3,982 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2015
    1. Or, again, there was Michel de Certeau’s “practice of everyday life,” which envisioned a “tactical” active reader analogous to a jaywalking pedestrian taking it on his own authority to walk a path different from any official A to Z.

      Look into de Certeau's definition of reader

    2. rebalancing the weights of the nodes in the core circuit so that the previous value placed on what Foucault called the “author function” diminished.

      Foucault Death of Author=birth of the coauthor/active reader/etc.

    3. Why not give readers Web-input pages similar to those used by authors so that they can write more fluently into the identical database, thus effectively allowing readers to become prolific commentators and actual coauthors?

      Image Description

    4. About the time of the 2000 dot-com bust, it dawned on a new generation of Web application developers that the data architecture I have called Web 1.5 could be tapped in new ways.

      Fascinating historical timeline I hadn't grasped before.

    5. when a reader clicked on a link to request content, an output template, or theme page—actually, a clustered series of files with HTML for Web formatting, scripting code for talking to databases, cascading style sheets for fine-tuning layout and styling, and JavaScript for active client behaviors—extracted material from the database, formatted it on the fly in the predesigned template, and delivered the overall construction to the reader.2

      ?

    6. no actual crossing on the early Web between the roles of author and reader, because the information delivery system partitioned those roles from each other, leaving any change in the reading act quarantined at the reader’s station.

      ...no

    7. the reader using a personal computer acquired an unprecedentedly active role, as envisioned by such early hypertext theorists as George Landow,

      Web has always been making active readers from the start?

    1. same messiness and doubt that make the complexities of concepts like race, gender, class, and culture most immediately relevant also remind us that the products of our technologies, our devices, always fall short of our perceived notions of the real or the authentic.

      Good line.

    2. “the need to ‘bridge’ a gap between automated computational analysis and interpretive reasoning that must make allowances for doubt, uncertainty, and/or multiple possibilities”

      human and machine interwoven

    3. “there was never clear separation between past and present, traditional and digital, or other bounded concepts” and that “[m]any of the researchers interviewed for this study assiduously avoided making such distinctions” (10).

      Good quote re false binary of new and old technologies of interpretation, etc.

    4. we are constantly met with interfaces (such as the card catalog) that reflect real structures with real people (with all of their quirks and fallibilities and imaginative wonderfulness) in real institutions reminds us how material and constructed (how situated) is the context in which the reader accesses and analyzes cultural content with text analysis, data mining, and visualization methodologies.

      Web, digital literacy...

    5. an ex-static archive, of an archive not assembled behind stone walls but suspended in a liquid element behind a luminous screen; the archive becomes a virtual repository of knowledge without visible limits, an archive in which the material now becomes immaterial. (ii)

      Is this a layered, annotatable archive, like a finely tuned kaleidoscope?

    6. computer-assisted methodologies such as text analysis, visualizations, and data mining are just such tools, but they often provide the view the magnifying glass gives the user when he or she turns it upside down. These methodologies defamiliarize texts,

      Are computer-assisted tools automatically reverse magnifying glasses? Isn't the basic fantasy of computer assistance the 2.0 of magnification or "enhancement"?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHepKd38pr0

    7. Liu poses a challenge to digital humanities scholars to show how these methodologies—which Franco Moretti and others have called “distant reading”—compare with and contribute to more traditional close reading practices (27).

      Read this essay (and Moretti's)...

    8. scholars should and do neglect using digital applications that aid interpretation because most of these tools seem too objective or deterministic—digital tools seem to take the “human” (e.g., the significance of gender, race, class, religion, sexuality, and history) out of literary study.

      Bias against tech tools in humanities.

  2. luminarydigitalmedia.com luminarydigitalmedia.com
    1. but then what’s the point?

      Turn it off, read the story, then turn it back on, using the annotations as a tool for re-reading rather than first encountering a text. Of course, that may be like asking kids not to peak at presents under the tree.

    2. The annotations scrolling down the right-hand margin tempt the reader (or at least they tempted me) to focus on them rather than the main text,

      Even when the annotations are potentially created by (rather than for) me, is it still a distraction? That is, does the ability to create annotations as I am using hypothes.is distract me from reading and contemplating the full argument of the text here.

    3. But the already-annotated text doesn’t leave much space for other kinds of encounters.

      Depends on the tone of the original annotator(s), no? And even on the technical specs of the annotation tool--does it allow for voting, replies, etc.?

    4. The general problem of the language of interpretive “keys” is that it imputes a singular, settled meaning to a text.

      In the end there's really nothing all that new to what Kahn did. It's a more technically ambitious version of what Norton has been doing for decades with it's annotated editions of great works of literature.

