allows the reader to share more intimately theexperience that is being articulated; and by introducing an a-logicalcounter-rhythm into the logical rhythm of syntax it cause

      Like the birth of thoughts -> also introduces non logical counter rhythm to the "normal" rhythm / flow of syntax

    4. e line-break records? If readers will think of their own speech, or their silent innermonologue, when describing thoughts, feelings, perceptions, scenesor events, they will, I think, recognize that they frequentlyhesitate?albeit very briefly?as if with an unspoken question,?a'what?' or a 'who?' or a khow?'?before nouns, a

      MECHANICS

    5. ncorporates and reveals the process of thinking/feeling, feeling/thinking, rather than focusing more exclusively on itsresults ; and in so doing it explores (or can explore) human experience in a way that is not wholly new but is (or can be) valuable in itssubtle difference of appro

      Huh, so modern poetry reveals process of thinking as opposed to chain of thoughts

    6. ess pronounced

      KEY about evolution: new, relatavistic poetry GENERALLY has less concrete endings / conclusions -> more open ended and less resolution.

      Side note -> is this just a "phase" -> will we see a return to like romanticism or something? More gothic? Obviously more of a split

      Also, is poetry just (easier) now? Is less structure a good or bad thing?

    7. The closed, contained quality of such forms has less relation to the relativistic sense of lifewhich unavoidably prevails in the late 20th century than modes thatare more exploratory, more open-ended.

      VERY interesting for Prof/discussion -> modenr poetry is a stylisitic evolution from old / traditional poems

      Life has become more relative and surreal in 20th century -> few people relate to old style for EXPRESSING themselves

      Reflection: I like older poetry more because it takes me AWAY from modern world? Or speaks universal truths? Idk

    1. t semi-professional hockey leagues like t

      Lmao because Quebec society is inherently violence - loving (hockey)

    2. Montreal is without question the capital of Canada's boxing and combat sports scene. Even before New Brunswick's Yvon Durelle waged a historic war with Archie Moore at the Montreal Forum in 1959, prizefighting and professional wrestling had long found a home in Quebecois society

      Montreal CAPITAL for boxing (what about amateur? Part of Quebecois culture (Like Ukraine)

    1. According to Yvon Michel, Montreal is a city that supports all sporting events. Montreal’s athletes are seen as celebrities and boxing matches are seen as social events.

      Athlete respect culture of MTL makes athletes local celebrities more than most cities

    1. The four AM cries of my son worm through the double foam of earplugs and diazepam.

      NOW full prose -> so in between state exists as well. In short, lines the most important distinction between prose and poetry

    2. m and dia

      Ah so TRADE off -> can have benefits -> rhyme scheme works better with prose but "keeps readers less engaged," etc

    3. e of enjambment allows him to dole out information bit by bit, heightening readers’ curiosity and the drama hidden inside a

      Drama in exchange for concrete images / clarity?

    4. subtle kind of mystery or anxiety, a

      PRODUCES MYSTERY / ANXIETY

    5. e enjambed, meaning they don’t end with punctuation or can’t be understood independently on their own

      hmmm. can't be understood on their own if using enjambment -> is this true? Isn't part of the relationship that the reader first gets an understanding of this line which is then altered/added to by reading the next several meant to act in concert w/ it?

    6. est way to approach the many ways poetic line can operate is to first examine how poets actually use it.

      KEY TO ANALYSIS

    7. “prose is printed (or written) within the confines of margins, while poetry is written in lines that do not necessarily pay any attention to the margins, especially the right margin.

      Key quote on difference between prose and poetry

    1. Why does a person or community members remember the past in a particular way?

      Ah, so stories may be false or exaggerated, but that alone can make us ask questions about why the tellers are presenting it as such. Why is there a community urge to do so?

    2. some can only be shared in certain seasons of the year;

      COOL

    1. xplaining that oral historians and archives do not have any special legal privileges or protections to withhold information about criminal activity. In the event of a subpoena, the institution would be obligated to turn over any records or information in its possession.

