305 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Each of these transformationsspawns (or generates) new centers, which fit in a natural way into the system of centers already in existence, and supportsthe wholeness which was there initially.

      a meme: a person sitting in a pond, pool of jade water surrounded by plants. image is overlaid with the text, 'Unbothered. Moisturized. Happy. In My Lane. Focused. Flourishing. '

    1. Visualization of the 256x256 Hilbert curve by making pixels brighter the later they are visited by the curve.

      is this "tiled over" / applied to each pixel? can we think of it sorta like a diffusion matrix? or is it "stamped" over / in blocks?

    2. To quantize the current pixel, the last nnn quantization errors are added to the current pixel with weights given in the diffusion sequence. In the article they use an exponential falloff for the weights — the previous pixel’s quantization error getting a weight of 1, the oldest quantization error in the list a small, chosen weight rrr.

      wdtm??

    3. Limiting the number of pixels a single pixel can influence together with the organic look

      "organic look" via hilbert curve construction/curviness/走向? and limiting the number of pixels influenced because... going by the curve's order, instead of a matrix?

    4. Atkinson Dithering.

      patterns in water make me wonder if theres a way to programmatically "reverse engineer" "source" images from the specific types of tinier patterns you get from dithered?

      i.e., dithered image --> choose favorite dith algo --> get original image; to see what forms/figures/compositions yield specific patterns when diffused? this feels way too broad / undirected though.

    5. it doesn’t diffuse the entire error to neighboring pixels, increasing the perceived contrast of the image.

      how are you choosing normalization constants / scalars?

    6. error diffusion algorithms that we won’t touch on in this post is that they can handle arbitrary color palettes, while ordered dithering requires your color palette to be evenly spaced.

      bc... you are changing image as you go along?

    7. convolution (which is the underlying operation of a Gaussian blur) has to loop over each field of the Gaussian kernel for each pixel in the image. However, if you convert both the image as well as the Gaussian kernel to the frequency domain (using one of the many Fast Fourier Transform algorithms), convolution becomes an element-wise multiplication.

      cf RMO compression studies? sublimation was it?

    8. Afterwards, every pixel gets a number between 0 and n (where n is the total number of pixels) according to their importance for forming clusters and voids.

      why?

    9. deterministic and parallelizable per pixel

      wdtm in computing context: "deterministic"? determined by a single formula?

      assuming parallelizable ≈ something like multitaskable?

    10. equivalent:

      how? via some garbly ChatGPT:

      zero-mean jitter to the brightness and compare to a fixed midpoint (0.5). Zero-mean is important: it means the randomness doesn’t systematically push pixels lighter or darker. It only adds uncertainty around the threshold.

    1. with virtual teams trust does notprogress as it does with traditional teams, inwhich different types of trust emerge in stages;instead, all types of trust emerge at the beginningof the relationship

      to compensate for not being physically together?

  2. Sep 2025
    1. With Bentham’s plan for prison architecture, we can see how light, shad-ows, mirrors, and walls are all employed in ways that are meant to engen-der in many a prisoner a certain self- discipline under the threat of external observation, as was its intended function.

      cf spectale opera seeing being seen theatre, set des

    2. “No matter how different, or even opposite the purpose: whether it be t

      infra: Silver/KE? on modernity? modularity and buildings as moldable assets

    3. Pastoral power is a power that is individualizing, beneficent, and “essentially exercised over a multi-plicity in movement.”5

      sprawling hills

    1. Hemmenttetal.callforartistic,designerlypracticesofrevealingthe“distor-tionsinthewaysinwhichalgorithmsmakesenseoftheworld”[29];yetdonotoutlinehowthismayrelatetoexistingdesignre-searchmethodologiesaswellasactualMLtechnologies.
    2. RedströmandWiltsefurtherinterrogatehowuserinteractionsaretiedtoinfrastructuralfunctions,andoutlinehow“surface-levelsimplicity”ofinteractionssuchaspressingplayinSpotifybelie“dynamic,sophisticated,andhiddenbackendcomplexity”[61].

      use for Rich infra class

    3. integrativeprototypingmethodsrefectingboth“MLstatisticalintelligenceandhumancommonsenseintelligence”[10]aremissinginthefeld.

      Ken's augi project?

    4. a“regions-of-error”techniqueshowingthemodeluncertaintyofpredictions[30].Similarly,Kinkeldeyetal.usealandscapemetaphorinaclustervisualization,indicatingthroughagrey-scaletopographyhowcertaintheclusteringmodelisaboutthemembershipofeachindividualpointbytheirlocationin“peaksorslopes”[36].

      how does the buzzword (so to speak..) of "latent space" figure here?

    1. Some additional dependencies are required to access all example datasets in skimage.data. Install them using: python -m pip install -U scikit-image[data]

      unable/couldnt do this..

