17 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2016
    1. they often intentionally restrict access by a certain class of individuals (here, drug dealers and “johns”).

      Couldn't it be argued that these regulations by architecture help protect an area's population?

    2. And while it addresses tools of exclusion such as ra-cially restrictive covenants and exclusionary zoning, never does it mention ex-clusion based on features of the built environment.73

      Do you/we/does anyone think that this is a conscious doing? Is it likely that rules against exclusion based on features of the built environment are purposely left vague to allow for discrimination? Or is the vagueness of the rules abused?