      VERY interesting -> obviously make transparent

    2. onsiderations should also include how oral history projects operate not only to preserve history but as a working tool for aiding community efforts for social justice.

      Like Adams -> projects NOT just "for history's sake" or to challenge other narratives, also a function of community healing and building (like, probably, Troubles)

    3. Decisions regarding preservation and archiving practices occur before the interview.

      Relates to Belfast project

    4. While interviewers may wish to highlight or focus on a particular subject matter, the incorrect structuring of the log outline might mislead the researcher about narrator’s point, focus, or intent.

      Aha, benefit here. Could actually prevent INTERVIEWER bias about pursuing specific info/ideas -> creating their own narrative even unintentionally

    5. Though these materials are normally considered confidential and the possession of the interviewer, they ignore how the interviewer might act to usurp or ignore the narrator’s own understanding of themselves and what they say. Narrators should receive a copy of audio, transcript, associated notes, time log, and proposed index to allow for clarification, challenge, and alteration to incorrect or unclear information or perspectives.

      INTERESTING -> against principles of journalism -> but damn could be true

    6. Narrators and oral history project participants should be informed of participating funding entities involved in projects.

      Influence of institutions and funds on project -> need to be transparent

    7. However, it’s also important to recognize that not all communities view the consent process, particularly the utilization of forms, as acceptable format for establishing agreement or partnership. I

      Consent must be adaptable to community preferences (ie not using forms for instance)

    8. e seek narrators not from the idea that their stories must be included in the historical record, but that the paradigms that excluded them in the first place are challenged and reshaped as a result

      NICE -> REASON for including minor and/or marginalized histories -> so they can challenge mainstream versions of history

    9. SJTF sees accountability as a protective pre-measure

      KEY -> accountability (legal restraints) as PRE MEASURE to avoid Belfast catastrophe

    10. What does it mean to stop avoiding how oral history work is politica

      Is not all history political? Maybe separation because of "low stakes"

    1. Unfortunately, historians andother researchers have no choice but to accept the historical facts oflife. Thus, it is the objective conditions of life to determine whichhistorical facts are important (in demand) and which are left inobscurity

      So...economy, society, "facts of life" determine whats relevant and what isn't, NOT historian. But Carr already agrees that Historians are shaped by theie societies...

    2. The reason I would choose my birthplace as a field ofstudy is not only my personal interest, but the objective historicalfact that I have a comparative advantage in doing research in myarea, including lower opportunity material costs. Historians mustface the objective historical fact of a budget constraint for theirresearch. Historical facts are objectively produced at a materialcost. Historians are not free to choose: facts are not a free good

      Damn this is good -> Historians culture and resources determine what is / isn't an historic fact -> "goods" bought at a cost

    3. Someone (a historian who echoed Carr’s argument) asked mewhat was so important about my area that it deserved a historicalanalysis. My response was that the importance of the area is that Iwas born there. Thus, I created a demand and “paid” historians toinvestigate the history of Akarnania

      AHA -> so WHO actually decides what facts are important enough for analysis? Here uses econ example, but could expand -> Does not the society churn away at what an important fact is?

    4. History is what historians do and whatthey do is to determine what is historical and what is not. Historicalfacts are only one facet of it

      WHAT HISTORY IS

    5. At the end, historians decide what is an importantfact and what is not

      Also, are Historians not a very closeted group? Western epistemologies, etc

    1. should develop the habit of reading and interpreting the evidence at the same time.

      But if you started interpreting and reading evidence at once, You might pick up on one train that you'd then try to fit all subsequent evidence into (like I'm doing now lol) -> thereby shaping your history into "what you want"

    2. he objective historian is also one who “penetrates most deeply” into the mutual method of fact and value, who recognises that facts and values are not necessarily in opposition to differences in standards emerging from disparity of historical fact, and vice versa.

      Could tie in value theory -> How does historian conclude on truth if not in a biased manner? Are historical truths not liable to change as well?