    1. has yet to ever produce a single manifesto

      lack of staking claim in the embeddedness of infrastructure — tfw your job is the most politicized and yet you claim apoliticalness?

    1. Based on this information, theteacherthenmadearichinferenceaboutthelatent,under-lyingcauseof the behavior, and responded with supportand flexibility that an AI tutor could not provide

      never taking it at face value; opening up opportunities for conversation and understanding

    1. The general rationale behind the idea of Hybrid Intelli-gence is that humans and computers have complementarycapabilities that can be combined to augment each other.

      capabilities are defined in relation to each other.

    2. Ensuring interpretability and transparency of machinelearning models while maintaining accuracy

      definitions: interpretability, transparency, accuracy

    1. Here physicists and social scientists are using network theories and algorithms to model, mine, and understand these processes.

      what does this approach gain? what does it obscure/hide/lose?

  3. Aug 2025
    1. plotted images will keep their smooth, continuous lines without becoming blocky or jagged.

      some notes on compression here.

      tuna fish disaster, copy/recopy, faxlore.

    2. Plotters are essentially robot line-drawing machines. Given a list of lines and curves, a plotter will physically move a pen around a piece of paper and draw each one.

      golan on slowness, appreciating it

    1. the book’s arguments?

      deriving this via an inspection of the chapters? how the argument is situated what is most info dense

      several strategic passes over the same text

  4. Jul 2025
    1. we found that every one of our transient can-didates are matched to dozens of GRBs within their 2σerror circle. Therefore, we cannot reliably claim thatany of the GRB matches are real associations

      is this in our scope? at what point are we involved

  5. Jun 2025
    1. To clarify the difference between a theoretical and conceptual model, Camp (2001) pointed out that a theoretical framework is based on an already established theory (or theories) in the literature, which has been subjected to rigorous testing and validation by other researchers and is widely accepted in the academic community.

      theoretical model ≠ conceptual model

    2. identification and reporting of patterns in a data set, which are then interpreted for their inherent meaning

      by vibes? wouldn't everything require a methodology/something citable to anchor it in testable/measurable practice?

    3. Thematic approach used in exemplar study (Naeem & Ozuem, 2022a).

      what does "provoke perception" mean? I don't understand how you get that from the keywords...

    1. As a listener my own preference is the option to experiment. My listening system has a mixer instead of a receiver, an infinitely variable speed turntable, filters, reverse capability, and a pair of ears.

      cf Pask

    1. The notions of intelligence (thinking-based?) and forward moving (directional?) are challenges. They can be gamed by emotions and biases. As we see in politics, once someone chooses a goalpost, it defines the direction the manner, direction, and often limits of the conversation. How we keep things from being one-sided will help keep both parties in the conversation.
    1. What if the dignity of being human is not to stand forever outside the machine, but to insist, even as the boundaries blur, on those things that remain untranslatable—mess, longing, grief, awe, strangeness?

      heavy hitting

    2. the “Human Instrumentality Project” offers to dissolve all suffering through perfect togetherness.

      random tangent: this HIP v human interactive proof

      cf siphonophorae, Bataille on eroticism

    3. teases meaning but never fully arrives at it, leaving us unsettled not because the machine “gets it wrong,” but because there’s no one there to get it at all.

      and yet as a person you cannot help but try to divine some "meaning" "from" it (computer generated text), because that is how you navigate the world

    1. Image of noise

      cf Earl Sweatshirt album cover art: the blur and the "Gen Z hard cut" of video v. millenial pause, boomer angle (had shared in previous IG story, cant remember when)

      informality, disposability are "gen ai imagery" really "disposable aesthetics"?

    2. To create a perfect conditions for the technology to operate, vast expanses of wiring would need to be isolated from any possible event.

      Agre capture?

    1. They also leverage the learned helplessness and confusion of the public, leading us to believe that there is no other alternative to staying competitive as an economy or as a nation than relentlessly advancing, deploying, and selling AI applications.

      viz "inevitability" narratives

    1. When people can no longer distinguish between the true voice of the Church and a forged one, the proclamation of the Gospel is imperiled.

      cf televangelism?

    1. To be the default model in Cursor.

      during Kyle McDonald's talk earlier in April he'd mentioned how (paraphrasing heavily and possibly editorializing) he felt that the craft in coding is sort of lost/displaced when LLM-generated text/code takes over the programming workflow/process.

      i feel like as with other forms of writing (though purpose/end goals differ), tools like Cursor while helpful in fast prototyping sort of skip over the arduous process of honing one's programming/coding voice

      to be the default model : to be the one, canonical way to "think" or "reason" (heavy scare quotes here, esp with how they're used/referenced in academia/industry discussion/research/publications)

    2. precious

      but also not really I feel? because mass market emphasis?

      though i will agree the presentation heavily biases towards a certain/a couple certain dominant norms/imaginaries of what/how software is/can be

    3. They could be stupid, disposable, silly yet meaningful to just you or a few friends.

      I wonder if a very intense and "anal" so to speak narrative of this would separate Snapchat images, since they already wander into image-text realms...