      It's when you give students the ability to talk back, to Melville, to Kahn, that something has changed in terms of how people are reading.

    5. it also short-circuits the kind of intensive or “close” reading traditionally valued in literary studies.

      I feel like this is still to be determined, as the author seems to suggest herself below--online annotation can enable close reading. That is Kahn's annotations may stop me from my own reading, but an annotatable "Bartleby" could occasion it, even if already populated with notes from my teacher and classmates.

    6. what kind of reading experience and engagement do texts like these, in their already-annotated state, engender? On the other, what kind of a reading practice does this process of annotation model and make evident?

      Great questions! Reminds me of first studying Shakespeare in high school. It was the first time I'd really had to toggle between a text and notes. What I remember is that some editions did this better than others, but that I wouldn't have been able to read Shakespeare unannotated. Now that's a particular use case--a basically foreign text (in time) for which some translation was needed.

      Some teachers that I've approached about using web annotation in the classroom have been resistant for precisely the reason alluded to here: they want students to experience the text for themselves, grapple with it without a safety net (or the distraction of peer commentary).

  3. d242fdlp0qlcia.cloudfront.net d242fdlp0qlcia.cloudfront.net
    1. was a very large lake here, the largest lake in Texas. That was over a hundred years ago. Now it is just a dry, flat wasteland.There used to be a town of Green Lake as well. The town shriveled and dried up along with the lake, and the people who lived there.During the summer the daytime temperature hovers around n

      test from desktop

    1. or equalities are so weighed

      The "qualities" of the 1623 Folio really seems to simplify a more complex line. "Weighing equalities" is kind of a contradiction in terms, whereas "weighing qualities" seems rather straight-forward.

    1. To combat this trend, a broad movement is underway to raise the performance level of American students, driven primarily by the adoption of the Common Core State Standards by most states and the District of Columbia.

      mention CCSS

      web annotation as close reading web annotation as promoting digital literacies

    1. public contributions

      Annotations made using our groups feature are not in the public domain or licensed under Creative Commons as with public contributions. The individual user reserves all rights provided by copyright law for their content created within groups.

    1. because the greater speed of typing leads to verbatim notes

      This hasn't been my personal (albeit highly unique) experience with digital annotation. As a reader, I'm more thoughtful in my digital note-taking than in my marginalia. As a teacher, I've seen students write annotations that nearer the depth of an essay precisely because they were at a keyboard.

    2. while note taking in cursive tends to be a synthesis of content in a reader’s own words.”

      Note taking is never truly "synthesis" is it? It's note taking. Synthesis happens later when really writing. To the extent that that is true, then I'd rather have my notes in a digital, searchable form.

    3. The problem is aggravated, obviously, when one is reading a computer or tablet connected to the Internet and the whole virtual world is at your fingertips.

      Isn't this the state of the world now, rather than a matter of device. Ever since college, my reading has been "burdened" by the resource/distraction of the Internet. I think I've adapted to leverage the latter in the interest of the former.

    4. romance (the biggest chunk by far), mystery, fantasy, and thrillers.

      Yeah, I tore (scrolled?) through several volumes of Game of Thrones on a Kindle, but never finished Gone Girl.

  4. Nov 2015
    1. cutting edge health technology will force people to choose between an early, costly death and a world without any semblance of privacy.

      Hmmm, I'll choose long healthy life.

    1. And because the newspapers in those days printed the home addresses of people they wrote about, strangers did indeed show up with food and gifts.

      What changed?

    1. I scorn to change my state with kings.

      It's interesting to note that the final couplet seems to focus on material "wealth," riches, things a "king" would possess.

      But when the speaker is "curse[ing] his fate" in the earlier lines he focuses on less tangible things like "hope" and "friendship" and "art"--which I read as craft, as in a poet's craft.

    1. - a Loaded Gun -

      Oddly enough this Dickinson line helped me figure out a lyric to a pop song I've been trying to decipher for sometime now, which in turn helped me think through this line more.

      The line is the chorus from Major Lazer's "Lean On"--the most streamed song on Spotify ever!:

      Blow a kiss, fire a gun We need someone to lean on

      What I see now in both lines is that they are contrasting life and death through their imagery. Normally a "loaded gun" carries the potential of ending life. But Dickinson seems to be using it differently: as storing the potential for life.

      Check out the annotation for the lyric at Genius.com here.

      Image Description

    1. Over a period of a year and a half, the Weinstein Company, which will distribute the film, arranged for old projectors to be procured, purchased and refurbished and new lenses to be made for theaters.