      Intro para -> explain difference between fact/value -> cite examples he cites -> refute

    3. does this by arguing that the standard for objectivity in history is the historian’s “sense of the direction in history”, which means the historian selects facts not on personal bias, but on the ability to choose “the right facts, or, in other words, that he applies the right standard of significance”.

      But ain't this personal bias??

    4. He overlooks the reality that new evidence and new theory can offer new interpretations.

      Is this true?

    5. For example, Carr’s argument that facts are a priori decision of the historian, and that the historians’ influence on and the arrangement of these facts is what constitutes historical meaning. However, this gives rise to the risk of subjectivity and the outcome may not be an accurate representation of the evidence. 

      Exactly what you're saying. Even outside of the whole "narrow focus" thing -> you're inherently trying to fit the jigsaw pieces (facts) within your own mould/framework, while maybe leaving out important pieces.

      On one hand, can't KNOW what pieces are important (slavery) But he also actively encourages to leave out facts so we can fit things to mould our view / aim (find example?)

      Consequently, Carr advocates for narrow, biased interpretations of history which, while they may bring to light relevant information for the present, do not bring to light everything.

      Even appears to prize people who have done this, sayign great history tells us as much about a historian's society as the one under study.

      OVERALL... while I agree with Carr's definition of history as a progressive science and continual conversation between past and present, his notion that the historian must give priority to some facts over others is misleading.

    6. . The writing is added to and subtracted from as he goes along. He found that his reading was more guided and directed by the writing as he went along.

      Ok, but admits bias entirely here. Starts with an aim in mind. Doesn't tell us anything related to filtration of facts here.

    7. A society which loses its belief in its capacity to move into the future will quickly cease to concern itself with its progress in the past.

      hmm

    8. The historian must seek to bring into the picture all known or knowable facts, relevant in one sense or the other to the theme and the interpretation proposed.

      But again, how do we define relevant?

      Again, his example of slavery here arises. Facts are apt to change in relevancy -> so what if "Black people look a lot like literally all other humans" isn't a relevant "fact" when writing history in the 17th century -> it will become relevant later on (especially during the abolition period.

      Carr's does address this in that he claims history is a constantly evolving process and new (broader) interpretations are made as society progresses, but also admits history (events) doesn't progress along a straight line, but rather rises and falls -> so how can we know that the society after us will actually build off of our arguments? Even suggessts that societies who fall won't progress back up the same ladder, but move forwards in an entirely different direction -> so who's to say the society after this one's collapse won't ignore our "relevant" facts that slavery is immoral ?

    9. They are always refracted through the mind of the recorder

      Non western epistemologies -> just as good as "recorded" history

    10. French history in the latter twentieth century was deeply affected by the Russian Revolution of 1917. Carr advises historians that equal importance should be given to the date and publication of writing as the name of the author when commencing on a study.

      Ok, but should we not be MORE aware of this? Like, need a goal in mind, yes, (Studying Russian imperial expansion because of Ukraine nowadays) but also can't limit ourselves to this. Also claims we need to "be aware" of our present / future bias, but then claims we need to have a bias (goal) in mind when conducting history? Seems counter intuitive.

      If, for instance, one were to study Russian Imperial Expansion or, closer to Carr's wheelhouse, Soviet expansion in the 20th century with the aim of explaining the ongoing war in Ukraine, we would have an admirable goal in mind (similar to a rigid thesis for an essay as opposed to a broad chronicle of events like he mentions in the Rowley test examples) but we would also be confining ourselves to just this perspective -> ie the political and economic reasons?

    11. The modern historian on the other hand has the dual task of discovering a few significant facts and discarding the insignificant ones as unhistorical.

      See this (in regards to modern history) How can we know what facts are unhistorical given that historical interpretation is a constantly evolving/progressive process?

      Thesis...? -> Carr's notion of history as progress, and his idea that facts must be rooted out and discarded are incompatible?

