Typo in the figure image: CTC (P681) should be CCT?

Typo: should be KX452689

Typo: should be MK935169

I think this is a typo - the accession number should be PRJNA706167

I think there's a typo in this primer sequence - it should be GGTTGGGAYTAYCCHAARTGYGA, with an extra "T" (see Table S1 for reference).

I think there's a typo in this primer sequence - it should be GGTCATKATAGCRTCAVMASWWGCNACATG, without the repeated "CNA".

I think this is an unavoidable flaw with the data analysed in this article: it's not possible to tell whether the higher citation rate is caused by deposit in PMC or whether there's just a correlation where the articles most likely to have low citation rates were not deposited.

The format of the <link> tag should be as follows:

<link href="uri-to-an-alternate" rel="alternate" type="application/xml" title="title">

Note that the attribute name for the MIME type is "type", not "media".

According to RFC 5988, the format of the HTTP header should be as follows:

Link: <uri-to-an-alternate>; rel="alternate"; type="application/xml"; title="title"

Note that the property name for the MIME type is "type", not "media".

Is there data that shows the preferred temperature range of these cells, for optimum growth?

This seems like a good idea to me. I hadn't realised that some bookmarklets can still run even under CSP (like here), and I'm beginning to prefer having the annotation interface at a separate URL (especially as they're not visible by default on the original page).

Is there data that shows the preferred temperature range of these cells, for optimum growth?