      This is pretty cool. I'm imagining 50 years from now some auteur "printing" paperback books in the ways of traditional "book" publishing.

    1. to offend at will in the name of intellectual discourse.

      This is a reasonable tactic for social change. If you are an edgy comedian with the appropriate platform. It's probably not the best practice among peers.

    2. Christakis’s proposed tactic puts the burden of confrontation, education, and maturity on the offended, not the offender, asking them to quell their anger, hurt, or fear in order to have a rational and mind-expanding conversation with those who have hurt them.

      Right. This is one of the more misguided points Christakis makes. Clearly the original message from the Yale administrators was a call to begin this thoughtfulness and conversation before it got to the point of direct offense.

    1. the ability to tolerate offence are the hallmarks of a free and open society.

      I really don't think this latter part of the statement is true. And in any case it's hard to imagine this being said at other moments in history when indignities were hurled at individuals because of their race.

      Image Description

    2. Am I fetishizing and appropriating others’ cultural experiences? Probably. But I really, really like them too.

      I feel for this woman, but this is about as textbook standard as a case of white privilege gets.

    3. Is it okay if you are eight, but not 18?

      I don't actually think this is a tough question. I'd look twice at a white girl dressed as Ariel if she was 18. And more so, of course, Titiana.

    4. Even if we could agree on how to avoid offense

      Part of the point Christakis misses is that there's a category of offense that most reasonable people would agree on. The problem is that young people have crossed that line without thinking about it too often. Hence the original email from the Yale administration.

      Image Description

    5. Whose business is it to control the forms of costumes of young people? It’s not mine, I know that.

      Actually if your boss has asked you to be aware of the issue, it kind of is.

    6. censure and prohibition.

      Don't want to make this argument really, but one could argue the opposite: American universities, especially elite ones like Yale, have become spaces lacking in prohibition. Take for example the way many universities mishandle accusations of sexual assault.

    7. Is there no room anymore for a child or young person to be a little bit obnoxious… a little bit inappropriate or provocative or, yes, offensive?

      Another misplaced argument for liberty. The answer of course is yes. But there's also room to do so without crossing racial lines for example.

    1. in creating a seemingly right-minded position that serves the same effect.

      The thing that perplexes me, though, is that, again, these folks would not likely have taken side of a Zimmerman, for example, but it's true that the end result is a similar stance.

    2. Right-to-offend advocates are, willingly or not, trafficking in the same sort of argument for the right to maintain subordination.

      In Christakis's case it seemed pretty unwilling. But how/why did she go there then? I'd guess that she would pretty strongly disagree with Senator Hill. Is it just a certain blindness of privilege--the failure to bodily grasp the potential offense--that lead her to argue for the offense?

    3. The default for avoiding discussion of racism is to invoke a separate principle, one with which few would disagree in the abstract—free speech, respectful participation in class—as the counterpoint to the violation of principles relating to civil rights.

      This is precisely how I felt in reading [Erika Christakis's letter to Silliman College Students.](Erika Christakis: “Dressing Yourselves,” email to Silliman College Students at Yale. Lots of abstract supporting points I agree with--talk about your feelings with others, don't over-parent young adults--but in the end these were in the service of an argument I didn't agree with.

    1. Essentially, this is a move from thinking about tech tools as finished products to thinking about them as dynamic components of our pedagogical processes

      Love this.

    2. Open pedagogy uses OER as a jumping-off point for remaking our courses so that they become not just repositories for content, but platforms for learning, collaboration, and engagement with the world outside the classroom.

      Amen!

    3. In this sense, knowledge is less a product that has distinct beginning and end points and is instead a process in which students can engage, ideally beyond the bounds of the course.

      Is this inevitable in the use of OERs, though? Isn't this more of a pedagogical philosophy than something inherent to the use of OERs?

    4. OER because the technology

      What is the "technology" of OER, though? OERs are resources. They are delivered lots of different ways, with varying degrees and types of bells and whistles.

    5. Instead, we should start with a vision for our courses and curricula, and then identify the technologies or strategies that can help us achieve or further develop that vision.

      Well said.

    1. And to anyone worried that it may be “weird” to cast someone who looks a certain way to play a certain part, because it’s not what people are used to, I say: Arnold Schwarzenegger.

      Image Description

    1. The police might, for example, attempt tostop a fleeing felon’s car by felling a large tree across the road;

      This is a cartoon hypothetical if I've heard one.

    1. Thanks to a partnership with Google, we will be sending free Google Cardboard VR viewers to all domestic New York Times home delivery subscribers who receive the Sunday edition. You should receive your Google Cardboard with your Sunday newspaper by November 8, 2015.