      Claims we must gaze into future and see all possibilities/become aware to write the best history (counter argument) but how can we possibly know what the future will bring? Maybe cite an example that HE cites about the future turning out far differently than expected. In that sense, need to take into account ALL facts since we - by nature - don't know whether or not Caesar's horse was brown is / isn't an important fact. He cites slavery for instance

    12. Their status as historical facts will depend on their interpretation.

      Disagree with status of historical facts?

    13. he question whither also assumes importance, since the line of demarcation between pre-historic and historical times is eclipsed when people cease to live only in the present and become consciously interested in their past and future.

      Disagreed w/ this -> outdated modes of social history (ie focusing on before recorded history)

      Maybe tie to archaeology? Broad patterns and "New Archaeology"?

      Also, "historical times" -> does this apply to everyone? Still isolate tribes, are we saying linear time was invented by Abrahamic religions? What about cyclical Chinese / Indian views on time, in eras when their civilization was greater than in Europe, etc

    14. raw material for the historian,

      Raw material may have something too. Unsure

    15. He however asserts that fact without accurate interpretation is ineffectua

      This might be key -> what is "ineffectual"? -> demarcation between historical facts and other facts of the past.

    16. great history is written when the historian’s view of the past is illuminated by insights into the conditions of the present.

      Might take issue here -> agree that view of the past illuminated by present, but also causes bias.

      Confusing because Carr doesn't seem to make up his mind here -> On one hand, thinks great history teaches us as much about the society it was written in as the society under study (ie Rome and Germany, etc). But does this not limit our understanding by deliberately confining us to one goal in mind? Carr thinks all great (or even just normal) history has a goal in mind, and that otherwise we're just "collecting facts" -> but is it not best to view ALL possible facts?

      History as pleasure -> useless facts as nothing -> actually trying to compile, say, every detail possible about civil war uniforms to have a renenactment

      Also, biography? What if we're just trying to seek out all information possible on our ancestors?

    17. history is a continual process of interaction; a dialogue between the historian in the present and the facts of the past and the relative weight of individuals and social elements on both sides of the equation.

      Ok so History (study, and specify it as a discipline) is a continual conversation between present and past (emphasize progressiveness), where individuals and social forces both influence what is under study and the study itself.

    1. Carr’s theory of the subject of history is at odds with the modern idea of history as it has many branches such as social, economic, education history amongst others.

      SO... Carr's views are too focused on political history maybe? Ignores social history which is JUST from masses/social forces?

      Also doesn't address "natural" accidents in history -> ie those outside of man's control. (Pompeii)

    2. Carr, since people did not form into political organisations in the modern sense until the last two centuries he considers the history of the masses prior to the 1800s as insignificant and ‘unsound’. This is very narrow definition of history

      Good way to counter -> wait, wouldn't it be way more important to study masses beforehand since political orgs couldn't be as influenced by a series of higher up / wealthy individuals? I guess rulers argument, but idk.

      AND what about social history? History of cultures? of art? These are as valid because they help explain the culture/art of the present, and yet wouldn't involve great men in the same way.

      Or would they? Nah. van Gogh was an impressionist

    3. the very act of asking a question the historian limits his choice of material – that he finds in the evidence that for which he looks”

      MAYBE ... -> claims we should START history by writing and asking questions (again, he's in the middle here) -> but by this is he not imposing an even more narrow scope on History?

      I suppose he'd counter this by saying Hist needs a goal in mind, but surely an approach with the least amount of bias would result in a clearer picture?

      Of course, can you even avoid asking a question when studying? Isn't there kinda a reason I want to study Russian history? to see patterns for Ukraine?

    4. oncludes that history in effect is determined by historian and as such it is the reflection of the historian’s time and environment.

      KEY -> THIS could be a good counter if we dig up something.

    5. mprobable that all sources regarding any one event can be attained. As such it is inevitable that some form of selection must occur.

      HARD AGREE

    6. e events are undeniable

      Like?