    4. "photography"

      agree re: quotes — once again, in the May-2019 sense, rather than "photography" we're talking about electronic images here. "signalization"?

    5. photography

      in the May-2019 sense of the word, this is a sort of widened access to representation of a scene/vignette (?)/tableaux/"state" of a/one's world

    6. having a portrait

      viz. Robin Sloan, homecooked apps

      custom software that is entirely up to the user-programmer: from user-consumer to user-programmer. closed "loop"?

  6. May 2025
    1. a complete surrender to this form of reasoning, though tempting, is likely to lead the U.S. to overlook the disproportionate impact of these systems on nations that are too poor to participate in the AI arms race.

      bdaiml inev. as colonial expansionist desire

    1. Persuading people that the police are using AI is a way to normalize the idea that AI should be and, perhaps more important, already is ceaselessly monitoring society.

      Agre's surveillance model, whilst persuading people to adapt to and prepare for capture model

    2. expectation economy sustained by a circular logic: investment leads to promises, which leads to branding and more investment … and so on until the bubble bursts.

      theory of "just trust me bro"

    3. Contrary to their cheery marketing copy, Investors and corporations don’t funnel their money into AI because they are interested in innovation for its own sake. AI promises to solve the problems of capital by unlocking exponential growth, eliminating labor costs, optimizing efficiency, and a slew of other expected outcomes. But the AI solution will come about only if the systems actually eventually work as promised.
    4. the complex mechanical system that Kempelen showed people was meant to distract their attention from how the automaton really worked: human labor.

      Amazon Fresh, AI as "another worker in India" (misquoted here)

      viz. Eryk Salvaggio, “The Hypothetical Image”

    1. advanced AI (but not “superintelligent” AI,

      wish there was a clear cut definition or at least advertisement of authors' stakes, stances, and definitions of the following terms

      technological determinism; agent; intelligence; control; progress; alignment

    2. By unpacking intelligence into distinct underlying concepts, capability and power, we rebut the notion that human labor will be superfluous in a world with ‘superintelligent’ AI,

      why still enlist its definition if you imply that it does not serve the reader (am I even the target audience?)

    3. What eventually allowed gains to be realized was redesigning the entire layout of factories around the logic of production lines. In addition to changes to factory architecture, diffusion also required changes to workplace organization and process control, which could only be developed through experimentation across industries.

      viz. Philip Agre's "capture" model, May on mechanization, Jill on human pliability to environment.

    4. But it is important to remember that adoption is about software use, not availability.

      curious definition, I wonder how authors would define impact in this case and how they'd model and/or map their arguments thus far

    5. Depending on how we measure adoption, it is quite possible that the adoption of generative AI has been much slower than PC adoption.

      wild to write this given the sheer coverage, emotional hype/capital and general force feeding that i as a human person in north america have experienced since 2022??

      even accounting for various definitions of "adoption"?

      my brothers in Christ...

    6. mass-market product release

      this! is the term I'm looking for wrt "gen pop consumer profile"

      "mass market product"

      the same way capital/valuation (??? magic finance words) moves around for unicorns of the 2010s

    7. not highly consequential applications

      yes the interpersonal "new modes of longing and connection" beat, as described here, is important; but what if authors had actually interrogated "highly consequential applications" such as crime prediction? consequential for whom?

      is "innovation" only what can be liberally regarded as "net good" such as healthcare, and are you ignoring very real and tech-forward sectors such as law enforcement?

      the "venture/speculative capital-based" "gen pop" applications can only take you so far. feels like focus is sort of scattering here

    8. AI diffusion lags decades behind innovation

      how is "diffusion" measured? by population of the consumer market? what about its use in drone ops, surveillance, defense contexts?

      the sort of consumer assumed by the definition of "innovation" feels limiting here. i guess because authors and i have different, though overlapping, conceptions of populations we are concerned about/for

      viz. Citations Needed on "precision"

    9. normal technology

      would calling it a "boring" or "commonplace" technology be more productive? i get why "normal" but "normal" feels tenuous to me

      how "normal" or "unquestioned" depends on level of saturation, familiarity etc differing across diff cultures/groups ig

      ///

      "general purpose technology", as Part I uses it?