      Awesome!

    1. If you’re watching something and missed what a character just said, you can ask Siri: “What did they just say?” and it will rewind the video about 15 seconds and replay that portion with subtitles turned on, before switching the subtitles off.

      This is the future I've always needed.

    1. more forms of private-ness

      Can't you restrict who sees your Tweets already? You could use Twitter just as most people use Facebook (and Instagram for that matter), within the relative privacy of a chosen group of friends/followers.

    2. And the media intensifies Tactical Twitter by watching Twitter as a social network more closely than it does other sites—what happens there gets turned into news stories in a way that doesn’t happen in other places.

      So true. You think they could monetize that...

    3. If you make a website that 4 percent of the world’s population finds interesting enough to peek at every month, you shouldn’t exactly feel embarrassed.

      But can you sustain it?

  5. Oct 2015
    1. rote about black pudding or blood sausage in The Odyssey nearly 3000 years ago. The ancestor of the modern hot dog, the frankfurter, is a boiled sausage of smoked pork encased in mutton intestine. Historians trace the frankfurter's origins to thirteenth-century Frankfurt, and it was German immigrants who added the frankfurter to the melting pot of American cuisine. By the 1890s the "hot dog" was part of the American experience, and by the turn of the twentieth century, American

      Google sites HTML test

    Annotators

    1. A local coroner’s office said the cause of death had not yet been determined. But Ms. Ake-Salvacion’s uncle said the coroner had told him his niece’s body was found “rock-hard solid.”

      Not a coroner, but my guess is freezing to death?

    1. it might have been completed a year or two earlier had I not been forced to listen to Raffi records for hours on end.

      Let's be honest, one to two years in Raffi hell is a pretty short stint.

      Image Description

    2. my friends and colleagues from the UT PhD program for discussing these ideas in seminars and at backyard cookouts, especially Molly Hardy, Matt King, Anthony Matteo, Nate Kreuter, Tony Fassi, John Jones, Aaron Zacks, Jeremy Dean, Jim Warren, Doug Freeman, Kathryn Hamilton, Andrew Busch, Renee Searfoss, Patty Burns, Stephanie Odom, Sean McCarthy, Rachel Schneider, Jan Fernheimer, Bill Wolff, Brooke Hunter, Rodney Herring, Jodi Relyea, Justin Tremel, Chris Chung, Will Burdette, Tim Turner, Erin Hurt, Anthony Arroyo, Jill Anderson, and Catherine Bacon.

      This is pretty damn sweet of Jim. It's not too often that you see a whole grad student cohort thanked in a book like this. But it was and is a smart and fun group of folks who came through UT-Austin at that time.

    3. we require a full engagement with “business as an intellectual and practical partner in knowledge work.”

      Interesting. Online communities like Wikipedia, with staff and sprawling usership, do seem an interestingplace to explore this idea.

    4. Who is at the table

      Sure, but the "at the table" part seems obvious. This is a truism about power, right?

      To me what is more interesting--and it's clearly part of what Jim is exploring here--is what types of systems are more open/hackable, and how we might design systems to be more democratic or open to possibility in this way. And how we maintain those systems, which certainly will require some kind of "table"/"room"/broad conversation.

    5. The world of apps is not closed, and the world of the web is not open.

      I'm interested in hearing more about this as my novice understanding is otherwise. Or maybe I've been misunderstanding some of the old radical Web folks that I've been keeping company with of late...

    6. However, that middle way still carries with it a definitive split between those with programming know-how and those without it.

      Novice question here: isn't the world of html ultimately more malleable and democratic than that of apps, even for a programmer?

    7. When the actions of Holm are characterized as a lapse in judgment, the assumption is that he has breached the ethical code of this space. But the software would suggest otherwise.

      This is a really interesting point. Does it matter whether the conditions that allowed for "possibility"/hack were intentional? Does it matter if it was something Twitter would change and disallow or if it would accept the changes?

    8. Many publications used the onMouseover exploit as evidence that the third-party applications (or even Twitter’s own mobile applications) are more secure than the Twitter.com website.

      I'm guessing this move away from the Web/html is an inhospitable one. I wonder if it has an analog in the the suburbanization of the American landscape and the concomitant changes to the public sphere...

    9. this same community employs computational procedures

      I'm confused by the term "community" here. Are we talking about Reddit users or engineers? It's really that latter--well, Reddit staff broadly--that is largely in charge of the software side of this ethical situation, right?

    10. How does software navigate between the unconditional welcome granted by a network connection, an invitation extended to a faceless foe, and the measured, conditional gestures that inevitably emerge in response, the gestures that begin to determine who or what is friend and foe?