    7. Whilst, it is acceptable that the historian will be, to an extent affected by their environment, it does not necessitate that their interpretation will necessarily be biased. It is entirely possible that Meineckes has changed his opinion about the German government due to the appearance of new evidence. This point is exemplified by Elton (2002, p. 54) who states, “This is not a question of interpreting fact but of establishing it, and the difference resulting is likely to be differences in the degree and depth of knowledge, no more.”

      Doesn't he kind of address this? Carr says the best Historians are those who are aware of their social biases and able to kinda "transcend" them

    8. how

      How to STRUCTURE (ie this is his argument, here's the specific examples he cites, etc)

    1. e uniforms and cinder blocks.

      Excellent evocations

    2. musicians

      Visual and sonic tie back to creation

    3. For them, the border is a not an invitationto think about nations, music or politics: it is thewall of a prison

      Collapsing virtual world -> virtual world with tangible consequences (separation of families)

    4. e virtual,

      As in projection/imposition? of a perspective

    1. The Eastern Door

      This sounds familiar...?

    2. met guitarist Rex Richardson, and toured across the U.S. in 1979 with Richardson, who set his poems to music.

      Damn this guy was COOL

    3. Haida people in the Queen Charlotte Islands of British Columbia, as a ranch hand in the vicinity of Susanville, California, and doing archaeological field work with the Paiute people of Pyramid Lake

      WIDE contact with vastly diverse Ind groups across NA

    4. became an ironworker in his teens, working in various cities in the American West. In

      Tie into Diane?

    5. nfluenced by European and American traditions. His grandfather was a school teacher at Kahnawake, exposed to the art of storytelling through the plays of William Shakespeare and the tales of Haudenosaunee.

      VERY interesting: cross cultural inspirations -> do these come across?

    6. raised in the Mohawk language.

      Interestingm how does this impact his poetry / relationship w/ English ?

  5. Aug 2022
    1. “and showeth forth the ulcers that are covered withtissue,” thereby making “kings fear to be tyrants.

      Moral use of poetry/tragedy

    2. superior to both the philosopher ang thehistorian, because he is more concrete than the one and more universal than theother.

      PULLQUOTE

    3. livelier and more affecting way than, nature does,

      Allows him to ONE UP nature basically

    4. efense argues both that the, poet, erate els intervene r“withi ; is own wi

      key for discussion -- poets are free from reality and have total control over their own (only pure creation/art as opposed to sculpting)

  6. May 2022
    1. Halifax food scene inside and out

      Past summers and such have made me extremey familiar with Halifax/Dartmouth's food scenes. From commercial spots to idk hole in the walls -> gloss over this one but mention it

    2. You love food, from

      Home cook, passionate about cuisine. WELL TRAVELLED -> EXPERIENCE TRYINF LOTS OF CULTURE, AND HAVE GROWN UP ABROAD BUT ATLANTIC CUISINE IS ALSO SPECIAL TO HEART. Whether it be my grandfather's saltfish to seviche in Quito to Dahl Bhat in Nepal, I'm on a mission to sample all of the world's wonderful cuisines. Dream is to be a travel writer

    3. ry but stories from food and

      Interview producers/artists about their work/challenges/etc

    4. beyond the mainstream and social media news a

      Fringe Arts: - beyond mainstream for music, wine, etc - Focused on underground stories as News editor

    1. provided a few African-Canadian boxers like Langford and George Dixon with temporary social momentum,allowing them to live relatively lavish lifestyles. But we should be careful aboutromanticising boxing as the first bastion of black Canadian "economic advancement.

      Appeal was romanticism of social advancement / becoming "great" but it wasn't the first "bastion of Black Canadian econ advancement"

    2. , boxing is only "good for some black men, allowing them to escape thedeprivation of the slums, but for many, it merely reflects and aggravates their basicoppression

      Myth that boxing a gateway / escape of economic / racial depravity for Blacks in NS - > in reality, aggrivates basic oppression for most.