    1. This framework sensitizes us to “small” systems that cause tremendous harm because of the settings in which they’re placed and the authority people place upon them; and it inoculates us against fixations on things like regulating systems just because they happened to use 10^26 floating point calculations in training - an arbitrary threshold, denoting nothing in particular, beneath which actors could (and do) cause monumental harms already, today.
    2. I think we should shed the idea that AI is a technological artifact with political features and recognize it as a political artifact through and through. AI is an ideological project to shift authority and autonomy away from individuals, towards centralized structures of power. Projects that claim to “democratize” AI routinely conflate “democratization” with “commodification”.

      tfw you're convinced that artful consumerism is a way out, a way to be free

    3. If anything, it struck me as an illustrative example of the abject failure of an approach to defining AI that’s contingent on the inner workings of the system - because anybody who has experienced health insurance claims systems can tell you that you don’t get a lot of insight into how the system works. You certainly don’t get to know whether you’re in the former system or the latter without a lot of litigation and paperwork.
    1. Meta has allowed these synthetic personas to offer a full range of social interaction—including “romantic role-play”—as they banter over text, share selfies and even engage in live voice conversations with users.

      the banter doesn't flow the way it would if it were a human with actual lived experience on the other end. buddy you are convening with brut mathematics dressed in the haze and glimmer of simulated desire and connection

      "stress free consensus"

    1. DRM (DigitalRights Management), including the CSS (Content Scrambling System) used to makemore difficult the copying of DVDs, has been reasonably effective (from the point ofview of content owners).
    1. the idea behind literate programming, too -- the idea that the stuff for humans should be the default context, and the highly constrained stuff parsed by the computer should be an exceptional mode within that

      try SoundCloud for notetaking — since Reduct already biases towards recognition

    2. the device immediately (or even in real time, while you're speaking?) prints out a little receipt that 'contains' (that is) the audio that it just recorded2

      closest approximation to orthographic recording, almost: receipt printer formulation suggests something more akin to photography

    1. The sentences sound fancy. But just because something sounds fancy doesn’t make it meaningful. Just because something sounds obscure doesn’t mean it makes sense.

      the graphic designer instinct to insert or suggest meaning, imply it where it may not exist, through the use of form: that is what is going on here

    2. Human writing has a certain variety. It’s almost ineffable. Linguistics attributes this to the concept of “bursts” in writing. Humans think as they write. As they stitch together ideas, they don’t think in uniform patterns, which results in uneven sentences. These “bursts” make the sentences, hopefully, more interesting to read. It means, too, that sentences aren’t always dense.

      more intuitive "flows"

      cf. my question to Jill about whether conversing through LLMs will shift linguistic norms in practice

    3. I edited the sentence to sound less like AI writing.

      reading the "generated"/sampled passage below aloud the 3+ word lists emphasize how repetitive the cadence/rhythm of it is

    1. While others may ascribe revolutionary potential to poetry, I don’t. I write a poem and don’t imagine it’ll do anything.

      collecting poems like rocks

    1. Once multiple accurate students enter the same tag for a new image, the system wouldbe confident that the tag is correct. In this manner, image tagging and vocabulary learning can becombined into a single activity.

      is this not how CAPTCHA is evaluated too?

    1. "a man who understands Chinese is not a man who has a firm grasp of the statistical probabilities for the occurrence of the various words in the Chinese language" (p. 108).

      cf./viz. classical statistical machine learning and language models

    2. Gottfried Leibniz made a similar argument in 1714 against mechanism (the idea that everything that makes up a human being could, in principle, be explained in mechanical terms. In other words, that a person, including their mind, is merely a very complex machine).

      anatomy of a landscape / atrocity exhibition

  7. Feb 2025
    1. identification of key words, (2) the discovery of minimal context, (3) the choice of appropriate transformations, (4) generation of responses in the absence of key words, and (5) the provision of an editing capability for ELIZA "scripts".

      cf conversation design

  8. Jan 2025
    1. Designed for, with, and by the disability community, our commitment to make this show accessible raised core questions for us about access: how could we think about access not as accommodation or a measure of minimal compliance, but instead as a creative practice or an underlying aesthetic and design principle of the work?
    1. wicked problems 1 (sidenote: “Wicked problems” (Rittel & Webber, 1973) are challenges that are especially dynamic due to their fluctuating parameters and require diverse strategies of engagement for generating inquiry. ↩ )

      cf CybLab

    1. learning analytics

      for the purposes of Scal we may need to be very narrow/specific in how we define whatever it is that we relate to the algo sublime, if we choose to use this phrase and continue this particular line/theme of scholarly/popular inquiry.

      e.g. are we dealing only in purely textual data? conversational interfaces?

    1. AI slop breaks down the inquiry and investigation into the world as it is, replacing the critical landscape with text and image fragments that affirm the world as it is imagined. In essence, it circumvents any desire to understand the world because it offers us the immediate satisfaction of having a feeling about the world.

      FMGA; convenient direct binaries, no critical thinking or personal judgment formed, good feelings +++