      What an important question for our time, and obviously not only in an academic context?...

    11. a demarcation point that seems to slip away when we begin to consider WiFi connections,

      In fact, it would seem that this assent has been eradicated. We seem to barely acknowledge the terms of service we "agree" to when we sign up for apps, etc. But by signing up we agree to/invite so much...

    1. a mental workout that counteracts the junk food of nonstop social media.

      This is more compelling argumentation here, though I we might say this about a variety of pedagogies, active learning included.

      In fact, in my opinion the author made a mistake in positing herself against active learning. It's fair to say that listening is the Active Learning 1010.

    2. Moreover, we capitulate to the worst features of the customer-service mentality that has seeped into the university from the business world.

      How? There's not argument here.

      I'd argue that the lecture is the closest academic analog to a consumer good. Active learning is the equivalent of asking patrons to cook their own meals at a restaurant.

    3. requiring students

      One problem with this article is the blanket use of "students." There are so many different learning styles and learning contexts. Indeed, lectures are appropriate in some, but certainly not all of them and not for all students.

    1. As Austin, Texas-based pediatrician Ari Brown wrote in her best-selling book Toddler 411, sandboxes are an excellent place for kids to catch pinworms, because pinworms cause kids’ butts to itch; then they scratch their butts, getting pinworm eggs on their fingers; then they build sandcastles studded with worm eggs.

      Update, this is literally the most disgusting thing ever.

    2. Once a child eats them, the eggs hatch in his or her body into larvae, which can burrow into the liver, lungs, central nervous system, or eyes.

      This is literally the most disgusting thing ever.

    1. the murder of children

      I'm not one of them, but it's this claim that it would seem Israel's defenders would contest, so the whole choice here is problematic for a certain audience.

    2. My tweets might appear uncivil, but such a judgment can’t be made in an ideological or rhetorical vacuum.

      Kind of surprised he even goes this direction--seems like what he said and why is somewhat besides the point at this point. But I suppose you have to discuss the root causes of the issue, and indeed, not approach the incidents in a vacuum.

    1. for the electronic medium

      This has become my hobby horse, but, again, should the definition not include works that might be appropriated by computer-users/readers/authors?

    1. Because information technology is driven increasingly by proprietary concerns,

      Very interesting. Any novels on MySpace are clearly lost.

      This issue should be recognized earlier than the archival moment, though. It should be part of the consciousness authors as well. Where will these works live and live on?

    2. Collaborative writing projects that allow readers to contribute to the text of a work

      "Contribute" during composition or after publication as well.

      What about a digital copy of a work not composed digitally, but marked up digitally and creatively--say in the voice of a character--by a second author?

    1. The future’s not ours to see.

      Spent a lot of time puzzling this one over with my daughter. We do know somethings about the future, the sun will rise, you will go to school--probably. It's that contingency that seems to be the problem. Something could happen.

    2. Studies on babies in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) show that premature infants prefer lullabylike songs to other music — their heart rates and breathing steady, their feeding patterns improve and they are more likely, when hearing lullabies regularly over time, to gain the weight they need.

      That is so amazing.

    1. But you’re a liar if you say you don’t use Wikipedia; and if you’re a rap fan who doesn’t consult Genius, you’re probably missing out.

      This statement, praising as it is, certainly limits the scope of Genius's success. It remains as it always has a site for hip hop fans. Could this limited scope actually be the basis for true (Rap) Genius success? That is, the recent hires seem to indicate a focus on music as the point.

    1. A school shooter, it appears, could be someone who had been brutally abused by the world or someone who imagined that the world brutally abused him or someone who wanted to brutally abuse the world himself.

      This sentence is powerful.

    1. They will most certainly lie down, but not on your command.

      Maybe I'm just not a cat person. This is an effective alignment of El-P and Killer Mike's revolutionary pathos with animal behavior.

    2. So while the way these remixers warp meows, hisses, scratches, yelps, and purrs into passable rap beats is impressive,

      Prince Paul's "Lie, Cheat, Meow" most impressively IMO.

    3. Soon enough, modern crowdfunding mentality kicked in and a Kickstarter raised $66,000 to get the idea off the ground.

      It actually seems that this Kickstarter campaign was inline with the original practical joke, even as it raised over 60K.

      Looking at the numbers (<3K contributors v. >60K raised), though, I got to think that Killer Mike and El-P must have been major funders of their own project.

    4. the most physically restorative record ever made—there are a lot of fucking purring sounds on this thing.

      Or does the album in fact represent an independent duo's final selling out to the LOLCat Information Complex?