    3. was revered by black and white Nova Scotians. As his careerwound down and his skills inevitably deteriorated, however, many of his white NovaScotian 'fans' deserted him. Practically blind, Langford was reduced to travelling with theBill Lynch amusement show, putting on boxing exhibitions against local boxers like JoeHartnett of Halifax. Not long after his Bill Lynch days, Langford was found living blind,penniless and alone in a small apartment in New York City

      Apparently, white supporters / admirers turn on him once his skills deteriorate.

    4. In interwar Nova Scotia the ring was by no means a place where racism and racialintolerance could so easily be surmounted. Even the most successful and celebrated ofAfrican-Nova Scotian boxers, Sam "the Boston Tarbaby" Langford, was unable to escapewhite hatred and its devastating effects. Langford was one of the most talented boxersin the history not only of Nova Scotia but the world. At the height of his career, hefought some of the best boxers in the world - Jack Johnson, Joe Gans, Joe Jeanette -travelled the globe in search of opponents, and won the Australian and Mexicanheavyweight championships.

      At height of interwar period, famed Black boxers like Sam Langford becoming country champs

  7. Apr 2022
    1. ing that we are living the bestmoments with them infinitely.

      Eternal Return?

    2. lashists believe that when you die and your life flashes before youreyes, you will not view the few “important” moments of your life, but instead you will see everysingle one again, including the moment that your life flashes before your eyes

      COOL

    3. It is also common practiceto wear shoes a few sizes too small so that they squeeze on your toes, causing them to curl in,putting you in a constant state of standing on your toes.

      this is really cool :)

    1. Women and children received most of the clothing Johnson distributed:they accounted for almost 69 percent of his total expenditure on clothingduring this period. Outfitting warriorsand sachems accounted for i6.3 per-cent and I2.5 percent respectively and outfitting the dead only 2.6 percen

      EXAMPLES

    2. It accounted for fif-teen kinds of items and approximately66.5 percent of the total value of thepresents

      EXAMPLES

    3. Like many eighteenth-century gentlemen, he collected and displayed within his home "curiosities,"objects he valued for beauty, craftsmanship, or rarity. These includedwampum, bows and arrows, calumets, and Indian clothing. Other gentleman-collectors requested Johnson's assistance in procuring such items of Indiandress as beaver coats, moccasins, and belts.

      ALSO -> provides ind good to euro collectors

    4. Johnson sponsored Mohawk raids on Frenchcolonists and their Indian allies. In his expense account between December1746 and November 1747 he identified by name more than thirty Indianswith whom he conducted this busines

      MORE EXAMPLES JOHNSON

    5. him of gr

      test 2

    6. Hendrick's costume added to his prestige and influence among Indians aswell. Much of his power as a sachem rested on his ability to funnel goodsfrom his European counterpartsto his fellow villagers. In this capacity, thepeople of Canajohariecould not have asked for a more productive emissary.From I70I, when h

      BECAUSE Hendrick can weave influence via clothing

    7. . Realizing thatan impressive outfit, a well-orchestratedentrance, or a ceremonial presenta-tion of a gift could speak volumes, Johnson and Hendrick used the nonver-bal languageof appearanceto negotiate cultural borders

      Realizing popularity of clothing and the cultural significance/messages it could carry, Johnson gets rich by manipulating (also Hendrick)

    8. ohnson's accounts reveal that he distributed clothing to sachems and war-riors personally-often in one-to-one encounters-when going to war, hon-oring the dead, or entertaining friends. When he gave clothing to Indianwomen and children, he distributed it in much greater quantities and formore utilitarian reasons:on May 24, I747, for example, he entered a debit inhis accounts of ?49.I7.o for "Cloathing for their [Indian warriors']Womenand Children being naked."3

      EXAMPLE OF JOHNSON TRANSACTIONS -> all aspects of Ind society like Euro goods - women/kids - warriors -Sachems - ALL PAY FOR THESE